Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The weak coupling approach for lattice spin models on a torus

Yves Brihaye, Philippe Spindel

Published Jan 1, 1986• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Stable Gapless Bose Liquid Phases without any Symmetry

Alex Rasmussen, Yi‐Zhuang You, Cenke Xu

It is well-known that a stable algebraic spin liquid state (or equivalently an algebraic Bose liquid (ABL) state) with emergent gapless photon excitations can exist in quantum spin ice systems, or in a quantum dimer model on a bipartite $3d$ lattice. This photon phase is stable against any weak perturbation without assuming any symmetry. Further works concluded that certain lattice models give rise to more exotic stable algebraic Bose liquid phases with graviton-like excitations. In this paper we will show how these algebraic Bose liquid states can be generalized to stable phases with even more exotic types of gapless excitations and then argue that these new phases are stable against weak perturbations. We also explicitly show that these theories have an (algebraic) topological ground state degeneracy on a torus, and construct the corresponding topological invariants.

arXiv:1601.08235•Jan 29, 2016•74 citations

Theory of Spin Lattices and Lattice Gauge Models

J. W. Clark, MANFRED L. RISTIG

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•9 citations

Quantum Spin Lattice Models: A Coupled-Cluster Treatment

R. F. Bishop, John B. Parkinson, Yang Xian

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1991•1 citation

Duality in 2D Spin Models on Torus

A. I. Bugrij, V. N. Shadura

Method of derivation of the duality relations for two-dimensional Z(N)-symmetric spin models on finite square lattice wrapped on the torus is proposed. As example, exact duality relations for the nonhomogeneous Ising model (N=2) and the Z(N)-Berezinsky-Villain model are obtained.

arXiv:hep-th/9706045•Jun 6, 1997•1 citation

Machine-defined lattice spin models

C. H. Woo

Physics Letters A•Jun 1, 1986•1 citation

Spin-projection orientations in the plane square-lattice Ising model with periodic boundary conditions

You-gang Feng

The periodic boundary conditions changed the plane square-lattice Ising model to the torus-lattice system which restricts the spin-projection orientations. Only two of the three important spin-projection orientations, parallel to the x-axis or to the y-axis, are suited to the torus-lattice system. The infinitesimal difference of the free-energies of the systems between the two systems mentioned above makes their critical temperatures infinitely close to each other, but their topological fundamental groups are distinct.

arXiv:quant-ph/0506202•Jun 24, 2005•0 citations
It is well-known that a stable algebraic spin liquid state (or equivalently an algebraic Bose liquid (ABL) state) with emergent gapless photon excitations can exist in quantum spin ice systems, or in a quantum dimer model on a bipartite 3d3d3d lattice. This photon phase is stable against any weak perturbation without assuming any symmetry. Further works concluded that certain lattice models give rise to more exotic stable algebraic Bose liquid phases with graviton-like excitations. In this paper we will show how these algebraic Bose liquid states can be generalized to stable phases with even more exotic types of gapless excitations and then argue that these new phases are stable against weak perturbations. We also explicitly show that these theories have an (algebraic) topological ground state degeneracy on a torus, and construct the corresponding topological invariants.
The periodic boundary conditions changed the plane square-lattice Ising model to the torus-lattice system which restricts the spin-projection orientations. Only two of the three important spin-projection orientations, parallel to the x-axis or to the y-axis, are suited to the torus-lattice system. The infinitesimal difference of the free-energies of the systems between the two systems mentioned above makes their critical temperatures infinitely close to each other, but their topological fundamental groups are distinct.