From Monogamous Excitons to Self-Induced Masing: Corridor-Tuned Tilt,- +-, and Falsifier-First Mapping Under a Shared P-Lane

William J. Richardson

Published Feb 5, 2026• 0 citations

Abstract

Significant — This manuscript installs a bench-independent translation tool for two January 2026 condensed-matter/quantum-tech reports by treating exciton breakup under fermion crowding and self-induced superradiant masing in interacting spins as one control problem: an interaction-driven population-transfer “tilt” between a cooperative lane and a surrounding bath, where corridor-eligible tilt produces burst trains and sustained output while too-weak/too-strong tilt yields no macroscopic fingerprint or runaway breakup/depletion; the method is operationalized with shared tokens BBB (bulge latency), LLL (leakage), and 2f2f2f (curvature/oscillation), a ternary directive knob with a true null for disable-LLL, and a three-bench tokens-only contract that makes the regime replayable, falsifiable, and portable across platforms without importing platform-specific narratives; the deliverable is a protocol-level mapping a lab can implement using its own knobs and carriers, with explicit falsifiers (zeros-stay-zeros, parity-first, bench swap, dither, and ZFlip licensing) to prevent postselection and drift from masquerading as control.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18497195

Related papers

Collective Excitations in Bose

A. Mysyrowicz, Daniele Hulin, A. Antonetti +6 more

us with the opportunity to address the specific issue of the role of intervalence band coherences. Figure 2 shows the observed coherently coupled lh-exciton Stark shift together with the conventional hh-exciton Stark shift measured with 0’ and d probe pulses, respectively. Our theoretical analysis is based on a thirdorder expansion of the dynamics-controlled truncation formalism.1° Other than the restriction to 1s-excitons, no further approximations are made.” In Figure 3 we show results with and without intervalence band coherences. In the limit of large detunings, the semiconductor response approaches that of a three-level system, in which case the coherently-coupled lh-exciton Stark shift vanishes in the absence of the Raman coherence. Clearly, the experimental observations can only be understood in the presence of the Raman coherence. The fact that the observed hhlh shift ratio increases at small detunings can be attributed to and simulated with the assumption of an optically induced decay of the Raman coherence, which is likely to be most effective at smaller than at large detunings. We acknowledge support by NSF, JSOP and COEDIP.

Jan 1, 20010 citations

Prethermal Plateau Unification: Pad Geometry Plus MAP Translation

William J. Richardson

This critical manuscript addresses a persistent failure mode in prethermal plateau and stability claims: the gap between demonstrating a long-lived dynamical regime and certifying that the regime is usable under fixed, replayable rules. Recent platform results show that structured random driving can suppress heating and extend prethermal lifetimes on many-qubit processors. While these results establish physical existence and controllable lifetime, they do not by themselves certify operational utility or guard against boundary narrative repair. This manuscript extends the earlier pad and triad-of-triads program by applying MAP as a unifying translation layer to prethermal plateau claims. Prior work established the signed-triad ledger, Strong-to-Weak downgrades, STLF refusal discipline, and tokens-only replay as independent enforcement tools. Here, those tools are bound together by MAP and explicitly externalized from the engine, allowing plateau lifetime claims to be evaluated as contract objects rather than as narrative curves. The result is a carry-forward certification spine that preserves earlier triad logic while adding a thermodynamic interpretation of acceptance leakage and a regime-transition marker (ZFlip) suitable for plateau-style datasets. The central contribution of this work is Mapping and Amplification Protocol (MAP), a pad-centered translation layer that externalizes certification logic from the engine and forces enforcement tools to act coherently under a shared coordinate meaning. MAP is not a new physical mechanism and not an optimizer. It is a deterministic translator from tokens to enforcement actions that binds Strong-to-Weak, STLF, Knob, and Sum-of-Zeros to the same declared pad and corridor. By doing so, MAP removes silent degrees of freedom that otherwise allow filtering, tightening, or drift to masquerade as stability. Under MAP, plateau behavior is no longer evaluated by a single flat curve or preferred projection. Instead, claims are promoted, downgraded, or refused through a triad-of-triads contract that separates signed state, windowed pattern fingerprints, and meta-promotion logic. Two independent redundancy cages (view square and ladder square) are enforced via double Four-Solves-Three auditing, blocking majority narratives and forcing disagreement to remain visible. Acceptance recovery is explicitly bounded: any recovered utility must be paid for through declared downgrades rather than repaired into Strong. Within this framework, the manuscript introduces a contract-level thermodynamic separation: what platform studies describe as “heating” is treated here as acceptance leakage in time under a fixed corridor. The quantity TzTzTz is operationalized as a burn-rate proxy that tracks how quickly tension is consumed as trajectories approach refusal, while ZFlipZFlipZFlip marks the first persistent regime transition where the effective plateau description fails. Plateau lifetime is therefore treated as necessary but not sufficient; the resource question is whether the plateau survives under fixed accounting until the flip. The intended outcome is a reusable, platform-independent certification object. MAP and the surrounding contract infrastructure are designed to carry forward across qubit, magnonic, photonic, and hybrid platforms, allowing future plateau datasets to be evaluated without modifying the rule spine. The result is not a critique of platform physics, but a durable method for turning plateau observations into bounded, replayable, and falsifiable objects of record.

Jan 31, 20260 citations

Certifying 91-Qubit Floquet Chaos Under A Fixed Tensor Corridor: Mitigation As Enforcement

William J. Richardson

Significant — This manuscript certifies a 91-qubit Floquet chaos verification claim under a fixed tensor corridor by converting dual-unitary admissibility, tensor-network baseline comparison, and mitigation workflows into declared corridor objects with tokens-only replay. The contract enforces MAP0–SEB–MAP1 separation so recognition cannot be repaired by enforcement, prohibits backflow authority, and treats mitigation as an explicit tightening ladder rather than as postprocessing convenience. A signed-triad record with zeros-stay-zeros discipline carries the primary sign record across tightening steps; flip-only audits and mitigation-disable (disable-L) falsifiers test anchor drift and translator dependence; strong-to-weak grading preserves value when survival fails without inflating the claim. Two ceilings bound what is certifiable (not what is physically chaotic): SoZ constrains yield/missingness under tightening, and an R≈1 containment ratio constrains instability growth versus declared budget. The output is a replayable branch-map decision record—promote, downgrade, refuse, or hold—with reason tokens, replay-kit fields, and falsifier-first logic suitable for bench transfer without moving thresholds.

Feb 14, 20260 citations

Harnessing a Dynamical Bifurcation for a High Fidelity, Dispersive Qubit Readout

Irfan A. Siddiqi

Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyMar 24, 20050 citations

A High-Fidelity Gateset for Exchange-Coupled Singlet-Triplet Qubits

René Otten, Pascal Cerfontaine, M. A. Wolfe +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyMar 5, 20190 citations

Hilbert, TWA, and TWA+: Operationalizing Subspace Acceptance With Tz and ZFlip Recovery

William J. Richardson

A standalone transition from Hilbert Subspace to TWA and the Operational TWA+ is presented as a standards-facing lineage bridge that separates non-operational oracle ideas from an executable corridor contract: (i) mathematical Hilbert supplies full-state geometry and the classic pre-operational gates (“is this entanglement” and “in the admissible region”); (ii) TWA-style truncation makes the oracle callable at scale but introduces a boundary/drift attack surface (“shortcut acceptance”); (iii) device-independent subspace targets (including [[5,1,3]]) motivate acceptance structure but still require an operational decision program; and (iv) an operational corridor layer freezes acceptance lines, enforces sign/null/ledger separation with zeros-stay-zeros and odd/even discipline, and defines tokens-only replay so repeated window splits and leave-one-out audits remain stable; finally, (v) TWA+ is framed as explicit payback that recovers truncation costs without relaxing the contract by enforcing preregistered z-tension headroom (Tz) and forced flip/unflip parity auditing (ZFlip), then tightening the story using later corridor tools (oscillation fingerprints, disable-L stress, Sum-of-Zeros at infinity, Centered-X outcomes, and 4S3 closure) so the method stays falsifier-first, replayable, and usable even when source work does not publish a full usable number set.

Jan 21, 20260 citations