Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Geometric quantum phase

J H Hannay

Published Jan 1, 1991• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The Geometric Phase in Quantum Systems

Arno Böhm, Ali Mostafazadeh, Hiroyasu Koizumi +2 more

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•426 citations

Interpretation of geometric phase via geometric distance and length during cyclic evolution

Arun Kumar Pati, Amitabh Joshi

We cast the nonadiabatic geometric phase in terms of the geometric distance function and the geometric length of the curve for arbitrary cyclic evolution of the quantum states. An interpretation is given to the geometric phase as the value of the integral of the contracted length of the curve along which the system traverses. It is found that for arbitrary cyclic evolution of the quantum states the geometric phase \ensuremath{\beta}(C) acquired by the system cannot be greater than the total length of the curve l(C). We have argued that the geometric phase arises because of the fundamental inequality between the length of the curve and the distance function. Finally, we have illustrated the calculation of the geometric phase based on the geometric distance function and the geometric length of the curve.

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1993•18 citations

Quantum Phase via Geometry

Science•Feb 7, 2008•0 citations

Unifying geometric entanglement and geometric phase in a quantum phase transition

Vahid Azimi Mousolou, C. M. Canali, Erik Sjöqvist

Geometric measure of entanglement and geometric phase have recently been used to analyze quantum phase transition in the $XY$ spin chain. We unify these two approaches by showing that the geometric entanglement and the geometric phase are respectively the real and imaginary parts of a complex-valued geometric entanglement, which can be investigated in typical quantum interferometry experiments. We argue that the singular behavior of the complex-value geometric entanglement at a quantum critical point is a characteristic of any quantum phase transition, by showing that the underlying mechanism is the occurrence of level crossings associated with the underlying Hamiltonian.

arXiv:1303.1623•Physical Review A•Jul 11, 2013•11 citations

The Geometric Phase in Quantum Physics

Arno Böhm

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1993•10 citations

Geometric aspects of noncyclic quantum evolutions

Arun Kumar Pati

The geometric phase is defined for any arbitrary quantum evolution using a ``reference section'' of the bundle covering the curve in the projective Hilbert space. A canonical one-form is defined whose line integral gives the desired geometric phase. It is manifestly gauge, phase, and reparametrization invariant for all quantum evolutions. A simple proof of the vanishing nature of the geometric phase along the geodesic is given. Also, an elementary proof of the nonadditive nature of the geometric phase is given. In the limit of cyclic evolution of a pure quantum state, this phase reduces to the Aharonov and Anandan phase, precisely. It is observed that in addition to the geometric phase, other geometric structures exist, such as the ``length'' and ``distance'' during any arbitrary quantum evolution. The relations among all of these geometric quantities are pointed out. Finally, two simple examples are studied to illustrate the ideas introduced in this paper.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1995•172 citations
We cast the nonadiabatic geometric phase in terms of the geometric distance function and the geometric length of the curve for arbitrary cyclic evolution of the quantum states. An interpretation is given to the geometric phase as the value of the integral of the contracted length of the curve along which the system traverses. It is found that for arbitrary cyclic evolution of the quantum states the geometric phase \ensuremath{\beta}(C) acquired by the system cannot be greater than the total length of the curve l(C). We have argued that the geometric phase arises because of the fundamental inequality between the length of the curve and the distance function. Finally, we have illustrated the calculation of the geometric phase based on the geometric distance function and the geometric length of the curve.
Geometric measure of entanglement and geometric phase have recently been used to analyze quantum phase transition in the XYXYXY spin chain. We unify these two approaches by showing that the geometric entanglement and the geometric phase are respectively the real and imaginary parts of a complex-valued geometric entanglement, which can be investigated in typical quantum interferometry experiments. We argue that the singular behavior of the complex-value geometric entanglement at a quantum critical point is a characteristic of any quantum phase transition, by showing that the underlying mechanism is the occurrence of level crossings associated with the underlying Hamiltonian.
The geometric phase is defined for any arbitrary quantum evolution using a ``reference section'' of the bundle covering the curve in the projective Hilbert space. A canonical one-form is defined whose line integral gives the desired geometric phase. It is manifestly gauge, phase, and reparametrization invariant for all quantum evolutions. A simple proof of the vanishing nature of the geometric phase along the geodesic is given. Also, an elementary proof of the nonadditive nature of the geometric phase is given. In the limit of cyclic evolution of a pure quantum state, this phase reduces to the Aharonov and Anandan phase, precisely. It is observed that in addition to the geometric phase, other geometric structures exist, such as the ``length'' and ``distance'' during any arbitrary quantum evolution. The relations among all of these geometric quantities are pointed out. Finally, two simple examples are studied to illustrate the ideas introduced in this paper.