Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Dynamical signatures of quantum phase transitions for excited states

Jakub Dolejší

Published Jan 1, 2020• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Dynamical signatures of quantum phase transitions for excited states Jakub Dolejší Abstract We study the impact of quantum phase transitions (QPTs) and excited- state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) on the validity of the adiabatic approximation for a slowly varying Hamiltonian. We compare two cases, when the initial state is the ground state of the initial Hamiltonian and when the initial state is a statistical mixture of excited states induced by a finite temperature. We use the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model of a spin lattice and obtain an abruptly decreasing scaling law of the ground-state population with a growing system size N. We comment on the justifiability of using the Landau-Zener formula to make a quantitative prediction in the case of a first-order and a second-order QPT. To achieve a truly adiabatic evolution in the thermodynamic limit, one would need to perform the Hamiltonian change during an impossibly long time period. It is possible, however, to obtain the same adiabatic final state in a given finite time period by inducing the quantum evolution with another Hamiltonian specifically devised for this purpose, thus employing the so called adiabatic shortcut. We verify the validity of adiabatic shortcuts in the presence of QPTs and ESQPTs and study the costs of performing such adiabatic...

Related papers

Excited-state quantum phase transitions in many-body systems with infinite-range interaction: Localization, dynamics, and bifurcation

Léa Ferreira dos Santos, Marco Távora, Francisco Pérez-Bernal

Excited-state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) are generalizations of quantum phase transitions to excited levels. They are associated with local divergences in the density of states. Here, we investigate how the presence of an ESQPT can be detected from the analysis of the structure of the Hamiltonian matrix, the level of localization of the eigenstates, the onset of bifurcation, and the speed of the system evolution. Our findings are illustrated for a Hamiltonian with infinite-range Ising interaction in a transverse field. This is a version of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model and the limiting case of the one-dimensional spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ system with tunable interactions realized with ion traps. From our studies for the dynamics, we uncover similarities between the LMG and the noninteracting XX models.

arXiv:1604.04289•Physical Review A•Jul 20, 2016•94 citations

Excited-state quantum phase transitions in the anharmonic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model: Static aspects

J. Gamito, Jamil Khalouf-Rivera, J. M. Arias +2 more

The basic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model displays a second-order ground-state quantum phase transition and an excited-state quantum phase transition (ESQPT). The inclusion of an anharmonic term in the Hamiltonian implies a second ESQPT of a different nature. We characterize this ESQPT using the mean field limit of the model. The alternative ESQPT, associated with the changes in the boundary of the finite Hilbert space of the system, can be properly described using the order parameter of the ground-state quantum phase transition, the energy gap between adjacent states, the participation ratio, and the quantum fidelity susceptibility.

arXiv:2202.11413•Physical review. E•Oct 17, 2022•17 citations

Excited-state quantum phase transitions and periodic dynamics

Georg Engelhardt, V. M. Bastidas, Wassilij Kopylov +1 more

We investigate signatures of the excited-state quantum phase transition in the periodic dynamics of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model and the Tavis-Cummings model. In the thermodynamic limit, expectation values of observables in eigenstates of the system can be calculated using classical trajectories. Motivated by this, we suggest a method based on the time evolution of the finite-size system to find singularities in observables, which arise due to the excited-state quantum phase transition.

arXiv:1405.3514•Physical Review A•Jan 30, 2015•47 citations

Signatures of the excited-state quantum phase transition in the periodic dynamics of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model

Georg Engelhardt, V. M. Bastidas, Tobias Brandes

We investigate signatures of the excited-state quantum phase transition in the periodic dynamics of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model. With this aim, we use the semiclassical trajectories to calculate quantum mechanical quantities such as the density of states and expectation values of observables in eigenstates of the system. Motivated by this approach, we suggest an experimental protocol, based on the time evolution of the finite-size system, to find singularities in observables, which arise due to the excited-state quantum phase transition. We also discuss the influence of the participation ratio on the deviations of the quantum mechanical finite-size time evolution from the classical one.

•May 14, 2014•0 citations

Effects of excited state quantum phase transitions on system dynamics

Francisco Pérez-Bernal, Léa Ferreira dos Santos

This work is concerned with the excited state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) defined in Ann. Phys. 323, 1106 (2008). In many‐body models that exhibit such transitions, the ground state quantum phase transition (QPT) occurs in parallel with a singularity in the energy spectrum that propagates to higher energies as the control parameter increases beyond the QPT critical point. The analysis of the spectrum has been a main tool for the detection of these ESQPTs. Studies of the effects of this transition on the system dynamics are more limited. Here, we extend our previous works and show that the evolution of an initial state with energy close to the ESQPT critical point may be extremely slow. This result is surprising, because it may take place in systems with long‐range interactions, where the dynamics is usually expected to be very fast. A timely example is the one‐dimensional spin‐1/2 model with infinite‐range Ising interaction studied in experiments with ion traps. Its Hamiltonian has a U(2) algebraic structure. More generally, the slow dynamics described here occurs in two‐level bosonic or fermionic models with pairing interactions and a Hamiltonian exhibiting a QPT between its limiting and dynamical symmetries. In this work, we compare the results for , and 3.

arXiv:1604.06851•Fortschritte der Physik•Jun 23, 2016•36 citations

Excited-state quantum phase transitions in the anharmonic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model: Dynamical aspects

Jamil Khalouf-Rivera, J. Gamito, Francisco Pérez-Bernal +2 more

The standard Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model undergoes a second-order ground-state quantum phase transition (QPT) and an excited-state quantum phase transition (ESQPT). The inclusion of an anharmonic term in the LMG Hamiltonian gives rise to a second ESQPT that alters the static properties of the model [Gamito et al., Phys. Rev. E 106, 044125 (2022)2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.106.044125]. In the present work, the dynamical implications associated to this new ESQPT are analyzed. For that purpose, a quantum quench protocol is defined on the system Hamiltonian that takes an initial state, usually the ground state, into a complex excited state that evolves on time. The impact of the new ESQPT on the time evolution of the survival probability and the local density of states after the quantum quench, as well as on the Loschmidt echoes and the microcanonical out-of-time-order correlator (OTOC) are discussed. The anharmonity-induced ESQPT, despite having a different physical origin, has dynamical consequences similar to those observed in the ESQPT already present in the standard LMG model.

arXiv:2207.04489•Physical review. E•Jun 26, 2023•8 citations
Dynamical signatures of quantum phase transitions for excited states Jakub Dolejší Abstract We study the impact of quantum phase transitions (QPTs) and excited- state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) on the validity of the adiabatic approximation for a slowly varying Hamiltonian. We compare two cases, when the initial state is the ground state of the initial Hamiltonian and when the initial state is a statistical mixture of excited states induced by a finite temperature. We use the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model of a spin lattice and obtain an abruptly decreasing scaling law of the ground-state population with a growing system size N. We comment on the justifiability of using the Landau-Zener formula to make a quantitative prediction in the case of a first-order and a second-order QPT. To achieve a truly adiabatic evolution in the thermodynamic limit, one would need to perform the Hamiltonian change during an impossibly long time period. It is possible, however, to obtain the same adiabatic final state in a given finite time period by inducing the quantum evolution with another Hamiltonian specifically devised for this purpose, thus employing the so called adiabatic shortcut. We verify the validity of adiabatic shortcuts in the presence of QPTs and ESQPTs and study the costs of performing such adiabatic...
Excited-state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) are generalizations of quantum phase transitions to excited levels. They are associated with local divergences in the density of states. Here, we investigate how the presence of an ESQPT can be detected from the analysis of the structure of the Hamiltonian matrix, the level of localization of the eigenstates, the onset of bifurcation, and the speed of the system evolution. Our findings are illustrated for a Hamiltonian with infinite-range Ising interaction in a transverse field. This is a version of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model and the limiting case of the one-dimensional spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ system with tunable interactions realized with ion traps. From our studies for the dynamics, we uncover similarities between the LMG and the noninteracting XX models.
The basic Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model displays a second-order ground-state quantum phase transition and an excited-state quantum phase transition (ESQPT). The inclusion of an anharmonic term in the Hamiltonian implies a second ESQPT of a different nature. We characterize this ESQPT using the mean field limit of the model. The alternative ESQPT, associated with the changes in the boundary of the finite Hilbert space of the system, can be properly described using the order parameter of the ground-state quantum phase transition, the energy gap between adjacent states, the participation ratio, and the quantum fidelity susceptibility.
We investigate signatures of the excited-state quantum phase transition in the periodic dynamics of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model. With this aim, we use the semiclassical trajectories to calculate quantum mechanical quantities such as the density of states and expectation values of observables in eigenstates of the system. Motivated by this approach, we suggest an experimental protocol, based on the time evolution of the finite-size system, to find singularities in observables, which arise due to the excited-state quantum phase transition. We also discuss the influence of the participation ratio on the deviations of the quantum mechanical finite-size time evolution from the classical one.
This work is concerned with the excited state quantum phase transitions (ESQPTs) defined in Ann. Phys. 323, 1106 (2008). In many‐body models that exhibit such transitions, the ground state quantum phase transition (QPT) occurs in parallel with a singularity in the energy spectrum that propagates to higher energies as the control parameter increases beyond the QPT critical point. The analysis of the spectrum has been a main tool for the detection of these ESQPTs. Studies of the effects of this transition on the system dynamics are more limited. Here, we extend our previous works and show that the evolution of an initial state with energy close to the ESQPT critical point may be extremely slow. This result is surprising, because it may take place in systems with long‐range interactions, where the dynamics is usually expected to be very fast. A timely example is the one‐dimensional spin‐1/2 model with infinite‐range Ising interaction studied in experiments with ion traps. Its Hamiltonian has a U(2) algebraic structure. More generally, the slow dynamics described here occurs in two‐level bosonic or fermionic models with pairing interactions and a Hamiltonian exhibiting a QPT between its limiting and dynamical symmetries. In this work, we compare the results for , and 3.
The standard Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) model undergoes a second-order ground-state quantum phase transition (QPT) and an excited-state quantum phase transition (ESQPT). The inclusion of an anharmonic term in the LMG Hamiltonian gives rise to a second ESQPT that alters the static properties of the model [Gamito et al., Phys. Rev. E 106, 044125 (2022)2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.106.044125]. In the present work, the dynamical implications associated to this new ESQPT are analyzed. For that purpose, a quantum quench protocol is defined on the system Hamiltonian that takes an initial state, usually the ground state, into a complex excited state that evolves on time. The impact of the new ESQPT on the time evolution of the survival probability and the local density of states after the quantum quench, as well as on the Loschmidt echoes and the microcanonical out-of-time-order correlator (OTOC) are discussed. The anharmonity-induced ESQPT, despite having a different physical origin, has dynamical consequences similar to those observed in the ESQPT already present in the standard LMG model.