The core innovation of this paper lies in proposing the "transcription channel" theory: physical observation values are not a direct reflection of material memory, but rather the result of memory mapped through specific "transcription channels"; the memory itself is non-attenuating, but its readability during dynamic conversion may appear attenuated due to mapping mismatch. This provides a new perspective on the quantum measurement problem—wavefunction collapse can be regarded as the limited-bandwidth expression of consciousness-memory information in physical channels.
The core innovation of this paper lies in proposing the "transcription channel" theory: physical observation values are not a direct reflection of material memory, but rather the result of memory mapped through specific "transcription channels"; the memory itself is non-attenuating, but its readability during dynamic conversion may appear attenuated due to mapping mismatch. This provides a new perspective on the quantum measurement problem—wavefunction collapse can be regarded as the limited-bandwidth expression of consciousness-memory information in physical channels.
This paper proposes the Zhao Futao Multi-Parallel Cartesian Coordinate System (MPCCS), which takes the Zhao Futao Dual Axiom System of Material Memory and Entanglement between Matter and Consciousness as the underlying logic. It separates the information attributes of "consciousness-memory" and the physical attributes of "motion-external field" into parallel coordinate systems, realizing coupling through a shared environmental axis to solve the problems of heterogeneous variable confusion and unclear physical meaning in traditional modeling. Taking photo-induced quantum decoherence as an application example, this paper substitutes real physical parameters to complete verifiable numerical calculations, clarifies the physical meaning and dimension of each physical quantity, and achieves accurate correspondence between the theoretical framework and actual physical processes, laying a solid foundation for subsequent experimental verification and cross-field expansion.
本文应用微元定理(即“事物的本质是该事物一切联系的集成”)处理量子力学中的波函数坍缩问题。其核心论证是:波函数是量子对象一切联系的数学表达;测量是以人为主导的新联系介入联系集成;坍缩是联系集成在新联系进入后的逻辑刷新,而非意识触发。量子隧穿、双缝干涉、量子擦除、薛定谔猫等实验与思想实验,均在微元定理框架下获得自洽的唯物辩证法解释。本文不修改量子力学数学结构,不引入额外假设,仅通过唯物辩证法基本命题的本体论转换,使测量问题自行消解。 This paper applies the Infinitesimal Theorem (i.e., “the essence of a thing is the integration of all its connections”) to address the wave function collapse problem in quantum mechanics. Its core argument states that the wave function is the mathematical expression of all connections of a quantum object; measurement is the intervention of new connections, led by human agency, into the integration of connections; and collapse is the logical update of the integration following the entry of new connections, rather than a process triggered by consciousness. Experiments and thought experiments such as quantum tunneling, double-slit interference, quantum erasure, and Schrödinger's cat all receive coherent materialist-dialectical interpretations within the framework of the Infinitesimal Theorem. This paper does not modify the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics, nor does it introduce any additional assumptions. It merely transforms the fundamental propositions of materialist dialectics from methodology to ontology, thereby allowing the measurement problem to resolve itself.
Abstract: Classical computationalism asserts that cognitive systems are functional state machines operating on observable physical data, implying that consciousness can, in principle, be cloned, simulated, or uploaded to digital hardware. Conversely, non-computable models of mind—most notably the Penrose-Hameroff Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR) framework—argue that cognition requires non-algorithmic quantum gravitational mechanics, yet face persistent criticisms regarding thermal decoherence in biological environments. In this paper, I resolve this conflict by establishing a formal physical boundary between two distinct domains of reality: static Information and dynamic Context. Key Physical & Mathematical Deliverables: Information vs. Context Duality: Physical matter consists of static, readable structural configurations (Information) that are fully cloneable given adequate architectural specifications. In contrast, an executive observer represents an active, self-referential resource queue (Context) operating on dynamic state updates. Proof of Uncloneability (uΩ→0): Reading out or copying an active Context vector requires diverting 100% of localized processing bandwidth to the measurement channel (Ωload→1.0). This forces the residual processing bandwidth to zero (uΩ=1.0−Ωload=0), halting internal state transitions and terminating the observer node. The No-Cloning Theorem is unmasked not as a universal rule governing all physical geometry, but as a strict boundary safeguarding executive agents. Immunity to Thermal Decoherence: Executive cognition is anchored to resource allocation bandwidth (Ωload), which is governed top-down by metric state transition latency (uΩ). Because agency is maintained at the level of metric execution rather than fragile spatial particle alignment, executive cognition is structurally insulated against Tegmark's biological thermal decoherence objection (∼10−13 s). Wave-Function Collapse as Expression Compression (P^collapse): Wave-function collapse is re-defined as an information-theoretic rendering event—the physical compression map (P^collapse:Cdynamic→Istatic) projecting fluid, infinite internal Context into discrete, static external Information. Falsification of Mind-Uploading: Digitizing a brain captures only static Information (Istatic), while the act of extracting the active Context vector terminates the conscious observer, proving that digital mind-uploading produces functional simulations (philosophical zombies) rather than identity continuation.
Quantum sensing and quantum computing face the core challenge of understanding and suppressing decoherence noise. Traditional noise models focus primarily on environmental parameters (temperature, magnetic field, charge density) but struggle to explain systematic differences in noise strength across material systems. Based on Zhao Futao’s Material Memory Theory, this work establishes a complete mathematical framework for quantum decoherence and interface noise injection. The theory is grounded in two axioms: the Material Memory Unit Axiom (all material systems carry and record their full evolutionary history, and evolution is the active response of memory) and the Matter-Consciousness Entanglement Unit Axiom (consciousness is a high-level entangled property of matter, with survival tendency as its simplest form). Using an optical analogy, we construct a unified theoretical chain from interface physics to macroscopic decoherence measurements.
What quantum theory has revealed about the nature of reality has remained hidden in plain sight for almost one-hundred years because what quantum theory has revealed about the nature of reality cannot be comprehended in the context of the materialist model and conception of reality in which science presently operates, which materialist model places physical reality at the center of reality and Consciousness at the periphery, as a secondary or derivative reality. What this work will demonstrate, by explaining the heretofore inexplicable basis of the phenomena that lie at the heart of quantum theory, is that it is Consciousness rather than physical reality that lies at the center of reality, and that it is physical reality rather than Consciousness that is a secondary or derivative reality. Specifically, wave-particle duality, quantum uncertainty, quantum non-locality, the probabilistic nature of the wavefunction, and the collapse of the wavefunction, will all be shown to be phenomena that have as their basis the way in which the fundamental Reality of Consciousness, through relation to Itself, creates what it apprehends as physical reality.One of the most important things the phenomena that lie at the heart of quantum theory will be shown to reveal about the nature of reality is that the nature of physical reality is like that of a reflection, and like a reflection, physical reality is able to obscure from view what is actually there, as long as it is mistaken for what is actually there. Thus, in revealing the reflection-like nature of physical reality, the phenomena that lie at the heart of quantum theory indirectly reveal that what is actually there, underlying the reflection that is physical reality, is the non-physical, non-experiential Reality of Consciousness that is, through relation to Itself, both creating and apprehending experiential reality in general and physical reality in particular. Ultimately, understanding the reflection-like nature of physical reality should make it possible for Individuals to understand that what actually Exists directly where they are, where their physical bodies appear to be, is not different in Nature than what actually Exists everywhere else as well, where the rest of physical reality appears to be, thereby disabusing them of the notion that what they are is a physical reality, while at the same time revealing to them their true Nature as Consciousness, which, through relation to that which is also Consciousness, creates what they, as Individual points of Consciousness, apprehend as experiential reality in general and physical reality in particular.Part I of this series of three articles includes: Background; Introduction; and 1. Building a new model of reality.
What quantum theory has revealed about the nature of reality has remained hidden in plain sight for almost one-hundred years because what quantum theory has revealed about the nature of reality cannot be comprehended in the context of the materialist model and conception of reality in which science presently operates, which materialist model places physical reality at the center of reality and Consciousness at the periphery, as a secondary or derivative reality. What this work will demonstrate, by explaining the heretofore inexplicable basis of the phenomena that lie at the heart of quantum theory, is that it is Consciousness (God) rather than physical reality that lies at the center of reality, and that it is physical reality rather than Consciousness that is a secondary or derivative reality. Specifically, wave-particle duality, quantum uncertainty, quantum non-locality, the probabilistic nature of the wavefunction, and the collapse of the wavefunction, will all be shown to be phenomena that have as their basis the way in which the fundamental Reality of Consciousness (God), through relation to Itself, creates what it apprehends as physical reality. One of the most important things the phenomena that lie at the heart of quantum theory will be shown to reveal about the nature of reality is that the nature of physical reality is like that of a reflection, and like a reflection, physical reality is able to obscure from view what is actually there, as long as it is mistaken for what is actually there. Thus, in revealing the reflection-like nature of physical reality, the phenomena that lie at the heart of quantum theory indirectly reveal that what is actually there, underlying the reflection that is physical reality, is the non-physical, non-experiential Reality of Consciousness (God) that is, through relation to Itself, both creating and apprehending experiential reality in general and physical reality in particular. Ultimately, understanding the reflection-like nature of physical reality should make it possible for Individuals to understand that what actually Exists directly where they are, where their physical bodies appear to be, is not different in Nature than what actually Exists everywhere else as well, where the rest of physical reality appears to be, thereby disabusing them of the notion that what they are is a physical reality, while at the same time revealing to them their true Nature as part of Consciousness (God), which, through relation to that which is also Consciousness (God), creates what they, as Individual points of Consciousness (God), apprehend as experiential reality in general and physical reality in particular. Part I of this series of three articles includes: Background; Introduction; and 1. Building a new model of reality.