Abstract Quantum computing represents a substantial threat to contemporary cryptographic systems, primarily due to the vulnerabilities introduced by quantum algorithms such as Shor’s algorithm, Deutsch’s algorithm, and Grover’s algorithm. In this study, advanced quantum computing frameworks, including Curl, PennyLane, and Qiskit, were selected to model these algorithms and to facilitate a comprehensive comparative analysis. A generalization scheme for quantum computing and its limitations are discussed. The pseudo-codes of the principal algorithms and their implications for cryptography are presented in detail. An empirical evaluation of time and memory consumption demonstrates that the Qiskit library exhibits superior performance in the implementation of the three aforementioned algorithms, requiring fewer lines of code, reduced execution time, and lower memory usage. This work offers insights into the efficiency of quantum computing algorithms and frameworks and highlights the broader impact of advances in quantum computing on traditional cryptographic paradigms.
Abstract Quantum computing represents a substantial threat to contemporary cryptographic systems, primarily due to the vulnerabilities introduced by quantum algorithms such as Shor’s algorithm, Deutsch’s algorithm, and Grover’s algorithm. In this study, advanced quantum computing frameworks, including Curl, PennyLane, and Qiskit, were selected to model these algorithms and to facilitate a comprehensive comparative analysis. A generalization scheme for quantum computing and its limitations are discussed. The pseudo-codes of the principal algorithms and their implications for cryptography are presented in detail. An empirical evaluation of time and memory consumption demonstrates that the Qiskit library exhibits superior performance in the implementation of the three aforementioned algorithms, requiring fewer lines of code, reduced execution time, and lower memory usage. This work offers insights into the efficiency of quantum computing algorithms and frameworks and highlights the broader impact of advances in quantum computing on traditional cryptographic paradigms.
Abstract—The emergence of quantum computing represents a fundamental challenge to contemporary cryptographic infras- tructures, mandating immediate adoption of quantum-resistant cryptographic standards to ensure long-term security. This paper analyzes how Shor’s algorithm renders RSA , ECC vulnerable by solving integer factorization and discrete alogarithm problems in polynomial time, while Grover’s algorithm weakens symmetric encryption through quadratic speedup attacks. Through compre- hensive cryptanalysis, we evaluate the vulnerabilities of current public-key infrastructures, symmetric ciphers, and hash functions against quantum threats. Our research systematically examines post-quantum cryptographic candidates, including lattice-based, hash-based, and multivariate polynomial schemes under NIST standardization, assessing their security guarantees and imple- mentation challenges. Furthermore, we investigate the broader implications for secure communications, blockchain networks, and authentication protocols in a post-quantum world. Based on our findings, we propose a practical transition framework featuring hybrid cryptographic systems, protocol enhancements, and policy updates to facilitate seamless migration. This work provides critical insights and actionable strategies for securing digital infrastructure against quantum threats while maintaining operational efficiency during the transition period. Index Terms—Cryptographic vulnerability, Grover’s algo- rithm, Post-quantum cryptography, Quantum computing, Quan- tum key distribution, Shor’s algorithm, Cybersecurity
The advent of large-scale quantum computers poses an existential threat to the cryptographic algorithms that underpin modern digital security. Shor's algorithm enables quantum computers to factor large integers and compute discrete logarithms in polynomial time, rendering RSA, Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), and Diffie-Hellman key exchange fundamentally insecure. Meanwhile, Grover's algorithm provides a quadratic speedup for brute-force search, effectively halving the security strength of symmetric ciphers and hash functions. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the impact of quantum computing on both asymmetric and symmetric cryptographic algorithms. We analyze the computational resources required by quantum attacks on current standards, evaluate the timeline of quantum threats based on hardware roadmaps from leading quantum computing companies, and conduct a systematic performance comparison of NIST-standardized post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) algorithms. Our experimental evaluation covers key generation time, encapsulation/decapsulation latency, signature generation/verification speed, key sizes, and bandwidth overhead across lattice-based, code-based, hash-based, and multivariate cryptographic schemes. Results indicate that lattice-based schemes, particularly CRYSTALS-Kyber and CRYSTALS-Dilithium, offer the most favorable balance of security and performance for practical deployment. We also propose a phased migration framework for transitioning existing cryptographic infrastructure to quantum-resistant alternatives, addressing compatibility, performance, and operational challenges.
Quantum computing can be regarded as a disruptive enabling technology that can pose a threat to traditional cryptography as it invented new approaches to encrypt data. This paper will compare the level of security that accompanies quantum algorithms as well as the level of efficiency. Specifically, we examine the impact of efficient quantum computing on traditional cryptography and propose techniques against quantum invasions. Four quantum algorithms are analyzed for their efficiency and security benefits in the post-quantum era: Grover’s Algorithm, Shor’s Algorithm, The Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), Lattice-based cryptography. The results reveal that Grover’s algorithm improves search time complexity from O(n) to O(√n), which is advantageous over large data sets. As it will be clear shortly, Shor’s algorithm challenges RSA encryption because it outperforms classical algorithms in factoring large integers. QKD presents secure key exchange protocols that cannot be breached notwithstanding the attempts made using quantum computing. Lattice-based schemes are quantum-resistant alternatives based on the security of certain hard mathematical problems. Based on our experimental results, computational efficiency can be improved, but new cryptographic systems will have to be developed for the mitigation of quantum-related vulnerabilities. This research shows the importance of quantum-resistant cryptographic techniques to ensure data security in the emerging quantum computing era.
Quantum computing represents one of the most disruptive technological advancements of the 21st century, with profound implications for modern cryptographic systems. Traditional digital signature algorithms—such as RSA, DSA, and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC)—derive their security from mathematical problems like integer factorization and discrete logarithms, which are computationally infeasible for classical computers. However, the advent of quantum algorithms, particularly Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms, poses a direct threat to these cryptographic assumptions by drastically reducing the time required to solve such problems. This development renders existing Digital Signature infrastructures potentially obsolete once large-scale quantum computers become operational. To counter this threat, researchers have proposed a range of post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) algorithms, including lattice-based, hash-based, and multivariate polynomial-based signature schemes, which are designed to resist quantum attacks. This paper critically examines the extent of quantum vulnerability in current Digital Signature systems and evaluates the comparative performance, efficiency, and security trade-offs of post-quantum alternatives. The study aims to provide a structured understanding of the ongoing transition toward quantum-resistant digital authentication and to propose a roadmap for secure implementation in future cryptographic environments.
This paper investigates the potential impact of quantum computing on the security of currently deployed cryptographic algorithms. The core premise is that the advent of powerful quantum computers, leveraging algorithms like Shor's algorithm and Grover's algorithm, poses a significant threat to widely used public-key cryptosystems and symmetric-key algorithms. We present a theoretical analysis of several key algorithms – RSA, ECC, and AES – examining their vulnerabilities when subjected to quantum attacks. Specifically, we explore the exponential speedup offered by Shor's algorithm for factoring large numbers, the impact on the key size of ECC, and the Grover's algorithm's influence on symmetric key search. Our work highlights the urgency of transitioning to post-quantum cryptography standards to mitigate the risks posed by this technological advancement. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the landscape of quantum cryptanalysis and its implications for the future of secure communication.
The rapid advancement of quantum computing threatens to undermine the security foundations of modern cryptographic systems, particularly those based on integer factorization and discrete logarithm problems. Algorithms such as Shor’s and Grover’s promise exponential or quadratic speedups, rendering RSA, ECC, and certain symmetric schemes vulnerable within the next decade. This paper presents a simulated evaluation of classical cryptographic algorithms against quantum attacks, followed by a performance assessment of post-quantum cryptographic (PQC) schemes—specifically lattice-based, hash-based, and code-based algorithms. A testing framework was developed using a quantum simulator (Qiskit) and a classical benchmarking environment to model potential attack timelines and measure computational efficiency. Results demonstrate that RSA-2048 can be theoretically broken within 8 hours on a 4000-qubit fault-tolerant quantum processor, while ECC-P256 succumbs in less than 4 hours. In contrast, lattice-based schemes such as CRYSTALS-Kyber resisted quantum simulation attacks, maintaining equivalent classical security levels with only a 27% performance overhead. The study also analyzes the trade-offs between key size, encryption/decryption speed, and resistance to quantum attacks. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for migration to NIST-recommended PQC algorithms and provide a decision-support matrix for selecting suitable replacements in government and enterprise systems.