Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Kubo–Martin–Schwinger Boundary Conditions

Giancarlo Calvanese Strinati

Published Feb 6, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This chapter considers the boundary conditions on the time variables z ₁ and z ₂ for the contour single-particle Green’s function, which run over a generic contour in the complex-time z -plane. Different contours of interest are then specified. The boundary conditions for the integral form of the Dyson equation are also considered.
DOI
10.1017/9781009411509.013

Related papers

Converting Contour-Time to Real-Time Arguments

Giancarlo Calvanese Strinati

The nonequilibrium diagrammatics and the Dyson equations contain integrations over the time variables that run over a generic contour. In both cases, the time variables run first forward and then backward along the ordinary time axis. For computational purposes, it is then required to convert these time integrals into ordinary time integrals. To this end, it is first necessary to single out all possible combinations of the pair of time variables in the contour single-particle Green’s function. This is what is done in the present chapter.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 6, 2026•0 citations

Non-equilibrium Dyson Equations

Giancarlo Calvanese Strinati

This chapter considers some of the items discussed in the previous chapters and cast them in a more formal way so as to adapt them for future developments. In this way, the integro-differential form of the Dyson equation for the contour single-particle Green’s function (as well as its integral counterpart) is obtained, which play an important role in the following chapters for capturing the dynamical evolution of the physical system.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 6, 2026•0 citations

Miscellany and Addenda to Part II

Giancarlo Calvanese Strinati

Similar to Chapter 20 of Part I, this chapter considers the treatment of a few topics, which are relevant to the general purposes of the book but whose inclusion in previous chapters would have diverted the discussion of the main topics of interest therein. Specifically, it considers the Dyson equations for the contour single-particle Green’s function in the Nambu representation, the relative strength of different frequency terms in the derivation of the time-dependent Gross–Pitaevskii equation, the detailed calculation of an integral occurring in the derivation of the time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau equation, the irrelevance of the reference time t ₀ for the convolutions entering the Kadanoff–Baym equations at equilibrium, and the average energy of the system expressed in terms of the lesser Green’s function even in nonequilibrium situations.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 6, 2026•0 citations

The Kadanoff–Baym Equations

Giancarlo Calvanese Strinati

This chapter converts the Dyson equation for the contour single-particle Green’s function to real-time variables. The corresponding equations for the Matsubara, right Keldysh, left Keldysh, lesser, greater, retarded, advanced, and Keldysh components are explicitly considered. A connection is also established with the original Kadanoff–Baym equations.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 6, 2026•0 citations

Connection between the Schwinger–Keldysh Closed-Contour Approach and the Lindblad Master Equation

Giancarlo Calvanese Strinati

This chapter explores to what extent the closed-contour Schwinger–Keldysh approach and the Lindblad Master equation can be connected with each other. Here, the connection with the Schwinger–Keldysh closed-contour approach does not involve the full machinery of the Green’s functions method, but rather refers directly to the time evolution of the many-body density matrix, which contains a forward evolution operator from the reference time t ₀ to the measuring time t and a backward evolution operator from t back to t ₀. The key approximations to derive the Lindblad Master equation are specified in detail. As an example, a two-level system coupled to a phonon bath is explicitly considered.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 6, 2026•0 citations

Time-dependent quantum Green's functions

William C. Schieve, Lawrence Paul Horwitz

Introduction Mathematically, given a linear differential operator L x , one encounters the solution to the inhomogeneous differential equation Here ρ ( x ) is a given source function. For a given boundary condition, we assume a solution to exist. The solution can be reduced to a simpler problem. Let G ( x, y ) is the Green's function. This is a function of x with y a parameter. Take G ( x, y ) to satisfy the same boundary conditions as φ ( x ). Then since An example of L x is, of course, the Schrödinger operator We take ρ ( x ) = V ( x ) ψ ( x , t ), ψ ( x , t ) being the wave function and V ( x ) the potential operator. We are interested in Green's functions taken over from the techniques of quantum field theory (Schweber, 1961; Lifshitz and Petaevskii, 1981). We will concern ourselves particularly with one- and two-time Green's functions, since our principal interest is to show a connection to the calculations of linear response theory (Chapter 15) as well as to quantum kinetic equations. Then we wish to compare the methods with those described in Chapter 4. In this we will follow the work of L. P. Kadanoff and G. Baym (1962) and of L. V. Keldysh (1965) and also Zubarev (1974). We will not discuss equilibrium statistical mechanics utilizing Green's function techniques for many-body problems. The literature is exhaustive (see Abrikosov et al. , 1963; Fetter and Walecka, 1971). A good general introduction is the book by G. D. Mahan (2000). One- and two-time quantum Green's functions and their properties Let us introduce the creation operator ψ † ( r, t ) and annihilation operator ψ ( r, t ) of the second quantization formalism (see Schweber, 1961). They have the equal time commutation rules for Bose and Fermi particles: The Hamiltonian operator for the particles is and the number density of particles at r t is the operator Note that r = ( r 1 … r N ) for (1, 2, 3, …, N ) and V (| r − r ′|) is the pair potential depending, as in Chapter 4, on the scalar distance between the particles.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 16, 2009•0 citations
The nonequilibrium diagrammatics and the Dyson equations contain integrations over the time variables that run over a generic contour. In both cases, the time variables run first forward and then backward along the ordinary time axis. For computational purposes, it is then required to convert these time integrals into ordinary time integrals. To this end, it is first necessary to single out all possible combinations of the pair of time variables in the contour single-particle Green’s function. This is what is done in the present chapter.
Similar to Chapter 20 of Part I, this chapter considers the treatment of a few topics, which are relevant to the general purposes of the book but whose inclusion in previous chapters would have diverted the discussion of the main topics of interest therein. Specifically, it considers the Dyson equations for the contour single-particle Green’s function in the Nambu representation, the relative strength of different frequency terms in the derivation of the time-dependent Gross–Pitaevskii equation, the detailed calculation of an integral occurring in the derivation of the time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau equation, the irrelevance of the reference time t ₀ for the convolutions entering the Kadanoff–Baym equations at equilibrium, and the average energy of the system expressed in terms of the lesser Green’s function even in nonequilibrium situations.
This chapter explores to what extent the closed-contour Schwinger–Keldysh approach and the Lindblad Master equation can be connected with each other. Here, the connection with the Schwinger–Keldysh closed-contour approach does not involve the full machinery of the Green’s functions method, but rather refers directly to the time evolution of the many-body density matrix, which contains a forward evolution operator from the reference time t ₀ to the measuring time t and a backward evolution operator from t back to t ₀. The key approximations to derive the Lindblad Master equation are specified in detail. As an example, a two-level system coupled to a phonon bath is explicitly considered.
Introduction Mathematically, given a linear differential operator L x , one encounters the solution to the inhomogeneous differential equation Here ρ ( x ) is a given source function. For a given boundary condition, we assume a solution to exist. The solution can be reduced to a simpler problem. Let G ( x, y ) is the Green's function. This is a function of x with y a parameter. Take G ( x, y ) to satisfy the same boundary conditions as φ ( x ). Then since An example of L x is, of course, the Schrödinger operator We take ρ ( x ) = V ( x ) ψ ( x , t ), ψ ( x , t ) being the wave function and V ( x ) the potential operator. We are interested in Green's functions taken over from the techniques of quantum field theory (Schweber, 1961; Lifshitz and Petaevskii, 1981). We will concern ourselves particularly with one- and two-time Green's functions, since our principal interest is to show a connection to the calculations of linear response theory (Chapter 15) as well as to quantum kinetic equations. Then we wish to compare the methods with those described in Chapter 4. In this we will follow the work of L. P. Kadanoff and G. Baym (1962) and of L. V. Keldysh (1965) and also Zubarev (1974). We will not discuss equilibrium statistical mechanics utilizing Green's function techniques for many-body problems. The literature is exhaustive (see Abrikosov et al. , 1963; Fetter and Walecka, 1971). A good general introduction is the book by G. D. Mahan (2000). One- and two-time quantum Green's functions and their properties Let us introduce the creation operator ψ † ( r, t ) and annihilation operator ψ ( r, t ) of the second quantization formalism (see Schweber, 1961). They have the equal time commutation rules for Bose and Fermi particles: The Hamiltonian operator for the particles is and the number density of particles at r t is the operator Note that r = ( r 1 … r N ) for (1, 2, 3, …, N ) and V (| r − r ′|) is the pair potential depending, as in Chapter 4, on the scalar distance between the particles.