Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Emergent Causality and Unaligned Geometry

Michael Geil

Published Feb 7, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The framework yields several concrete predictions that can be tested directly using existing datasets, without requiring new experimental infrastructure. In particular, the coherence–geometry coupling implies the presence of narrowband temporal structure in long-baseline qubit energy-relaxation time series, as well as correlated features across spatially separated laboratories. These signatures arise from Earth’s motion through the residual cosmological coherence field and from the geometry-dependent accessibility of Tier-2 correlations. Crucially, the predicted signals possess well-defined frequency content, phase structure, and cross-laboratory relationships, enabling immediate backtests and providing clear criteria for falsification.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18520907

Related papers

Laboratory-Constrained Coherence Dynamics and a Pre-Data Prediction for DESI Y3

Eduardo Parra

We present a laboratory-constrained phenomenological framework linking controlled quantum coherence experiments to large-scale cosmological observables. Using experimental results from superconducting qubits subjected to structured low-frequency toroidal magnetic fields, we define a dimensionless coherence proxy, κ_lab = 0.728 ± 0.020, which captures both temporal decoherence suppression and spatial field uniformity. This observable is derived directly from measured enhancements in qubit relaxation time (T1), without modification to materials or circuit design. We then introduce a calibrated laboratory-to-cosmology bridge, mapping κ_lab into an effective coupling parameter within a coherence-driven cosmological framework. This mapping enables a quantitative pre-data prediction for an environmental modulation of the Hubble expansion rate:ΔH0/H0 = 0.73^{+0.21}_{-0.18}%,for the benchmark regime m_φ ~ H0 and α = 1. The key contribution of this work is not the assumption of a confirmed cross-scale mechanism, but the construction of a transparent and falsifiable bridge between a laboratory-measured coherence observable and a cosmological testable quantity. The prediction lies within the sensitivity range of DESI Year 3, enabling a clear binary test: • Detection of a ~0.5–1.0% environmental step supports the viability of scale-bridging coherence dynamics.• A null result constrains the phenomenological bridge while preserving the laboratory result as an independent demonstration of environmental coherence engineering. This approach establishes a new paradigm in which controlled quantum systems can serve as quantitative anchors for testing phenomenological extensions of large-scale physics, connecting laboratory coherence and cosmological expansion in a falsifiable framework.

•Apr 18, 2026•0 citations

Testing Quantum Mechanics with Observations of Causally Disconnected Cosmological Events

Andrew S. Friedman, David I. Kaiser, Jason R. Gallicchio +1 more

AAS•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Probing quantum causality with geometric asymmetry in spatial-temporal correlations

Yu Meng, Zhenghao Liu, Zhikuan Zhao +11 more

Science China Information Sciences•Aug 19, 2024•0 citations

Experimental Signatures and Falsifiability of Phase Ontology: How a Phase-Primary Framework Can Be Tested

Rob ten Napel

Experimental Signatures and Falsifiability of Phase Ontology: How a Phase-Primary Framework Can Be Tested (Phase Ontology — Part VII) completes the Phase Ontology series by translating its core claims into concrete, falsifiable expectations. While Parts I–VI argue that phase coherence is physically real and that spacetime is an emergent projection of stable phase relations, this paper makes the scientific demand explicit: the framework must constrain what should be observed in the laboratory—not merely reinterpret existing results. The paper outlines a set of testable signatures that should appear if measurement is genuinely a phase-locking process, if coherence is a physical resource that can be preserved or dispersed, and if detectors and environments are active material participants rather than generic sources of noise. Key experimental arenas include: (1) detector-dependent phase-locking thresholds (e.g., interferometry where small, controlled detector-material changes produce disproportionate shifts in localization/fringe behavior), (2) coherence capacity and delayed classicality (engineered environments that produce non-linear regime changes rather than only smooth decoherence), (3) entanglement under structured phase environments (sensitivity to structured phase modulation beyond standard loss/noise parameters), (4) precision clocks as phase probes (searching for residual coherence-environment dependencies beyond known systematics), and (5) macroscopic coherence bridge regimes in superconducting and mesoscopic networks where topology and coupling geometry should matter in structured ways. Crucially, the paper states what falsification would look like in practice: if across multiple platforms detector variations yield no structured threshold effects, coherence isolation produces only fully predictable smooth behavior, entanglement responds solely to standard channel parameters, and precision clocks show no reproducible residual coherence-structure dependence, then Phase Ontology remains an interpretation but loses its claim to be an empirically distinct physical framework. A staged experimental program is proposed, moving from tabletop interferometry to progressively more demanding coherence and clock tests.

•Feb 15, 2026•0 citations

Temporal Coherence Correlations in Leptonic Decay Observables: A Test of Observer-Field Coupling at the LHC

Kate Lynn Blatt

Abstract The Energy-Consciousness Observer Framework (ECOF) predicts that observer-field coupling introduces small, structured deviations in particle decay observables that scale with rest mass. If this coupling depends on local coherence gradients in the laboratory environment, measurable correlations should emerge between independent leptonic decay channels across LHC operational periods. We propose a specific, falsifiable test: fill-to-fill fluctuations in H→μμ and Z→μμ signal strengths should exhibit temporal correlations with coefficient r = 0.40 ± 0.15 after luminosity corrections. This correlation should disappear under time-scrambling (r < 0.1) and scale with lepton mass. The analysis uses existing Run 3 data, requires no new detector capabilities, and provides clear null controls. A positive result would constitute evidence for environment-dependent quantum coupling effects; a null result would constrain ECOF coherence-gradient models at the sub-percent level.

•Mar 9, 2026•0 citations

Consistent quantum prediction and decoherence in quantum cosmology

David Craig A

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 2, 2012•0 citations
The framework yields several concrete predictions that can be tested directly using existing datasets, without requiring new experimental infrastructure. In particular, the coherence–geometry coupling implies the presence of narrowband temporal structure in long-baseline qubit energy-relaxation time series, as well as correlated features across spatially separated laboratories. These signatures arise from Earth’s motion through the residual cosmological coherence field and from the geometry-dependent accessibility of Tier-2 correlations. Crucially, the predicted signals possess well-defined frequency content, phase structure, and cross-laboratory relationships, enabling immediate backtests and providing clear criteria for falsification.
We present a laboratory-constrained phenomenological framework linking controlled quantum coherence experiments to large-scale cosmological observables. Using experimental results from superconducting qubits subjected to structured low-frequency toroidal magnetic fields, we define a dimensionless coherence proxy, κ_lab = 0.728 ± 0.020, which captures both temporal decoherence suppression and spatial field uniformity. This observable is derived directly from measured enhancements in qubit relaxation time (T1), without modification to materials or circuit design. We then introduce a calibrated laboratory-to-cosmology bridge, mapping κ_lab into an effective coupling parameter within a coherence-driven cosmological framework. This mapping enables a quantitative pre-data prediction for an environmental modulation of the Hubble expansion rate:ΔH0/H0 = 0.73^{+0.21}_{-0.18}%,for the benchmark regime m_φ ~ H0 and α = 1. The key contribution of this work is not the assumption of a confirmed cross-scale mechanism, but the construction of a transparent and falsifiable bridge between a laboratory-measured coherence observable and a cosmological testable quantity. The prediction lies within the sensitivity range of DESI Year 3, enabling a clear binary test: • Detection of a ~0.5–1.0% environmental step supports the viability of scale-bridging coherence dynamics.• A null result constrains the phenomenological bridge while preserving the laboratory result as an independent demonstration of environmental coherence engineering. This approach establishes a new paradigm in which controlled quantum systems can serve as quantitative anchors for testing phenomenological extensions of large-scale physics, connecting laboratory coherence and cosmological expansion in a falsifiable framework.
Experimental Signatures and Falsifiability of Phase Ontology: How a Phase-Primary Framework Can Be Tested (Phase Ontology — Part VII) completes the Phase Ontology series by translating its core claims into concrete, falsifiable expectations. While Parts I–VI argue that phase coherence is physically real and that spacetime is an emergent projection of stable phase relations, this paper makes the scientific demand explicit: the framework must constrain what should be observed in the laboratory—not merely reinterpret existing results. The paper outlines a set of testable signatures that should appear if measurement is genuinely a phase-locking process, if coherence is a physical resource that can be preserved or dispersed, and if detectors and environments are active material participants rather than generic sources of noise. Key experimental arenas include: (1) detector-dependent phase-locking thresholds (e.g., interferometry where small, controlled detector-material changes produce disproportionate shifts in localization/fringe behavior), (2) coherence capacity and delayed classicality (engineered environments that produce non-linear regime changes rather than only smooth decoherence), (3) entanglement under structured phase environments (sensitivity to structured phase modulation beyond standard loss/noise parameters), (4) precision clocks as phase probes (searching for residual coherence-environment dependencies beyond known systematics), and (5) macroscopic coherence bridge regimes in superconducting and mesoscopic networks where topology and coupling geometry should matter in structured ways. Crucially, the paper states what falsification would look like in practice: if across multiple platforms detector variations yield no structured threshold effects, coherence isolation produces only fully predictable smooth behavior, entanglement responds solely to standard channel parameters, and precision clocks show no reproducible residual coherence-structure dependence, then Phase Ontology remains an interpretation but loses its claim to be an empirically distinct physical framework. A staged experimental program is proposed, moving from tabletop interferometry to progressively more demanding coherence and clock tests.
Abstract The Energy-Consciousness Observer Framework (ECOF) predicts that observer-field coupling introduces small, structured deviations in particle decay observables that scale with rest mass. If this coupling depends on local coherence gradients in the laboratory environment, measurable correlations should emerge between independent leptonic decay channels across LHC operational periods. We propose a specific, falsifiable test: fill-to-fill fluctuations in H→μμ and Z→μμ signal strengths should exhibit temporal correlations with coefficient r = 0.40 ± 0.15 after luminosity corrections. This correlation should disappear under time-scrambling (r < 0.1) and scale with lepton mass. The analysis uses existing Run 3 data, requires no new detector capabilities, and provides clear null controls. A positive result would constitute evidence for environment-dependent quantum coupling effects; a null result would constrain ECOF coherence-gradient models at the sub-percent level.