Postulate of Absolute Structural Unity and the Elimination of Physical Duality It is proposed that physical reality is ontologically indivisible. Every phenomenological distinction—spatial, temporal, or material—corresponds to internal differentiations of organization within a single vibrational structure described by the Absolute Frequency (Φ). Autonomous entities do not exist; there exists only internal variation of structural coherence. If ρeff represents the effective density of vibrational organization, then any observable differentiation Δ satisfies: Δ = internal function (ρeff), without the introduction of new matter or additional ontological domains. The notion of a “part” is a metric interpretation that emerges from a limitation of global coherence. In this context, causality is not an interaction between objects, but an internal sequence of structural reorganizations. Locality arises as a constraint of coherent consistency; it is not a fundamental principle. The subject–object separation is an effect of informational asymmetry within the same structure. The physical implications are structural:(i) elimination of the field–matter dual ontology;(ii) reformulation of the notion of an isolated physical system;(iii) reinterpretation of quantum nonlocality as preserved structural coherence;(iv) ontological impossibility of real fragmentation of continuous vibration. Absolute structural unity implies that the universe does not contain multiple interacting realities, but rather a single self-organized reality whose diversity is an internal projection of different coherence states of the same Absolute Frequency.
Postulate of Absolute Structural Unity and the Elimination of Physical Duality It is proposed that physical reality is ontologically indivisible. Every phenomenological distinction—spatial, temporal, or material—corresponds to internal differentiations of organization within a single vibrational structure described by the Absolute Frequency (Φ). Autonomous entities do not exist; there exists only internal variation of structural coherence. If ρeff represents the effective density of vibrational organization, then any observable differentiation Δ satisfies: Δ = internal function (ρeff), without the introduction of new matter or additional ontological domains. The notion of a “part” is a metric interpretation that emerges from a limitation of global coherence. In this context, causality is not an interaction between objects, but an internal sequence of structural reorganizations. Locality arises as a constraint of coherent consistency; it is not a fundamental principle. The subject–object separation is an effect of informational asymmetry within the same structure. The physical implications are structural:(i) elimination of the field–matter dual ontology;(ii) reformulation of the notion of an isolated physical system;(iii) reinterpretation of quantum nonlocality as preserved structural coherence;(iv) ontological impossibility of real fragmentation of continuous vibration. Absolute structural unity implies that the universe does not contain multiple interacting realities, but rather a single self-organized reality whose diversity is an internal projection of different coherence states of the same Absolute Frequency.
This paper introduces Axiom 0, a minimal foundational principle for physical reality: the impossibility of any globally closed description of the total correlational structure. Rather than postulating space, time, dynamics, locality, or physical laws as primitive, the framework assumes only: (i) the existence of a correlational structure, (ii) the structural impossibility of complete self-closure, and (iii) consistency under partial comparison. From these ingredients, the paper shows how: physical laws emerge as stabilizing regularities of incomplete descriptions, time, dynamics, and geometry arise as effective, regime-dependent structures, irreversibility follows from projection and information loss, and why no description can be both exact and globally complete. Non-closure is treated as an ontological constraint, not as epistemic ignorance or observer dependence. Physical reality exists precisely because complete closure is impossible, independently of observation or modeling. The paper does not attempt to replace existing physical theories or derive numerical constants. Instead, it provides a structural foundation within which effective physical theories (quantum, classical, relativistic, and open-system regimes) can be consistently understood as emergent and domain-limited. This work is intended as a conceptual and structural foundation for correlational and relational approaches to fundamental physics, clarifying the origin of laws, dynamics, and physical regularity without invoking additional ontological postulates.
Abstract This study extends the complex-time framework introduced in Part I, where time was formulated as an intrinsic complex coordinate . Within this framework, the imaginary unit is reconsidered not as an algebraic symbol but as an operator of indeterminacy, representing the undetermined future phase of physical existence.The real component corresponds to the determined past. Temporal evolution is thus interpreted as a continuous projection through which potential states become actualized. Building upon this model, we propose a unified interpretation of measurement, entropy, entanglement, and nonlocality. Measurement may be viewed as a temporal projection fixing latent existence from the imaginary phase into the real domain; entropy growth corresponds to the cumulative conversion of undetermined futures into fixed pasts, giving rise to the arrow of time. Quantum indeterminacy is reinterpreted as the openness of the future, while entanglement appears as a form of temporal coherence connecting events through a shared phase structure. When correlations become fully realized, the internal -phase vanishes and the relation attains , implying a null-temporal state beyond spacetime separation. At the macroscopic level, matter with rest mass can be regarded as a dense network of such microscopic fixations. Each quantum interaction functions as a micro-instance of temporal fixation, producing the statistical rhythm perceived as continuous time. This interpretation suggests that reality may evolve through a self-referential process in which the universe continuously projects its potential phase into realized history—a dynamic structure of physical reality emerging from complex-time geometry. Running Title: Complex-Time Structure and Physical Reality Keywords: Complex Time; Temporal Projection; Quantum Measurement; Quantum Entanglement; Decoherence; Entropy; Information Dissipation; Physical Reality
In resisting attempts to explain the unity of a whole in terms of a multiplicity of interacting parts, quantum mechanics calls for an explanatory concept that proceeds in the opposite direction: from unity to multiplicity. Being part of the Scientific Image of the world, the theory concerns the process by which (the physical aspect of) what Sellars called the Manifest Image of the world comes into being. This process consists in the progressive differentiation of an intrinsically undifferentiated entity. By entering into reflexive spatial relations, this entity gives rise to (i) what looks like a multiplicity of relata if the reflexive quality of the relations is not taken into account, and (ii) what looks like a substantial expanse if the spatial quality of the relations is reified. If there is a distinctly quantum domain, it is a non-spatial and non-temporal dimension across which the transition from the unity of this entity to the multiplicity of the world takes place. Instead of being constituents of the physical world, subatomic particles, atoms, and molecules are instrumental in its manifestation. These conclusions are based on the following interpretive principle and its more direct consequences: whenever the calculation of probabilities calls for the addition of amplitudes, the distinctions we make between the alternatives lack objective reality. Applied to alternatives involving distinctions between regions of space, this principle implies that, owing to the indefiniteness of positions, the spatiotemporal differentiation of the physical world is incomplete: the existence of a real-valued spatiotemporal background is an unrealistic idealization. This guarantees the existence of observables whose values are real per se, as against “real by virtue of being indicated by the values of observables that are real per se.” Applied to alternatives involving distinctions between things, it implies that, intrinsically, all fundamental particles are numerically identical and thus identifiable with the aforementioned undifferentiated entity.
ABSTRACT Contemporary physics and philosophy rely on multiple dualisms: matter vs energy, body vs consciousness, quantum vs classical, information vs field. Each dualism creates contradictions and requires artificial bridges between incompatible ontologies.This work proposes a unified model in which everything is Information, existing in two inseparable states: active (dynamic) and passive (concentrated as a Model).A Model is passive Information; the environment is active Information.Model + active Information = Reality. This framework explains quantum non separability, phantom limb phenomena, CERN observations, natural vs artificial division of systems, evolution, de evolution, and the coexistence of multiple realities that cannot perceive one another due to incompatible informational interfaces.The model is more coherent than existing physical or philosophical theories because it eliminates dualisms, requires no external entities, and derives all observed phenomena from a single principle. Author: Waldemar Superson (This is Part of the Super Son of the Net Initiative) DESCRIPTION This article introduces a unified informational ontology in which all existence is described as Information in two inseparable states: active (dynamic, environmental) and passive (concentrated as a Model).The proposed structure — Model + active Information = Reality — provides a coherent explanation for quantum non locality, natural vs artificial system division, phantom limb persistence, and CERN observations.It further demonstrates that multiple realities can coexist without perceiving one another due to incompatible informational configurations.The work argues that this monistic framework is more internally consistent than contemporary physical or philosophical theories, which rely on dualisms and require additional assumptions or ontological bridges.The article positions this model as a new paradigm for understanding existence, structure, evolution, and the nature of reality itself. Author: Waldemar Superson (This is Part of the Super Son of the Net Initiative)
Este artigo apresenta uma análise crítico-propositiva do trabalho de Zhai Xingyun, PAPER-Δ: The Structural Architecture of Physical Reality — A Minimal Ontological Constitution for the DCQ–FBT Framework, em confronto com a Teoria da Objetividade (TO), desenvolvida por Vidamor Cabannas e Denivaldo Silva. O estudo examina os quatro postulados constitucionais do quadro DCQ–FBT — Realismo Estrutural, Admissibilidade Simplética, Determinismo Modal e Travamento Topológico — e os compara com os axiomas modais da Teoria da Objetividade, especialmente as Sete Verdades Absolutas, os elementos fenomênicos, os Efeitos Indutores, o teorema cosmogênico da TO e as Eras cosmológicas da teoria. A análise sustenta que o PAPER-Δ oferece uma poderosa arquitetura formal de admissibilidade estrutural, na qual espaço-tempo, observáveis, histórias dinâmicas, setores discretos e constantes físicas estáveis são interpretados como leituras restringidas de um substrato geométrico e algébrico mais profundo. A partir da perspectiva da TO, essa arquitetura é compatível com a rejeição de uma ontologia primitiva baseada em objetos, com a primazia da admissibilidade estrutural, com o papel da seleção modal e com a estabilização dos setores físicos por meio de restrições topológicas. Entretanto, o artigo também identifica importantes pontos de tensão. O PAPER-Δ não formula uma ontologia do Nada, não desenvolve plenamente a observação como condição relacional envolvendo ao menos dois outros elementos, não teoriza explicitamente a áurea como princípio modal de individuação e não incorpora a substância transcendente ao quantum como conhecimento ou informação produzidos nas relações atômicas e equivalentes às radiações atômicas. O artigo propõe que o quadro DCQ–FBT pode ser interpretado, à luz da Teoria da Objetividade, como uma arquitetura formal situada entre os Trilhos Lógicos e a emergência fenomênica do espaço-tempo. Sua contribuição está em oferecer uma teoria constitucional da estrutura física, enquanto a Teoria da Objetividade oferece uma ontologia modal mais profunda da gênese, da fronteira, da observação, da composição e da transcendência informacional. Este texto analítico contou com o suporte analítico do ChatGPT. Palavras-chave Teoria da Objetividade; Quadro DCQ–FBT; PAPER-Δ; Zhai Xingyun; Realismo Estrutural; Admissibilidade Simplética; Determinismo Modal; Travamento Topológico; Arquitetura Ontológica; Ontologia Modal; Elementos Fenomênicos; Efeitos Indutores; Cosmologia; Espaço-Tempo Emergente; Invariantes Topológicos; Informação; Radiação Atômica; Substância Transcendente; Análise Crítico-Propositiva.
Modern physics has achieved remarkable success by describing reality in terms of particles, states, and information bits. Yet recent developments in quantum matter, unconventional superconductivity, and topological computation increasingly suggest that a purely particle-centric framework may not be the most natural organizing description, but rather a convenient approximation. This work proposes an ontological reframing—from It from Bit to It from Wave—in which physical reality is understood as persistent, collective wave processes characterized by phase continuity, nonlocal coherence, and history-bearing relations. Within this framework, quasiparticles—including magnons, phonons, plasmons, and anyons—are reinterpreted not as entities, but as stable collective excitation modes: enduring patterns of interacting waves sustained by a medium. Building on this shift, localization is reinterpreted as the breakdown of wave connectivity, while delocalization corresponds to the restoration of global phase coherence. Superconductivity is reformulated not as a special property of paired particles, but as a phase-continuous, delocalized regime in which dissipation is not eliminated but reorganized into collective phase dynamics—naturally suggesting disorder-tolerant and non-BCS-like superconducting behavior. Extending the same ontology to computation, we argue that quantum computation is fundamentally history-based rather than state-based. Information is encoded not primarily in localized bits or qubits, but in the topological and phase-coherent histories of wave evolution, where robustness arises from nonlocal distribution rather than active error suppression. Crucially, this framework motivates previously under-emphasized physical observables—such as phase continuity length, history coherence time, degree of nonlocality, and dissipation-reorganized coherence—as primary descriptors of relational persistence. Rather than introducing new equations, this work reorganizes interpretation across domains and specifies concrete experimental and theoretical directions by asking which wave relations persist, under what constraints, and for how long. This paper constitutes the ontological foundation of the “It from Wave” research program. A complementary interpretive study examines the historical and conceptual shift from particle transport to phase propagation in electrical conduction, while a minimal physical model demonstrates how information and conduction can arise from phase-coupled dynamics without particle motion. Together, these works articulate a unified framework in which phase relations, history, and nonlocal coherence are treated as physically primary. This paper forms part of a conceptual trilogy exploring the transition from a Machine OS to a Life OS through an It from Wave perspective. The trilogy consists of:(i) a foundational conceptual work reframing information, existence, and generation beyond the It from Bit paradigm;(ii) a minimal theoretical study addressing nonlinear generative time, resonance, and feedback dynamics; and(iii) an applied interpretation engaging recent cosmological observations, including extreme intracluster heating in the early universe. While each paper is self-contained, together they articulate a unified framework in which reality is understood as a resonant, generative process rather than a sequential, machine-like assembly.