Abstract Quantum Machine Learning (QML) holds the promise of improving conventional machine learning, but the conditions under which an advantage can be obtained are still unclear. Although many studies have been conducted in the literature, there is no conclusive evidence that allows us to determine which types of classical datasets or which problem complexities benefit from the use of quantum techniques. Moreover, there have been contradicting findings when dealing with small or unbalanced datasets. In order to systematically approach this challenge and clarify the need for quantum properties in specific tasks, we propose the adoption of a framework capable of exploring the solution space of quantum feature maps and providing solid evidence of their potential advantages. Our framework comprises three main components: (a) the construction of datasets designed to highlight the specific characteristics that are expected to be relevant in quantum machine learning tasks; (b) the definition of metrics that serve as proxies for quantum kernels with desirable properties; and (c) an evolutionary-guided search for quantum feature maps maximizing those metrics. When using this framework with sensible parameter choices, we obtain results suggesting that some previous studies may have reported overfitted outcomes. This shows that justifying the need for quantum mechanical properties might be beyond the actual scope of conventional classical tasks, since there is no clear quantum feature that contributes to the gain shown by some of the QML techniques most commonly applied in the literature.
Abstract Quantum Machine Learning (QML) holds the promise of improving conventional machine learning, but the conditions under which an advantage can be obtained are still unclear. Although many studies have been conducted in the literature, there is no conclusive evidence that allows us to determine which types of classical datasets or which problem complexities benefit from the use of quantum techniques. Moreover, there have been contradicting findings when dealing with small or unbalanced datasets. In order to systematically approach this challenge and clarify the need for quantum properties in specific tasks, we propose the adoption of a framework capable of exploring the solution space of quantum feature maps and providing solid evidence of their potential advantages. Our framework comprises three main components: (a) the construction of datasets designed to highlight the specific characteristics that are expected to be relevant in quantum machine learning tasks; (b) the definition of metrics that serve as proxies for quantum kernels with desirable properties; and (c) an evolutionary-guided search for quantum feature maps maximizing those metrics. When using this framework with sensible parameter choices, we obtain results suggesting that some previous studies may have reported overfitted outcomes. This shows that justifying the need for quantum mechanical properties might be beyond the actual scope of conventional classical tasks, since there is no clear quantum feature that contributes to the gain shown by some of the QML techniques most commonly applied in the literature.
Quantum computing has been proven to excel in factorization issues and unordered search problems due to its capability of quantum parallelism. This unique feature allows exponential speed-up in solving certain problems. However, this advantage does not apply universally, and challenges arise when combining classical and quantum computing to achieve acceleration in computation speed. This paper aims to address these challenges by exploring the current state of quantum machine learning and benchmarking the performance of quantum and classical algorithms in terms of accuracy. Specifically, we conducted experiments with three datasets for binary classification, implementing Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Quantum SVM (QSVM) algorithms. Our findings suggest that the QSVM algorithm outperforms classical SVM on complex datasets, and the performance gap between quantum and classical models increases with dataset complexity, as simple models tend to overfit with complex datasets. While there is still a long way to go in terms of developing quantum hardware with sufficient resources, quantum machine learning holds great potential in areas such as unsupervised learning and generative models. Moving forward, more efforts are needed to explore new quantum learning models that can leverage the power of quantum mechanics to overcome the limitations of classical machine learning.
This rapid growth in data and the increased complexity of machine learning models have made it almost impossible to continue pushing forward with classical computing, thereby creating a pressing need for new computational paradigms. The following paper will examine how quantum machine learning answers the above questions by applying the principles of quantum mechanics to the art of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data analytics. We examine some of the current Quantum Machine Learning (QML) algorithms and their applications based on a framework that employs quantum-enhanced feature spaces, variational quantum circuits, and quantum-inspired classical algorithms. Our methodology combines theoretical analysis with empirical evaluation of these methods over standard benchmark datasets, using both quantum simulators and real quantum hardware. Key findings include a set of advantages carried by QML in specific fields, such as dimensionality reduction, optimization problems, and some clustering tasks. These are the quadratic speedup for support vector machines and the exponential advantage for principal component analysis. Our results also show that quantum error correction isn’t perfect and that loading classical data into a quantum system can be hard. We conclude that, while QML holds much promise, it is, by all means, clearly still a way off from being considered a panacea. It is awaiting further breakthroughs in quantum hardware, error mitigation techniques, and algorithm design in order to fully realize its potential. This work thus presents a roadmap for future research and highlights where QML is best placed to make major impactful differences in artificial intelligence and big data analytics.
Quantum computing has demonstrated remarkable prowess in addressing factorization issues and unordered search problems, showcasing its quantum parallelism capabilities that enable exponential speed-up for specific computational challenges. However, the seamless integration of classical and quantum computing to harness accelerated computation speed presents unique challenges. This paper delves into the intricacies of this integration, focusing on the current state of quantum machine learning (QML) and evaluating the performance of classical and quantum algorithms in terms of accuracy. To address these challenges, we conducted experiments utilizing three datasets for binary classification, implementing both classical Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Quantum SVM (QSVM) algorithms. Our investigations reveal that the QSVM algorithm consistently outperforms its classical counterpart on complex datasets. Notably, the performance gap between quantum and classical models widens with increasing dataset complexity, shedding light on the susceptibility of simple classical models to overfitting when confronted with intricate datasets.Despite the ongoing development required for quantum hardware with ample resources, our findings underscore the significant potential of quantum machine learning, particularly in unsupervised learning and generative models. As we move forward, it is imperative to channel more efforts into exploring novel quantum learning models capable of harnessing the inherent power of quantum mechanics to overcome the constraints of classical machine learning. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on the future of quantum computing, emphasizing the need for continued exploration and innovation in quantum machine learning methodologies.
Abstract - The exponential growth of large-scale data has created significant challenges in storage, processing, and optimization that classical computing systems struggle to address efficiently. Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a promising paradigm that integrates quantum computing concepts with machine learning techniques to tackle complex big data optimization problems. By utilizing quantum features such as superposition, entanglement, and parallelism, QML algorithms can accelerate tasks like clustering, classification, and dimensionality reduction, which are traditionally computationally demanding. Recent advancements indicate strong potential for quantum-inspired optimization in fields including cybersecurity, financial portfolio management, Industry 4.0, and healthcare analytics. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of QML algorithms designed for big data optimization, examining their advantages, limitations, and application domains. Additionally, it discusses the performance trade-offs associated with hybrid quantum–classical frameworks and highlights future research directions aimed at creating secure, scalable, and resource-efficient quantum solutions for large-scale, data-driven decision-making. As data volumes continue to expand at extremely rapid rates, processing big data with traditional machine learning (ML) techniques has become increasingly challenging. ML models often struggle with issues related to computational power, efficient parameter tuning, accurate model selection, and maintaining high performance when dealing with massive datasets. Deep learning approaches—such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs)—demand substantial computational resources to train on large-scale supervised learning tasks. Moreover, the difficulty of training these networks grows significantly as the size and complexity of the datasets increase. In response to these limitations, Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as a promising research domain at the intersection of quantum computing and machine learning. Quantum computers operate fundamentally differently from classical systems, using the principles of quantum mechanics to encode and process information. As a result, quantum computational methods have the potential to address certain problems that are computationally intensive or infeasible for classical machines. Index Terms— Quantum Machine Learning (QML); Big Data Optimization; Quantum Algorithms; Hybrid Quantum-Classical Models; Quantum Computing; Data Analytics
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) represents a promising frontier of research where the principles of quantum mechanics are combined with machine learning to offer potentially superior performance over classical counterparts. This review article explores the current advancements in QML, specifically focusing on the performance improvement and comparison between standard classical algorithms and their quantum implementations. We initiate with an overview of fundamental quantum algorithms that have found applicability within machine learning contexts, such as quantum principal component analysis and quantum support vector machines. The review then delves into a critical assessment of these quantum approaches, highlighting case studies where quantum implementations have demonstrated computational speedups or improved accuracy. Furthermore, we investigate the inherent challenges and limitations that currently hinder the widespread adoption of QML technologies, including the issues of decoherence, error rates, and quantum resource requirements. In addition, the review provides insights into the current state of quantum hardware and its scalability for machine learning tasks. Throughout, comparisons are made to outline scenarios in which quantum machine learning presents a genuine advantage over classical techniques, supported by performance metrics and benchmark datasets. The article concludes by discussing future directions in QML research, with an emphasis on algorithmic innovation and hardware improvement, to realize the full potential of quantum-enhanced machine learning.
Quantum machine learning has emerged as a promising paradigm that leverages quantum computational principles to potentially outperform classical approaches on specific learning tasks. This paper presents a comprehensive empirical investigation comparing Quantum Machine Learning (QML), specifically Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM) against Classical Machine Learning (CML) baselines including Logistic Regression, K Nearest Neighbors and classical SVMs. We implement quantum kernel methods using variational quantum circuits with angle embedding, IQP and ZZ feature maps on datasets exhibiting varying structural complexity. Our experiments on synthetic quantum generated datasets (Quantum Parity, Quantum Entanglement, Quantum Interference) demonstrate that QSVM achieves superior classification accuracy with improvements ranging from 2.9 % to 60 % over the best classical baselines achieving a 55.6 % overall win rate. Notably, on the Quantum Parity dataset, QSVM consistently outperformed all classical models across multiple configurations. On real-world benchmark datasets (Breast Cancer, Iris, Wine), QSVM Angle achieved 88% accuracy on Breast Cancer compared to 76% for classical SVM Linear a 15.8 % relative improvement while matching the best classical performance on Iris(100%)and Wine(92%). All experiments were conducted using quantum circuit simulation on classical hardware. These results provide empirical evidence that quantum kernel methods offer meaningful advantages over classical approaches on datasets with complex feature interactions. We discuss the theoretical foundations of these improvements including quantum feature space expressivity and kernel alignment.