Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Functional Architecture Of Reality: Bridging set Theory and Physical Determinism

Krish Keshwala

Published Feb 5, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper presents an exploratory conceptual framework for understanding reality through functional architecture, drawing on ideas from theoretical physics, mathematics, and philosophy. It examines how complex physical laws may emerge from simpler underlying structures and discusses possible connections between quantum theory, relativity, and information-based approaches. The work is intended as a student-level theoretical exploration aimed at encouraging further study into the foundations of physics.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18822880

Related papers

A Layered and Probabilistic Framework of the Cosmos: From Observable Reality to Quantum Foundations

azy tah

This article presents a conceptual and mathematical framework for understanding the universe as a layered system, where classical determinism and quantum probability are not opposing ideas but complementary aspects of reality.By introducing a foundational substrate beneath all physical layers, the paper explains how observable spacetime, quantum behavior, and probabilistic laws emerge naturally from deeper structures.The work combines intuitive explanations with mathematical formulations, aiming to bridge physics, cosmology, and foundational theory in a unified and accessible way.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Complementary Realities and the Quantum World

Sudip Patra, Menas C. Kafatos

This is a unique text that explores quantum-like modelling frameworks that connect quantum mechanics with cognitive science and consciousness studies to propose a new ontological framework that transcends traditional boundaries between physics, philosophy, and cognitive science. The book develops along two complementary paths. First, it explores quantum-like modelling, an exciting emerging field where researchers apply logical and mathematical structures from quantum mechanics and information theory to cognitive modelling and decision science. Second, it investigates the profound links between quantum science and consciousness studies, incorporating insights from advanced mathematical frameworks such as category theory. By synthesizing these two approaches, the authors propose a novel framework termed 'quantum-like reality' that moves beyond pragmatic modelling to offer deeper ontological thinking that can enrich both foundational understanding and applied research. This will be an interesting read for students and researchers working at the intersection of quantum physics, cognitive science, and consciousness studies.

Routledge eBooks•May 26, 2026•0 citations

A Novel Way of `Understanding' Quantum Mechanics

Armin Nikkhah Shirazi

Written at a level appropriate for an educated lay audience, this paper attempts to give a primarily conceptual overview of a framework recently introduced in reference [3] by this author, which attempts to clarify what quantum mechanics tells us about reality. Physicists may find this pa-per useful because it focuses on the central ideas of the framework at a conceptual level, thereby lessening their unfamiliarity, an unavoidable fea-ture of truly novel ideas. The author hopes that this article will motivate physicists to seriously evaluate the mathematical details of the framework given in the original reference...I think I can safely say that nobody understands Quantum Mechanics.”[1]

•Oct 3, 2011•0 citations

Distributed Presence Research Program (DP)

Nasiri Vatan Sadeq

Distributed Presence Research Program (DP) is an interdisciplinary foundational research program investigating whether physical reality can be more coherently understood in terms of distributed, relational, and phase-structured presence rather than as a collection of fundamentally isolated entities. The program explores the possibility that mass, charge, localization, probability, field structure, quantum behavior, and spacetime organization may be interpreted as emergent modes of response, stabilization, and relational configuration within a deeper ontology of distributed presence. A central aim of the program is to develop an ontological unity in physics by articulating a framework in which the interpretation of physical properties, the ontology of fields, the status of probability, and the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics can be approached within a common relational structure. In particular, the DP Research Program addresses: the ontology of distributed presence, the emergence of localization, the reinterpretation of mass and charge, phase and response structures, the ontological interpretation of probability, the interpretation of quantum mechanics, spacetime emergence, and the search for ontological unity across physical theory. Rather than presenting itself as a completed physical theory, DP develops a conceptual and exploratory formal framework connecting philosophy of physics, metaphysics of science, quantum foundations, field-theoretic interpretation, and ontological modeling. The program aims to function as an open research platform for conceptual clarification, formal development, and interdisciplinary dialogue on the foundations and unity of physical reality.

•May 13, 2026•0 citations

Reality Behind the Quantum

Mehmet Serdar Kilin

This project is a theoretical study that aims to explain the seemingly counterintuitive results of quantum mechanics within a more understandable, causal, and conceptually unified framework. KZSK seeks to transform the approach sometimes summarized as “do not question, just calculate” into an approach of “question, uncover the mechanism, and make sense of it.” Rather than leaving quantum phenomena as disconnected mysteries, it attempts to bring them together under a common formative logic and a coherent physical process of emergence. In this way, KZSK aims to reduce as much as possible the idea that “quantum mechanics works, but we do not fully understand why it works this way.” From this perspective, KZSK is intended not merely as an interpretation of quantum mechanics, but as a formation architecture that seeks to explain why quantum behavior emerges. This architecture is based on three fundamental stages: 1. Timeless Root Reality: The formative foundation and relational order that precede physical spacetime. 2. Quantum Intermediate Form: The transition level between the timeless structure and temporal physical processes, where phase, sequentiality, and micro-temporal change begin to emerge. 3. Physical Spacetime: The classical level in which local interactions, measurement, and physical records become manifest. Within this structure, waves, particles, measurement, and entanglement are not treated as independent quantum mysteries, but as different stages and manifestations of the same underlying process of formation. KZSK also investigates the hypothesis that a more fundamental deterministic process may underlie the apparent probabilistic behavior of quantum mechanics. The aim is to develop this framework beyond a purely philosophical interpretation into a physical model candidate that can be mathematically formulated, further developed, and experimentally tested. KZSK is not yet a verified physical theory. Its physical validity must be evaluated through further mathematical development, quantitative comparison with existing experiments, independent research, and experimental testing.

•Aug 8, 2026•0 citations

Reality from its Basics

J.A.J. van Leunen

Building a physics theory from the basics of physical reality is not a costly enterprise and can be realized with some determination. Finding the basic structure is essential. Quite peculiar enough, the discovery of that structure occurred long ago. Current physics does not yet exploit this knowledge.

•May 1, 2018•0 citations
This paper presents an exploratory conceptual framework for understanding reality through functional architecture, drawing on ideas from theoretical physics, mathematics, and philosophy. It examines how complex physical laws may emerge from simpler underlying structures and discusses possible connections between quantum theory, relativity, and information-based approaches. The work is intended as a student-level theoretical exploration aimed at encouraging further study into the foundations of physics.
This article presents a conceptual and mathematical framework for understanding the universe as a layered system, where classical determinism and quantum probability are not opposing ideas but complementary aspects of reality.By introducing a foundational substrate beneath all physical layers, the paper explains how observable spacetime, quantum behavior, and probabilistic laws emerge naturally from deeper structures.The work combines intuitive explanations with mathematical formulations, aiming to bridge physics, cosmology, and foundational theory in a unified and accessible way.
This is a unique text that explores quantum-like modelling frameworks that connect quantum mechanics with cognitive science and consciousness studies to propose a new ontological framework that transcends traditional boundaries between physics, philosophy, and cognitive science. The book develops along two complementary paths. First, it explores quantum-like modelling, an exciting emerging field where researchers apply logical and mathematical structures from quantum mechanics and information theory to cognitive modelling and decision science. Second, it investigates the profound links between quantum science and consciousness studies, incorporating insights from advanced mathematical frameworks such as category theory. By synthesizing these two approaches, the authors propose a novel framework termed 'quantum-like reality' that moves beyond pragmatic modelling to offer deeper ontological thinking that can enrich both foundational understanding and applied research. This will be an interesting read for students and researchers working at the intersection of quantum physics, cognitive science, and consciousness studies.
Written at a level appropriate for an educated lay audience, this paper attempts to give a primarily conceptual overview of a framework recently introduced in reference [3] by this author, which attempts to clarify what quantum mechanics tells us about reality. Physicists may find this pa-per useful because it focuses on the central ideas of the framework at a conceptual level, thereby lessening their unfamiliarity, an unavoidable fea-ture of truly novel ideas. The author hopes that this article will motivate physicists to seriously evaluate the mathematical details of the framework given in the original reference...I think I can safely say that nobody understands Quantum Mechanics.”[1]
Distributed Presence Research Program (DP) is an interdisciplinary foundational research program investigating whether physical reality can be more coherently understood in terms of distributed, relational, and phase-structured presence rather than as a collection of fundamentally isolated entities. The program explores the possibility that mass, charge, localization, probability, field structure, quantum behavior, and spacetime organization may be interpreted as emergent modes of response, stabilization, and relational configuration within a deeper ontology of distributed presence. A central aim of the program is to develop an ontological unity in physics by articulating a framework in which the interpretation of physical properties, the ontology of fields, the status of probability, and the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics can be approached within a common relational structure. In particular, the DP Research Program addresses: the ontology of distributed presence, the emergence of localization, the reinterpretation of mass and charge, phase and response structures, the ontological interpretation of probability, the interpretation of quantum mechanics, spacetime emergence, and the search for ontological unity across physical theory. Rather than presenting itself as a completed physical theory, DP develops a conceptual and exploratory formal framework connecting philosophy of physics, metaphysics of science, quantum foundations, field-theoretic interpretation, and ontological modeling. The program aims to function as an open research platform for conceptual clarification, formal development, and interdisciplinary dialogue on the foundations and unity of physical reality.
This project is a theoretical study that aims to explain the seemingly counterintuitive results of quantum mechanics within a more understandable, causal, and conceptually unified framework. KZSK seeks to transform the approach sometimes summarized as “do not question, just calculate” into an approach of “question, uncover the mechanism, and make sense of it.” Rather than leaving quantum phenomena as disconnected mysteries, it attempts to bring them together under a common formative logic and a coherent physical process of emergence. In this way, KZSK aims to reduce as much as possible the idea that “quantum mechanics works, but we do not fully understand why it works this way.” From this perspective, KZSK is intended not merely as an interpretation of quantum mechanics, but as a formation architecture that seeks to explain why quantum behavior emerges. This architecture is based on three fundamental stages: 1. Timeless Root Reality: The formative foundation and relational order that precede physical spacetime. 2. Quantum Intermediate Form: The transition level between the timeless structure and temporal physical processes, where phase, sequentiality, and micro-temporal change begin to emerge. 3. Physical Spacetime: The classical level in which local interactions, measurement, and physical records become manifest. Within this structure, waves, particles, measurement, and entanglement are not treated as independent quantum mysteries, but as different stages and manifestations of the same underlying process of formation. KZSK also investigates the hypothesis that a more fundamental deterministic process may underlie the apparent probabilistic behavior of quantum mechanics. The aim is to develop this framework beyond a purely philosophical interpretation into a physical model candidate that can be mathematically formulated, further developed, and experimentally tested. KZSK is not yet a verified physical theory. Its physical validity must be evaluated through further mathematical development, quantitative comparison with existing experiments, independent research, and experimental testing.