Chapter 8 : Statistical measurements in C∗-algebraic formulation

シロウイシカワ, Shiro Ishikawa, 史郎石川

Published Jan 1, 2006• 0 citations

Abstract

8.1 Statistical measurements (C∗-algebraic formulation) 8.2 General statistical system (Example) 8.3 Bayes theorem in statistical MT 8.4 Kalman filter in noise 8.5 Information and entropy 8.6 Belief measurement theory (=BMT) 8.7 Appendix (Bertrand's paradox)

Related papers

Chapter 9 : Statistical measurements in W∗-algebraic formulation

シロウイシカワ, Shiro Ishikawa, 史郎石川

9.1 Statistical measurements (W∗-algebraic formulation) 9.2 The relation among systems (Proclaimʷ∗2 in SMTʷ∗) 9.3 Quantum mechanics in B(L²(R)) 9.4 The method of moments 9.5 Principal components analysis in MT

Jan 1, 20060 citations

Chapter 8 : Statistical measurements in C∗-algebraic formulation

史郎石川

Jan 1, 20060 citations

Chapter 9 : Statistical measurements in W∗-algebraic formulation

史郎石川

Jan 1, 20060 citations

Mathematical foundations of measurement theory = 測定理論の数学的基礎

史郎石川

ＴｈｅｐｈｉｌｏｓｏｐｈｙｏｆｍｅａｓｕｒｅｍｅｎｔｔｈｅｏｒｙＭｅａｓｕｒｅｍｅｎｔｓ（Ａｘｉｏｍ１）Ｔｈｅｒｅｌａｔｉｏｎａｍｏｎｇｓｙｓｔｅｍｓ（Ａｘｉｏｍ２）Ｂｏｌｔｚｍａｎｎ’ｓｅｑｕｉｌｉｂｒｉｕｍｓｔａｔｉｓｔｉｃａｌｍｅｃｈａｎｉｃｓＦｉｓｈｅｒ’ｓｓｔａｔｉｓｔｉｃｓＩ（ｕｎｄｅｒＡｘｉｏｍ１）Ｆｉｓｈｅｒ’ｓｓｔａｔｉｓｔｉｃｓＩＩ（ｒｅｌａｔｅｄｔｏＡｘｉｏｍｓ１ａｎｄ２）ＰｒａｃｔｉｃａｌｌｏｇｉｃＳｔａｔｉｓｔｉｃａｌｍｅａｓｕｒｅｍｅｎｔｓｉｎＣ＊‐ａｌｇｅｂｒａｉｃｆｏｒｍｕｌａｔｉｏｎＳｔａｔｉｓｔｉｃａｌｍｅａｓｕｒｅｍｅｎｔｓｉｎＷ＊‐ａｌｇｅｂｒａｉｃｆｏｒｍｕｌａｔｉｏｎＮｅｗｔｏｎｉａｎｍｅｃｈａｎｉｃｓｉｎｍｅａｓｕｒｅｍｅｎｔＴｈｅｏｒｙＭｅａｓｕｒｅｍｅｎｔｅｒｒｏｒＨｅｉｓｅｎｂｅｒｇ’ｓｕｎｃｅｒｔａｉｎｔｙｒｅｌａｔｉｏｎ

Jan 1, 20060 citations

Kalman filter in quantum language

Shiro Ishikawa, Kohshi Kikuchi

Recently, we proposed measurement theory ( or. quantum language) as a linguistic turn of quantum mechanics (with the Copenhagen interpretation). This theory has a great power of scientific descriptions. In fact, we have continued asserting that even statistics can be described in terms of measurement theory. Thus, we believe that quantum language is future statistics (i.e., statistics will develop into quantum language). However, now we think that our arguments were too abstract and philosophical, that is, we should have presented concrete examples much more. Thus, in this paper, we show that the calculation of Kalman filter is more understandable in terms of quantum language than in terms of usual statistics. For this, we devote ourselves to statistical measurement theory, in which the Bertrand paradox is discussed.

arXiv:1404.2664Apr 10, 20143 citations

Toward an Interpretation-Free Formulation of Quantum Theory: Fisher Statistics, Bayesian Statistics, Kalman Filtering, and Wigner's Friend in Observable System Theory

Shiro Ishikawa

I have proposed OST (Observable System Theory) as a foundational theory of system theory.3 This theory adopts two principles, namely, the Born principle and the Causal principle, and furthermore explicitly uses the one-shot measurement principle as a rule of use. OST is one of the most fundamental scientific theories, alongside mathematics and physics, and it can provide a unified framework for discussing quantum mechanics (information), statistics (system theory), practical logic, epistemology (philosophy), statistical mechanics, and so on.In this paper, I clarify that Fisherian statistics, Bayesian statistics, and quantum mechanics share a common mathematical foundation, namely OST. In statistics, an OST-based understanding of the Kalman filter is presented. Moreover, the so-called “interpretation problem” of quantum mechanics after measurement is unnecessary, and the “Wigner’s friend paradox” is resolved within OST. In addition, the FR paradox (= Frauchiger–Renner paradox) is understood as a paradox arising from the violation of the one-shot measurement principle, and thus it suggests the validity of OST. Through these discussions, I claim the following two points:(i) OST-based statistics will, in the future, become the standard understanding of statistics.(ii) OST-based quantum mechanics is the final form of von Neumann-style quantum mechanics

May 1, 20260 citations