Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. B./Physical review. B

Quantum phase diagram of the extended spin- 3 2 Kitaev-Heisenberg model: A DMRG study

Gui-Xin Liu, Ting-Long Wang, Yi‐Fan Jiang

Published Feb 18, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1103/bvb1-rk38

Related papers

Phase diagram of the Kitaev-Heisenberg-J 2 -J 3 model: A DMRG study

Yi‐Fan Jiang, Hong‐Chen Jiang

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 6, 2018•0 citations

Ground-state phase diagram of the extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model on a honeycomb lattice

Sei-ichiro Suga, Takafumi Suzuki, Takuto Yamada

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 4, 2019•0 citations

Phase diagram and excitation spectra of the anisotropic Kitaev-Heisenberg model

Si-Qi Hou, Wei Wang, Shun-Li Yu +1 more

Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Mar 25, 2026•1 citation

Quantum phase diagram of the extended spin-3/2 Kitaev-Heisenberg model: A DMRG study

Gui-Xin Liu, Ting-Long Wang, Yi‐Fan Jiang

Recently there has been considerable excitement surrounding the promising realization of high-spin Kitaev material, such as the quasi-2D compound CrI$_3$ and CrGeTe$_3$. However, the stability of quantum spin liquids (QSL) against single ion anisotropy (SIA) in these materials and the global quantum phase diagram of the extended spin-3/2 Kitaev model with finite SIA remain unclear. In this study, we perform large-scale density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) to explore the quantum phase diagram of the generalized spin-3/2 Kitaev-Heisenberg (K-H) model accompanied with SIA $A_c$. In the $A_c=0$ limit, the spin-3/2 K-H model exhibits a quantum phase diagram similar to that of a spin-1/2 system, including two QSLs around antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic Kitaev models. For models with finite $A_c$, we map out the quantum phase diagram around two Kitaev points and observe distinct types of in-plane vortex orders developed from these two QSL phases. Interestingly, series of nearly degenerate vortex configurations are discovered in each vortex phases. Using linear spin-wave theory, we demonstrate that these vortex configurations can be understood as a consequence of the quantum correction on a continuous family of degenerate classical states.

arXiv:2503.24246•Mar 31, 2025•0 citations

Renormalization group approach to the phase diagram of two-dimensional Heisenberg spin systems

José G. Esteve, Amalio F. Pacheco

Nuclear Physics B•Oct 1, 1979•2 citations

Density-matrix renormalization group study of the extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model

Kazuya Shinjo, Shigetoshi Sota, Takami Tohyama

We study an extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model including additional anisotropic couplings by using the two-dimensional density-matrix renormalization group method. Calculating the ground-state energy, entanglement entropy, and spin-spin correlation functions, we make a phase diagram of the extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model around the spin-liquid phase. We find a zigzag antiferromagnetic phase, a ferromagnetic phase, a ${120}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$ antiferromagnetic phase, and two kinds of incommensurate phases around the Kitaev spin-liquid phase. Furthermore, we study the entanglement spectrum of the model, and we find that entanglement levels in the Kitaev spin-liquid phase are degenerate forming pairs, but those in the magnetically ordered phases are nondegenerate. The Schmidt gap defined as the energy difference between the lowest two levels changes at the phase boundary adjacent to the Kitaev spin-liquid phase. However, we find that phase boundaries between magnetically ordered phases do not necessarily agree with the change of the Schmidt gap.

arXiv:1410.4790•Physical Review B•Feb 4, 2015•36 citations
Recently there has been considerable excitement surrounding the promising realization of high-spin Kitaev material, such as the quasi-2D compound CrI3_33​ and CrGeTe3_33​. However, the stability of quantum spin liquids (QSL) against single ion anisotropy (SIA) in these materials and the global quantum phase diagram of the extended spin-3/2 Kitaev model with finite SIA remain unclear. In this study, we perform large-scale density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) to explore the quantum phase diagram of the generalized spin-3/2 Kitaev-Heisenberg (K-H) model accompanied with SIA AcA_cAc​. In the Ac=0A_c=0Ac​=0 limit, the spin-3/2 K-H model exhibits a quantum phase diagram similar to that of a spin-1/2 system, including two QSLs around antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic Kitaev models. For models with finite AcA_cAc​, we map out the quantum phase diagram around two Kitaev points and observe distinct types of in-plane vortex orders developed from these two QSL phases. Interestingly, series of nearly degenerate vortex configurations are discovered in each vortex phases. Using linear spin-wave theory, we demonstrate that these vortex configurations can be understood as a consequence of the quantum correction on a continuous family of degenerate classical states.
We study an extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model including additional anisotropic couplings by using the two-dimensional density-matrix renormalization group method. Calculating the ground-state energy, entanglement entropy, and spin-spin correlation functions, we make a phase diagram of the extended Kitaev-Heisenberg model around the spin-liquid phase. We find a zigzag antiferromagnetic phase, a ferromagnetic phase, a ${120}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$ antiferromagnetic phase, and two kinds of incommensurate phases around the Kitaev spin-liquid phase. Furthermore, we study the entanglement spectrum of the model, and we find that entanglement levels in the Kitaev spin-liquid phase are degenerate forming pairs, but those in the magnetically ordered phases are nondegenerate. The Schmidt gap defined as the energy difference between the lowest two levels changes at the phase boundary adjacent to the Kitaev spin-liquid phase. However, we find that phase boundaries between magnetically ordered phases do not necessarily agree with the change of the Schmidt gap.