Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Phase Compatibility Principle A Structural Condition for Coherent Interaction Between Dynamical Systems

Jonatan P. camargo

Published Mar 14, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We investigate the minimal conditions under which two independent dynamical evolutions can remain in stable coherent interaction. The starting point is the existence of a scalar accumulative quantity \(S[\gamma]\) associated with each admissible evolution, together with the possibility of ordering this evolution by a monotonic parameter. From these hypotheses, the dynamical phase is introduced through the relation \[ \phi=\frac{S}{\hbar}, \] and it is shown that the observable interferential coherence between two evolutions depends exclusively on the phase difference \[ \Delta\phi(t)=\phi_A(t)-\phi_B(t). \] The analysis of the superposition of two complex amplitudes leads to the necessary and sufficient condition for maximum constructive interference, \[ \Delta\phi=2\pi n \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \Delta S=2\pi n\,\hbar, \qquad n\in\mathbb Z, \] which arises directly from the periodic structure of the phase and is not introduced as an independent postulate. Then, under the regularity hypothesis \(\Delta S\in C^1(I)\), it is demonstrated that non-degenerate zeros of the function \[ f_n(t)=\Delta S(t)-2\pi n\,\hbar \] are isolated. As a consequence, the central result of the work is established: if the accumulated action difference is not constant in an open interval, then exact phase compatibility between two evolutions cannot persist continuously in that interval. In particular, under the hypothesis of local non-degeneracy, the instants in which \[ \Delta S(t)=2\pi n\,\hbar \] form a discrete set. This result allows formulating the \emph{Phase Compatibility Principle}: stable coherent interaction between dynamical systems requires continuous accumulated phase compatibility. When phase accumulation rates differ, exact compatibility cannot be maintained continuously and occurs only at episodic instants. A minimal relativistic application shows that this structure includes, as a particular case, evolutions whose phases are controlled by proper time, \[ \phi=-\frac{mc^2}{\hbar}\tau, \] so that differences between proper time rates induce phase rate divergences and, consequently, episodic compatibilities. The obtained result establishes, therefore, a structural constraint on the coherence between independent evolutions: the spatio-temporal coexistence of two systems does not imply, by itself, dynamical compatibility. The relevant criterion is the compatibility of their accumulated phases throughout the evolution. The present work does not derive lattice operators, Laplacian structures, mass spectra, specific Lagrangian forms, or spacetime ontologies; it only demonstrates the minimal interferential constraint that governs the possibility of continuous coherence between dynamical evolutions.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.19013590

Related papers

Coherent Interaction and Phase Compatibility: An Application of the Phase Compatibility Principle to Electromagnetic Beam Crossing

Jonatan P. camargo

In this work, we apply the Phase Compatibility Principle, established in \cite{04283}, to the problem of the spatial crossing of two dynamical systems with distinct phase rates. The starting point is the existence of an accumulated action \(S[\gamma]\) associated with each admissible evolution and the definition of the dynamical phase by \[ \phi=\frac{S}{\hbar}. \] Exact compatibility between two evolutions \(A\) and \(B\) is then characterized by the condition \[ \Delta\phi(t)=2\pi n \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \Delta S(t)=2\pi n\hbar, \qquad n\in\mathbb Z. \] Based on this framework, we distinguish two logically independent domains: the geometric domain of spatial coincidence, \[ E_{\mathrm{esp}}=\{\,t:\mathbf r_A(t)=\mathbf r_B(t)\,\}, \] and the interferential domain of phase compatibility, \[ E_{\phi}=\{\,t:\Delta S(t)=2\pi n\hbar,\ n\in\mathbb Z\,\}. \] The coherent interaction set is then defined by \[ E_{\mathrm{int}}=E_{\mathrm{esp}}\cap E_{\phi}. \] Thus, it is shown that spatial coincidence is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for exact coherent interaction. In the elementary kinematic case of two linear phases, \[ \phi_A(t)=\omega_A t+\phi_{A0}, \qquad \phi_B(t)=\omega_B t+\phi_{B0}, \] we obtain \[ \Delta\phi(t)=(\omega_A-\omega_B)t+\Delta\phi_0, \] so that, for \(\omega_A\neq\omega_B\), the instants of compatibility are given by \[ t_n=\frac{2\pi n-\Delta\phi_0}{\omega_A-\omega_B}, \] forming a discrete set. Consequently, an arbitrary instant of spatial crossing \(t_0\in E_{\mathrm{esp}}\) does not generically belong to \(E_{\phi}\), and therefore does not generically belong to \(E_{\mathrm{int}}\). A minimal relativistic realization is also presented, based on the action \[ S=-mc^2\tau, \] which yields \[ \phi=-\frac{mc^2}{\hbar}\tau. \] For two systems with distinct proper times, the phase difference is \[ \Delta\phi=\frac{mc^2}{\hbar}(\tau_B-\tau_A), \] and the inequality between the proper time rates implies a difference between phase rates, reestablishing the episodic character of compatibility. Finally, an operational extension of finite resolution is introduced, in which an interferential tolerance \(\delta\phi>0\) defines effective causal windows of width \[ \Delta t_{\mathrm{porta}}=\frac{2\delta\phi}{|\omega_A-\omega_B|}, \] showing that, in the limit of large spectral separation, the coincidence between spatial crossing and effective compatibility becomes progressively rarer. The central result of the article can be synthesized by the implication \[ \text{spatial coincidence} \not\Rightarrow \text{coherent interaction}. \] The work does not intend to derive Bose--Einstein statistics, replace quantum electrodynamics, or construct a complete theory of photon--photon scattering. Its result is more restricted and more precise: it establishes, as a physical application of the Phase Compatibility Principle, that exact coherent interaction between two systems requires not only geometric coincidence but also belonging to the phase compatibility set.

•Mar 14, 2026•0 citations

Electromagnetic Time and Frequency in Hz as the Rate of Action Accumulation: A Variational Derivation of Coherent Communication Between Systems

Jonatan P. camargo

The description of physical phenomena in terms of frequency in Hz is operationally central in electromagnetic and interferential contexts, but it is usually introduced as a primitive quantity, without explicit derivation from the variational structure of dynamics. In contrast, formulations based on the action principle establish that the fundamental quantity associated with physical evolution is the accumulated action $S$, and that interferential observables depend on differences of this quantity through phases of the form $\phi = S/\hbar$. In this work, we establish, starting from minimal variational hypotheses and without introducing ad hoc structures, the direct connection between action, phase, and observable frequency. It is shown that frequency in cycles per second is not an independent quantity, but the rate of action accumulation converted into cycles: \[ f = \frac{1}{2\pi\hbar}\dot S. \] From this identification, it is demonstrated that the coherent interaction between two physical systems is governed by the difference between their rates of action accumulation, leading to the definition of a coherent communication frequency \[ f_{\mathrm{com}} = \frac{1}{2\pi\hbar}|\dot S_A - \dot S_B|. \] As a consequence, it is shown that interferential compatibility between systems is not, in general, continuous, but occurs at discrete instants determined by phase conditions. Temporal discretization emerges, therefore, as an operational property associated with the dynamics of action, without the need to postulate a fundamental granularity of time. The results obtained do not introduce new dynamical principles nor do they modify established equations; they make explicit a structural relationship already implicit in the variational formulation: frequency in Hz as the operational manifestation of the rate of action accumulation, and physical communication as a phenomenon governed by differences in this rate.

•Apr 11, 2026•0 citations

Action As a Fundamental Structure Dynamic Compatibility

Jonatan P. camargo

The possibility of distinct physical systems remaining dynamically compatible over time is often implicitly assumed in various areas of physics, from interferometric descriptions to clock comparisons and the analysis of composite systems. In this work, we show that such continuous compatibility is not a generic property but encounters a structural limitation that stems directly from the variational formulation of dynamics. Starting from only minimal hypotheses—the existence of an accumulative action, monotonic proper parametrizations, and operational dependence on action differences via factors $e^{iS/\hbar}$—we demonstrate that dynamically independent systems cannot maintain functional coincidence of their actions over open intervals, except under fine-tuning. Consequently, moments of compatibility form a necessarily discrete set, and any coherent coupling is effective only within a time scale determined by the difference between the rates of action accumulation. The result does not depend on a specific microscopic model, nor on dissipative, statistical, or environmental mechanisms, being consistent with classical mechanics, relativity, and quantum field theory. It is shown, in particular, that effects such as the loss of interferometric visibility associated with time dilation can be understood as physical realizations of a more general constraint: the structural incompatibility between evolutions parameterized by distinct actions. Thus, the so-called ``compatibility window'' does not constitute a new dynamic principle, but an inevitable consequence of the variational architecture common to established physical theories.

•Feb 16, 2026•0 citations

Structural Consequences of the Universal Action Principle. Global Phase, Action Constant, and Spectral Stability.

Jonatan P. camargo

Starting from only three ingredients: (i) variational formulation with cumulative action, (ii) interferential dependence on $S$, and (iii) PFu's episodic compatibility theorem, this paper assumes a single additional hypothesis of the universality of the action constant ($h$) and a minimal hypothesis of macroscopic stability, and derives mathematical consequences in an axiomatic and constructive manner, without introducing new fields, potentials, or \textit{ad hoc} phenomenological terms. Three main results are obtained. First, it is demonstrated that the existence of a universal action constant $h$ is a structural requirement for interferential consistency among multiple systems: the phase $\phi$ must be treated as a global structure, defined modulo $h$, common to all admissible processes. Second, it is shown that dynamic compatibility between systems can only occur at discrete events of phase coincidence, characterized by $\delta\phi = 0$; the observable dynamics are, therefore, reconstructible as sampling over a discrete sequence of compatibility events, whose density is proportional to the rate of variation of $S$ (abstract relativistic sampling theorem). Third, under hypotheses of invariance, extensivity, and coercivity, a global functional $\mathcal{I}$ is constructed that measures the compatibility stability of a configuration of systems, and it is proven that, in the infrared regime, it is equivalent to a quadratic spectral functional $Q = \langle \psi, \mathcal{A} \psi \rangle$, where $\mathcal{A}$ is a positive self-adjoint operator that encodes the compatibility structure. In the continuous limit, when $\mathcal{A}$ admits a realization as an effective elliptic operator and its spectrum is described by a spectral density $\rho(\lambda)$, the abstract functional $\mathcal{I}$ is rewritten as a geometric functional of the PESG type, but now interpreted as a consequence of universal action and episodic compatibility, rather than as an independent geometric principle.

•Feb 27, 2026•0 citations

Causal Filtering of the Action Phase and the Stroboscopic Synchronization Mesh

Jonatan P. camargo

This article investigates the structural role of spectral operators in the observation of phase compatibility events generated by the relativistic dynamics of accumulated action. The starting point of the work is the definition of the dynamical phase associated with an admissible evolution, \( \phi=S/\hbar \), and the condition of exact compatibility between two evolutions, \( \Delta S(t)=2\pi n\hbar \). When the action difference is not constant over an open interval, this condition implies that the compatibility instants form a discrete set. In the relativistic regime, the divergence between the proper times of the evolutions generates a phase difference that, under a uniform beat approximation, produces a discrete temporal mesh of synchronization instants. These events constitute the interferential compatibility domain \(E_\phi\), whose intersection with the geometric spatial coincidence domain \(E_{\mathrm{esp}}\) defines the set of observable coherent interactions. The present work analyzes how time-invariant linear operators act upon this structure. It is shown that a spectral operator with transfer function \( H(\omega)=|H(\omega)|e^{i\phi_C(\omega)} \) introduces a phase shift that rigidly translates the observed mesh of compatibility events. In formal terms, the filtered phase satisfies \( \Delta\phi'(t)=\Delta\phi(t)-\phi_C \), which leads to a shifted sequence of synchronization instants, without changing the spacing between consecutive events. In set-theoretic language, the filtered interferential domain \( E_\phi^{(H)} \) is obtained by uniform temporal translation of the set \(E_\phi\), and the corresponding domain of coherent interaction becomes \( E_{\mathrm{int}}^{(H)}=E_{\mathrm{esp}}\cap E_\phi^{(H)}. \) It follows that spectral operators do not modify the causal structure that generates the compatibility events; they merely alter the operational domain under which these events become observable. A complete physical example is provided by the RC circuit, whose transfer function \( H_C(s)=sRC/(1+sRC) \) introduces a phase \( \phi_C(\Omega)=\arctan(1/(\Omega RC)) \), producing an explicit temporal shift of the observed synchronization instants, dependent on the hardware parameters, but preserving the periodicity of the causal mesh. The main result of the article can be summarized as follows: spectral filtering acts as an operational selection mechanism of the phase compatibility events generated by the relativistic dynamics of the accumulated action. In condensed form, \[ \text{filtering} \;\Longrightarrow\; \text{operational selection of } E_\phi. \] The work therefore identifies a structural link between action theory, the discrete interferential synchronization mesh, and spectral operators from linear systems theory, showing that such operators can be interpreted as causal phase filters.

•Mar 17, 2026•0 citations

Spatial Geometry as a Projection of Action Phase Compatibility

Jonatan P. camargo

This work investigates the structural relationship between accumulated action, dynamic phase, and the geometry of trajectories in spacetime. Starting from the definition of the dynamic phase \[ \phi=\frac{S}{\hbar}, \] we consider the phase compatibility condition between two admissible evolutions, \[ \Delta S = 2\pi n\hbar, \qquad n\in\mathbb Z, \] established in previous works as a criterion of interferential compatibility between dynamical systems. It is shown that this condition cannot be analyzed independently of the geometry of the trajectories, as the accumulated action is a functional of the path in spacetime. In the variational form, \[ S=\int L(x,\dot x,t)\,dt, \] the action depends on the trajectory in the configuration space; in the minimal relativistic realization, \[ S=-mc^2\tau, \] the accumulated phase is proportional to the proper time and, therefore, to the geometry of the worldline; and, in the canonical form, \[ S=\int (p\cdot dx-H\,dt), \] the action simultaneously incorporates spatial and temporal contributions. From these structures, it is demonstrated that the possibility of phase compatibility between two evolutions depends on the compared geometry of their trajectories. In particular, the relevant geometric structure for the interaction between systems can be interpreted as a projection of the phase compatibility of the accumulated action. It is also shown that the canonical form of the action leads, under the assumption of local differentiability of \(S(x,t)\), to the identities \[ p=\nabla S, \qquad H=-\partial_t S, \] which constitute the differential structure of the Hamilton--Jacobi equation, thus establishing a direct connection between the global interferential condition on the action and the local form of variational dynamics. The obtained result does not aim to replace general relativity nor to fully derive classical or quantum dynamics. Its objective is more restricted: to identify the minimal structural relationship between accumulated action, dynamic phase, and the geometry of trajectories, showing that the geometrically relevant structure for the interaction between systems can be interpreted as a projection of the phase compatibility of the action.

•Mar 17, 2026•0 citations
We investigate the minimal conditions under which two independent dynamical evolutions can remain in stable coherent interaction. The starting point is the existence of a scalar accumulative quantity (S[\gamma]) associated with each admissible evolution, together with the possibility of ordering this evolution by a monotonic parameter. From these hypotheses, the dynamical phase is introduced through the relation [ \phi=\frac{S}{\hbar}, ] and it is shown that the observable interferential coherence between two evolutions depends exclusively on the phase difference [ \Delta\phi(t)=\phi_A(t)-\phi_B(t). ] The analysis of the superposition of two complex amplitudes leads to the necessary and sufficient condition for maximum constructive interference, [ \Delta\phi=2\pi n \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \Delta S=2\pi n,\hbar, \qquad n\in\mathbb Z, ] which arises directly from the periodic structure of the phase and is not introduced as an independent postulate. Then, under the regularity hypothesis (\Delta S\in C^1(I)), it is demonstrated that non-degenerate zeros of the function [ f_n(t)=\Delta S(t)-2\pi n,\hbar ] are isolated. As a consequence, the central result of the work is established: if the accumulated action difference is not constant in an open interval, then exact phase compatibility between two evolutions cannot persist continuously in that interval. In particular, under the hypothesis of local non-degeneracy, the instants in which [ \Delta S(t)=2\pi n,\hbar ] form a discrete set. This result allows formulating the \emph{Phase Compatibility Principle}: stable coherent interaction between dynamical systems requires continuous accumulated phase compatibility. When phase accumulation rates differ, exact compatibility cannot be maintained continuously and occurs only at episodic instants. A minimal relativistic application shows that this structure includes, as a particular case, evolutions whose phases are controlled by proper time, [ \phi=-\frac{mc^2}{\hbar}\tau, ] so that differences between proper time rates induce phase rate divergences and, consequently, episodic compatibilities. The obtained result establishes, therefore, a structural constraint on the coherence between independent evolutions: the spatio-temporal coexistence of two systems does not imply, by itself, dynamical compatibility. The relevant criterion is the compatibility of their accumulated phases throughout the evolution. The present work does not derive lattice operators, Laplacian structures, mass spectra, specific Lagrangian forms, or spacetime ontologies; it only demonstrates the minimal interferential constraint that governs the possibility of continuous coherence between dynamical evolutions.
In this work, we apply the Phase Compatibility Principle, established in \cite{04283}, to the problem of the spatial crossing of two dynamical systems with distinct phase rates. The starting point is the existence of an accumulated action S[γ]S[\gamma]S[γ] associated with each admissible evolution and the definition of the dynamical phase by ϕ=Sℏ. \phi=\frac{S}{\hbar}. ϕ=ℏS​. Exact compatibility between two evolutions AAA and BBB is then characterized by the condition Δϕ(t)=2πn⟺ΔS(t)=2πnℏ,n∈Z. \Delta\phi(t)=2\pi n \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \Delta S(t)=2\pi n\hbar, \qquad n\in\mathbb Z. Δϕ(t)=2πn⟺ΔS(t)=2πnℏ,n∈Z. Based on this framework, we distinguish two logically independent domains: the geometric domain of spatial coincidence, Eesp={ t:rA(t)=rB(t) }, E_{\mathrm{esp}}=\{\,t:\mathbf r_A(t)=\mathbf r_B(t)\,\}, Eesp​={t:rA​(t)=rB​(t)}, and the interferential domain of phase compatibility, Eϕ={ t:ΔS(t)=2πnℏ, n∈Z }. E_{\phi}=\{\,t:\Delta S(t)=2\pi n\hbar,\ n\in\mathbb Z\,\}. Eϕ​={t:ΔS(t)=2πnℏ, n∈Z}. The coherent interaction set is then defined by Eint=Eesp∩Eϕ. E_{\mathrm{int}}=E_{\mathrm{esp}}\cap E_{\phi}. Eint​=Eesp​∩Eϕ​. Thus, it is shown that spatial coincidence is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for exact coherent interaction. In the elementary kinematic case of two linear phases, ϕA(t)=ωAt+ϕA0,ϕB(t)=ωBt+ϕB0, \phi_A(t)=\omega_A t+\phi_{A0}, \qquad \phi_B(t)=\omega_B t+\phi_{B0}, ϕA​(t)=ωA​t+ϕA0​,ϕB​(t)=ωB​t+ϕB0​, we obtain Δϕ(t)=(ωA−ωB)t+Δϕ0, \Delta\phi(t)=(\omega_A-\omega_B)t+\Delta\phi_0, Δϕ(t)=(ωA​−ωB​)t+Δϕ0​, so that, for ωA≠ωB\omega_A\neq\omega_BωA​=ωB​, the instants of compatibility are given by tn=2πn−Δϕ0ωA−ωB, t_n=\frac{2\pi n-\Delta\phi_0}{\omega_A-\omega_B}, tn​=ωA​−ωB​2πn−Δϕ0​​, forming a discrete set. Consequently, an arbitrary instant of spatial crossing t0∈Eespt_0\in E_{\mathrm{esp}}t0​∈Eesp​ does not generically belong to EϕE_{\phi}Eϕ​, and therefore does not generically belong to EintE_{\mathrm{int}}Eint​. A minimal relativistic realization is also presented, based on the action S=−mc2τ, S=-mc^2\tau, S=−mc2τ, which yields ϕ=−mc2ℏτ. \phi=-\frac{mc^2}{\hbar}\tau. ϕ=−ℏmc2​τ. For two systems with distinct proper times, the phase difference is Δϕ=mc2ℏ(τB−τA), \Delta\phi=\frac{mc^2}{\hbar}(\tau_B-\tau_A), Δϕ=ℏmc2​(τB​−τA​), and the inequality between the proper time rates implies a difference between phase rates, reestablishing the episodic character of compatibility. Finally, an operational extension of finite resolution is introduced, in which an interferential tolerance δϕ>0\delta\phi>0δϕ>0 defines effective causal windows of width Δtporta=2δϕ∣ωA−ωB∣, \Delta t_{\mathrm{porta}}=\frac{2\delta\phi}{|\omega_A-\omega_B|}, Δtporta​=∣ωA​−ωB​∣2δϕ​, showing that, in the limit of large spectral separation, the coincidence between spatial crossing and effective compatibility becomes progressively rarer. The central result of the article can be synthesized by the implication spatial coincidence⇏coherent interaction. \text{spatial coincidence} \not\Rightarrow \text{coherent interaction}. spatial coincidence⇒coherent interaction. The work does not intend to derive Bose--Einstein statistics, replace quantum electrodynamics, or construct a complete theory of photon--photon scattering. Its result is more restricted and more precise: it establishes, as a physical application of the Phase Compatibility Principle, that exact coherent interaction between two systems requires not only geometric coincidence but also belonging to the phase compatibility set.
The description of physical phenomena in terms of frequency in Hz is operationally central in electromagnetic and interferential contexts, but it is usually introduced as a primitive quantity, without explicit derivation from the variational structure of dynamics. In contrast, formulations based on the action principle establish that the fundamental quantity associated with physical evolution is the accumulated action SSS, and that interferential observables depend on differences of this quantity through phases of the form ϕ=S/ℏ\phi = S/\hbarϕ=S/ℏ. In this work, we establish, starting from minimal variational hypotheses and without introducing ad hoc structures, the direct connection between action, phase, and observable frequency. It is shown that frequency in cycles per second is not an independent quantity, but the rate of action accumulation converted into cycles: f=12πℏS˙. f = \frac{1}{2\pi\hbar}\dot S. f=2πℏ1​S˙. From this identification, it is demonstrated that the coherent interaction between two physical systems is governed by the difference between their rates of action accumulation, leading to the definition of a coherent communication frequency fcom=12πℏ∣S˙A−S˙B∣. f_{\mathrm{com}} = \frac{1}{2\pi\hbar}|\dot S_A - \dot S_B|. fcom​=2πℏ1​∣S˙A​−S˙B​∣. As a consequence, it is shown that interferential compatibility between systems is not, in general, continuous, but occurs at discrete instants determined by phase conditions. Temporal discretization emerges, therefore, as an operational property associated with the dynamics of action, without the need to postulate a fundamental granularity of time. The results obtained do not introduce new dynamical principles nor do they modify established equations; they make explicit a structural relationship already implicit in the variational formulation: frequency in Hz as the operational manifestation of the rate of action accumulation, and physical communication as a phenomenon governed by differences in this rate.
The possibility of distinct physical systems remaining dynamically compatible over time is often implicitly assumed in various areas of physics, from interferometric descriptions to clock comparisons and the analysis of composite systems. In this work, we show that such continuous compatibility is not a generic property but encounters a structural limitation that stems directly from the variational formulation of dynamics. Starting from only minimal hypotheses—the existence of an accumulative action, monotonic proper parametrizations, and operational dependence on action differences via factors eiS/ℏe^{iS/\hbar}eiS/ℏ—we demonstrate that dynamically independent systems cannot maintain functional coincidence of their actions over open intervals, except under fine-tuning. Consequently, moments of compatibility form a necessarily discrete set, and any coherent coupling is effective only within a time scale determined by the difference between the rates of action accumulation. The result does not depend on a specific microscopic model, nor on dissipative, statistical, or environmental mechanisms, being consistent with classical mechanics, relativity, and quantum field theory. It is shown, in particular, that effects such as the loss of interferometric visibility associated with time dilation can be understood as physical realizations of a more general constraint: the structural incompatibility between evolutions parameterized by distinct actions. Thus, the so-called ``compatibility window'' does not constitute a new dynamic principle, but an inevitable consequence of the variational architecture common to established physical theories.
Starting from only three ingredients: (i) variational formulation with cumulative action, (ii) interferential dependence on SSS, and (iii) PFu's episodic compatibility theorem, this paper assumes a single additional hypothesis of the universality of the action constant (hhh) and a minimal hypothesis of macroscopic stability, and derives mathematical consequences in an axiomatic and constructive manner, without introducing new fields, potentials, or \textit{ad hoc} phenomenological terms. Three main results are obtained. First, it is demonstrated that the existence of a universal action constant hhh is a structural requirement for interferential consistency among multiple systems: the phase ϕ\phiϕ must be treated as a global structure, defined modulo hhh, common to all admissible processes. Second, it is shown that dynamic compatibility between systems can only occur at discrete events of phase coincidence, characterized by δϕ=0\delta\phi = 0δϕ=0; the observable dynamics are, therefore, reconstructible as sampling over a discrete sequence of compatibility events, whose density is proportional to the rate of variation of SSS (abstract relativistic sampling theorem). Third, under hypotheses of invariance, extensivity, and coercivity, a global functional I\mathcal{I}I is constructed that measures the compatibility stability of a configuration of systems, and it is proven that, in the infrared regime, it is equivalent to a quadratic spectral functional Q=⟨ψ,Aψ⟩Q = \langle \psi, \mathcal{A} \psi \rangleQ=⟨ψ,Aψ⟩, where A\mathcal{A}A is a positive self-adjoint operator that encodes the compatibility structure. In the continuous limit, when A\mathcal{A}A admits a realization as an effective elliptic operator and its spectrum is described by a spectral density ρ(λ)\rho(\lambda)ρ(λ), the abstract functional I\mathcal{I}I is rewritten as a geometric functional of the PESG type, but now interpreted as a consequence of universal action and episodic compatibility, rather than as an independent geometric principle.
This article investigates the structural role of spectral operators in the observation of phase compatibility events generated by the relativistic dynamics of accumulated action. The starting point of the work is the definition of the dynamical phase associated with an admissible evolution, ϕ=S/ℏ \phi=S/\hbar ϕ=S/ℏ, and the condition of exact compatibility between two evolutions, ΔS(t)=2πnℏ \Delta S(t)=2\pi n\hbar ΔS(t)=2πnℏ. When the action difference is not constant over an open interval, this condition implies that the compatibility instants form a discrete set. In the relativistic regime, the divergence between the proper times of the evolutions generates a phase difference that, under a uniform beat approximation, produces a discrete temporal mesh of synchronization instants. These events constitute the interferential compatibility domain EϕE_\phiEϕ​, whose intersection with the geometric spatial coincidence domain EespE_{\mathrm{esp}}Eesp​ defines the set of observable coherent interactions. The present work analyzes how time-invariant linear operators act upon this structure. It is shown that a spectral operator with transfer function H(ω)=∣H(ω)∣eiϕC(ω) H(\omega)=|H(\omega)|e^{i\phi_C(\omega)} H(ω)=∣H(ω)∣eiϕC​(ω) introduces a phase shift that rigidly translates the observed mesh of compatibility events. In formal terms, the filtered phase satisfies Δϕ′(t)=Δϕ(t)−ϕC \Delta\phi'(t)=\Delta\phi(t)-\phi_C Δϕ′(t)=Δϕ(t)−ϕC​, which leads to a shifted sequence of synchronization instants, without changing the spacing between consecutive events. In set-theoretic language, the filtered interferential domain Eϕ(H) E_\phi^{(H)} Eϕ(H)​ is obtained by uniform temporal translation of the set EϕE_\phiEϕ​, and the corresponding domain of coherent interaction becomes Eint(H)=Eesp∩Eϕ(H). E_{\mathrm{int}}^{(H)}=E_{\mathrm{esp}}\cap E_\phi^{(H)}. Eint(H)​=Eesp​∩Eϕ(H)​. It follows that spectral operators do not modify the causal structure that generates the compatibility events; they merely alter the operational domain under which these events become observable. A complete physical example is provided by the RC circuit, whose transfer function HC(s)=sRC/(1+sRC) H_C(s)=sRC/(1+sRC) HC​(s)=sRC/(1+sRC) introduces a phase ϕC(Ω)=arctan⁡(1/(ΩRC)) \phi_C(\Omega)=\arctan(1/(\Omega RC)) ϕC​(Ω)=arctan(1/(ΩRC)), producing an explicit temporal shift of the observed synchronization instants, dependent on the hardware parameters, but preserving the periodicity of the causal mesh. The main result of the article can be summarized as follows: spectral filtering acts as an operational selection mechanism of the phase compatibility events generated by the relativistic dynamics of the accumulated action. In condensed form, filtering  ⟹  operational selection of Eϕ. \text{filtering} \;\Longrightarrow\; \text{operational selection of } E_\phi. filtering⟹operational selection of Eϕ​. The work therefore identifies a structural link between action theory, the discrete interferential synchronization mesh, and spectral operators from linear systems theory, showing that such operators can be interpreted as causal phase filters.
This work investigates the structural relationship between accumulated action, dynamic phase, and the geometry of trajectories in spacetime. Starting from the definition of the dynamic phase ϕ=Sℏ, \phi=\frac{S}{\hbar}, ϕ=ℏS​, we consider the phase compatibility condition between two admissible evolutions, ΔS=2πnℏ,n∈Z, \Delta S = 2\pi n\hbar, \qquad n\in\mathbb Z, ΔS=2πnℏ,n∈Z, established in previous works as a criterion of interferential compatibility between dynamical systems. It is shown that this condition cannot be analyzed independently of the geometry of the trajectories, as the accumulated action is a functional of the path in spacetime. In the variational form, S=∫L(x,x˙,t) dt, S=\int L(x,\dot x,t)\,dt, S=∫L(x,x˙,t)dt, the action depends on the trajectory in the configuration space; in the minimal relativistic realization, S=−mc2τ, S=-mc^2\tau, S=−mc2τ, the accumulated phase is proportional to the proper time and, therefore, to the geometry of the worldline; and, in the canonical form, S=∫(p⋅dx−H dt), S=\int (p\cdot dx-H\,dt), S=∫(p⋅dx−Hdt), the action simultaneously incorporates spatial and temporal contributions. From these structures, it is demonstrated that the possibility of phase compatibility between two evolutions depends on the compared geometry of their trajectories. In particular, the relevant geometric structure for the interaction between systems can be interpreted as a projection of the phase compatibility of the accumulated action. It is also shown that the canonical form of the action leads, under the assumption of local differentiability of S(x,t)S(x,t)S(x,t), to the identities p=∇S,H=−∂tS, p=\nabla S, \qquad H=-\partial_t S, p=∇S,H=−∂t​S, which constitute the differential structure of the Hamilton--Jacobi equation, thus establishing a direct connection between the global interferential condition on the action and the local form of variational dynamics. The obtained result does not aim to replace general relativity nor to fully derive classical or quantum dynamics. Its objective is more restricted: to identify the minimal structural relationship between accumulated action, dynamic phase, and the geometry of trajectories, showing that the geometrically relevant structure for the interaction between systems can be interpreted as a projection of the phase compatibility of the action.