Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Michigan State University Press eBooks

HEISENBERG’S FINAL EXPERIMENT

Published Mar 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.14321/jj.36828012.54

Related papers

XYZ Quantum Heisenberg Models with p -Orbital Bosons

Fernanda Pinheiro, Georg M. Bruun, J.-P. Martikainen +1 more

We demonstrate how the spin-1/2 XYZ quantum Heisenberg model can be realized with bosonic atoms loaded in the p band of an optical lattice in the Mott regime. The combination of Bose statistics and the symmetry of the p-orbital wave functions leads to a nonintegrable Heisenberg model with antiferromagnetic couplings. Moreover, the sign and relative strength of the couplings characterizing the model are shown to be experimentally tunable. We display the rich phase diagram in the one-dimensional case and discuss finite size effects relevant for trapped systems. Finally, experimental issues related to preparation, manipulation, detection, and imperfections are considered.

arXiv:1304.3178•Physical Review Letters•Nov 12, 2013•72 citations

On Heisenberg's Discovery

Abner Shimony

Science•Jan 13, 1978•0 citations

Heisenberg’s gedanken experiment revisited

Dipankar Home, S. Sengupta

American Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 1983•2 citations

T=0 magnetization and susceptibility curves for Heisenberg-like and other spin-1 chains (abstract)

Jill C. Bonner

Recently there has been extensive theoretical interest in the remarkable Haldane prediction that spin-1 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg-like chains should display an energy gap between singlet ground state and excited continua. This behavior has been confirmed numerically, and it has been shown that the energy gap is of a magnitude to be observable experimentally. The phenomenon has captured the interest of experimental groups in neutron scattering and magnetism. A recent experimental study obtains very good experimental agreement with the theoretical T=0 magnetization curve obtained numerically by Parkinson and Bonner.1,2 An explanation will be provided for the unusual phase diagram and other anomalous features observed by the authors of Ref. 2. Numerical susceptibility studies of Heisenberg antiferromagnetic and general XXZ spin-1 chains will be presented, and discussed in terms of a novel quantum-classical cross-over phenomenon.2 Finally, a comparison will be made of T=0 magnetization isotherms for several spin-1 chains, including the Takhtajan–Babujian chain and the chain with pure biquadratic interactions.

Journal of Applied Physics•Apr 15, 1991•0 citations

Heisenberg picture and reality

Bernard d’Espagnat

Foundations of Physics•Dec 1, 1992•1 citation

Heisenberg limit for detecting vacuum birefringence

Naser Ahmadiniaz, T. E. Cowan, Roland A. Sauerbrey +3 more

Quantum electrodynamics predicts the vacuum to behave as a nonlinear medium, including effects such as birefringence. However, for experimentally available field strengths, this vacuum polarizability is extremely small and thus very hard to measure. In analogy to the Heisenberg limit in quantum metrology, we study the minimum requirements for such a detection in a given strong field (the pump field). Using a laser pulse as the probe field, we find that its energy must exceed a certain threshold depending on the interaction time. However, a detection at that threshold, i.e., the Heisenberg limit, requires highly nonlinear measurement schemes---while for ordinary linear-optics schemes, the required energy (Poisson or shot noise limit) is much larger. Finally, we discuss several currently considered experimental scenarios from this point of view.

arXiv:2003.10519•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Jun 30, 2020•20 citations
We demonstrate how the spin-1/2 XYZ quantum Heisenberg model can be realized with bosonic atoms loaded in the p band of an optical lattice in the Mott regime. The combination of Bose statistics and the symmetry of the p-orbital wave functions leads to a nonintegrable Heisenberg model with antiferromagnetic couplings. Moreover, the sign and relative strength of the couplings characterizing the model are shown to be experimentally tunable. We display the rich phase diagram in the one-dimensional case and discuss finite size effects relevant for trapped systems. Finally, experimental issues related to preparation, manipulation, detection, and imperfections are considered.
Recently there has been extensive theoretical interest in the remarkable Haldane prediction that spin-1 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg-like chains should display an energy gap between singlet ground state and excited continua. This behavior has been confirmed numerically, and it has been shown that the energy gap is of a magnitude to be observable experimentally. The phenomenon has captured the interest of experimental groups in neutron scattering and magnetism. A recent experimental study obtains very good experimental agreement with the theoretical T=0 magnetization curve obtained numerically by Parkinson and Bonner.1,2 An explanation will be provided for the unusual phase diagram and other anomalous features observed by the authors of Ref. 2. Numerical susceptibility studies of Heisenberg antiferromagnetic and general XXZ spin-1 chains will be presented, and discussed in terms of a novel quantum-classical cross-over phenomenon.2 Finally, a comparison will be made of T=0 magnetization isotherms for several spin-1 chains, including the Takhtajan–Babujian chain and the chain with pure biquadratic interactions.
Quantum electrodynamics predicts the vacuum to behave as a nonlinear medium, including effects such as birefringence. However, for experimentally available field strengths, this vacuum polarizability is extremely small and thus very hard to measure. In analogy to the Heisenberg limit in quantum metrology, we study the minimum requirements for such a detection in a given strong field (the pump field). Using a laser pulse as the probe field, we find that its energy must exceed a certain threshold depending on the interaction time. However, a detection at that threshold, i.e., the Heisenberg limit, requires highly nonlinear measurement schemes---while for ordinary linear-optics schemes, the required energy (Poisson or shot noise limit) is much larger. Finally, we discuss several currently considered experimental scenarios from this point of view.