This manuscript revisits quantum entanglement from a quantum field–theoretic perspective,with the aim of clarifying its conceptual status rather than proposing a new theory. The central claim is that quantum entanglement need not be understood as a mysteriousnonlocal phenomenon.When quantum fields are taken as the primary physical entities, entanglement followsnaturally from the non-separable structure of global field excitations.What appears puzzling in particle-based descriptions is thus revealed to be an expectedfeature of field-based ontology combined with reduced descriptions. The paper emphasizes a structural reading of the wavefunction as a description of fieldexcitations, and interprets entanglement as a consequence of restricting access to aglobally defined state.Locality is preserved at the level of operators, and all empirical predictions of quantumfield theory remain unchanged. No new dynamics, interpretations, or empirical claims are introduced.Instead, the work makes explicit a conceptual perspective that is already implicit instandard quantum field theory but is rarely articulated in a unified and accessible form.Formal details supporting the argument are provided in an appendix, while the main textfocuses on conceptual clarity. This work is intended as a contribution to the foundations of quantum theory, clarifyingthe relationship between entanglement, locality, and field-theoretic structure.
This manuscript revisits quantum entanglement from a quantum field–theoretic perspective,with the aim of clarifying its conceptual status rather than proposing a new theory. The central claim is that quantum entanglement need not be understood as a mysteriousnonlocal phenomenon.When quantum fields are taken as the primary physical entities, entanglement followsnaturally from the non-separable structure of global field excitations.What appears puzzling in particle-based descriptions is thus revealed to be an expectedfeature of field-based ontology combined with reduced descriptions. The paper emphasizes a structural reading of the wavefunction as a description of fieldexcitations, and interprets entanglement as a consequence of restricting access to aglobally defined state.Locality is preserved at the level of operators, and all empirical predictions of quantumfield theory remain unchanged. No new dynamics, interpretations, or empirical claims are introduced.Instead, the work makes explicit a conceptual perspective that is already implicit instandard quantum field theory but is rarely articulated in a unified and accessible form.Formal details supporting the argument are provided in an appendix, while the main textfocuses on conceptual clarity. This work is intended as a contribution to the foundations of quantum theory, clarifyingthe relationship between entanglement, locality, and field-theoretic structure.
All known physical systems are described by quantum fields, whose observable properties arise from measurable correlations among their states. In this interpretation, what we call information is not an abstract entity but the physical pattern formed by these correlations. Energy, momentum, and spacetime curvature are already known to be expressible through expectation values of quantum operators, and recent results in quantum information theory show that variations in entanglement correspond directly to variations in energy. From this perspective, macroscopic structures—including matter and spacetime geometry—can be understood as stable, evolving patterns within quantum fields. Apparent non-local correlations, such as quantum entanglement, do not transmit signals faster than light but reflect pre-existing informational structure consistent with relativistic causality. Gravitational effects traditionally attributed to unseen components may, in principle, also be described as consequences of information distribution within known fields, without invoking new particles or interactions. This interpretation does not modify established physical laws or introduce new constants. It remains fully compatible with quantum field theory and general relativity, and is intended as a conceptual framework for organizing existing results rather than a new predictive theory. Its empirical relevance lies in re-expressing known phenomena in terms of information patterns that are, in principle, measurable through correlations and entanglement.
Abstract The conceptual unification of quantum mechanics and relativity remains one of the central challenges of modern theoretical physics. While quantum theory successfully describes microscopic phenomena through probabilistic wave dynamics and field quantization, relativity establishes the geometric structure of space-time and the causal organization of physical events. Despite extensive progress in quantum field theory and relativistic quantum frameworks, foundational tensions persist regarding locality, causality, and coherence. This study presents a conceptual and structural analysis of quantum field coherence within relativistic space-time. Rather than focusing on specific unification proposals, we examine the compatibility conditions between quantum coherence, relativistic causality, and space-time structure. Particular attention is given to field-based interpretations of quantum states, entanglement propagation limits, and covariance requirements. The analysis synthesizes perspectives from relativistic quantum field theory, conceptual foundations of quantum measurement, and geometric interpretations of space-time. We argue that coherence phenomena can be understood as structurally constrained by relativistic causal order, without requiring violation of space-time locality. The aim of this article is to clarify foundational relationships between quantum coherence and relativistic structure through a conceptual framework that integrates field-theoretic and geometric viewpoints.
This work presents a conceptual and representational framework aimed at clarifying the structural relationships among established physical theories across relativistic, quantum, and cosmological regimes. Rather than proposing new dynamical laws, particles, or experimentally testable predictions, the manuscript focuses on how existing physical descriptions may be consistently interpreted within a unified representational structure. The proposed Dual-Spacetime Projection Framework distinguishes between an underlying descriptive domain and an observed effective spacetime, connected through a scale-dependent projection. This distinction is intended as a formal and interpretative tool, not as an ontological claim about the existence of multiple physical spacetimes. Within this perspective, several foundational features of modern physics—such as Lorentz invariance, finite signal propagation, quantum uncertainty, and large-scale cosmological behavior—are discussed as consequences of representational structure rather than as independent postulates. The manuscript is positioned as a contribution to the foundations of theoretical physics, offering a coherent conceptual lens for organizing and interpreting existing theories. It is intended for readers interested in foundational questions, conceptual unification, and the representational aspects of physical law, and does not rely on experimental data or numerical simulation.
Quantum entanglement, a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, presents a profound challenge to classical intuition. This paper explores the potential of extending this peculiar phenomenon to encompass non-local correlations, proposing a novel framework termed "Entanglement Non-Locality" (ENL). The core claim is to establish a theoretical foundation for this non-locality, leveraging the inherent properties of entangled states to simulate quantum information transfer and associate it with classical information transfer. We hypothesize that by embedding entanglement within a non-local field theory, we can achieve enhanced quantum information processing and communication capabilities. This research delves into the design of such a field theory, examining its potential to overcome limitations imposed by classical physics and unlock new avenues for quantum technologies.
This work proposes the Ontological Framework of Imbricated Degrees (OFID), a minimal ontological structure intended to clarify the relationship between global physical states and locally accessible descriptions within contemporary physics. The framework is derived from structural constraints already present in established physics, including quantum decoherence, entanglement, and gravitational horizons. These phenomena jointly indicate a dissociation between global ontological states and effective local descriptions. OFID introduces no modification to the formalism of quantum mechanics or general relativity and proposes no additional dynamical mechanisms. Instead, it provides a minimal ontological clarification of the informational accessibility structure implicit in these theories. The framework is explicitly exposed to empirical falsification through the OFID-G conjecture, which proposes the possible existence of an irreducible gravitational contribution to decoherence affecting mesoscopic quantum superpositions. This work aims to provide a coherent conceptual structure linking phenomena often treated separately in modern physics, including quantum superposition, measurement, decoherence, entanglement, and gravitational horizons. Project page (experimental framework, OFID-G, and OFID): https://alexsasfrance.github.io/OFID-framework/