This dissertation studies the interplay between quantum and classical computational resources through the lens of computational complexity theory. Part I considers low-energy states of quantum systems. We study the complexity of estimating ground- and excited-state energies of local Hamiltonians, given access to a guiding state promised to have non-negligible overlap with the relevant eigenspace. We formalise access models for such guiding states, examine their properties and relations, and study the problem for physically motivated Hamiltonians. We also study the task of obtaining approximate descriptions of ground states, given QMA-oracle access, in the setting of low-locality reduced density matrices. Part II focuses on quantum probabilistically checkable proof systems (QPCPs). We define a general class of QPCPs that allows adaptivity and multiple unentangled provers, and study its relationship to constant-gap local Hamiltonian problems via quantum reductions. Additionally, we investigate quantum–classical PCPs (QCPCPs), where a quantum verifier has either classical or quantum query access to a classical proof. Part III explores alternative complexity measures: unitary query complexity and sample complexity. For unitary query complexity, we develop a lower-bound technique based on unitary channel discrimination. In the context of sample complexity, we introduce and analyse a new sample-to-sample task, called complement sampling, and study the power of quantum computation with quantum samples over their classical counterparts.
This dissertation studies the interplay between quantum and classical computational resources through the lens of computational complexity theory. Part I considers low-energy states of quantum systems. We study the complexity of estimating ground- and excited-state energies of local Hamiltonians, given access to a guiding state promised to have non-negligible overlap with the relevant eigenspace. We formalise access models for such guiding states, examine their properties and relations, and study the problem for physically motivated Hamiltonians. We also study the task of obtaining approximate descriptions of ground states, given QMA-oracle access, in the setting of low-locality reduced density matrices. Part II focuses on quantum probabilistically checkable proof systems (QPCPs). We define a general class of QPCPs that allows adaptivity and multiple unentangled provers, and study its relationship to constant-gap local Hamiltonian problems via quantum reductions. Additionally, we investigate quantum–classical PCPs (QCPCPs), where a quantum verifier has either classical or quantum query access to a classical proof. Part III explores alternative complexity measures: unitary query complexity and sample complexity. For unitary query complexity, we develop a lower-bound technique based on unitary channel discrimination. In the context of sample complexity, we introduce and analyse a new sample-to-sample task, called complement sampling, and study the power of quantum computation with quantum samples over their classical counterparts.
Despite rapid advances in quantum hardware and the appearance of the first devices with active error correction by 2025, fully fault-tolerant quantum computation remains a distant milestone. This thesis investigates how additional resources can enhance computational power across various stages of quantum device development. Part I examines computation before error correction, where only constant-depth circuits are feasible. We introduce LAQCC, which augments such circuits with intermediate measurement and classical computation, and show that this model enables far more powerful computations. In Part II, we study the early fault-tolerance regime, where the main limitation is the number of logical qubits. Inspired by the classical catalytic space model, we introduce a quantum analogue in which a space-bounded quantum machine has access to an auxiliary catalytic register that may be modified during the computation but must be restored at the end. We show that this catalytic resource increases the power of quantum space-bounded machines. In Part III, we study the full fault-tolerant regime and look at the problem of estimating the ground-state energy of a Local Hamiltonian which is central to quantum chemistry. Here, we study the BQP-hard Guided Local Hamiltonian problem (estimating ground-state energy given a guiding state), showing its hardness persists over a broader parameter range. Furthermore, by introducing the Guidable Local Hamiltonian problem, we provide complexity-theoretic evidence that classical guiding-state heuristics are as powerful as quantum ones, in this setting. Finally, this problem also provides restrictions on possible gap-amplification procedures, relevant for the quantum PCP conjecture.
Abstract. The polynomial method by Beals, Buhrman, Cleve, Mosca, and de Wolf (FOCS 1998; [ J. ACM, 48 (2001), pp. 778–797]) and the adversary method by Ambainis (STOC 2000; [ J. Comput. System Sci., 64 (2002), pp. 750–767]) and the compressed oracle method by Zhandry [ Proceedings of the 39 th CRYPTO, 2019, pp. 239–268] have been shown to be powerful in proving quantum query lower bounds for a wide variety of problems. In this paper, we propose a new method for proving quantum query lower bounds by a quantum sample-to-query lifting theorem, which is from an information theory perspective. Using this method, we obtain the following new results: (1) A quadratic relation between quantum sample and query complexities regarding quantum property testing, which is optimal and saturated by quantum state discrimination. Here, the sample complexity is measured given sample access to the quantum state to be tested, while the query complexity is measured given query access to an oracle that block-encodes the quantum state. (2) A matching lower bound [Formula: see text] for quantum Gibbs sampling at inverse temperature [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] suppresses logarithmic factors), showing that the quantum Gibbs sampler by Gilyén, Su, Low, and Wiebe [ Proceedings of the 51 st STOC, 2019, pp. 193–204] is optimal. (3) A new lower bound [Formula: see text] for the entanglement entropy problem with gap [Formula: see text], which was recently studied by She and Yuen [ Proceedings of the 14 th ITCS, 2023, pp. 96:1–96:17]. (4) A series of quantum query lower bounds for matrix spectrum testing, based on the sample lower bounds for quantum state spectrum testing by O’Donnell and Wright (STOC 2015; [ Comm. Math. Phys., 387 (2021), pp. 1–95]). In addition, we provide unified proofs for some known lower bounds that have been proven previously via different techniques, including those for phase/amplitude estimation and Hamiltonian simulation.
The theory of fault tolerance is a cornerstone of computing and many modern technologies. With the development of quantum science and engineering, fault tolerance has become increasingly important, as quantum systems are intrinsically susceptible to noise. This thesis presents several advances in quantum fault tolerance and develops new connections between fault tolerance and quantum complexity theory. In Part I, we construct a fault-tolerant quantum computation scheme with constant space overhead and near-logarithmic time overhead. This is the lowest overhead achieved to date and and provides the first rigorous proof that fault tolerance based on quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes can achieve better asymptotic spacetime overhead than conventional schemes. The construction relies on locally testable qLDPC codes and new quantum state distillation algorithms with improved spacetime overhead. Additionally, a variant of these algorithms yields the first magic state distillation algorithm with constant space overhead. In Part II, we make progress on the quantum probabilistically checkable proofs (PCP) conjecture by using ideas from fault tolerance. We introduce a new circuit-to-Hamiltonian mapping that allows Hamiltonians to inherit the fault tolerance properties of quantum circuits. Using this new mapping, we construct the first known template for quantum locality-preserving gap amplification---the quantum analogue of a central ingredient in the classical PCP theorem---and prove that it amplifies the combinatorial gap. The construction develops a new framework for reasoning about gap amplification in terms of fault-tolerant distributed computation, along with new tools in secure multiparty computation and high-dimensional expanders.
This dissertation investigates the theory of quantum stochastic processes and its applications in quantum many-body physics. The main goal is to analyse complexity-theoretic aspects of both static and dynamic properties of physical systems modelled by quantum stochastic processes. The thesis consists of two parts: the first one addresses the computational complexity of certain quantum and classical divisibility questions, whereas the second one addresses the topic of Hamiltonian complexity theory. In the divisibility part, we discuss the question whether one can efficiently sub-divide a map describing the evolution of a system in a noisy environment, i.e. a CPTP- or stochastic map for quantum and classical processes, respectively, and we prove that taking the nth root of a CPTP or stochastic map is an NP-complete problem. Furthermore, we show that answering the question whether one can divide up a random variable X into a sum of n iid random variables Yi, i.e. X=∑i=1nYi, is poly-time computable; relaxing the iid condition renders the problem NP-hard. In the local Hamiltonian part, we study computation embedded into the ground state of a many-body quantum system, going beyond "history state" constructions with a linear clock. We first develop a series of mathematical techniques which allow us to study the energy spectrum of the resulting Hamiltonian, and extend classical string rewriting to the quantum setting. This allows us to construct the most physically-realistic QMAEXP-complete instances for the LOCAL HAMILTONIAN problem (i.e. the question of estimating the ground state energy of a quantum many-body system) known to date, both in one- and three dimensions. Furthermore, we study weighted versions of linear history state constructions, allowing us to obtain tight lower and upper bounds on the promise gap of the LOCAL HAMILTONIAN problem in various cases. We finally study a classical embedding of a Busy Beaver Turing Machine into a low-dimensional lattice spin model, which allows us to dictate a transition from a purely classical phase to a Toric Code phase at arbitrarily large and potentially even uncomputable system sizes.
Query complexity provides a basic framework to quantify the inherent computational cost of functions in the model where access to the input is limited to oracle queries. In this paper, we provide a detailed discussion of classical and quantum models of inquiry, emphasizing the structural differences and the common mathematical basis. We consider deterministic, randomized and quantum query complexities and highlight key techniques to prove lower bounds such as adversarial techniques, polynomial approximations and hybrid arguments . The main theme of this paper is the polynomial-spectral relation which underlies both the classical and the quantum models. In the classical setting, the decision tree complexity is closely related to the degree of real polynomials representing Boolean functions. In the quantum setting, the relation involves the spectral properties of the operators controlling quantum query algorithms, and gives deep insights into quantum accelerations. We study tight bounds for basic problems such as search and element distinctness, proving separations between classical and quantum query complexity. The present study uses methods from approximation theory, linear algebra and spectrum analysis to build a foundation for a complete understanding of the power and limitations of query-based computation.
Determining properties of ground states of spin Hamiltonians remains a topic of central relevance connecting disciplines of mathematical, theoretical and applied physics. In the last few decades, ground state properties of physical systems have been increasingly considered as computational resources. This thesis develops parts of the mathematical apparatus to create (program) ground states relevant for quantum and classical computation. The core findings presented in this thesis (now over a decade old) including that (i) logic operations (gates) can be embedded into the low-energy sector of Ising spins whereas three (and higher) body Ising interaction terms can be mimicked through the minimisation of 2- and 1-body Ising terms yet require the introduction of slack spins; (ii) Perturbation theory gadgets enable the emulation of interactions not present in a given Hamiltonian, e.g.~YY interactions can be realized from ZZ, XX, the thesis contains a result from 2007 showing that physically relevant two-body model Hamiltonian's have a QMA-hard ground state energy decision problem. Merged with other results, this established that these models provide a universal resource for ground state quantum computation. More recent findings include the proof that an idealised version of the contemporary variational approach to quantum algorithms enables a universal model of quantum computation. Other related results are also presented as they relate to ground state quantum computation and the minimisation of Hamiltonians by quantum circuits. The topics covered include: Ising model reductions, stochastic versus quantum processes on graphs, quantum gates and circuits as tensor networks, variational quantum algorithms and Hamiltonian gadgets.