Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Non-Orientable Topology in a Stabilizer Circuit: Experimental Demonstration of a Klein Bottle Quantum Error-Correcting Code

Leonardo Roma

Published Mar 24, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This upload contains the manuscript, LaTeX source, and Python code for the paper: "Non-Orientable Topology in a Stabilizer Circuit: Experimental Demonstration of a Klein Bottle Quantum Error-Correcting Code" We report the first experimental implementation of a Klein bottle stabilizer code on superconducting quantum hardware. The code achieves a 138× enhancement of the predicted antipodal syndrome signature (44.2% frequency, Z=499σ) on IBM Fez, confirmed on three independent processors (IBM Fez, Marrakesh, Torino) and in four simultaneous parallel code instances. The code uses 25% fewer physical qubits than the square toric code at equivalent code distance. The Python code implements the Klein bottle stabilizer code on a 4×2 lattice, reproduces the antipodal signature from the initial 26.3% to the optimised 44.2%, and includes hardware verification across three processors and MWPM logical error rate simulation. All hardware job IDs are provided in the README for independent reproducibility. Contents: paper.pdf — manuscript latex/ — LaTeX source and figures code/ — Python scripts (circuit builder, verification, simulation) README.md — instructions and complete hardware job ID table All hardware experiments were performed on IBM Fez (Heron r2, 156 qubits) via IBM Quantum Runtime. The code is released under MIT license; the manuscript under CC BY 4.0.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.19202944

Related papers

Non-Orientable Topology in a Stabilizer Circuit: Experimental Demonstration of a Klein Bottle Quantum Error-Correcting Code

Leonardo Roma

The first experimental implementation of a non-orientable stabilizer code on quantum hardware. We encode the boundary conditions of a Klein bottle onto the 156-qubit IBM Fez processor and measure a 138× enhancement of the predicted antipodal syndrome signature (44.2% frequency, Z=499σ). The code uses 25% fewer physical qubits than the square toric code at equivalent code distance. Key results confirmed on hardware: Result Value Best antipodal frequency 44.2% (seed=77, depth=112) Best enhancement over toric 138× Best Z-score 499σ Orientation-even sectors 13% fewer syndrome violations Orientation-odd sectors 26% more syndrome violations Logical error rate (MWPM) K/T ≈ 1.0 (equivalent to toric) Qubit efficiency 24 vs 32 qubits (25% reduction vs square toric d=4) Processors confirmed IBM Fez, Marrakesh, Torino Parallel codes on 156q chip 4 simultaneous (Z=404–721σ each) Author: Leonardo Roma, Independent Researcher, Ceccano, ItalyDate: March 2026Live demo: kleincode.pythonanywhere.com Additional verification Topology kill test (job d73rfc4vllmc73ansvk0) Klein circuit (prep edge v(3,1)) produced 10000001 at 47.99% while an identical Fake Klein (one edge changed) produced 0.39% — 122.8× enhancement at Z=691σ. The Fake Klein produced its own predicted pattern 10001000 at 33.39%, proving topology determines where the signal lands, not hardware resonance. Holonomy — non-orientable algebra (job d73rqh5koquc73e22ni0) Dynamic circuit test (mid-circuit reset). B-cycle gate applied to a-anyon sector, syndrome measured in a second round. Klein: 10000010 at 11.79%, Z=90σ. Toric: 10001011 at 22.96%, Z=272σ. Cross-contamination < 1.2%. Confirms b-cycle has non-trivial action on a-cycle — the algebraic signature of non-orientable topology. All hardware experiments performed on IBM Fez (Heron r2, 156 qubits) via IBM Quantum Runtime. Code: MIT license. Paper: CC BY 4.0.

•Mar 28, 2026•0 citations

Logical Operator Holonomy and Non-Orientable Algebra in a Klein Bottle Stabilizer Code

Leonardo Roma

We demonstrate that the logical operator algebra of the Klein bottle stabilizer code is non-orientable, confirming that the code encodes non-orientable topology at the level of the logical Hilbert space, not merely at the level of the stabilizer construction. Using dynamic circuits with mid-circuit reset on IBM Fez (Heron r2, 156 qubits), we apply the b-cycle logical gate X_L2 to each of the four logical sectors and measure the resulting syndrome in a second round. The Klein code produces different sector transitions than the toric code under the identical gate, confirming that X_L2 anticommutes with Z_L1 in Klein but commutes in the toric code. No orientable stabilizer code can produce this result. Key results: Sector Job ID Klein R2 Z Toric R2 Z |10>_L (holonomy) d73rqh5koquc73e22ni0 10000010 at 11.79% 90σ 10001011 at 22.96% 272σ |00>_L d73u5ttkoquc73e251eg 10000001 at 13.9% 99σ 10001000 at 21.9% 312σ |10>_L d73u5ttkoquc73e251eg 10000010 at 12.7% 105σ 10001011 at 18.0% 230σ |01>_L d73u5ttkoquc73e251eg 10001000 at 11.9% 45σ 10000001 at 16.0% 70σ |11>_L d73u854vllmc73anvom0 dominant confirmed — dominant confirmed — All dominant patterns match theoretical predictions exactly. Cross-contamination below 1.2% in all cases. The transition table: Klein: |00> ↔ |11>, |10> ↔ |01> (X_L2 flips BOTH Z_L1 and Z_L2) Toric: |00> ↔ |01>, |10> ↔ |11> (X_L2 flips ONLY Z_L2) The two holonomy maps act on different sector pairs, the non-orientable twist permutes the logical sector labels relative to the orientable case. This is the third in a series of three papers establishing complete experimental characterisation of the Klein bottle stabilizer code: Paper 1 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19284050): Code exists on hardware, GSD=4, kill test Z=691σ Paper 2 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19286677): Boundary parameter δ is tunable, Z=316–606σ Paper 3 (this paper): Logical algebra is non-orientable, Z=45–312σ Live demo: https://kleincode.pythonanywhere.com Paper 1: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19284050 Paper 2: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19286677 All hardware experiments performed on IBM Fez (Heron r2, 156 qubits) via IBM Quantum Runtime. Code: MIT license. Paper: CC BY 4.0.

•Mar 28, 2026•0 citations

Topologically Robust Syndrome-Based Readout of a Classical Parameter in a Family of Non-Orientable Stabilizer Codes

Leonardo Roma

This upload contains the manuscript, LaTeX source, and figures for the second paper in the Klein Bottle QEC series. Research Overview We introduce a one-parameter family of Klein bottle stabilizer codes C(δ) defined by shifting the orientation-reversing boundary identification of an Lx × Ly lattice. Although all members share identical topology (Klein bottle, GSD=4), each produces a distinct and theoretically predictable syndrome fingerprint P(δ) when a topological excitation is prepared. Key Results We verify all four fingerprints of the Lx=4, Ly=2 family on the 156-qubit IBM Fez processor (Heron r2), with statistical significance Z = 316–606σ (job d71582469uic73cl1q5g, 8192 shots each). Topological Protection The encoding map δ → P(δ) is injective and robust under noise. Because δ is embedded in the circuit topology rather than the quantum state, local errors cannot corrupt the parameter directly. Misidentifying δ requires ≥ d simultaneous errors, providing a misidentification probability scaling as pᵈ (where d=4) versus p¹ for standard gate-encoded parameters. Contents paper.pdf – Full manuscript paper.tex – LaTeX source (self-contained) fig_delta_lattice.pdf – Lattice diagrams and fingerprint encoding maps fig_delta_fingerprints.pdf – Hardware results: pattern frequencies and Z-scores fig_delta_depth.pdf – Signal strength vs. circuit depth analysis README.md – Detailed job IDs, API instructions, and reproduction notes Related Resources Paper 1 (Discovery): doi:10.5281/zenodo.19202945 Live API: https://kleincode.pythonanywhere.com GitHub: https://github.com/theoricline/klein-bottle-qec License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

•Mar 25, 2026•0 citations

Bunny Codes: Broadening Superconducting Quantum Error Correction Capability through Advanced Control Engineering

Runshi Zhou, Xingye Yuan, Linghang Kong +4 more

Drawing on advances in superconducting qubit control schemes that unlock enriched native gate sets at the hardware level, we systematically examine how harnessing this enlarged physical two-qubit gate pool---specifically CNOT and CXSWAP---streamlines syndrome extraction for certain qLDPC codes with nonlocal stabilizers. Through an exhaustive search, we discover a set of qLDPC codes with various stabilizer weights and distances that can be implemented on the two-dimensional nearest-neighbor qubit connectivity native to superconducting hardware while achieving performance equivalent to that of the direct CNOT implementation requiring long-range interactions. We refer to those codes as Bunny codes. Across all code distances we examine, the best Bunny codes with weight-6 stabilizers in periodic boundary conditions have a code rate approximately $3\times$ that of the toric code; when converted to open boundary conditions, they retain an approximately $2\times$ code rate advantage over the rotated surface code. In circuit-level simulation, we find that some Bunny codes exhibit logical error rates an order of magnitude lower than toric codes with comparable code rates. Our results demonstrate that high-performance quantum error correction can be achieved using an expanded gate set rather than long-range couplers, thereby significantly reducing hardware complexity.

quant-pharXiv:2606.22853•Jun 23, 2026•0 citations

Minimum Weight Perfect Matching Decoder for a Non-Orientable Stabilizer Code: Antipodal Shortcut and Hardware Validation

Leonardo Roma

We present the first minimum weight perfect matching (MWPM) decoder designed for a non-orientable stabilizer code: the Klein bottle quantum error-correcting code. The decoder incorporates an antipodal shortcut: in the Klein bottle code, the non-orientable boundary identification connects two syndrome qubits via a single edge, giving them defect-graph distance 1 rather than the toric Manhattan distance of 4. A standard toric MWPM decoder fails on 25% of single-qubit errors (the four vertical edges on the non-orientable boundary); the Klein decoder corrects all 64 single-qubit errors across all four logical sectors analytically. Hardware validation on IBM Fez (Heron r2, 156 qubits) confirms 6/6 correction scenarios at Z = 688–730σ, including both antipodal-edge scenarios. Multi-session reproducibility across six calibration sessions and double-error logical fidelity (98.57% single-error, one identified degenerate pair at f = 0.51%) are reported in the appendix. This is the fifth paper in a series on the experimental characterisation of the Klein bottle stabilizer code on superconducting quantum hardware. Companion papers: Paper 1: Code existence, GSD=4, kill test Z=691σ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19284050 Paper 2: δ-family, topological parameter encoding https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19286677 Paper 3: Non-orientable logical algebra, holonomy https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19287977 Paper 4: Six Simultaneous Non-Orientable Stabilizer Codes https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19333513

•Apr 7, 2026•0 citations

Experimental Realization of the Klein Bottle Stabilizer Code on a Superconducting Processor

Leonardo Roma

Comprehensive experimental account of non-orientable stabilizer codes on superconducting quantum hardware. This work consolidates and extends a five-paper series on the Klein bottle stabilizer code, and reports the first experimental realisation of the real projective plane (RP²) stabilizer code. Key results: Klein bottle code confirmed at distances d=2,3,4 with a working MWPM decoder (antipodal shortcut, 6/6 hardware validation at Z=688–730σ); transversal Clifford group with O(1) gate overhead; 12 logical qubits on 156 physical qubits at CV=0.01; δ-family confirmed at d=2,3,4. RP² 4×4 code: both boundary twists confirmed simultaneously (266–571σ, zero noise bits in dominant), logical qubit verified with Z_L contrast 0.885, GSD=2 confirmed. Transversal T^⊗32 ruled out analytically; code deformation identified as the open problem. Raw syndrome count data for all experiments available at https://github.com/theoricline/klein-bottle-qec/data Paper 1: Code existence, GSD=4, kill test Z=691σ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19284050 Paper 2: δ-family, topological parameter encoding https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19286677 Paper 3: Non-orientable logical algebra, holonomy https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19287977 Paper 4: Six Simultaneous Non-Orientable Stabilizer Codes https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19333513 Paper 5: MWPM Decoder for a Non-Orientable Stabilizer Code https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19451825

•Apr 7, 2026•0 citations
This upload contains the manuscript, LaTeX source, and Python code for the paper: "Non-Orientable Topology in a Stabilizer Circuit: Experimental Demonstration of a Klein Bottle Quantum Error-Correcting Code" We report the first experimental implementation of a Klein bottle stabilizer code on superconducting quantum hardware. The code achieves a 138× enhancement of the predicted antipodal syndrome signature (44.2% frequency, Z=499σ) on IBM Fez, confirmed on three independent processors (IBM Fez, Marrakesh, Torino) and in four simultaneous parallel code instances. The code uses 25% fewer physical qubits than the square toric code at equivalent code distance. The Python code implements the Klein bottle stabilizer code on a 4×2 lattice, reproduces the antipodal signature from the initial 26.3% to the optimised 44.2%, and includes hardware verification across three processors and MWPM logical error rate simulation. All hardware job IDs are provided in the README for independent reproducibility. Contents: paper.pdf — manuscript latex/ — LaTeX source and figures code/ — Python scripts (circuit builder, verification, simulation) README.md — instructions and complete hardware job ID table All hardware experiments were performed on IBM Fez (Heron r2, 156 qubits) via IBM Quantum Runtime. The code is released under MIT license; the manuscript under CC BY 4.0.
The first experimental implementation of a non-orientable stabilizer code on quantum hardware. We encode the boundary conditions of a Klein bottle onto the 156-qubit IBM Fez processor and measure a 138× enhancement of the predicted antipodal syndrome signature (44.2% frequency, Z=499σ). The code uses 25% fewer physical qubits than the square toric code at equivalent code distance. Key results confirmed on hardware: Result Value Best antipodal frequency 44.2% (seed=77, depth=112) Best enhancement over toric 138× Best Z-score 499σ Orientation-even sectors 13% fewer syndrome violations Orientation-odd sectors 26% more syndrome violations Logical error rate (MWPM) K/T ≈ 1.0 (equivalent to toric) Qubit efficiency 24 vs 32 qubits (25% reduction vs square toric d=4) Processors confirmed IBM Fez, Marrakesh, Torino Parallel codes on 156q chip 4 simultaneous (Z=404–721σ each) Author: Leonardo Roma, Independent Researcher, Ceccano, ItalyDate: March 2026Live demo: kleincode.pythonanywhere.com Additional verification Topology kill test (job d73rfc4vllmc73ansvk0) Klein circuit (prep edge v(3,1)) produced 10000001 at 47.99% while an identical Fake Klein (one edge changed) produced 0.39% — 122.8× enhancement at Z=691σ. The Fake Klein produced its own predicted pattern 10001000 at 33.39%, proving topology determines where the signal lands, not hardware resonance. Holonomy — non-orientable algebra (job d73rqh5koquc73e22ni0) Dynamic circuit test (mid-circuit reset). B-cycle gate applied to a-anyon sector, syndrome measured in a second round. Klein: 10000010 at 11.79%, Z=90σ. Toric: 10001011 at 22.96%, Z=272σ. Cross-contamination < 1.2%. Confirms b-cycle has non-trivial action on a-cycle — the algebraic signature of non-orientable topology. All hardware experiments performed on IBM Fez (Heron r2, 156 qubits) via IBM Quantum Runtime. Code: MIT license. Paper: CC BY 4.0.
We demonstrate that the logical operator algebra of the Klein bottle stabilizer code is non-orientable, confirming that the code encodes non-orientable topology at the level of the logical Hilbert space, not merely at the level of the stabilizer construction. Using dynamic circuits with mid-circuit reset on IBM Fez (Heron r2, 156 qubits), we apply the b-cycle logical gate X_L2 to each of the four logical sectors and measure the resulting syndrome in a second round. The Klein code produces different sector transitions than the toric code under the identical gate, confirming that X_L2 anticommutes with Z_L1 in Klein but commutes in the toric code. No orientable stabilizer code can produce this result. Key results: Sector Job ID Klein R2 Z Toric R2 Z |10>_L (holonomy) d73rqh5koquc73e22ni0 10000010 at 11.79% 90σ 10001011 at 22.96% 272σ |00>_L d73u5ttkoquc73e251eg 10000001 at 13.9% 99σ 10001000 at 21.9% 312σ |10>_L d73u5ttkoquc73e251eg 10000010 at 12.7% 105σ 10001011 at 18.0% 230σ |01>_L d73u5ttkoquc73e251eg 10001000 at 11.9% 45σ 10000001 at 16.0% 70σ |11>_L d73u854vllmc73anvom0 dominant confirmed — dominant confirmed — All dominant patterns match theoretical predictions exactly. Cross-contamination below 1.2% in all cases. The transition table: Klein: |00> ↔ |11>, |10> ↔ |01> (X_L2 flips BOTH Z_L1 and Z_L2) Toric: |00> ↔ |01>, |10> ↔ |11> (X_L2 flips ONLY Z_L2) The two holonomy maps act on different sector pairs, the non-orientable twist permutes the logical sector labels relative to the orientable case. This is the third in a series of three papers establishing complete experimental characterisation of the Klein bottle stabilizer code: Paper 1 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19284050): Code exists on hardware, GSD=4, kill test Z=691σ Paper 2 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.19286677): Boundary parameter δ is tunable, Z=316–606σ Paper 3 (this paper): Logical algebra is non-orientable, Z=45–312σ Live demo: https://kleincode.pythonanywhere.com Paper 1: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19284050 Paper 2: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19286677 All hardware experiments performed on IBM Fez (Heron r2, 156 qubits) via IBM Quantum Runtime. Code: MIT license. Paper: CC BY 4.0.
This upload contains the manuscript, LaTeX source, and figures for the second paper in the Klein Bottle QEC series. Research Overview We introduce a one-parameter family of Klein bottle stabilizer codes C(δ) defined by shifting the orientation-reversing boundary identification of an Lx × Ly lattice. Although all members share identical topology (Klein bottle, GSD=4), each produces a distinct and theoretically predictable syndrome fingerprint P(δ) when a topological excitation is prepared. Key Results We verify all four fingerprints of the Lx=4, Ly=2 family on the 156-qubit IBM Fez processor (Heron r2), with statistical significance Z = 316–606σ (job d71582469uic73cl1q5g, 8192 shots each). Topological Protection The encoding map δ → P(δ) is injective and robust under noise. Because δ is embedded in the circuit topology rather than the quantum state, local errors cannot corrupt the parameter directly. Misidentifying δ requires ≥ d simultaneous errors, providing a misidentification probability scaling as pᵈ (where d=4) versus p¹ for standard gate-encoded parameters. Contents paper.pdf – Full manuscript paper.tex – LaTeX source (self-contained) fig_delta_lattice.pdf – Lattice diagrams and fingerprint encoding maps fig_delta_fingerprints.pdf – Hardware results: pattern frequencies and Z-scores fig_delta_depth.pdf – Signal strength vs. circuit depth analysis README.md – Detailed job IDs, API instructions, and reproduction notes Related Resources Paper 1 (Discovery): doi:10.5281/zenodo.19202945 Live API: https://kleincode.pythonanywhere.com GitHub: https://github.com/theoricline/klein-bottle-qec License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Drawing on advances in superconducting qubit control schemes that unlock enriched native gate sets at the hardware level, we systematically examine how harnessing this enlarged physical two-qubit gate pool---specifically CNOT and CXSWAP---streamlines syndrome extraction for certain qLDPC codes with nonlocal stabilizers. Through an exhaustive search, we discover a set of qLDPC codes with various stabilizer weights and distances that can be implemented on the two-dimensional nearest-neighbor qubit connectivity native to superconducting hardware while achieving performance equivalent to that of the direct CNOT implementation requiring long-range interactions. We refer to those codes as Bunny codes. Across all code distances we examine, the best Bunny codes with weight-6 stabilizers in periodic boundary conditions have a code rate approximately 3×3\times3× that of the toric code; when converted to open boundary conditions, they retain an approximately 2×2\times2× code rate advantage over the rotated surface code. In circuit-level simulation, we find that some Bunny codes exhibit logical error rates an order of magnitude lower than toric codes with comparable code rates. Our results demonstrate that high-performance quantum error correction can be achieved using an expanded gate set rather than long-range couplers, thereby significantly reducing hardware complexity.
We present the first minimum weight perfect matching (MWPM) decoder designed for a non-orientable stabilizer code: the Klein bottle quantum error-correcting code. The decoder incorporates an antipodal shortcut: in the Klein bottle code, the non-orientable boundary identification connects two syndrome qubits via a single edge, giving them defect-graph distance 1 rather than the toric Manhattan distance of 4. A standard toric MWPM decoder fails on 25% of single-qubit errors (the four vertical edges on the non-orientable boundary); the Klein decoder corrects all 64 single-qubit errors across all four logical sectors analytically. Hardware validation on IBM Fez (Heron r2, 156 qubits) confirms 6/6 correction scenarios at Z = 688–730σ, including both antipodal-edge scenarios. Multi-session reproducibility across six calibration sessions and double-error logical fidelity (98.57% single-error, one identified degenerate pair at f = 0.51%) are reported in the appendix. This is the fifth paper in a series on the experimental characterisation of the Klein bottle stabilizer code on superconducting quantum hardware. Companion papers: Paper 1: Code existence, GSD=4, kill test Z=691σ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19284050 Paper 2: δ-family, topological parameter encoding https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19286677 Paper 3: Non-orientable logical algebra, holonomy https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19287977 Paper 4: Six Simultaneous Non-Orientable Stabilizer Codes https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19333513
Comprehensive experimental account of non-orientable stabilizer codes on superconducting quantum hardware. This work consolidates and extends a five-paper series on the Klein bottle stabilizer code, and reports the first experimental realisation of the real projective plane (RP²) stabilizer code. Key results: Klein bottle code confirmed at distances d=2,3,4 with a working MWPM decoder (antipodal shortcut, 6/6 hardware validation at Z=688–730σ); transversal Clifford group with O(1) gate overhead; 12 logical qubits on 156 physical qubits at CV=0.01; δ-family confirmed at d=2,3,4. RP² 4×4 code: both boundary twists confirmed simultaneously (266–571σ, zero noise bits in dominant), logical qubit verified with Z_L contrast 0.885, GSD=2 confirmed. Transversal T^⊗32 ruled out analytically; code deformation identified as the open problem. Raw syndrome count data for all experiments available at https://github.com/theoricline/klein-bottle-qec/data Paper 1: Code existence, GSD=4, kill test Z=691σ https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19284050 Paper 2: δ-family, topological parameter encoding https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19286677 Paper 3: Non-orientable logical algebra, holonomy https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19287977 Paper 4: Six Simultaneous Non-Orientable Stabilizer Codes https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19333513 Paper 5: MWPM Decoder for a Non-Orientable Stabilizer Code https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19451825