Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Verification of the Core Hypothesis of the Energy Gradient Model (EGM) in the 1s State of Hydrogen Atom Energiegradientenmodell (EGM): Verifikation der Kernhypothese im 1s-Zustand des Wasserstoffatoms

Yung Hsu

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Energy Gradient Model (EGM) takes the proportionality between gradient force and energy density gradient as its core hypothesis, the theoretical foundation for constructing a unified description of gravitational and quantum mechanical systems. This paper selects the hydrogen atom 1s state—a typical spherical symmetric, stable quantum system conforming to EGM's application scope—as the research object. Based on the EGM-modified Schrödinger equation, the EGM gradient potential U_EGM of the hydrogen atom 1s state is rigorously derived by substituting the spherical symmetric Laplace operator and hydrogen atom Coulomb potential; the gradient force F_EGM is further obtained according to EGM's gradient force definition. Combined with the hydrogen atom 1s state wave function, the energy density ρ_E and its spatial gradient ∇ρ_E are calculated in accordance with the EGM definition ρ_E=|ψ|². The proportional relationship between F_EGM and ∇ρ_E is quantitatively verified at the Bohr radius, and the accurate value, unit and physical meaning of the proportional constant K are given. Results show that F_EGM and ∇ρ_E at the Bohr radius satisfy the strict proportional relationship F_EGM=K·∇ρ_E; K is a fixed scalar, with the unit of cubic meter (m³) in the International System of Units and a numerical value of about -1.014×10^-39 m³. The sign difference between F_EGM and ∇ρ_E is a necessary result derived from the EGM definition chain, consistent with the model's theoretical logic. Compared with the approximate calculation method based on the hydrogen atom 1s-2s energy transition, the derivation method based on the EGM-modified Schrödinger equation avoids inherent errors in energy density calculation during the transition process, and the obtained K value has higher precision and theoretical rigor. This study completes the strict theoretical verification of the EGM core hypothesis in the typical quantum system of the hydrogen atom 1s state, which not only proves the rationality of EGM's basic assumption, but also provides a reliable theoretical derivation method for the subsequent application of EGM in more quantum systems, and lays a solid foundation for the further development of EGM in the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics.

DOI
10.17605/osf.io/y9bf8

Related papers

Energy Gradient Model (EGM) Derivation of the Stable Equilibrium State of Hydrogen Atom 1s State — Physical Interpretation of Bohr Force Balance and Centrifugal Force Based on Energy Gradient Distribution

Yung Hsu

Based on the Energy Gradient Model (EGM), this paper starts from the basic postulate of energy density distribution and strictly derives the stable equilibrium condition of the hydrogen atom 1s state. The results show that the stable orbit of the electron in the ground state is not determined by artificially assumed quantization conditions, but results from the balance between the gradient force generated by the spatial distribution of the energy cloud and the Coulomb force. At the Bohr radius a_0, the magnitudes of the gradient force, Coulomb force, and Bohr centrifugal force are exactly equal, achieving self-consistent equilibrium. This model explains the physical mechanism of Bohr orbital stability from the nature of energy distribution, provides a microscopic energetic foundation for the classical force balance condition, and offers a new unified description for the physical origin of quantum stable states.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Energy Gradient Model (EGM): Definition and Experimental Verification of the Energy Difference-Distance Constant C

Yung Hsu

This paper proposes the Energy Gradient Model (EGM), which establishes a unified description of the energy density field, gravitational field and quantum wave function evolution by introducing the gradient force and gradient potential. The core hypothesis of the model is that the gradient force is proportional to the energy density gradient, and the energy density gradient is proportional to the square of the absolute value of the quantum wave function. Based on this hypothesis, the classical Schrödinger equation is modified, such that the gradient potential coupling is automatically introduced when the energy density distribution is inhomogeneous, and the model reverts to classical quantum mechanics in a homogeneous field. Based on the experiments of the Mozi Quantum Science Experimental Satellite and ground-based micro-precision experiments, the total energy difference is rigorously defined as the sum of the absolute value of the gravitational potential energy difference and the absolute value of the Earth's rotational kinetic energy difference, and the energy difference-distance constant C is derived. The macroscopic experiment yields C_{macro} \approx 0.0235 J/(kg·m), and the microscopic experiment yields C_{micro} \approx 1.6\times10^{-10} J/(kg·m), with the ratio of the two being about an order of 10^8, which is consistent with the theoretical prediction of EGM. This paper also clarifies the scope of application and limitations of the EGM, which realizes the unification of macroscopic gravity and microscopic quantum systems, and provides a new theoretical framework for quantum entanglement, gravitational gradient effects and the physical origin of fundamental physical constants.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Kinetic Energy Model and Energy Gradient Model(EGM) for the Hydrogen Atom 1s State

Yung Hsu

This paper establishes a self-consistent framework for the kinetic energy distribution of the hydrogen atom ground state (1s) based on the **Energy Gradient Model (EGM)**. By clarifying the distinction between the global total kinetic energy and the local probabilistic energy density, we correct the conceptual ambiguities arising from the traditional assumption of a continuous energy field. The core proposition is that the energy density is fundamentally the total kinetic energy distributed according to the quantum probability cloud. The energy density is proportional to the squared modulus of the wavefunction, with the proportionality constant being the ground-state total kinetic energy of 13.6 eV, independent of spatial position. The full-space integral of the energy density naturally converges to the total kinetic energy, with no divergence or contradictions. This work provides a clear physical picture, a complete formula system, and numerical verification, offering a consistent and intuitive foundation for the EGM.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Energy Gradient Model 2.0 (EGM 2.0)

Yung Hsu

The Energy Gradient Model 2.0 (EGM 2.0) provides a clear, intuitive, and experimentally consistent framework for describing microscopic particle dynamics. Unlike traditional quantum mechanics, which relies on abstract wavefunction penetration and probabilistic interpretations, EGM 2.0 interprets quantum behavior as energy‑gradient‑driven evolution of electron clouds. The model unifies quantum tunneling and quantum transition under a single physical mechanism distinguished by a critical structural stability threshold. This paper presents a concise introduction to the core concepts, fundamental assumptions, and basic formalism of EGM 2.0. Keywords: Energy Gradient Model, EGM 2.0, electron cloud, energy gradient, quantum tunneling, quantum transition

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Wrong Potential Energy Term in Schrödinger’s Equation for Hydrogen Atom

Gurcharn Singh Sandhu

Even after nine decades of successful run of the Quantum Mechanics (QM), different viewpoints on foundational problems of Quantum Physics are still being actively debated. That is because mathematical logic of QM often defies the physical intuition which constitutes the main spirit of Physics. De Broglie’s hypothesis of matter waves implied that the dynamic characteristics of a micro particle in motion, can be ascribed to the wave characteristics of the wavelet accompanying the particle. The Schrödinger equation models the matter-wave interactions through wavefunction ψ and effectively serves as the foundation of QM. Even though mathematical structure of the Schrödinger equation is sound and elegant, here we show a conceptual mistake in the development of this equation wherein the physical situation has not been correctly modeled in the equation. The Coulomb potential energy of the proton electron pair in Hydrogen atom is essentially the negative interaction energy between their superposed electrostatic fields which is inversely proportional to their instantaneous separation distance. Assuming the proton to be relatively fixed at the origin of an appropriate coordinate system, the potential energy of the orbiting electron will be a function of instantaneous position coordinates of the electron. This has not been properly modeled in the Schrödinger equation. The resulting errors in the solution have been quantitatively demonstrated in this paper. We have stressed the necessity of incorporating a specific correction in the potential energy term of the Schrödinger equation, after which it may facilitate the adoption of Bohmian QM.

Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2018•3 citations

Why is the Solution of the Schrödinger Equation not a Miracle in Quantum Chemistry? A Perspective From the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

Lieu Le Quang, Liviu Giurgiulescu, Khiem Tran Ngoc +1 more

The Schrödinger equation is the cornerstone of quantum mechanics and is used to determine the energy levels of the hydrogen atom. However, in the teaching of Quantum Chemistry, many students tend to regard the solutions of the Schrödinger equation as purely mathematical results without fully understanding the physical origin of quantum energy levels. In this paper, an approximate model of the hydrogen atom is first developed based on the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the Coulomb potential. This model is then used to derive the Bohr radius and the ground-state energy by minimizing the total energy function. Subsequently, the time-independent Schrödinger equation is formulated and solved by the method of separation of variables in spherical coordinates to obtain the exact energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom. The results demonstrate that both the approximate model and the exact solution predict the same ground-state energy, E1 = −13.6 eV, while the Schrödinger equation further generalizes this result to the quantized energy spectrum, En = −13.6/n2. These findings indicate that the solutions of the Schrödinger equation are not "miraculous" mathematical outcomes but rather the inevitable consequences of the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. This approach provides a clearer physical interpretation of quantum energy levels and offers significant pedagogical value for the teaching of Quantum Chemistry.

Technical Education Science/Giáo dục Kỹ thuật•Sep 17, 2026•0 citations
The Energy Gradient Model (EGM) takes the proportionality between gradient force and energy density gradient as its core hypothesis, the theoretical foundation for constructing a unified description of gravitational and quantum mechanical systems. This paper selects the hydrogen atom 1s state—a typical spherical symmetric, stable quantum system conforming to EGM's application scope—as the research object. Based on the EGM-modified Schrödinger equation, the EGM gradient potential U_EGM of the hydrogen atom 1s state is rigorously derived by substituting the spherical symmetric Laplace operator and hydrogen atom Coulomb potential; the gradient force F_EGM is further obtained according to EGM's gradient force definition. Combined with the hydrogen atom 1s state wave function, the energy density ρ_E and its spatial gradient ∇ρ_E are calculated in accordance with the EGM definition ρ_E=|ψ|². The proportional relationship between F_EGM and ∇ρ_E is quantitatively verified at the Bohr radius, and the accurate value, unit and physical meaning of the proportional constant K are given. Results show that F_EGM and ∇ρ_E at the Bohr radius satisfy the strict proportional relationship F_EGM=K·∇ρ_E; K is a fixed scalar, with the unit of cubic meter (m³) in the International System of Units and a numerical value of about -1.014×10^-39 m³. The sign difference between F_EGM and ∇ρ_E is a necessary result derived from the EGM definition chain, consistent with the model's theoretical logic. Compared with the approximate calculation method based on the hydrogen atom 1s-2s energy transition, the derivation method based on the EGM-modified Schrödinger equation avoids inherent errors in energy density calculation during the transition process, and the obtained K value has higher precision and theoretical rigor. This study completes the strict theoretical verification of the EGM core hypothesis in the typical quantum system of the hydrogen atom 1s state, which not only proves the rationality of EGM's basic assumption, but also provides a reliable theoretical derivation method for the subsequent application of EGM in more quantum systems, and lays a solid foundation for the further development of EGM in the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics.
Based on the Energy Gradient Model (EGM), this paper starts from the basic postulate of energy density distribution and strictly derives the stable equilibrium condition of the hydrogen atom 1s state. The results show that the stable orbit of the electron in the ground state is not determined by artificially assumed quantization conditions, but results from the balance between the gradient force generated by the spatial distribution of the energy cloud and the Coulomb force. At the Bohr radius a_0, the magnitudes of the gradient force, Coulomb force, and Bohr centrifugal force are exactly equal, achieving self-consistent equilibrium. This model explains the physical mechanism of Bohr orbital stability from the nature of energy distribution, provides a microscopic energetic foundation for the classical force balance condition, and offers a new unified description for the physical origin of quantum stable states.
This paper proposes the Energy Gradient Model (EGM), which establishes a unified description of the energy density field, gravitational field and quantum wave function evolution by introducing the gradient force and gradient potential. The core hypothesis of the model is that the gradient force is proportional to the energy density gradient, and the energy density gradient is proportional to the square of the absolute value of the quantum wave function. Based on this hypothesis, the classical Schrödinger equation is modified, such that the gradient potential coupling is automatically introduced when the energy density distribution is inhomogeneous, and the model reverts to classical quantum mechanics in a homogeneous field. Based on the experiments of the Mozi Quantum Science Experimental Satellite and ground-based micro-precision experiments, the total energy difference is rigorously defined as the sum of the absolute value of the gravitational potential energy difference and the absolute value of the Earth's rotational kinetic energy difference, and the energy difference-distance constant C is derived. The macroscopic experiment yields C_{macro} \approx 0.0235 J/(kg·m), and the microscopic experiment yields C_{micro} \approx 1.6\times10^{-10} J/(kg·m), with the ratio of the two being about an order of 10^8, which is consistent with the theoretical prediction of EGM. This paper also clarifies the scope of application and limitations of the EGM, which realizes the unification of macroscopic gravity and microscopic quantum systems, and provides a new theoretical framework for quantum entanglement, gravitational gradient effects and the physical origin of fundamental physical constants.
This paper establishes a self-consistent framework for the kinetic energy distribution of the hydrogen atom ground state (1s) based on the **Energy Gradient Model (EGM)**. By clarifying the distinction between the global total kinetic energy and the local probabilistic energy density, we correct the conceptual ambiguities arising from the traditional assumption of a continuous energy field. The core proposition is that the energy density is fundamentally the total kinetic energy distributed according to the quantum probability cloud. The energy density is proportional to the squared modulus of the wavefunction, with the proportionality constant being the ground-state total kinetic energy of 13.6 eV, independent of spatial position. The full-space integral of the energy density naturally converges to the total kinetic energy, with no divergence or contradictions. This work provides a clear physical picture, a complete formula system, and numerical verification, offering a consistent and intuitive foundation for the EGM.
The Energy Gradient Model 2.0 (EGM 2.0) provides a clear, intuitive, and experimentally consistent framework for describing microscopic particle dynamics. Unlike traditional quantum mechanics, which relies on abstract wavefunction penetration and probabilistic interpretations, EGM 2.0 interprets quantum behavior as energy‑gradient‑driven evolution of electron clouds. The model unifies quantum tunneling and quantum transition under a single physical mechanism distinguished by a critical structural stability threshold. This paper presents a concise introduction to the core concepts, fundamental assumptions, and basic formalism of EGM 2.0. Keywords: Energy Gradient Model, EGM 2.0, electron cloud, energy gradient, quantum tunneling, quantum transition
Even after nine decades of successful run of the Quantum Mechanics (QM), different viewpoints on foundational problems of Quantum Physics are still being actively debated. That is because mathematical logic of QM often defies the physical intuition which constitutes the main spirit of Physics. De Broglie’s hypothesis of matter waves implied that the dynamic characteristics of a micro particle in motion, can be ascribed to the wave characteristics of the wavelet accompanying the particle. The Schrödinger equation models the matter-wave interactions through wavefunction ψ and effectively serves as the foundation of QM. Even though mathematical structure of the Schrödinger equation is sound and elegant, here we show a conceptual mistake in the development of this equation wherein the physical situation has not been correctly modeled in the equation. The Coulomb potential energy of the proton electron pair in Hydrogen atom is essentially the negative interaction energy between their superposed electrostatic fields which is inversely proportional to their instantaneous separation distance. Assuming the proton to be relatively fixed at the origin of an appropriate coordinate system, the potential energy of the orbiting electron will be a function of instantaneous position coordinates of the electron. This has not been properly modeled in the Schrödinger equation. The resulting errors in the solution have been quantitatively demonstrated in this paper. We have stressed the necessity of incorporating a specific correction in the potential energy term of the Schrödinger equation, after which it may facilitate the adoption of Bohmian QM.
The Schrödinger equation is the cornerstone of quantum mechanics and is used to determine the energy levels of the hydrogen atom. However, in the teaching of Quantum Chemistry, many students tend to regard the solutions of the Schrödinger equation as purely mathematical results without fully understanding the physical origin of quantum energy levels. In this paper, an approximate model of the hydrogen atom is first developed based on the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the Coulomb potential. This model is then used to derive the Bohr radius and the ground-state energy by minimizing the total energy function. Subsequently, the time-independent Schrödinger equation is formulated and solved by the method of separation of variables in spherical coordinates to obtain the exact energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom. The results demonstrate that both the approximate model and the exact solution predict the same ground-state energy, E1 = −13.6 eV, while the Schrödinger equation further generalizes this result to the quantized energy spectrum, En = −13.6/n2. These findings indicate that the solutions of the Schrödinger equation are not "miraculous" mathematical outcomes but rather the inevitable consequences of the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. This approach provides a clearer physical interpretation of quantum energy levels and offers significant pedagogical value for the teaching of Quantum Chemistry.