Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Applications of the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation

Olímpia Lombardi

Published Feb 19, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Standard Quantum Mechanics is a theory that has been applied to many concrete physical situations and by means of which an impressive amount of experimental evidence has been accounted for. Therefore, a “good” interpretation must not only meet the traditional interpretative challenges of the theory, but must also show its agreement with the orthodox practice of physics. This chapter is devoted to argue for the physical relevance of the MHI by applying it to well-known models and experimental results, which will be presented in the usual physical language. In particular, it is applied to the free particle, free particle with spin, harmonic oscillator, free hydrogen atom, Zeeman effect, fine structure, decoherence, the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, the problem of symmetry in quantum chemistry.

DOI
10.1093/9780198951407.003.0005

Related papers

Standard Quantum Mechanics: Formalism and physical content

Olímpia Lombardi

Abstract Since the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation (MHI) is based on the formalism and the minimal interpretation of Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM), this chapter may seem superfluous: it could be argued that everyone knows what SQM is. However, as remarked in the previous chapter, the identification of SQM is not as immediate as is usually assumed. Therefore, if an interpretation of quantum mechanics is to be precisely developed, the underlying theoretical commitments must be clear from the very beginning. The second reason why this chapter is not superfluous is that the MHI differs from the traditional Hilbert space formulation of SQM by adopting the algebraic formalism as its departing point. Although this might seem a minor formal detail, it will play a central role in the ontological picture arising from the MHI interpretation, as will be seen in Chapter 10.

•Feb 19, 2026•0 citations

The Postulates of the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation

Olímpia Lombardi

Abstract In the present chapter, the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation (MHI) is introduced in terms of interpretative postulates. These postulates distinguish between type-properties and case-properties, and define quantum systems as bundles of properties. The Hamiltonian of the system plays a central role in the definition of systems and subsystems. Moreover, according to the MHI-Actualization Rule, the selection of the preferred context is based on the Hamiltonian. In this chapter, the MHI is introduced in a neutral way, without discussing its advantages over other proposals. The arguments supporting it will become clear in the following chapters, where its physical relevance will be explained (Chapter 5) and it will be applied to solve traditional interpretative challenges (Chapter 6).

•Feb 19, 2026•0 citations

A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics

Olímpia Lombardi, Mario Castagnino

The aim of this paper is to introduce a new member of the family of the modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. In this modal-Hamiltonian interpretation, the Hamiltonian of the quantum system plays a decisive role in the property-ascription rule that selects the definite-valued observables whose possible values become actual. We show that this interpretation is effective for solving the measurement problem, both in its ideal and its non-ideal versions, and we argue for the physical relevance of the property-ascription rule by applying it to well-known physical situations. Moreover, we explain how this interpretation supplies a description of the elemental categories of the ontology referred to by the theory, where quantum systems turn out to be bundles of possible properties.

arXiv:quant-ph/0610121•Oct 15, 2006•1 citation

Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

Olímpia Lombardi

Abstract Since the aim of this book is to introduce the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation (MHI) in a comprehensive way, this chapter focuses on the family of Modal Interpretations of quantum mechanics, to which the MHI belongs. The purpose is, then, to recall the common features of the Modal Interpretations as well as the differences between them. In particular, the original proposal of van Fraassen is presented, and the Biorthogonal-Decomposition Modal Interpretation, the Spectral-Decomposition Modal Interpretation, the Atomic Modal Interpretation, and the Perspectival Modal Interpretation are described, pointing out their advantages and limitations.

•Feb 19, 2026•0 citations

A Galilei-invariant Version of the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation

Olímpia Lombardi

Abstract Although it is usual to read that non-relativistic quantum mechanics is covariant, and even invariant, under the Galilei transformations, this topic has scarcely been addressed in the standard literature on the theory. This fact has, at least, two undesirable consequences. On the one hand, the meanings of the concepts of covariance and invariance are not precisely elucidated. On the other hand, one is left without a clear idea about in what sense the covariance and/or invariance of quantum mechanics can be asserted. This situation has its counterpart in the field of the interpretation of quantum mechanics: the relevance of the Galilei group is rarely discussed in the impressive amount of literature on the subject. The general premise underlying the present chapter is that the relationship between interpretation and Galilei transformations deserves to be seriously analyzed: the fact that the theory is covariant under the Galilei group does not guarantee the same property for the interpretation because, in general, interpretations add interpretative postulates to the formal structure of the theory. On this basis, and after clarifying the concepts of covariance and invariance, this chapter considers in what sense quantum mechanics is covariant and under what conditions it is invariant under the transformations of the Galilei group. This conceptual framework will provide the tools to study the result of the application of the Galilei transformations to the Modal-Hamiltonian interpretative postulates.

•Feb 19, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics

N. S. Manton, Nicholas Mee

Abstract In this chapter, the main features of quantum theory are presented. The chapter begins with a historical account of the invention of quantum mechanics. The meaning of position and momentum in quantum mechanics is discussed and non-commuting operators are introduced. The Schrödinger equation is presented and solved for a free particle and for a harmonic oscillator potential in one dimension. The meaning of the wavefunction is considered and the probabilistic interpretation is presented. The mathematical machinery and language of quantum mechanics are developed, including Hermitian operators, observables and expectation values. The uncertainty principle is discussed and the uncertainty relations are presented. Scattering and tunnelling by potential wells and barriers is considered. The use of variational principles to estimate ground state energies is explained and illustrated with a simple example.

•Apr 13, 2017•0 citations
Abstract Standard Quantum Mechanics is a theory that has been applied to many concrete physical situations and by means of which an impressive amount of experimental evidence has been accounted for. Therefore, a “good” interpretation must not only meet the traditional interpretative challenges of the theory, but must also show its agreement with the orthodox practice of physics. This chapter is devoted to argue for the physical relevance of the MHI by applying it to well-known models and experimental results, which will be presented in the usual physical language. In particular, it is applied to the free particle, free particle with spin, harmonic oscillator, free hydrogen atom, Zeeman effect, fine structure, decoherence, the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, the problem of symmetry in quantum chemistry.
Abstract Since the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation (MHI) is based on the formalism and the minimal interpretation of Standard Quantum Mechanics (SQM), this chapter may seem superfluous: it could be argued that everyone knows what SQM is. However, as remarked in the previous chapter, the identification of SQM is not as immediate as is usually assumed. Therefore, if an interpretation of quantum mechanics is to be precisely developed, the underlying theoretical commitments must be clear from the very beginning. The second reason why this chapter is not superfluous is that the MHI differs from the traditional Hilbert space formulation of SQM by adopting the algebraic formalism as its departing point. Although this might seem a minor formal detail, it will play a central role in the ontological picture arising from the MHI interpretation, as will be seen in Chapter 10.
Abstract In the present chapter, the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation (MHI) is introduced in terms of interpretative postulates. These postulates distinguish between type-properties and case-properties, and define quantum systems as bundles of properties. The Hamiltonian of the system plays a central role in the definition of systems and subsystems. Moreover, according to the MHI-Actualization Rule, the selection of the preferred context is based on the Hamiltonian. In this chapter, the MHI is introduced in a neutral way, without discussing its advantages over other proposals. The arguments supporting it will become clear in the following chapters, where its physical relevance will be explained (Chapter 5) and it will be applied to solve traditional interpretative challenges (Chapter 6).
The aim of this paper is to introduce a new member of the family of the modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. In this modal-Hamiltonian interpretation, the Hamiltonian of the quantum system plays a decisive role in the property-ascription rule that selects the definite-valued observables whose possible values become actual. We show that this interpretation is effective for solving the measurement problem, both in its ideal and its non-ideal versions, and we argue for the physical relevance of the property-ascription rule by applying it to well-known physical situations. Moreover, we explain how this interpretation supplies a description of the elemental categories of the ontology referred to by the theory, where quantum systems turn out to be bundles of possible properties.
Abstract Since the aim of this book is to introduce the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation (MHI) in a comprehensive way, this chapter focuses on the family of Modal Interpretations of quantum mechanics, to which the MHI belongs. The purpose is, then, to recall the common features of the Modal Interpretations as well as the differences between them. In particular, the original proposal of van Fraassen is presented, and the Biorthogonal-Decomposition Modal Interpretation, the Spectral-Decomposition Modal Interpretation, the Atomic Modal Interpretation, and the Perspectival Modal Interpretation are described, pointing out their advantages and limitations.
Abstract Although it is usual to read that non-relativistic quantum mechanics is covariant, and even invariant, under the Galilei transformations, this topic has scarcely been addressed in the standard literature on the theory. This fact has, at least, two undesirable consequences. On the one hand, the meanings of the concepts of covariance and invariance are not precisely elucidated. On the other hand, one is left without a clear idea about in what sense the covariance and/or invariance of quantum mechanics can be asserted. This situation has its counterpart in the field of the interpretation of quantum mechanics: the relevance of the Galilei group is rarely discussed in the impressive amount of literature on the subject. The general premise underlying the present chapter is that the relationship between interpretation and Galilei transformations deserves to be seriously analyzed: the fact that the theory is covariant under the Galilei group does not guarantee the same property for the interpretation because, in general, interpretations add interpretative postulates to the formal structure of the theory. On this basis, and after clarifying the concepts of covariance and invariance, this chapter considers in what sense quantum mechanics is covariant and under what conditions it is invariant under the transformations of the Galilei group. This conceptual framework will provide the tools to study the result of the application of the Galilei transformations to the Modal-Hamiltonian interpretative postulates.
Abstract In this chapter, the main features of quantum theory are presented. The chapter begins with a historical account of the invention of quantum mechanics. The meaning of position and momentum in quantum mechanics is discussed and non-commuting operators are introduced. The Schrödinger equation is presented and solved for a free particle and for a harmonic oscillator potential in one dimension. The meaning of the wavefunction is considered and the probabilistic interpretation is presented. The mathematical machinery and language of quantum mechanics are developed, including Hermitian operators, observables and expectation values. The uncertainty principle is discussed and the uncertainty relations are presented. Scattering and tunnelling by potential wells and barriers is considered. The use of variational principles to estimate ground state energies is explained and illustrated with a simple example.