Quantum computing promises to revolutionize fields reliant on complex data processing, such as medical diagnostics. This paper presents an extended comparative analysis of classical and quantum machine learning (QML) techniques for breast cancer detection, using the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset. Classical kernel-based Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and Quantum Support Vector Classification (QSVC) using IBM's Qiskit platform are employed. Beyond accuracy comparisons, this study provides insights into the technical challenges of quantum feature encoding, computational overheads, and hardware limitations. Results suggest that while classical models currently dominate, QML represents a credible future pathway for handling large-scale, complex medical datasets.
Quantum computing promises to revolutionize fields reliant on complex data processing, such as medical diagnostics. This paper presents an extended comparative analysis of classical and quantum machine learning (QML) techniques for breast cancer detection, using the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset. Classical kernel-based Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and Quantum Support Vector Classification (QSVC) using IBM's Qiskit platform are employed. Beyond accuracy comparisons, this study provides insights into the technical challenges of quantum feature encoding, computational overheads, and hardware limitations. Results suggest that while classical models currently dominate, QML represents a credible future pathway for handling large-scale, complex medical datasets.
Breast cancer continues to be among the most common causes of cancer death globally, with early and precise diagnosis playing a pivotal role in enhancing patient survival. Traditional machine learning (ML) techniques have shown great promise in the field of medical imaging and diagnosis; however, the emergence of quantum machine learning (QML) offers new avenues for the improvement of pattern discovery and diagnostic accuracy in high-dimensional medical data. This work describes a thorough benchmark comparison of quantum and classical machine learning methods for breast cancer diagnosis over the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer data and mammographic image data. We compare variational quantum classifiers (VQC), quantum kernel methods (QKM), quantum convolutional neural networks (QCNNs), and hybrid quantum-classical neural structures with traditional classical baselines like support vector machines (SVM) and convolutional neural networks (CNN). QKM techniques perform better in high-dimensional feature spaces and better generalize on external validation sets. This implementation framework describes in depth how to develop, train, and deploy QML models in the clinical workflow, including optimization approaches, code structures, and deployment issues. The work demonstrates that it is possible to streamline breast cancer screening and diagnosis using QML with more accurate and more efficient solutions, which would lead to a huge impact on patient outcomes.
Breast cancer is a major health concern, and early detection can make a great difference in treatment and survival rates for breast cancer patients. Machine learning methods have noticeably improved prediction accuracy on high-dimensional medical datasets and have become widely used tools in medical diagnostics. The transition to a quantum computational framework has opened new directions in machine learning research. By using qubits instead of classical bits, quantum models may provide new ways to represent and process complex medical data. In medical diagnostics, this has led to a growing interest in whether quantum approaches can improve classification performance more effectively than classical methods. The purpose of this paper is to compare classical and quantum machine learning models on the task of breast cancer classification and to determine whether quantum models can achieve higher accuracy and faster prediction on a selected dataset. Alongside the main simulator-based experiment, a smaller experiment was performed on a real IBM quantum computer to demonstrate the practical execution of the same task under current hardware constraints. In the practical part of the study, the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset was used. This dataset consists of 569 samples with 30 numerical features extracted from digitized fine needle aspirate images and provides a reliable basis for evaluating model performance. A comparative analysis was conducted between classical and quantum machine learning models, including a support vector machine (SVM), an artificial neural network (ANN), a quantum support vector machine (QSVM), and a hybrid quantum-classical neural network (QNN). In the simulator-based experiment, both SVM and ANN achieved an accuracy of 0.956 with an F1-score of 0.965 on the test set, while QSVM reached an accuracy of 0.807 with an F1-score of 0.866 and the Hybrid QNN achieved 0.623 accuracy with an F1-score of 0.677. These quantum and hybrid models also required substantially longer training times than the classical baselines. A small hardware experiment on an IBM quantum device further illustrates both the practical feasibility and the current limitations of executing this classification task on noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware.
The application of machine learning has shown significant progress in various fields, including clinical data classification. This study presents a comparative analysis between the classical Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) for breast cancer classification using the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied as dimension reduction strategy across three configurations (PCA = 2, PCA = 4, and PCA = 6) to evaluate the sensitivity of both models to the feature space dimension. Preprocessing included log1p transformation on 22 skewed features, Manual SMOTE balancing, and MinMaxScaler normalization. SVM was optimized via GridSearchCV (80 parameter combinations, cv = 5), while QSVM employed a ZZFeatureMap quantum kernel (reps = 2, entanglement = full) on qasm_simulator. Experimental results demonstrate that SVM achieved superior accuracy across all configurations, with peak performance at PCA = 6 (Accuracy= 98.83%, AUC = 0.9985, Specificity = 1.0000, Sensitivity = 0.9688, Precision = 1.0000, NPV = 0.9817, and F1-score for malignant = 0.98). QSVM achieved its highest accuracy at PCA = 4 (92.98%), AUC = 0.9622, Sensitivity = 0.9219, Precision = 0.8939, NPV = 0.9524, and F1-score for malignant = 0.91. Across the three PCA configurations, QSVM exhibited a non-monotonic relationship between PCA dimensions and quantum kernel performance . These findings provide a quantitative benchmark for comparing quantum and classical machine learning in breast cancer diagnosis.
Breast cancer is rated as one of the top leading diagnosed and deadliest cancers affecting women worldwide and causing high mortality rate among cancers. With the data-driven applications, hybrid quantum-classical machine learning models have evolved as significant alternatives for handling complex feature spaces with the growing interest in quantum computing. This paper presents a systematic comparative study of classical and quantum machine learning approaches for breast cancer classification using the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Dataset. In this architecture we have preprocessed classical feature vectors using standard normalized techniques and parallelly quantum states are mapped through data embedding techniques which relies on parameterized rotational gates. In this work we have implemented all quantum models using the Pennylane library, resulting in hybrid quantum–classical optimization on near-term quantum simulators. The comparison results in multiple classical and quantum models. In classical we have Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), which are compared with the quantum-based models such as the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC), Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) and Quantum Convolutional Neural Network (QCNN). In QSVM, we have performed dimensionality reduction using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) before to quantum embedding, and quantum-generated features are used to train a classical linear SVM. The evaluation metrics results in accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC curves and confusion matrices. The classical models achieves the accuracy in the range of 94%-96%, whereas competitive performance of quantum models demonstrate depending on the embedding strategy and circuit configuration. In the implemented quantum models, the variational quantum classifier achieved the highest classification accuracy of 96.06%, surpassing other evaluated models. These results demonstrate quantum embedding combined with variational quantum circuits can effectively capture discriminative patterns in medical datasets, indicating the implementation of quantum machine learning models for breast cancer diagnosis with the present quantum simulating platforms.
Abstract The breast cancer is widely prevalent, with millions of new cases and deaths reported annually. Globally, one in every 70 women is affected with breast cancer. It is apparent from the statistics that the number of breast cancer subjects are exponentially rising day by day. Early detection of the disease plays a crucial role to decrease the mortality rate and increase the survival chance. Quantum machine learning is an upcoming field in the era of big data, which helps to process the complex data more efficiently. This study aims to explore the QML models to accurately predict the breast cancer subjects and diagnose the disease in the early stage. Additionally, QML-based models aid in the classification of breast cancer as either benign or malignant. This study presents the comparative analysis of three QML models, namely QRF, QkNN and QSVM, for breast cancer classification using the Breast Cancer Wisconsin dataset. Each model is evaluated based on key performance metrics and the models achieved the accuracy of 97%, 94% and 90%, respectively. Hence, the results showed that the QRF outperformed QSVM and QkNN in classification accuracy, demonstrating superior ability to distinguish between malignant and benign tumors. This study highlights the potential of QML in medical diagnostics while emphasizing the need for further research in hybrid quantum-classical approaches, improved feature mapping techniques, and optimized quantum circuits.
Early and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer plays a critical role in improving patient survival rates and reducing treatment costs. Classical machine learning algorithms such as Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machines (SVM) have demonstrated strong performance in medical diagnosis tasks; however, their scalability and representational limits motivate the exploration of emerging paradigms. Quantum Machine Learning (QML), particularly Variational Quantum Classifiers (VQC), has recently gained attention due to its potential to model complex decision boundaries using quantum circuits. This paper presents a comparative analysis between a Variational Quantum Classifier and classical machine learning models for binary breast cancer classification. The study employs dimensionality-reduced clinical data and evaluates model performance using accuracy, confusion matrices, decision boundary visualization, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Experimental results indicate that the VQC achieves competitive performance with classical approaches, demonstrating its feasibility for small-scale medical datasets and highlighting the promise of quantum-enhanced learning in healthcare applications.