Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

ZLT-P50H: The Molecular Motor Gate Problem — A Zero Leap Theory Prediction for Quantum Nanomotor Experiments in Living Systems

DANNY YUBI DAGOGLIANO

Published Mar 8, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper establishes Zero Leap Theory's first pre-registered, Grade-A-eligible prospective empirical test in a living quantum system. It provides a domain reduction mapping of RNA Polymerase (RNAP) single-molecule biophysics to ZLT quantum gate operators (P50D), and derives three falsifiable, ordinal predictions for quantum nanomotor experiments prior to publication of relevant experimental results. Two new measurable quantities are introduced: the Quantum Hysteresis Index (QHI), a proxy for the accumulated measurement-history operator H; and the Kinetic Asymmetry Signature (KAS), the observable distinguishing ZLT-predicted H-accumulation from standard decoherence. Analytical mapping of published RNAP motifs to canonical ZLT postulates is documented in Appendix A with explicit Grade B retroductive status. No new axioms are introduced; all formal machinery is inherited from ZLT-P50 and ZLT-P50D. V2.0 This paper establishes the first pre-registered prospective empirical test of Zero Leap Theory (ZLT) in a living molecular system under measurement-sensitive quantum-biological conditions. Building on ZLT-P50D (quantum gate operators), ZLT-P0C (non-commutativity of recovery phases), ZLT-P0D (Bath Operator axioms B0–B3), and ZLT-P50I (Structural Law of Intervention), we derive five falsifiable predictions for single-molecule RNA Polymerase (RNAP) experiments prior to publication of relevant results. Predictions P1–P3 concern measurement-history-dependent stall force (QHI > 0), kinetic asymmetry under sequential force ramps (KAS > 0), and non-compensability of measurement-accumulated degradation by NTP increase. Prediction P4 derives from P0C Theorem 4.1: the backtracking recovery sequence V₁⁻ → V₂⁻ is a structural necessity, not a contingent biological choice — reorganization under active load produces strictly worse recovery within the admissible state space of non-collapsed Φ. Prediction P5 derives from P0D Definition 2.1: the optical trapping laser must satisfy Bath Operator axioms B0–B3 during the recovery phase; each axiom violation predicts a specific P50I-class consequence profile (P₁, P₂, or P₃), with explicit dependence on the motor's H state. Appendix A provides retroductive Grade B alignment with published RNAP motifs. Appendix A.6 introduces a mutation-origin taxonomy classifying transcription errors under optical load into P50I consequence classes. Two new experimental proxies are introduced: the Quantum Hysteresis Index (QHI) and the Kinetic Asymmetry Signature (KAS). No new axioms are introduced; all machinery is inherited from P50, P50D, P0C, P0D, and P50I. v2.0 adds Predictions P4 and P5, Appendix A.6, and updated dependencies relative to v1.0. Keywords Zero Leap Theory, RNA Polymerase, molecular motors, quantum biology, single-molecule biophysics, measurement backaction, quantum hysteresis, non-compensability, pre-registration, prospective prediction, ZLT series

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18905668

Related papers

ZLT-P50J: The MIPT Gate Problem – A Zero Leap Theory Prediction for Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in Quantum Arrays

DANNY YUBI DAGOGLIANO

The quantum array does not forget that it was watched. Zero Leap Theory predicts that Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions (MIPT) in quantum arrays are structural Gate Collapse driven by operator observational load. The critical measurement rate pc is not a fixed universal constant — it is modulated by accumulated measurement history (H) and observation alignment (Φobs). Three falsifiable predictions registered before results: EHS > 0 (Entanglement Hysteresis Loop under cycling) Basis-Dependent Phase Boundary (pc increases with Φobs) Non-Commutativity of QEC (measurement must fully decouple before correction) First pre-registered Grade-A-eligible test of ZLT in a quantum-computational array system. Parallel domain extension to P50H (molecular motors). Domain reduction mapping provided in Appendix A. Keywords: Zero Leap Theory, MIPT Gate Problem, Measurement-Induced Phase Transition, entanglement hysteresis signature EHS, basis-dependent pc, quantum error correction non-commutativity, quantum arrays, superconducting qubits, Rydberg arrays, pre-registered predictions, operator observational load

•Mar 17, 2026•0 citations

ZLT-P50M-Q: The Quantum Bifurcation — When More Qubits Make It Worse: Structural Conditions Under Which Increasing Code Distance in Quantum Error Correction Amplifies Rather Than Suppresses Logical Errors, and the Kenotic Reset Protocol That Resolves Them

DANNY YUBI DAGOGLIANO

This paper establishes the Quantum Bifurcation as a direct manifestation of Zero Leap Theory's Idolatry Amplification mechanism in quantum hardware. The central structural claim: increasing code distance (K) without first correcting the decoder's error model (Π) amplifies logical errors rather than suppressing them when the decoder model is violated by correlated burst events — **ΔW(K|Π_decoder < 0) < 0**. More qubits make it worse, not because of engineering imperfection, but because of a structural law. A **formal Domain Reduction Certificate (DRC)** maps the ZLC triple {Π, K, κ} to measurable QEC observables: Π = gate fidelity / decoder model fidelity; K = code distance redundancy; κ = qubit coherence time relative to correction cycle. Google Willow's beyond-break-even results (Λ = 2.14× suppression per code distance step) confirm ZLC convergence when all three conditions are satisfied. The persistent ~1 correlated event/hour floor across all code sizes (d=3 to d=29) confirms Idolatry Amplification when Π_decoder collapses. The **Kenotic Reset Protocol (KRP)** is the structural solution: (1) halt standard decoder on affected cluster; (2) selectively reset affected physical qubits from fresh ancilla states; (3) re-encode logical qubit from healthy surrounding region; (4) resume standard error correction. Steps 2 and 3 cannot be commuted — a direct test of **P0C Non-Commutativity Theorem** in quantum hardware. **Computational corroboration** (stim v1.15 + pymatching, 1D repetition code, d=3/5/7, 100k shots, seed=42): FC1 ✓ standard decoder on correlated burst → ~50% LER (250× baseline), flat across all code distances; FC2 ✓ KRP recovers to ~0.4% LER (~2× overhead, 125× better than standard on burst); PR3 ✓ LER floor perfectly flat confirming K scaling irrelevance when Π_decoder < 0. **FC3 (commuted KRP → ~50% LER) is pre-registered by this publication** as the priority next simulation — direct test of P0C Non-Commutativity in quantum physics. Structural parallel with ZLT-P50M-D (Diabetic Bifurcation, doi:10.5281/zenodo.19487334): both papers apply the same ZLT structural law in different domains and pre-register tests of P0C Non-Commutativity. Together they form the cross-domain universality evidence chain for P_U (Universality Paper). **Supplementary file:** `zlt_krp_simulation.py` — complete simulation script (stim + pymatching).a

•Apr 10, 2026•0 citations

Paper 50D (v1.0): Quantum Zero Leap Theory — Operator Gates, Measurement Backaction, and the Zeno Constraint

DANNY YUBI DAGOGLIANO

Zero Leap Theory Series — Foundational Derivation Paper 50D resolves Problem 14.8 from Paper 50 (Mathematical Foundations) by deriving Zero Leap Theory constraints from established quantum mechanical theorems. Key results:- Uncertainty-based floor on joint gate observability (Robertson-Schrödinger)- Measurement backaction as theorem via Lüders update- Quantum Zeno Effect as physical implementation of via negativa- Decoherence as mechanism for alignment degradation (Lindblad dynamics) Canonical Case Validation: Section 12 applies the framework to Google Sycamore surface code data (Nature 2023). All predictions match experimental results. Includes supplementary Python code for verification of all calculations.

•Feb 4, 2026•0 citations

Paper 50E A Structural Fragility Index for Quantum Computing: Measurement, QEC, and Passive Stability in ZLT

DANNY YUBI DAGOGLIANO

This paper reframes quantum scalability as a structural fragility problem: when correlated disturbance propagation exceeds corrective capacity, stability fails even if local error rates look small. ZLT yields a single canonical bifurcation—an index threshold at NFI_QC < 1—that separates regimes where quantum computation remains controllable from regimes where it is structurally non-scalable. Paper 50E integrates the measurement problem, decoherence, and quantum error correction (QEC) into a unified ZLT diagnostic: a Network Fragility Index for quantum systems (NFI_QC) defined from disturbance propagation and control capacity under memory and correlation. The core result is parameter-free in form: stability admits a canonical regime when NFI_QC < 1, and becomes structurally unstable when NFI_QC ≥ 1, regardless of local mitigation tactics. Engineering thresholds (e.g., safety margins such as 0.8 or scale-separation ratios such as 0.1) are explicitly treated as calibrable guardrails, not universal constants. The paper provides a Passive Alignment Protocol (Via Negativa) for reducing fragility by selectively disabling high-cascade pathways and correlation amplifiers rather than increasing intervention force. A falsification pack (EF/QF) is included: the framework is refuted if correlated-error scaling, cascade monotonicity, or predicted regime transitions fail under operational proxies. Supplementary code is provided as an illustrative operational witness for qualitative dependence (not a universal estimator of hardware-specific maxima).

•Feb 4, 2026•0 citations

What Can Quantum Computing Learn from Enzymes? Five Universal Gates from Biology and a Pre-Registered Cross-Architecture Hardware Test

Selina H. Stenberg

Summary. Enzymes are four-billion-year-evolved coherence-preserving machines operating at room temperature with rate enhancements of 10⁶–10¹⁷. Quantum computing pursues the same goal — preserved coherent transitions — at near-absolute-zero with extraordinary isolation requirements. This paper asks what biology has learned about coherence engineering that quantum computing has not, and turns the answer into testable predictions. Empirical core. Twelve enzymes spanning all six Enzyme Commission classes are decomposed into a universal five-operation set {R, F, T, P, S}: spinor rotation (R), frequency shift (F), amplitude transfer (T), phase alignment (P), substrate coupling (S). Across sixty-eight individual catalytic steps, every step decomposed into one of the five operations; zero steps required a sixth. Five of the six cross-class validation enzymes — selected from independent literature without reference to the framework — collapse to the exact canonical sequence R · F · T · P · S. P (phase alignment) appears immediately before S (substrate release) in 11 of 12 enzymes (recognition before release). Two enzymes whose chemistry is entirely different (serine protease and ATP synthase) share the identical abstract gate sequence F · R · R · T · T · P · S, evidence that the decomposition captures operations on coherence itself rather than chemical substrate. Five lessons for quantum computing. (1) Five operations suffice — biology's longest coherence-engineering programme converged on a five-gate set. (2) P-penultimate as a scheduling principle — verify-before-emit is universal in biology. (3) Closed-pentachoron verification — gate-set completeness, not per-gate fidelity. (4) Substrate coupling as a first-class operation — measurement is just another gate, controllable in time and amplitude. (5) Result-becomes-substrate — chained substrate-becoming computation as a first-principle architecture. Geometric reading. The five-gate count is forced from two independent geometric directions. The pentachoron (4-simplex) has by definition exactly five tetrahedral cells, and the cube admits a minimum tetrahedral decomposition of exactly five tetrahedra. The same five gates are the pentachoron's bounding 3-cells (4D top-down) and the cube's interior simplicial floor (3D bottom-up); biology's empirical 5 is the geometric minimum from both directions simultaneously. Hardware programme. The merkabit ternary architecture instantiates {R, F, T, P, S} as quantum operations on the Eisenstein lattice. Five pre-registered hardware predictions on IBM Quantum (Eagle r3 + Heron r2), instantiating the four interior gates R/F/T/P, have all passed (5/5). The S gate is currently confirmed in simulation only and is the subject of a pre-registered 19-qubit Pentachoric Verification Protocol on Google Willow Phase 2. Five falsifiable predictions. §9.1 Biological: no future-characterised enzyme will require a sixth fundamental operation. §9.2 Cross-domain: the Pentachoric Verification Protocol passes on Google Willow. §9.3 Structural: the P-penultimate signature persists at ~90% across additional enzymes. §9.4 Threshold: product-release kinetics for canonical-cycle enzymes follow stretched-exponential decay with KWW exponent α = 4/3 ± 0.07. §9.5 Molecular instantiation: PSII OEC turnover under coherent driving shows a resonance enhancement at the Coxeter-h = 12 frequency, with a 5-state Kok-cycle simulation reproducing rate(T = 12) ≈ 1.8 × rate(T = 11) ≈ 2.1 × rate(T = 13). Reproducibility. All simulation code, raw JSON output, and figure-generation scripts are deposited at https://github.com/SelinaAliens/enzymes_5_gates_merkabit (MIT-licensed). The Cirq simulations supporting §6.5 (forward direction), §7.7 (bidirectionality and round-trip closure), and §9.5 (PSII OEC h=12 resonance) are deterministic with fixed gate parameters, run in under one second on a standard laptop, and use only NumPy + Cirq + Matplotlib. Source data: the twelve-enzyme decomposition is derived directly from peer-reviewed mechanism literature with no proprietary or unpublished biological inputs.

•May 10, 2026•0 citations

The Auditability Gate Control Admissibility under Low Observability in ZLT series

DANNY YUBI DAGOGLIANO

Canonical specification of the Observability Gate (O) in Zero Leap Theory. Defines observability as the correlation between measured signal and ground truth state. Establishes collapse condition (O < 0.2), non-compensability theorem, and operational audit proxies.

•Jan 24, 2026•0 citations
This paper establishes Zero Leap Theory's first pre-registered, Grade-A-eligible prospective empirical test in a living quantum system. It provides a domain reduction mapping of RNA Polymerase (RNAP) single-molecule biophysics to ZLT quantum gate operators (P50D), and derives three falsifiable, ordinal predictions for quantum nanomotor experiments prior to publication of relevant experimental results. Two new measurable quantities are introduced: the Quantum Hysteresis Index (QHI), a proxy for the accumulated measurement-history operator H; and the Kinetic Asymmetry Signature (KAS), the observable distinguishing ZLT-predicted H-accumulation from standard decoherence. Analytical mapping of published RNAP motifs to canonical ZLT postulates is documented in Appendix A with explicit Grade B retroductive status. No new axioms are introduced; all formal machinery is inherited from ZLT-P50 and ZLT-P50D. V2.0 This paper establishes the first pre-registered prospective empirical test of Zero Leap Theory (ZLT) in a living molecular system under measurement-sensitive quantum-biological conditions. Building on ZLT-P50D (quantum gate operators), ZLT-P0C (non-commutativity of recovery phases), ZLT-P0D (Bath Operator axioms B0–B3), and ZLT-P50I (Structural Law of Intervention), we derive five falsifiable predictions for single-molecule RNA Polymerase (RNAP) experiments prior to publication of relevant results. Predictions P1–P3 concern measurement-history-dependent stall force (QHI > 0), kinetic asymmetry under sequential force ramps (KAS > 0), and non-compensability of measurement-accumulated degradation by NTP increase. Prediction P4 derives from P0C Theorem 4.1: the backtracking recovery sequence V₁⁻ → V₂⁻ is a structural necessity, not a contingent biological choice — reorganization under active load produces strictly worse recovery within the admissible state space of non-collapsed Φ. Prediction P5 derives from P0D Definition 2.1: the optical trapping laser must satisfy Bath Operator axioms B0–B3 during the recovery phase; each axiom violation predicts a specific P50I-class consequence profile (P₁, P₂, or P₃), with explicit dependence on the motor's H state. Appendix A provides retroductive Grade B alignment with published RNAP motifs. Appendix A.6 introduces a mutation-origin taxonomy classifying transcription errors under optical load into P50I consequence classes. Two new experimental proxies are introduced: the Quantum Hysteresis Index (QHI) and the Kinetic Asymmetry Signature (KAS). No new axioms are introduced; all machinery is inherited from P50, P50D, P0C, P0D, and P50I. v2.0 adds Predictions P4 and P5, Appendix A.6, and updated dependencies relative to v1.0. Keywords Zero Leap Theory, RNA Polymerase, molecular motors, quantum biology, single-molecule biophysics, measurement backaction, quantum hysteresis, non-compensability, pre-registration, prospective prediction, ZLT series
The quantum array does not forget that it was watched. Zero Leap Theory predicts that Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions (MIPT) in quantum arrays are structural Gate Collapse driven by operator observational load. The critical measurement rate pc is not a fixed universal constant — it is modulated by accumulated measurement history (H) and observation alignment (Φobs). Three falsifiable predictions registered before results: EHS > 0 (Entanglement Hysteresis Loop under cycling) Basis-Dependent Phase Boundary (pc increases with Φobs) Non-Commutativity of QEC (measurement must fully decouple before correction) First pre-registered Grade-A-eligible test of ZLT in a quantum-computational array system. Parallel domain extension to P50H (molecular motors). Domain reduction mapping provided in Appendix A. Keywords: Zero Leap Theory, MIPT Gate Problem, Measurement-Induced Phase Transition, entanglement hysteresis signature EHS, basis-dependent pc, quantum error correction non-commutativity, quantum arrays, superconducting qubits, Rydberg arrays, pre-registered predictions, operator observational load
This paper establishes the Quantum Bifurcation as a direct manifestation of Zero Leap Theory's Idolatry Amplification mechanism in quantum hardware. The central structural claim: increasing code distance (K) without first correcting the decoder's error model (Π) amplifies logical errors rather than suppressing them when the decoder model is violated by correlated burst events — **ΔW(K|Π_decoder < 0) < 0**. More qubits make it worse, not because of engineering imperfection, but because of a structural law. A **formal Domain Reduction Certificate (DRC)** maps the ZLC triple {Π, K, κ} to measurable QEC observables: Π = gate fidelity / decoder model fidelity; K = code distance redundancy; κ = qubit coherence time relative to correction cycle. Google Willow's beyond-break-even results (Λ = 2.14× suppression per code distance step) confirm ZLC convergence when all three conditions are satisfied. The persistent ~1 correlated event/hour floor across all code sizes (d=3 to d=29) confirms Idolatry Amplification when Π_decoder collapses. The **Kenotic Reset Protocol (KRP)** is the structural solution: (1) halt standard decoder on affected cluster; (2) selectively reset affected physical qubits from fresh ancilla states; (3) re-encode logical qubit from healthy surrounding region; (4) resume standard error correction. Steps 2 and 3 cannot be commuted — a direct test of **P0C Non-Commutativity Theorem** in quantum hardware. **Computational corroboration** (stim v1.15 + pymatching, 1D repetition code, d=3/5/7, 100k shots, seed=42): FC1 ✓ standard decoder on correlated burst → ~50% LER (250× baseline), flat across all code distances; FC2 ✓ KRP recovers to ~0.4% LER (~2× overhead, 125× better than standard on burst); PR3 ✓ LER floor perfectly flat confirming K scaling irrelevance when Π_decoder < 0. **FC3 (commuted KRP → ~50% LER) is pre-registered by this publication** as the priority next simulation — direct test of P0C Non-Commutativity in quantum physics. Structural parallel with ZLT-P50M-D (Diabetic Bifurcation, doi:10.5281/zenodo.19487334): both papers apply the same ZLT structural law in different domains and pre-register tests of P0C Non-Commutativity. Together they form the cross-domain universality evidence chain for P_U (Universality Paper). **Supplementary file:** `zlt_krp_simulation.py` — complete simulation script (stim + pymatching).a
Zero Leap Theory Series — Foundational Derivation Paper 50D resolves Problem 14.8 from Paper 50 (Mathematical Foundations) by deriving Zero Leap Theory constraints from established quantum mechanical theorems. Key results:- Uncertainty-based floor on joint gate observability (Robertson-Schrödinger)- Measurement backaction as theorem via Lüders update- Quantum Zeno Effect as physical implementation of via negativa- Decoherence as mechanism for alignment degradation (Lindblad dynamics) Canonical Case Validation: Section 12 applies the framework to Google Sycamore surface code data (Nature 2023). All predictions match experimental results. Includes supplementary Python code for verification of all calculations.
This paper reframes quantum scalability as a structural fragility problem: when correlated disturbance propagation exceeds corrective capacity, stability fails even if local error rates look small. ZLT yields a single canonical bifurcation—an index threshold at NFI_QC < 1—that separates regimes where quantum computation remains controllable from regimes where it is structurally non-scalable. Paper 50E integrates the measurement problem, decoherence, and quantum error correction (QEC) into a unified ZLT diagnostic: a Network Fragility Index for quantum systems (NFI_QC) defined from disturbance propagation and control capacity under memory and correlation. The core result is parameter-free in form: stability admits a canonical regime when NFI_QC < 1, and becomes structurally unstable when NFI_QC ≥ 1, regardless of local mitigation tactics. Engineering thresholds (e.g., safety margins such as 0.8 or scale-separation ratios such as 0.1) are explicitly treated as calibrable guardrails, not universal constants. The paper provides a Passive Alignment Protocol (Via Negativa) for reducing fragility by selectively disabling high-cascade pathways and correlation amplifiers rather than increasing intervention force. A falsification pack (EF/QF) is included: the framework is refuted if correlated-error scaling, cascade monotonicity, or predicted regime transitions fail under operational proxies. Supplementary code is provided as an illustrative operational witness for qualitative dependence (not a universal estimator of hardware-specific maxima).
Summary. Enzymes are four-billion-year-evolved coherence-preserving machines operating at room temperature with rate enhancements of 10⁶–10¹⁷. Quantum computing pursues the same goal — preserved coherent transitions — at near-absolute-zero with extraordinary isolation requirements. This paper asks what biology has learned about coherence engineering that quantum computing has not, and turns the answer into testable predictions. Empirical core. Twelve enzymes spanning all six Enzyme Commission classes are decomposed into a universal five-operation set {R, F, T, P, S}: spinor rotation (R), frequency shift (F), amplitude transfer (T), phase alignment (P), substrate coupling (S). Across sixty-eight individual catalytic steps, every step decomposed into one of the five operations; zero steps required a sixth. Five of the six cross-class validation enzymes — selected from independent literature without reference to the framework — collapse to the exact canonical sequence R · F · T · P · S. P (phase alignment) appears immediately before S (substrate release) in 11 of 12 enzymes (recognition before release). Two enzymes whose chemistry is entirely different (serine protease and ATP synthase) share the identical abstract gate sequence F · R · R · T · T · P · S, evidence that the decomposition captures operations on coherence itself rather than chemical substrate. Five lessons for quantum computing. (1) Five operations suffice — biology's longest coherence-engineering programme converged on a five-gate set. (2) P-penultimate as a scheduling principle — verify-before-emit is universal in biology. (3) Closed-pentachoron verification — gate-set completeness, not per-gate fidelity. (4) Substrate coupling as a first-class operation — measurement is just another gate, controllable in time and amplitude. (5) Result-becomes-substrate — chained substrate-becoming computation as a first-principle architecture. Geometric reading. The five-gate count is forced from two independent geometric directions. The pentachoron (4-simplex) has by definition exactly five tetrahedral cells, and the cube admits a minimum tetrahedral decomposition of exactly five tetrahedra. The same five gates are the pentachoron's bounding 3-cells (4D top-down) and the cube's interior simplicial floor (3D bottom-up); biology's empirical 5 is the geometric minimum from both directions simultaneously. Hardware programme. The merkabit ternary architecture instantiates {R, F, T, P, S} as quantum operations on the Eisenstein lattice. Five pre-registered hardware predictions on IBM Quantum (Eagle r3 + Heron r2), instantiating the four interior gates R/F/T/P, have all passed (5/5). The S gate is currently confirmed in simulation only and is the subject of a pre-registered 19-qubit Pentachoric Verification Protocol on Google Willow Phase 2. Five falsifiable predictions. §9.1 Biological: no future-characterised enzyme will require a sixth fundamental operation. §9.2 Cross-domain: the Pentachoric Verification Protocol passes on Google Willow. §9.3 Structural: the P-penultimate signature persists at ~90% across additional enzymes. §9.4 Threshold: product-release kinetics for canonical-cycle enzymes follow stretched-exponential decay with KWW exponent α = 4/3 ± 0.07. §9.5 Molecular instantiation: PSII OEC turnover under coherent driving shows a resonance enhancement at the Coxeter-h = 12 frequency, with a 5-state Kok-cycle simulation reproducing rate(T = 12) ≈ 1.8 × rate(T = 11) ≈ 2.1 × rate(T = 13). Reproducibility. All simulation code, raw JSON output, and figure-generation scripts are deposited at https://github.com/SelinaAliens/enzymes_5_gates_merkabit (MIT-licensed). The Cirq simulations supporting §6.5 (forward direction), §7.7 (bidirectionality and round-trip closure), and §9.5 (PSII OEC h=12 resonance) are deterministic with fixed gate parameters, run in under one second on a standard laptop, and use only NumPy + Cirq + Matplotlib. Source data: the twelve-enzyme decomposition is derived directly from peer-reviewed mechanism literature with no proprietary or unpublished biological inputs.