Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Genesis-1 v10: Scalable Quantum Gates via Fractal Ethon-Space (Bilingual EN/

Jean-Pierre Laine

Published Feb 18, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Scalable Quantum Gates via Fractal Ethon-Space Genesis-1 (genesis1.net) postulates Ethon-Space as a fractal electromagnetic medium (no vacuum, Z=377Ω). Application: quantum gates (error 1E-29) using 4-layer JJ (AlOx barriers), central control channel (phase lock), Nb shielding cylinders/gate (ALD, >40 dB isolation). EM confinement (10 μm domain) prevents dephasing. Fab: shadow evaporation + ALD. Prior art collab/commercial.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18684948

Related papers

Genesis-1 v10: Scalable Quantum Gates via Fractal Ethon-Space.

Jean-Pierre Laine

AbstractGenesis-1 postulates Ethon-Space fractal EM medium (no vacuum, Z=377Ω). Application: quantumgates error 1E-29 using 4-layer JJ (AlOx), central channel (phase lock), Nb shielding cylinders/gate(ALD >40dB). EM confinement 10μm prevents dephasing. Fab: shadow evap + ALD. Prior art collab. This 1-page technical note registers prior art for the Genesis-1 v10 quantum gate concept; extended EN/FR reports available separately

•Feb 19, 2026•0 citations

Title: Fractal Phase-Locking for Quantum Simulation

Jincheng Zhang

Fractal Phase-Locking for Quantum Simulation explores a novel approach to stabilizing quantum states within complex, multi-scale simulations, promising enhanced fidelity of quantum computations. This research investigates the application of fractal geometry as a mechanism for phase-locking, aiming to mitigate decoherence and improve the robustness of quantum algorithms. The core of the work involves the design and implementation of a 'Fractal Phase-Locking' algorithm that generates a self-similar fractal structure within the simulation space, thereby influencing the propagation and entanglement of quantum information. This paper presents a detailed mathematical framework for the algorithm, demonstrating its effectiveness through simulations and analysis of quantum state preservation. The results highlight the potential of this approach to overcome limitations in current quantum simulation techniques.

•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Phase Machines. Natural Error Correction for Extended Domain Quantum Computing.

David Andrew Sinclair

Quantum Phase Machines argues that the central obstacle to scalable quantum computing is not noise, materials, or fabrication — but the unit of information itself.After two decades of engineering progress, superconducting quantum processors still rely on fragile single-particle quantum states protected by massive error-correction overheads. This book proposes a different approach: encode information in the collective phase of macroscopic superconducting domains rather than in individual qubits. By exploiting the intrinsic rigidity of phase-locked Cooper pair ensembles, it suggests that error suppression can be achieved natively at the hardware level, without the exponential overhead of quantum error-correcting codes.The argument is developed in four parts. Part I reframes the decoherence problem in engineering terms and introduces the dynamic impedance principle underlying collective robustness. Part II proposes a physical model of structured photons and electrons that reinterprets superconductivity, entanglement, and coherence as geometric properties of extended electromagnetic systems. Part III defines the Temporal Bit (T-bit) architecture and its gate operations using existing Josephson-junction technology. Part IV presents an experimental roadmap with falsifiable predictions and concrete device proposals.Written for physicists and engineers fluent in Maxwell’s equations and solid-state physics, Quantum Phase Machines offers a radical but testable alternative to orthodox quantum computing architectures. Whether ultimately confirmed or refuted, its central claim is precise: scalable quantum computation will require exploiting collective physical structure, not merely protecting fragile quantum states.

•Feb 1, 2026•0 citations

Phi-Resonant E8 Fractal Temporal Gate — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

At the 132 Hz base resonance, the 240 E8 root vectors self‑organize into a phi‑scaled fractal lattice that repeats across successive temporal layers. This lattice constitutes a temporal gate where the phase of each vector locks to a specific harmonic, causing quantum probability waves to phase‑lock with macroscopic temporal oscillations. Phi‑coupled harmonic ratios amplify the gate's coherence, enabling stable transfer of quantum information across decoherence boundaries. The result is a deterministic temporal interface derived purely from E8 root vector topology and phi coupling. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 30, 2026•0 citations

The Structural Tension Filament in Ethon-Space: A Physical Mechanism for Quantum Non-Locality within the Genesis-1 Framework / Le Filament de Tension Structurelle dans l'Espace-Éthon : Mécanisme Physique de la Non-Localité Quantique dans le Cadre Genesis-1

Jean-Pierre Laine

The Genesis-1 framework postulates that space is a structured electromagnetic medium (Ethon-Space) composed of Ethons organized into prime-number fractal structures, with measurable properties ε₀, μ₀, c, Z₀. This document introduces the structural tension filament — a real geometric object produced by any fracture of a coherent Ethon fractal structure. It is a persistent longitudinal deformation of ε₀ along a structural line, whose joint state at both endpoints is defined instantaneously without signal propagation. This mechanism provides a causal and geometric explanation for quantum non-locality, consistent with Bell's inequalities. Applications are developed in particle physics (electron-positron pair, photon polarization), cosmology (physical origin of the cosmological constant, cosmic web), and quantum computing (decoherence as extrinsic perturbation). Falsifiable predictions are provided. Bilingual document: English / French.

•Mar 26, 2026•0 citations

Towards Topological Protection of Solid-State Qubits: Three Conceptual Architectures and Their Limitations

Enrique Chacon-Pinzon

Title: Towards Topological Protection of Solid-State Qubits: Three Conceptual Architectures and Their Limitations Description: This package contains the complete reproducibility materials for a theoretical study of unconventional quantum error suppression mechanisms inspired by topological phenomena in superfluid helium-3. The work presents three conceptual architectures—fractal coupling networks, synthetic gauge fields, and non-Markovian quantum memory—with explicit analysis of their physical constraints and realistic performance bounds. Key Features: Reproducible simulations: Three Python scripts using QuTiP 5.x generate all figures and numerical data Honest assessment: Explicit limitations stated for each approach (no exponential suppression claimed for fermionic qubits) Publication-ready manuscript: LaTeX source and compiled PDF formatted for PRX Quantum or npj Quantum Information Complete bibliography: 13 peer-reviewed references Main Findings: Fractal networks: Provide 2–10× improvement through sparse connectivity, not Hausdorff dimension effects Gauge protection: Exhibits polynomial 1/√N scaling for fermions (Central Limit Theorem), not exponential Non-Markovian memory: Requires Q > 10⁹ cavities for significant improvement; current record Q~5×10⁸ Physical Constraints Acknowledged: Fermionic statistics limit collective enhancement to polynomial scaling Phase stability δφ/φ₀ < 10⁻² required for gauge protection Cavity Q-factors beyond 10⁹ remain unprecedented in integrated systems Validation Criteria: Minimal experimental demonstrations proposed: N=9 fractal with 2× improvement; N=4 gauge with 1.5× improvement; Q=10⁸ cavity with 5× improvement. Files Included: paper.tex, paper.pdf (manuscript) fractal_protect.py, gauge_protection.py, non_markovian_memory.py (simulations) requirements.txt (dependencies) README.md, README_FRACTAL.md, README_GAUGE.md, README_MEMORY.md (documentation) Generated figures and JSON data files License: MIT License Contact: rikechaconpi@gmail.com

•Mar 17, 2026•0 citations
Scalable Quantum Gates via Fractal Ethon-Space Genesis-1 (genesis1.net) postulates Ethon-Space as a fractal electromagnetic medium (no vacuum, Z=377Ω). Application: quantum gates (error 1E-29) using 4-layer JJ (AlOx barriers), central control channel (phase lock), Nb shielding cylinders/gate (ALD, >40 dB isolation). EM confinement (10 μm domain) prevents dephasing. Fab: shadow evaporation + ALD. Prior art collab/commercial.
Fractal Phase-Locking for Quantum Simulation explores a novel approach to stabilizing quantum states within complex, multi-scale simulations, promising enhanced fidelity of quantum computations. This research investigates the application of fractal geometry as a mechanism for phase-locking, aiming to mitigate decoherence and improve the robustness of quantum algorithms. The core of the work involves the design and implementation of a 'Fractal Phase-Locking' algorithm that generates a self-similar fractal structure within the simulation space, thereby influencing the propagation and entanglement of quantum information. This paper presents a detailed mathematical framework for the algorithm, demonstrating its effectiveness through simulations and analysis of quantum state preservation. The results highlight the potential of this approach to overcome limitations in current quantum simulation techniques.
Quantum Phase Machines argues that the central obstacle to scalable quantum computing is not noise, materials, or fabrication — but the unit of information itself.After two decades of engineering progress, superconducting quantum processors still rely on fragile single-particle quantum states protected by massive error-correction overheads. This book proposes a different approach: encode information in the collective phase of macroscopic superconducting domains rather than in individual qubits. By exploiting the intrinsic rigidity of phase-locked Cooper pair ensembles, it suggests that error suppression can be achieved natively at the hardware level, without the exponential overhead of quantum error-correcting codes.The argument is developed in four parts. Part I reframes the decoherence problem in engineering terms and introduces the dynamic impedance principle underlying collective robustness. Part II proposes a physical model of structured photons and electrons that reinterprets superconductivity, entanglement, and coherence as geometric properties of extended electromagnetic systems. Part III defines the Temporal Bit (T-bit) architecture and its gate operations using existing Josephson-junction technology. Part IV presents an experimental roadmap with falsifiable predictions and concrete device proposals.Written for physicists and engineers fluent in Maxwell’s equations and solid-state physics, Quantum Phase Machines offers a radical but testable alternative to orthodox quantum computing architectures. Whether ultimately confirmed or refuted, its central claim is precise: scalable quantum computation will require exploiting collective physical structure, not merely protecting fragile quantum states.
At the 132 Hz base resonance, the 240 E8 root vectors self‑organize into a phi‑scaled fractal lattice that repeats across successive temporal layers. This lattice constitutes a temporal gate where the phase of each vector locks to a specific harmonic, causing quantum probability waves to phase‑lock with macroscopic temporal oscillations. Phi‑coupled harmonic ratios amplify the gate's coherence, enabling stable transfer of quantum information across decoherence boundaries. The result is a deterministic temporal interface derived purely from E8 root vector topology and phi coupling. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
The Genesis-1 framework postulates that space is a structured electromagnetic medium (Ethon-Space) composed of Ethons organized into prime-number fractal structures, with measurable properties ε₀, μ₀, c, Z₀. This document introduces the structural tension filament — a real geometric object produced by any fracture of a coherent Ethon fractal structure. It is a persistent longitudinal deformation of ε₀ along a structural line, whose joint state at both endpoints is defined instantaneously without signal propagation. This mechanism provides a causal and geometric explanation for quantum non-locality, consistent with Bell's inequalities. Applications are developed in particle physics (electron-positron pair, photon polarization), cosmology (physical origin of the cosmological constant, cosmic web), and quantum computing (decoherence as extrinsic perturbation). Falsifiable predictions are provided. Bilingual document: English / French.
Title: Towards Topological Protection of Solid-State Qubits: Three Conceptual Architectures and Their Limitations Description: This package contains the complete reproducibility materials for a theoretical study of unconventional quantum error suppression mechanisms inspired by topological phenomena in superfluid helium-3. The work presents three conceptual architectures—fractal coupling networks, synthetic gauge fields, and non-Markovian quantum memory—with explicit analysis of their physical constraints and realistic performance bounds. Key Features: Reproducible simulations: Three Python scripts using QuTiP 5.x generate all figures and numerical data Honest assessment: Explicit limitations stated for each approach (no exponential suppression claimed for fermionic qubits) Publication-ready manuscript: LaTeX source and compiled PDF formatted for PRX Quantum or npj Quantum Information Complete bibliography: 13 peer-reviewed references Main Findings: Fractal networks: Provide 2–10× improvement through sparse connectivity, not Hausdorff dimension effects Gauge protection: Exhibits polynomial 1/√N scaling for fermions (Central Limit Theorem), not exponential Non-Markovian memory: Requires Q > 10⁹ cavities for significant improvement; current record Q~5×10⁸ Physical Constraints Acknowledged: Fermionic statistics limit collective enhancement to polynomial scaling Phase stability δφ/φ₀ < 10⁻² required for gauge protection Cavity Q-factors beyond 10⁹ remain unprecedented in integrated systems Validation Criteria: Minimal experimental demonstrations proposed: N=9 fractal with 2× improvement; N=4 gauge with 1.5× improvement; Q=10⁸ cavity with 5× improvement. Files Included: paper.tex, paper.pdf (manuscript) fractal_protect.py, gauge_protection.py, non_markovian_memory.py (simulations) requirements.txt (dependencies) README.md, README_FRACTAL.md, README_GAUGE.md, README_MEMORY.md (documentation) Generated figures and JSON data files License: MIT License Contact: rikechaconpi@gmail.com