Transformation Theory and the Development of the Probabilistic Interpretation

Jagdish Mehra, Helmut Rechenberg

Bartosz Regula

The difficulty in manipulating quantum resources deterministically often necessitates the use of probabilistic protocols, but the characterization of their capabilities and limitations has been lacking. We develop a general approach to this problem by introducing a new resource monotone that obeys a very strong type of monotonicity: it can rule out all transformations, probabilistic or deterministic, between states in any quantum resource theory. This allows us to place fundamental limitations on state transformations and restrict the advantages that probabilistic protocols can provide over deterministic ones, significantly strengthening previous findings and extending recent no-go theorems. We apply our results to obtain a substantial improvement in bounds for the errors and overheads of probabilistic distillation protocols, directly applicable to tasks such as entanglement or magic state distillation, and computable through convex optimization. In broad classes of resources, we strengthen our results to show that the monotone completely governs probabilistic transformations-it serves as a necessary and sufficient condition for state convertibility. This endows the monotone with a direct operational interpretation, as it can exactly quantify the highest fidelity achievable in resource distillation tasks by means of any probabilistic manipulation protocol.

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We start to develop the quantization formalism in a hyperbolic Hilbert space. Generalizing Born's probability interpretation, we found that unitary transformations in such a Hilbert space represent a new class of transformations of probabilities which describe a kind of {\it hyperbolic interference}. The most interesting problem which was generated by our investigation is to find experimental evidence of hyperbolic interference. The hyperbolic quantum formalism can also be interesting as a new theory of probabilistic waves that can be developed parallely to the standard quantum theory. Comparative analysis of these two wave theories could be useful for understanding of the role of various structures of the standard quantum formalism. In particular, one of distinguishing feature of the hyperbolic quantum formalism is the restricted validity of the superposition principle.

Louis Fein

Jerome Blackman, Wu-Teh Hsiang

Early in the development of quantum theory Bohr introduced what came to be called the Copenhagen interpretation. Specifically, the square of the absolute value of the wave function was to be used as a probability density. There followed lengthy arguments about this ranging from alternative universes to Schrodinger's cat. Einstein famously remarked "I am convinced that He (God) does not play dice." The purpose of this paper is to present a mathematical model of the measuring process that shows that the Copenhagen interpretation can actually follow from the fact that the time development of quantum systems is governed by the usual one parameter group of unitary transformations exp-iHt and that probability enters into the theory in the way it usually does in physics, namely, by having a large number of deterministic equations that can only be handled probabilistically.