Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum computing, norms and polynomials

Francisco Escudero Gutiérrez

Published Mar 26, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this thesis, Quantum computing, norms, and polynomials, we investigate the interplay between quantum mechanics, complexity theory, and functional analysis, three central areas of physics, computer science, and mathematics, respectively. The unifying theme throughout the thesis is the dynamic exchange between quantum computing and functional analysis: we explore new applications of functional inequalities in quantum computing, and, in the process, establish novel results in functional analysis itself. In the first part, we study quantum query algorithms through their correspondence with completely bounded polynomials, as established in earlier work. We begin by revisiting this correspondence, extending it, and presenting it in a new form. Building on this foundation, we draw an analogy between quantum query algorithms and the Grothendieck inequality. Finally, we conclude this part by employing completely bounded polynomials to solve a special case of one of the main open problems in quantum query complexity, the Aaronson–Ambainis conjecture. In the second part, we turn to quantum learning theory, which seeks to determine how much information must be extracted from a quantum system to fully characterize it. We begin by applying existing versions of the Bohnenblust–Hille inequalities and deriving new ones to obtain results in the learning of low-degree quantum objects. We conclude by presenting some of the first results in the emerging area of Hamiltonian testing and learning. We also include a third part, as a bonus, where we gather three new proofs, that we find elegant and concise, of known results related to the analysis of Boolean functions.

DOI
10.60602/1887-4289617

Related papers

Optimal inequalities for completely bounded polynomials and the limitations of quantum query algorithms

Francisco Escudero Gutiérrez, Miquel Saucedo, Carlos Palazuelos

We consider the problem of establishing limitations on the power of quantum query algorithms via the completely bounded polynomial method. In particular, we prove several optimal functional inequalities involving different notions of completely bounded polynomials. These inequalities lead to limiting theorems for the power of quantum query algorithms that improve on prior works. 1. An optimal root-influence bound for block-multilinear polynomials. Prior work showed that block-multilinear polynomials $p$ of degree $t$ satisfy a root-influence bound, $\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\geq \sum_i \sqrt{\mathrm{Inf}_i[p]}/t^2$, which is stronger than the bound appearing in the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture. We find the optimal constant in that inequality: $\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\geq \sum_i \sqrt{\mathrm{Inf}_i[p]}/t$. Since the amplitudes of quantum algorithms that query disjoint blocks of inputs-such as $t$-fold forrelation- are block-multilinear polynomials with $\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\leq 1,$ our inequality shows that they satisfy $t\geq \sum_i\sqrt{\mathrm{Inf}_i[p]}$. We prove that this inequality yields both a more efficient classical simulation than prior results based on the Aaronson-Ambainis argument, and a qualitative improvement: all classical queries are nonadaptive. 2. Optimal Fourier growth of the highest level of quantum query algorithms. We show that for every polynomial $p$ defined on $\{-1,1\}^n$ of degree $2t$, the Fourier Growth at the level $2t,$ namely $\|\widehat p_{2t}\|_{\ell_1}$, satisfies $\|\widehat p_{2t}\|_{\ell_1}\leq (en/(2t-1))^{\frac{2t-1}{2}}\|p\|_{\text{cb}}$. This is optimal up to the factor $e$, as witnessed by $2t$-fold forrelation. As quantum query algorithms that make $t$ queries (to the whole input) satisfy $\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\leq 1$, this yields a Fourier growth bound for these algorithms, partially resolving a question by Girish (STOC, 2026).

quant-pharXiv:2609.05201•Sep 7, 2026•0 citations

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM QUERY MODELS: COMPLEXITY, LOWER BOUNDS, AND POLYNOMIAL-SPECTRAL INTERPLAY

Medak Srinivas

Query complexity provides a basic framework to quantify the inherent computational cost of functions in the model where access to the input is limited to oracle queries. In this paper, we provide a detailed discussion of classical and quantum models of inquiry, emphasizing the structural differences and the common mathematical basis. We consider deterministic, randomized and quantum query complexities and highlight key techniques to prove lower bounds such as adversarial techniques, polynomial approximations and hybrid arguments . The main theme of this paper is the polynomial-spectral relation which underlies both the classical and the quantum models. In the classical setting, the decision tree complexity is closely related to the degree of real polynomials representing Boolean functions. In the quantum setting, the relation involves the spectral properties of the operators controlling quantum query algorithms, and gives deep insights into quantum accelerations. We study tight bounds for basic problems such as search and element distinctness, proving separations between classical and quantum query complexity. The present study uses methods from approximation theory, linear algebra and spectrum analysis to build a foundation for a complete understanding of the power and limitations of query-based computation.

Iterative International Publishers eBooks•May 1, 2026•0 citations

Algebraic Methods in Query and Proof Complexity

Adrian She

Algebraic methods have become a powerful tool for analyzing the complexity of various computational models, including low-depth circuits, algebraic proofs, and quantum query algorithms. In particular, the complexity of computing a function in these models is related to whether or not the function admits a low-degree polynomial approximation. In this thesis, we present two novel applications of algebraic methods in computational complexity theory. In the first part of the thesis, we study unitary property testing, where a quantum algorithm is given query access to a black-box unitary and has to decide whether or not it satisfies some property. In addition to containing the classical query complexity model as a special case, this model also contains "inherently quantum" problems that have no classical analogue. Our main contribution is a generalized polynomial method for analyzing the complexity of unitary property testing problems. By leveraging connections with invariant theory, we apply this method to obtain lower bounds on problems such as determining recurrence times of unitaries, approximating the dimension of a subspace, and approximating the entanglement entropy of a state. We also present a candidate problem towards an oracle separation of QMA and QMA(2), a long standing open question in quantum complexity theory. In the second part of the thesis, we study the tensor isomorphism problem (TI), which has recently emerged as having connections to multiple areas of research, including quantum information theory, post-quantum cryptography, and computational algebra. However, the current best upper bound is essentially the brute force algorithm. Being an algebraic problem, the study of tensor isomorphism naturally lends itself to algebraic and semi-algebraic proof systems such as the polynomial calculus (PC) and sum-of-squares (SoS). We show a linear degree lower bound on PC degree or SoS degree for tensor isomorphism and a non-trivial upper bound for testing isomorphism of tensors of bounded rank. Along the way, we also show that PC cannot perform basic linear algebra in sublinear degree, such as comparing the rank of two matrices. We introduce a strictly stronger proof system, called PC + Inv, which enables linear algebra to be done in low degree. We conjecture that even PC + Inv cannot solve TI in polynomial time either, and highlight many other open questions about proof complexity approaches to TI.

•Nov 1, 2024•0 citations

Query Complexity: Cryptography, Property Testing, and Lower Bounds Across Models

Weiqiang Yuan

Query complexity studies the amount of information about an input that is needed to solve a computational problem. This thesis investigates query complexity in several settings, with applications to cryptography and property testing, as well as connections to communication complexity and other computational models. In property testing, we study tolerant junta testing and establish the first superpolynomial quantum advantage for this problem: within a certain parameter regime, a quantum algorithm uses polynomially many queries, whereas every classical randomised algorithm requires quasipolynomially many queries. In cryptography, we study the average-case complexity of search problems. We show that verifiable delay functions do not exist in the random oracle model, and strengthen known barriers to constructing average-case hard TFNP problems from one-way functions. Finally, we study lower bounds and their behaviour across computational models. We prove new direct sum results for randomised parity decision trees. We also establish a new separation between query complexity measures of total Boolean functions and, through query-to-communication lifting, derive new communication lower bounds and lower bounds for unambiguous finite automata.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Influences of Fourier Completely Bounded Polynomials and Classical Simulation of Quantum Algorithms

Francisco Escudero Gutiérrez

We give a new presentation of the main result of Arunachalam, Briët and Palazuelos (SICOMP'19) and show that quantum query algorithms are characterized by a new class of polynomials which we call Fourier completely bounded polynomials. We conjecture that all such polynomials have an influential variable. This conjecture is weaker than the famous Aaronson-Ambainis (AA) conjecture (Theory of Computing'14), but has the same implications for classical simulation of quantum query algorithms. We prove a new case of the AA conjecture by showing that it holds for homogeneous Fourier completely bounded polynomials. This implies that if the output of $d$-query quantum algorithm is a homogeneous polynomial $p$ of degree $2d$, then it has a variable with influence at least $Var[p]^2$. In addition, we give an alternative proof of the results of Bansal, Sinha and de Wolf (CCC'22 and QIP'23) showing that block-multilinear completely bounded polynomials have influential variables. Our proof is simpler, obtains better constants and does not use randomness.

arXiv:2304.06713•Apr 13, 2023•1 citation

$\mathsf{BQP} \subseteq \mathsf{IP}$ Does Not Relativize

Adam Bouland, Andrew Huang, Anand Natarajan +2 more

We construct an oracle relative to which $\mathsf{BQP} \not\subseteq \mathsf{IP}$, resolving a long-standing open question in quantum complexity theory. Together with recent work due to Aaronson et al., our work also gives the first oracle separation between $\mathsf{IP}$ and $\mathsf{MIP}$, answering a question dating back to Fortnow's thesis. Our separation is based on the Forrelation problem, where given Boolean functions $f$ and $g$, the goal is to determine if $f$ is correlated with the Fourier spectrum of $g$. While this task is solvable by a query-efficient quantum algorithm, we show that it admits no classical interactive protocol with polynomial communication and a polynomial-query verifier. Our proof is based on (i) a new structural result showing how to approximate Avg-Max circuits (which are well-known to capture the power of interactive proofs in the oracular setting) by convex functions with small first and second derivatives and (ii) a novel analysis establishing that the Forrelation distribution suggested by Aaronson and Ambainis fools such functions. Our results imply that any prover-efficient classical interactive protocol for $\mathsf{BQP}$ must rely on non-relativizing techniques. This might serve as a partial explanation for the lack of progress towards doubly-efficient, unconditionally sound classical verification of quantum computation.

quant-pharXiv:2609.25680•Sep 23, 2026•0 citations
In this thesis, Quantum computing, norms, and polynomials, we investigate the interplay between quantum mechanics, complexity theory, and functional analysis, three central areas of physics, computer science, and mathematics, respectively. The unifying theme throughout the thesis is the dynamic exchange between quantum computing and functional analysis: we explore new applications of functional inequalities in quantum computing, and, in the process, establish novel results in functional analysis itself. In the first part, we study quantum query algorithms through their correspondence with completely bounded polynomials, as established in earlier work. We begin by revisiting this correspondence, extending it, and presenting it in a new form. Building on this foundation, we draw an analogy between quantum query algorithms and the Grothendieck inequality. Finally, we conclude this part by employing completely bounded polynomials to solve a special case of one of the main open problems in quantum query complexity, the Aaronson–Ambainis conjecture. In the second part, we turn to quantum learning theory, which seeks to determine how much information must be extracted from a quantum system to fully characterize it. We begin by applying existing versions of the Bohnenblust–Hille inequalities and deriving new ones to obtain results in the learning of low-degree quantum objects. We conclude by presenting some of the first results in the emerging area of Hamiltonian testing and learning. We also include a third part, as a bonus, where we gather three new proofs, that we find elegant and concise, of known results related to the analysis of Boolean functions.
We consider the problem of establishing limitations on the power of quantum query algorithms via the completely bounded polynomial method. In particular, we prove several optimal functional inequalities involving different notions of completely bounded polynomials. These inequalities lead to limiting theorems for the power of quantum query algorithms that improve on prior works. 1. An optimal root-influence bound for block-multilinear polynomials. Prior work showed that block-multilinear polynomials ppp of degree ttt satisfy a root-influence bound, ∥p∥cb≥∑iInfi[p]/t2\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\geq \sum_i \sqrt{\mathrm{Inf}_i[p]}/t^2∥p∥cb​≥∑i​Infi​[p]​/t2, which is stronger than the bound appearing in the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture. We find the optimal constant in that inequality: ∥p∥cb≥∑iInfi[p]/t\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\geq \sum_i \sqrt{\mathrm{Inf}_i[p]}/t∥p∥cb​≥∑i​Infi​[p]​/t. Since the amplitudes of quantum algorithms that query disjoint blocks of inputs-such as ttt-fold forrelation- are block-multilinear polynomials with ∥p∥cb≤1,\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\leq 1,∥p∥cb​≤1, our inequality shows that they satisfy t≥∑iInfi[p]t\geq \sum_i\sqrt{\mathrm{Inf}_i[p]}t≥∑i​Infi​[p]​. We prove that this inequality yields both a more efficient classical simulation than prior results based on the Aaronson-Ambainis argument, and a qualitative improvement: all classical queries are nonadaptive. 2. Optimal Fourier growth of the highest level of quantum query algorithms. We show that for every polynomial ppp defined on {−1,1}n\{-1,1\}^n{−1,1}n of degree 2t2t2t, the Fourier Growth at the level 2t,2t,2t, namely ∥p^2t∥ℓ1\|\widehat p_{2t}\|_{\ell_1}∥p​2t​∥ℓ1​​, satisfies ∥p^2t∥ℓ1≤(en/(2t−1))2t−12∥p∥cb\|\widehat p_{2t}\|_{\ell_1}\leq (en/(2t-1))^{\frac{2t-1}{2}}\|p\|_{\text{cb}}∥p​2t​∥ℓ1​​≤(en/(2t−1))22t−1​∥p∥cb​. This is optimal up to the factor eee, as witnessed by 2t2t2t-fold forrelation. As quantum query algorithms that make ttt queries (to the whole input) satisfy ∥p∥cb≤1\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\leq 1∥p∥cb​≤1, this yields a Fourier growth bound for these algorithms, partially resolving a question by Girish (STOC, 2026).
Query complexity provides a basic framework to quantify the inherent computational cost of functions in the model where access to the input is limited to oracle queries. In this paper, we provide a detailed discussion of classical and quantum models of inquiry, emphasizing the structural differences and the common mathematical basis. We consider deterministic, randomized and quantum query complexities and highlight key techniques to prove lower bounds such as adversarial techniques, polynomial approximations and hybrid arguments . The main theme of this paper is the polynomial-spectral relation which underlies both the classical and the quantum models. In the classical setting, the decision tree complexity is closely related to the degree of real polynomials representing Boolean functions. In the quantum setting, the relation involves the spectral properties of the operators controlling quantum query algorithms, and gives deep insights into quantum accelerations. We study tight bounds for basic problems such as search and element distinctness, proving separations between classical and quantum query complexity. The present study uses methods from approximation theory, linear algebra and spectrum analysis to build a foundation for a complete understanding of the power and limitations of query-based computation.
Algebraic methods have become a powerful tool for analyzing the complexity of various computational models, including low-depth circuits, algebraic proofs, and quantum query algorithms. In particular, the complexity of computing a function in these models is related to whether or not the function admits a low-degree polynomial approximation. In this thesis, we present two novel applications of algebraic methods in computational complexity theory. In the first part of the thesis, we study unitary property testing, where a quantum algorithm is given query access to a black-box unitary and has to decide whether or not it satisfies some property. In addition to containing the classical query complexity model as a special case, this model also contains "inherently quantum" problems that have no classical analogue. Our main contribution is a generalized polynomial method for analyzing the complexity of unitary property testing problems. By leveraging connections with invariant theory, we apply this method to obtain lower bounds on problems such as determining recurrence times of unitaries, approximating the dimension of a subspace, and approximating the entanglement entropy of a state. We also present a candidate problem towards an oracle separation of QMA and QMA(2), a long standing open question in quantum complexity theory. In the second part of the thesis, we study the tensor isomorphism problem (TI), which has recently emerged as having connections to multiple areas of research, including quantum information theory, post-quantum cryptography, and computational algebra. However, the current best upper bound is essentially the brute force algorithm. Being an algebraic problem, the study of tensor isomorphism naturally lends itself to algebraic and semi-algebraic proof systems such as the polynomial calculus (PC) and sum-of-squares (SoS). We show a linear degree lower bound on PC degree or SoS degree for tensor isomorphism and a non-trivial upper bound for testing isomorphism of tensors of bounded rank. Along the way, we also show that PC cannot perform basic linear algebra in sublinear degree, such as comparing the rank of two matrices. We introduce a strictly stronger proof system, called PC + Inv, which enables linear algebra to be done in low degree. We conjecture that even PC + Inv cannot solve TI in polynomial time either, and highlight many other open questions about proof complexity approaches to TI.
Query complexity studies the amount of information about an input that is needed to solve a computational problem. This thesis investigates query complexity in several settings, with applications to cryptography and property testing, as well as connections to communication complexity and other computational models. In property testing, we study tolerant junta testing and establish the first superpolynomial quantum advantage for this problem: within a certain parameter regime, a quantum algorithm uses polynomially many queries, whereas every classical randomised algorithm requires quasipolynomially many queries. In cryptography, we study the average-case complexity of search problems. We show that verifiable delay functions do not exist in the random oracle model, and strengthen known barriers to constructing average-case hard TFNP problems from one-way functions. Finally, we study lower bounds and their behaviour across computational models. We prove new direct sum results for randomised parity decision trees. We also establish a new separation between query complexity measures of total Boolean functions and, through query-to-communication lifting, derive new communication lower bounds and lower bounds for unambiguous finite automata.
We give a new presentation of the main result of Arunachalam, Briët and Palazuelos (SICOMP'19) and show that quantum query algorithms are characterized by a new class of polynomials which we call Fourier completely bounded polynomials. We conjecture that all such polynomials have an influential variable. This conjecture is weaker than the famous Aaronson-Ambainis (AA) conjecture (Theory of Computing'14), but has the same implications for classical simulation of quantum query algorithms. We prove a new case of the AA conjecture by showing that it holds for homogeneous Fourier completely bounded polynomials. This implies that if the output of ddd-query quantum algorithm is a homogeneous polynomial ppp of degree 2d2d2d, then it has a variable with influence at least Var[p]2Var[p]^2Var[p]2. In addition, we give an alternative proof of the results of Bansal, Sinha and de Wolf (CCC'22 and QIP'23) showing that block-multilinear completely bounded polynomials have influential variables. Our proof is simpler, obtains better constants and does not use randomness.
BQP⊆IP\mathsf{BQP} \subseteq \mathsf{IP}BQP⊆IP Does Not Relativize
We construct an oracle relative to which BQP⊈IP\mathsf{BQP} \not\subseteq \mathsf{IP}BQP⊆IP, resolving a long-standing open question in quantum complexity theory. Together with recent work due to Aaronson et al., our work also gives the first oracle separation between IP\mathsf{IP}IP and MIP\mathsf{MIP}MIP, answering a question dating back to Fortnow's thesis. Our separation is based on the Forrelation problem, where given Boolean functions fff and ggg, the goal is to determine if fff is correlated with the Fourier spectrum of ggg. While this task is solvable by a query-efficient quantum algorithm, we show that it admits no classical interactive protocol with polynomial communication and a polynomial-query verifier. Our proof is based on (i) a new structural result showing how to approximate Avg-Max circuits (which are well-known to capture the power of interactive proofs in the oracular setting) by convex functions with small first and second derivatives and (ii) a novel analysis establishing that the Forrelation distribution suggested by Aaronson and Ambainis fools such functions. Our results imply that any prover-efficient classical interactive protocol for BQP\mathsf{BQP}BQP must rely on non-relativizing techniques. This might serve as a partial explanation for the lack of progress towards doubly-efficient, unconditionally sound classical verification of quantum computation.