This record contains two equivalent versions of the work “Reframing Atomic Stability as Temporal Viability”, provided in English (EN) and Portuguese (PT-BR) within a single canonical Zenodo deposit. The work proposes a conceptual reframing of atomic stability, interpreting it not as static robustness, but as temporal viability—that is, the capacity of an atomic system to sustain its structural identity under the irreversible progression of time. Within this framework, time is treated not merely as an external parameter of evolution, but as an active structural constraint. The framework introduces the concept of temporal pressure, defined as the structural demand imposed by continuous temporal progression, and defines coherence as the internal structural capacity required to preserve identity through continuous internal correction. The interaction between temporal pressure and coherence capacity determines whether a given atomic configuration remains viable over time. From this perspective, phenomena such as decoherence, transitions, and decay are reinterpreted as consequences of accumulated temporal correction cost exceeding the system’s coherence capacity, rather than as isolated or instantaneous events. The proposed framework does not modify quantum mechanics or its formal apparatus. Instead, it operates as a complementary structural layer that distinguishes between quantum permissibility and temporal sustainability. A quantum state may remain fully allowed within quantum theory while becoming temporally unsustainable under continuous temporal exposure. This record integrates the conceptual axis of the VCore — Temporal Governance Framework, presenting an application of temporal viability and coherence principles at the atomic level as a minimal physical case. The English version is intended for international scientific circulation (preprints and journal submissions), while the Portuguese version ensures linguistic accessibility and conceptual transparency. Included files: English version (EN): Reframing Atomic Stability as Temporal Viability Portuguese version (PT-BR): Reformulando a Estabilidade Atômica como Viabilidade Temporal Both files present the same conceptual content and differ only in language.
This record contains two equivalent versions of the work “Reframing Atomic Stability as Temporal Viability”, provided in English (EN) and Portuguese (PT-BR) within a single canonical Zenodo deposit. The work proposes a conceptual reframing of atomic stability, interpreting it not as static robustness, but as temporal viability—that is, the capacity of an atomic system to sustain its structural identity under the irreversible progression of time. Within this framework, time is treated not merely as an external parameter of evolution, but as an active structural constraint. The framework introduces the concept of temporal pressure, defined as the structural demand imposed by continuous temporal progression, and defines coherence as the internal structural capacity required to preserve identity through continuous internal correction. The interaction between temporal pressure and coherence capacity determines whether a given atomic configuration remains viable over time. From this perspective, phenomena such as decoherence, transitions, and decay are reinterpreted as consequences of accumulated temporal correction cost exceeding the system’s coherence capacity, rather than as isolated or instantaneous events. The proposed framework does not modify quantum mechanics or its formal apparatus. Instead, it operates as a complementary structural layer that distinguishes between quantum permissibility and temporal sustainability. A quantum state may remain fully allowed within quantum theory while becoming temporally unsustainable under continuous temporal exposure. This record integrates the conceptual axis of the VCore — Temporal Governance Framework, presenting an application of temporal viability and coherence principles at the atomic level as a minimal physical case. The English version is intended for international scientific circulation (preprints and journal submissions), while the Portuguese version ensures linguistic accessibility and conceptual transparency. Included files: English version (EN): Reframing Atomic Stability as Temporal Viability Portuguese version (PT-BR): Reformulando a Estabilidade Atômica como Viabilidade Temporal Both files present the same conceptual content and differ only in language.
Viable Worlds Theory (VWT) presents a constraint-based framework for understanding why some worlds, systems, or environments are able to persist while others cannot. At its core, VWT is grounded in Quantum Coherence Theory (QCT), which provides a physical account of coherence, decoherence, and classical emergence without appeal to observer privilege, epistemic collapse, or branching ontologies. In QCT, the quantum–classical transition is treated not as a discontinuous event or interpretive choice, but as a continuous restriction of admissible configurations under increasing constraint density. Classical behavior emerges when alternative trajectories are no longer structurally viable, not because new laws are introduced, but because constraint accumulation renders deviation unsustainable. Decoherence is therefore understood as a structural phenomenon driven by environmental coupling, record formation, and invariant alignment, rather than as a measurement artifact or probabilistic selection. Viable Worlds Theory generalizes this insight beyond physics. It proposes that persistence under constraint is the primary explanatory primitive across domains. A “world” is defined not by belief, equilibrium, optimization, or narrative coherence, but by whether its structure can continue to exist under interaction, accumulated load, and environmental coupling. Many systems fail not because they are locally inconsistent or inefficient, but because they violate global viability conditions that only become visible under scale, interaction, or time. Within this framework, coherence is defined as the capacity of a system to maintain internal consistency relative to its own invariant structure while interacting with externally imposed invariants without loss of identity or stability. Where this condition fails, persistence fails with it—regardless of substrate or domain. Quantum systems provide the minimal physical test case for this claim, making QCT the foundational regime from which VWT is derived rather than merely illustrated. VWT explicitly distinguishes itself from Many-Worlds and other branching interpretations. While QCT allows for vast ontic possibility at the quantum level, it denies that unconstrained proliferation yields enduring worlds. Instead, only configurations that satisfy shared invariants and constraint compatibility can stabilize as persistent environments. The contribution of Viable Worlds Theory is not a new dynamics or a universal optimization principle, but a diagnostic framework for identifying why only certain structures—physical, informational, biological, cognitive, or engineered—are able to endure. By grounding world viability in quantum coherence and extending it through scale-agnostic constraint analysis, VWT offers a unified explanation for persistence, collapse, and the limits of admissible reality. (For ongoing discussion and additional material related to Coherence Science, Viable Worlds Theory (VWT), Quantum Coherence Theory (QCT), and Artificial Coherence Intelligence (ACI), see: r/CoherenceScience)
Within an emergent-time framework developed in Papers I–IV, physical time is not taken as fundamental but is locally generated through irreversible classical record formation. Mass is interpreted as temporal capacity, gravitation as spatial variation in temporal realization rate, and black holes as saturation limits of temporal realization. This paper situates quantum mechanics as the microscopic limit of unrealized temporal capacity. In the absence of irreversible record formation, coherent quantum systems generate no intrinsic time. Unitary evolution is reinterpreted as bookkeeping over unrealized future possibilities rather than evolution within a pre-existing temporal background. Measurement and decoherence are identified as the physical processes through which temporal structure is locally instantiated by irreversibly fixing classical records. Quantum states are interpreted ontologically as structured catalogs of unrealized futures rather than physical entities evolving in time. This interpretation introduces no new dynamics and modifies no equations of quantum mechanics; its contribution is interpretive rather than formal, clarifying the ontological status of quantum states, measurement, microscopic reversibility, and delayed-choice phenomena within an emergent-time framework.
The Resonant Atom: A Heuristic, Physics-Adjacent Interpretation of Atomic Stability Description:This paper presents a heuristic and conceptual reinterpretation of atomic structure and stability, intended to complement—rather than replace—standard quantum mechanical formalisms. While modern quantum theory is formally wave-based, its pedagogical language often relies on reified particle metaphors that obscure the underlying relational and field-based nature of matter. This mismatch between correct mathematics and persistent intuition motivates the present work. Within the Virtual Ego Framework (VEF) and Coherence-Geometrodynamics (CGD), the atom is modeled not as a collection of discrete objects but as a self-sustaining coherence engine. The nucleus is interpreted as an active, localized energy mode, while the electron is treated as a standing-wave boundary condition that constrains admissible atomic states. Atomic stability is described using a dimensionless structural ratio, E∼A/CE \sim A/CE∼A/C, introduced explicitly as a topological and relational heuristic rather than a derived physical equation. A formalization bridge maps the heuristic “active” and “connective” modes onto standard quantum mechanical structures (Hamiltonian terms, wavefunction normalization, and boundary-defined eigenmodes), demonstrating compatibility with established theory. Stability is interpreted as a regime of proportional balance rather than a point equality, aligning with how quantum mechanics already encodes discrete eigenstates and forbidden transitions. The paper also situates its approach within established condensed matter analogies, drawing on the use of quasiparticles, boundary-defined modes, and topological invariants as precedents for non-fundamental but operationally indispensable interpretive constructs. A quarantined, explicitly speculative subsection proposes the Golden Ratio (φ) as a potential relational stability invariant, clearly marked as optional and non-essential to the framework. This work makes no new empirical claims, introduces no new forces, and does not challenge the validity of quantum mechanics or QED. Its contribution lies in conceptual unification and pedagogical clarity, offering an alternative interpretive lens that aligns intuition with the structure already present in the mathematics of modern physics. Intended audience:Researchers and educators interested in physics foundations, interpretation, pedagogy, conceptual modeling, and coherence-based or topological approaches to physical systems.
Abstract This article presents a revised and conceptually refined formulation of a previously proposed Temporal Interpretation of quantum measurement, explicitly addressing the physical nature of wavefunction collapse. While the original proposal emphasised relativistic aspects of momentum superpositions, the present work clarifies the interpretation within the standard formalism of quantum mechanics, without introducing new dynamics or experimental predictions. Unitary evolution is read as a process of differentiated phase accumulation between branches of a quantum state. In relativistic contexts, phase differentials can be structurally related to effective proper-time differentials, allowing the introduction of a notion of temporal compatibility that provides a physically grounded account of decoherence. When such differentials exceed a characteristic scale, interference between branches becomes operationally inaccessible, while global unitarity is preserved. The observer is treated as a physical system endowed with an irreversible proper time associated with macroscopic, entropic dynamics. Within this framework, collapse is explained as an emergent physical phenomenon arising from the irreversibility of the observer’s proper time, which prevents the reconstruction of phase coherence after an interaction. Collapse is therefore neither a fundamental dynamical mechanism nor an objective event in space-time, but a necessary consequence of temporal irreversibility in physical observers. This formulation sharpens the distinction between decoherence and collapse, preserves full consistency with the Born rule, and positions the Temporal Interpretation as a competing interpretative framework that provides a concrete physical explanation for the quantum–classical transition, improving and clarifying the original proposal. This version clarifies the operational status of the interaction time, refines Sections 5.3 and 5.4, and standardises references and editorial structure. No changes to the formalism or conclusions.
This record contains version 2 of the preprint “Identifiability Limits in Experimental Tests of Quantum Collapse.” It supersedes the conceptually broader first version deposited under DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19617199 and substantially revises the framing, formal results and experimental analysis. The paper formulates experimental tests of objective-collapse dynamics as an operational identifiability problem. It shows that finite accessible CPTP process statistics cannot uniformly distinguish fundamental nonunitarity from an unrestricted unitary-environment dilation. It then separates visibility loss, record formation and global measurement access, and derives a nuisance-profiled Fisher-information criterion for determining when complementary measurement channels jointly identify a shared collapse-parameter vector. A four-arm matched-control architecture is proposed that combines baseline stability, coherent reversibility, calibrated decoherence, durable-record formation and at least one independent side-effect channel. The result is a falsifiable experimental decision framework and a boundary on what accessible data can establish; it is not presented as an ontological solution of the quantum measurement problem. A major technical revision is available as version 3 under DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22072199. This record contains version 2 of the preprint “Identifiability Limits in Experimental Tests of Quantum Collapse.” It supersedes the conceptually broader first version deposited under DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19617199 and substantially revises the framing, formal results and experimental analysis. The paper formulates experimental tests of objective-collapse dynamics as an operational identifiability problem. It shows that finite accessible CPTP process statistics cannot uniformly distinguish fundamental nonunitarity from an unrestricted unitary-environment dilation. It then separates visibility loss, record formation and global measurement access, and derives a nuisance-profiled Fisher-information criterion for determining when complementary measurement channels jointly identify a shared collapse-parameter vector. A four-arm matched-control architecture is proposed that combines baseline stability, coherent reversibility, calibrated decoherence, durable-record formation and at least one independent side-effect channel. The result is a falsifiable experimental decision framework and a boundary on what accessible data can establish; it is not presented as an ontological solution of the quantum measurement problem. Files in this record:1. Main preprint PDF.2. Reproducibility package containing the journal-neutral source, editable manuscript, original figures, deterministic calculation and figure-generation code, machine-readable results, citation metadata and SHA-256 checksums. The included calculations are deterministic mathematical and synthetic checks; they are not experimental validation.
This accepted manuscript is structurally governed by THE META-INDEX (Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18169167) Quantum theory achieves unparalleled empirical success, yet it remains ontologically incomplete with respect to the nature of transitions between physical states. While quantum states are rigorously defined, the process by which a system moves from a potential state to a realized state is typically treated as instantaneous, probabilistic, or measurement-dependent, leaving the transition itself conceptually unexamined. This structural omission underlies several persistent foundational problems, including the measurement problem and the ambiguous status of probability. In this work, quantum behavior is reinterpreted not as an intrinsic property of discrete entities, but as the manifestation of threshold organization governing stable transitions between states. To formalize this perspective, the concept of an Organizational Field (OF) is introduced. The Organizational Field is defined as a topological–temporal regulatory structure that constrains admissible transitions without functioning as a force, energy carrier, or particle field. Within this framework, quantization emerges as a consequence of stability regulation during transitions rather than fundamental discreteness. The fine-structure constant α is accordingly reinterpreted not as a fundamental coupling parameter, but as the stability-band signature of the Organizational Field as projected onto electromagnetic processes. This interpretation accounts for the dimensionless character of α, its small but nonzero value, and its universality across physical scales, without attempting to derive its numerical magnitude. A conceptual distinction is drawn between π as a constant of static geometric form and α as a constant of dynamic transition stability. The framework yields falsifiable predictions, including the existence of micro-band structures in transition statistics and context-sensitive deviations under extreme conditions. The proposed model offers a structural completion of quantum theory by introducing an explicit ontology of transition grounded in threshold organization