Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Annealing for Balance Optimization Subset Selection

真 山下, Makoto Yamashita, Pornnapas Huntrakool

Published Oct 1, 2021• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Optimizing Sensor Subset Selection with Quantum Annealing: A Large-Scale Indoor Temperature Regulation Application

Aurelien O. Meray, Nagarajan Prabakar

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

An Approach of Feature Subset Selection Using Simulated Quantum Annealing

Ashis Kumar Mandal, Mrityunjoy Panday, Aniruddha Biswas +3 more

Advances in intelligent systems and computing•Aug 18, 2020•5 citations

Simulated annealing and quantum detailed balance

Alberto Frigerio

Journal of Statistical Physics•Jan 1, 1990•10 citations

Quantum Annealing for Automated Feature Selection in Stress Detection

Rajdeep Kumar Nath, Himanshu Thapliyal, Travis S. Humble

We present a novel methodology for automated feature subset selection from a pool of physiological signals using Quantum Annealing (QA). As a case study, we will investigate the effectiveness of QA-based feature selection techniques in selecting the optimal feature subset for stress detection. Features are extracted from four signal sources: foot EDA, hand EDA, ECG, and respiration. The proposed method embeds the feature variables extracted from the physiological signals in a binary quadratic model. The bias of the feature variable is calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient between the feature variable and the target variable. The weight of the edge connecting the two feature variables is calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient between two feature variables in the binary quadratic model. Subsequently, D-Wave’s clique sampler is used to sample cliques from the binary quadratic model. The underlying solution is then re-sampled to obtain multiple good solutions and the clique with the lowest energy is returned as the optimal solution. The proposed method is compared with commonly used feature selection techniques for stress detection. Results indicate that QA-based feature subset selection performed equally as that of classical techniques. However, under data uncertainty conditions such as limited training data, the performance of quantum annealing for selecting optimum features remained unaffected, whereas a significant decrease in performance is observed with classical feature selection techniques. Preliminary results show the promise of quantum annealing in optimizing the training phase of a machine learning classifier, especially under data uncertainty conditions.

arXiv:2106.05134•IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI•Jul 1, 2021•7 citations

Evaluating the Performance of a D-Wave Quantum Annealing System for Feature Subset Selection in Software Defect Prediction

Ashis Kumar Mandal, Md Nadim, Chanchal Kumar Roy +2 more

Predicting software defects early in the development process not only enhances the quality and reliability of the software but also decreases the cost of development. A wide range of machine learning techniques can be employed to create software defect prediction models, but the effectiveness and accuracy of these models are often influenced by the choice of appropriate feature subset. Since finding the optimal feature subset is computationally intensive, heuristic and metaheuristic approaches are commonly employed to identify near-optimal solutions within a reasonable time frame. Recently, the quantum computing paradigm quantum annealing (QA) has been deployed to find solutions to complex optimization problems. This opens up the possibility of addressing the feature subset selection problem with a QA machine. Although several strategies have been proposed for feature subset selection using a QA machine, little exploration has been done regarding the viability of a QA machine for feature subset selection in software defect prediction. This study investigates the potential of D-Wave QA system for this task, where we formulate a mutual information (MI)-based filter approach as an optimization problem and utilize a D-Wave Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) solver as a QA solver for feature subset selection. We evaluate the performance of this approach using multiple software defect datasets from the AEEM, JIRA, and NASA projects. We also utilize a D-Wave classical solver for comparative analysis. Our experimental results demonstrate that QA-based feature subset selection can enhance software defect prediction. Although the D-Wave QPU solver exhibits competitive prediction performance with the classical solver in software defect prediction, it significantly reduces the time required to identify the best feature subset compared to its classical counterpart.

arXiv:2410.16469•IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Sep 15, 2024•3 citations

Optimization algorithms for Quantum Annealing

E. Arvidsson

•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations
We present a novel methodology for automated feature subset selection from a pool of physiological signals using Quantum Annealing (QA). As a case study, we will investigate the effectiveness of QA-based feature selection techniques in selecting the optimal feature subset for stress detection. Features are extracted from four signal sources: foot EDA, hand EDA, ECG, and respiration. The proposed method embeds the feature variables extracted from the physiological signals in a binary quadratic model. The bias of the feature variable is calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient between the feature variable and the target variable. The weight of the edge connecting the two feature variables is calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient between two feature variables in the binary quadratic model. Subsequently, D-Wave’s clique sampler is used to sample cliques from the binary quadratic model. The underlying solution is then re-sampled to obtain multiple good solutions and the clique with the lowest energy is returned as the optimal solution. The proposed method is compared with commonly used feature selection techniques for stress detection. Results indicate that QA-based feature subset selection performed equally as that of classical techniques. However, under data uncertainty conditions such as limited training data, the performance of quantum annealing for selecting optimum features remained unaffected, whereas a significant decrease in performance is observed with classical feature selection techniques. Preliminary results show the promise of quantum annealing in optimizing the training phase of a machine learning classifier, especially under data uncertainty conditions.
Predicting software defects early in the development process not only enhances the quality and reliability of the software but also decreases the cost of development. A wide range of machine learning techniques can be employed to create software defect prediction models, but the effectiveness and accuracy of these models are often influenced by the choice of appropriate feature subset. Since finding the optimal feature subset is computationally intensive, heuristic and metaheuristic approaches are commonly employed to identify near-optimal solutions within a reasonable time frame. Recently, the quantum computing paradigm quantum annealing (QA) has been deployed to find solutions to complex optimization problems. This opens up the possibility of addressing the feature subset selection problem with a QA machine. Although several strategies have been proposed for feature subset selection using a QA machine, little exploration has been done regarding the viability of a QA machine for feature subset selection in software defect prediction. This study investigates the potential of D-Wave QA system for this task, where we formulate a mutual information (MI)-based filter approach as an optimization problem and utilize a D-Wave Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) solver as a QA solver for feature subset selection. We evaluate the performance of this approach using multiple software defect datasets from the AEEM, JIRA, and NASA projects. We also utilize a D-Wave classical solver for comparative analysis. Our experimental results demonstrate that QA-based feature subset selection can enhance software defect prediction. Although the D-Wave QPU solver exhibits competitive prediction performance with the classical solver in software defect prediction, it significantly reduces the time required to identify the best feature subset compared to its classical counterpart.