Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CVFT - Operational Manual

Iker ibarrola

Published Feb 19, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This document provides the explicit operational procedure for executing Connectivity Variational Field Theory (CVFT) as a predictive physical model. It specifies admissible kernel construction, spectral computation, geometric extraction, internal algebra derivation, fermionic realization, and observable calculation. No modification of foundational ontology is introduced.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18705330

Related papers

CVFT - Ontological Foundations

Iker ibarrola

We present an operational formulation of Correlational Variational Field Theory (CVFT) in which physical structure is described by a positive correlational kernel defined over a relational domain. In this framework the fundamental ontological object is a multiscale kernel $K_s(x,y)$ encoding the strength of relational connectivity between degrees of freedom. Contact: ibarrolaiker@gmail.com

•Mar 9, 2026•0 citations

Operational Manual and Guideline

Iker Ibarrola Echeverría

This document provides a complete operational guide for the correct use of the correlational physical framework developed across the foundational volumes and canonical papers of this project. The purpose of this manual is strictly methodological and technical. No new ontological assumptions are introduced. No new physical postulates are added. No empirical claims or speculative interpretations are proposed. Instead, the manual serves to: Explicitly separate ontology, formalism, realization, and interpretation. Define the admissible use of correlational configuration spaces, consistency functionals, flows, operators, and projections. Specify the precise conditions under which effective physical regimes (quantum, classical, geometric, decoherent) may be identified. Provide a complete step-by-step operational pipeline from abstract correlational configurations to quantitative physical outputs. Clarify limits, failure modes, and non-physical configurations to prevent category errors and overinterpretation. The document is intended for researchers who wish to apply the correlational framework in concrete physical contexts, construct toy models, perform numerical analysis, or compare effective predictions with known experimental data—without modifying the foundational structure of the theory. This manual should be read as a user-level technical companion to the foundational and canonical papers. It does not replace them, but ensures their correct and consistent application.

•Jan 26, 2026•0 citations

CVFT - Ontology Foundations

Iker ibarrola

This manuscript develops Correlational Variational Field Theory (CVFT) as a minimal structural program for fundamental physics. The framework is based on a kernel-first ontology in which physical reality is described as an open, non-closed correlational structure evolving under a refinement semigroup governed by a structural functional. No primitive spacetime, fields, or particles are postulated at the foundational level. Contact: ibarrolaiker@gmail.com

•Mar 2, 2026•0 citations

Operational Definitions Manual UCL

Ibarrola Echeverría, Iker

This document is an Operational Definitions Manual for the Ω-Framework (Functional Quantum General Relativity / Correlational Physics). Its purpose is not to introduce new theoretical assumptions, but to define precisely how the theoretical objects of the framework are to be interpreted, instantiated, computed, and tested in practice. The manual provides a rigorous bridge between abstract correlational concepts and concrete operational procedures. Each core object of the theory—kernels, correlational amplitudes, effective observables, emergent quantities, and comparison metrics—is given a clear operational meaning: how it is constructed, what inputs it requires, what outputs it produces, and how those outputs should be compared with empirical or numerical data. Rather than functioning as a speculative or interpretative text, this document is explicitly methodological. It is designed to ensure that independent researchers can: Reproduce numerical experiments, Implement toy models and parameter scans, Compare predictions against experimental benchmarks, Identify which parts of the framework are assumptions, definitions, or derived results. Special attention is given to: Separation between definitions, conventions, and physical claims, Dimensional consistency and normalization choices, The distinction between toy models and physically testable predictions, Error measures and comparison ratios used when confronting data. This manual is intended to be read alongside the main theoretical documents of the Ω-Framework, but it is logically self-contained. No acceptance of the framework’s physical validity is required to use this document; it can be employed purely as a technical guide for implementation and falsification attempts. In short, this work serves as the operational backbone of the framework: it does not argue why the theory should be correct, but specifies how its claims are to be made precise, computed, and evaluated.

•Dec 14, 2025•0 citations

CVFT - Programmatic Extension

Iker ibarrola

We present a closed axiomatic formulation of a multiscale correlational framework (CVFT 3.0). No spacetime, metric, or geometric structure is postulated at the fundamental level. Instead, physical structure is encoded in an algebra of observables endowed with a refinement semigroup, an internal relational flow, and a positive spectral generator. We formally delimit the structural consequences derivable from the axioms and explicitly state the boundaries of the framework.

•Feb 27, 2026•0 citations

UCL Predictive Framework

Ibarrola Echeverría, Iker

Definition (UCL Predictive Framework). A physical framework is said to be predictive within the Universal Correlational Lattice (UCL) formalism if and only if it satisfies the following conditions: Well-defined fundamental object. The theory is fully specified by a universal correlational kernel K(x,x';\tau,\tau') \in \mathcal{K}, defined on correlational sites and internal parameters, together with a variational principle that determines its admissible configurations. Observable construction without postulates. All physical observables \mathcal{O} are defined as explicit functionals of the kernel, \mathcal{O} = \mathcal{F}[K], without introducing independent measurement axioms, wavefunction collapse postulates, or external probabilistic rules. Emergent uncertainty and statistics. Any probabilistic or statistical behavior arises solely from coarse-graining, partial access, or effective reduction of the correlational degrees of freedom, and is not fundamental to the ontology of the theory. Parameter rigidity. Once the kernel structure and its correlational scales are fixed, predictions cannot be arbitrarily tuned without modifying the underlying correlational dynamics. Numerical outputs are therefore constrained by the theory’s internal consistency rather than phenomenological fitting. Macroscopic limit and empirical contact. In appropriate limits (e.g. decoherence, high-density correlation regimes, or long-range coherence), the framework yields effective quantities directly comparable to experimental observables, such as masses, couplings, metric components, or anomalous moments. Under these conditions, the UCL framework constitutes a predictive physical theory in which empirical quantities emerge from correlational structure alone, and where agreement or disagreement with experiment constitutes a genuine test of the framework rather than an interpretational choice.

•Dec 18, 2025•0 citations
This document provides the explicit operational procedure for executing Connectivity Variational Field Theory (CVFT) as a predictive physical model. It specifies admissible kernel construction, spectral computation, geometric extraction, internal algebra derivation, fermionic realization, and observable calculation. No modification of foundational ontology is introduced.
We present an operational formulation of Correlational Variational Field Theory (CVFT) in which physical structure is described by a positive correlational kernel defined over a relational domain. In this framework the fundamental ontological object is a multiscale kernel Ks(x,y)K_s(x,y)Ks​(x,y) encoding the strength of relational connectivity between degrees of freedom. Contact: ibarrolaiker@gmail.com
This document provides a complete operational guide for the correct use of the correlational physical framework developed across the foundational volumes and canonical papers of this project. The purpose of this manual is strictly methodological and technical. No new ontological assumptions are introduced. No new physical postulates are added. No empirical claims or speculative interpretations are proposed. Instead, the manual serves to: Explicitly separate ontology, formalism, realization, and interpretation. Define the admissible use of correlational configuration spaces, consistency functionals, flows, operators, and projections. Specify the precise conditions under which effective physical regimes (quantum, classical, geometric, decoherent) may be identified. Provide a complete step-by-step operational pipeline from abstract correlational configurations to quantitative physical outputs. Clarify limits, failure modes, and non-physical configurations to prevent category errors and overinterpretation. The document is intended for researchers who wish to apply the correlational framework in concrete physical contexts, construct toy models, perform numerical analysis, or compare effective predictions with known experimental data—without modifying the foundational structure of the theory. This manual should be read as a user-level technical companion to the foundational and canonical papers. It does not replace them, but ensures their correct and consistent application.
This document is an Operational Definitions Manual for the Ω-Framework (Functional Quantum General Relativity / Correlational Physics). Its purpose is not to introduce new theoretical assumptions, but to define precisely how the theoretical objects of the framework are to be interpreted, instantiated, computed, and tested in practice. The manual provides a rigorous bridge between abstract correlational concepts and concrete operational procedures. Each core object of the theory—kernels, correlational amplitudes, effective observables, emergent quantities, and comparison metrics—is given a clear operational meaning: how it is constructed, what inputs it requires, what outputs it produces, and how those outputs should be compared with empirical or numerical data. Rather than functioning as a speculative or interpretative text, this document is explicitly methodological. It is designed to ensure that independent researchers can: Reproduce numerical experiments, Implement toy models and parameter scans, Compare predictions against experimental benchmarks, Identify which parts of the framework are assumptions, definitions, or derived results. Special attention is given to: Separation between definitions, conventions, and physical claims, Dimensional consistency and normalization choices, The distinction between toy models and physically testable predictions, Error measures and comparison ratios used when confronting data. This manual is intended to be read alongside the main theoretical documents of the Ω-Framework, but it is logically self-contained. No acceptance of the framework’s physical validity is required to use this document; it can be employed purely as a technical guide for implementation and falsification attempts. In short, this work serves as the operational backbone of the framework: it does not argue why the theory should be correct, but specifies how its claims are to be made precise, computed, and evaluated.
Definition (UCL Predictive Framework). A physical framework is said to be predictive within the Universal Correlational Lattice (UCL) formalism if and only if it satisfies the following conditions: Well-defined fundamental object. The theory is fully specified by a universal correlational kernel K(x,x';\tau,\tau') \in \mathcal{K}, defined on correlational sites and internal parameters, together with a variational principle that determines its admissible configurations. Observable construction without postulates. All physical observables \mathcal{O} are defined as explicit functionals of the kernel, \mathcal{O} = \mathcal{F}[K], without introducing independent measurement axioms, wavefunction collapse postulates, or external probabilistic rules. Emergent uncertainty and statistics. Any probabilistic or statistical behavior arises solely from coarse-graining, partial access, or effective reduction of the correlational degrees of freedom, and is not fundamental to the ontology of the theory. Parameter rigidity. Once the kernel structure and its correlational scales are fixed, predictions cannot be arbitrarily tuned without modifying the underlying correlational dynamics. Numerical outputs are therefore constrained by the theory’s internal consistency rather than phenomenological fitting. Macroscopic limit and empirical contact. In appropriate limits (e.g. decoherence, high-density correlation regimes, or long-range coherence), the framework yields effective quantities directly comparable to experimental observables, such as masses, couplings, metric components, or anomalous moments. Under these conditions, the UCL framework constitutes a predictive physical theory in which empirical quantities emerge from correlational structure alone, and where agreement or disagreement with experiment constitutes a genuine test of the framework rather than an interpretational choice.