Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Quantum Machine Learning: A Primer

Madhusudan Singh Irish Singh, Bharat S. Rawal

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-981-95-2498-3_9

Related papers

Primer on Data in Quantum Machine Learning

Aviral Shrivastava, Vinayak Sharma

With the increased interest in Quantum Machine Learning (QML), the integration of classical data into quantum systems presents unique challenges and opportunities. The class "Primer on Data in Quantum Machine Learning" delves into the foundational concepts and advanced techniques of embedding classical data into quantum states, a critical process for enhancing the performance of quantum algorithms. By exploring various quantum embedding methods and understanding their strengths and limitations, participants will gain a comprehensive understanding of the impact quantum embeddings can have on machine learning applications. This lesson will cover the following concepts: Fundamental Concepts of Quantum Machine Learning, Limits of NISQ devices and Computing in the NISQ era, Embeddings for QML, and Practical effects of embeddings. The understanding of these topics should provide a better understanding of the importance and effect of embeddings on the overall performance of QML in the NISQ era.

International Conference on Compilers, Architecture, and Synthesis for Embedded Systems (CASES)•Sep 29, 2024•3 citations

A Primer on Quantum Machine Learning

Su Yeon Chang, M. Cerezo

Quantum machine learning (QML) is a computational paradigm that seeks to apply quantum-mechanical resources to solve learning problems. As such, the goal of this framework is to leverage quantum processors to tackle optimization, supervised, unsupervised and reinforcement learning, and generative modeling-among other tasks-more efficiently than classical models. Here we offer a high level overview of QML, focusing on settings where the quantum device is the primary learning or data generating unit. We outline the field's tensions between practicality and guarantees, access models and speedups, and classical baselines and claimed quantum advantages-flagging where evidence is strong, where it is conditional or still lacking, and where open questions remain. By shedding light on these nuances and debates, we aim to provide a friendly map of the QML landscape so that the reader can judge when-and under what assumptions-quantum approaches may offer real benefits.

quant-pharXiv:2511.15969•Nov 21, 2025•0 citations

A Review on Quantum Machine Learning

Toran Verma, Botcha Kishore Kumar, Janga Rajendar +1 more

Lecture notes in electrical engineering•Jan 1, 2024•4 citations

Quantum Machine Learning: Principles and Applications

Yanjun Ji

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Machine Learning: A Comparative Review of Algorithms and Applications

Amani Lamine, Ameni Mejri, Bilel Charfi

Lecture notes in networks and systems•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Machine Learning in Medical Imaging: A Primer for Radiologists

Ruben Ortiz Cordero, Gaven K. Smart, Harshada Gothankar +3 more

Deep learning has transformed radiology, but the computational cost of training and deploying modern models is outpacing what classical hardware can support. Quantum computing has been proposed as one response to this bottleneck: an n-qubit system can represent $2^n$ states simultaneously, although practical speedups require efficient algorithms, data encoding, and measurement strategies rather than superposition alone. This review introduces radiologists to five core quantum concepts, qubits, superposition, entanglement, quantum gates, and quantum circuits, and to the superconducting, trapped-ion, and photonic hardware platforms that define the current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era. We then summarize the quantum machine learning architectures most often applied to medical imaging (quantum support vector machines, quantum neural networks, variational quantum circuits, and quantum convolutional neural networks) and quantum image representations such as the flexible representation of quantum images (FRQI) and the novel enhanced quantum representation (NEQR). Reported applications include brain tumor classification and segmentation on MRI, pneumonia detection on chest radiographs, skin and breast lesion classification, CT and PET reconstruction, and ultrasound denoising. Nearly all published systems are hybrid quantum-classical pipelines evaluated on small, downsampled benchmark datasets or simulators, and clinical deployment is not yet feasible. We conclude with current limitations and translational priorities for radiology.

quant-pharXiv:2610.32762•Oct 26, 2026•0 citations
With the increased interest in Quantum Machine Learning (QML), the integration of classical data into quantum systems presents unique challenges and opportunities. The class "Primer on Data in Quantum Machine Learning" delves into the foundational concepts and advanced techniques of embedding classical data into quantum states, a critical process for enhancing the performance of quantum algorithms. By exploring various quantum embedding methods and understanding their strengths and limitations, participants will gain a comprehensive understanding of the impact quantum embeddings can have on machine learning applications. This lesson will cover the following concepts: Fundamental Concepts of Quantum Machine Learning, Limits of NISQ devices and Computing in the NISQ era, Embeddings for QML, and Practical effects of embeddings. The understanding of these topics should provide a better understanding of the importance and effect of embeddings on the overall performance of QML in the NISQ era.
Quantum machine learning (QML) is a computational paradigm that seeks to apply quantum-mechanical resources to solve learning problems. As such, the goal of this framework is to leverage quantum processors to tackle optimization, supervised, unsupervised and reinforcement learning, and generative modeling-among other tasks-more efficiently than classical models. Here we offer a high level overview of QML, focusing on settings where the quantum device is the primary learning or data generating unit. We outline the field's tensions between practicality and guarantees, access models and speedups, and classical baselines and claimed quantum advantages-flagging where evidence is strong, where it is conditional or still lacking, and where open questions remain. By shedding light on these nuances and debates, we aim to provide a friendly map of the QML landscape so that the reader can judge when-and under what assumptions-quantum approaches may offer real benefits.
Deep learning has transformed radiology, but the computational cost of training and deploying modern models is outpacing what classical hardware can support. Quantum computing has been proposed as one response to this bottleneck: an n-qubit system can represent 2n2^n2n states simultaneously, although practical speedups require efficient algorithms, data encoding, and measurement strategies rather than superposition alone. This review introduces radiologists to five core quantum concepts, qubits, superposition, entanglement, quantum gates, and quantum circuits, and to the superconducting, trapped-ion, and photonic hardware platforms that define the current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era. We then summarize the quantum machine learning architectures most often applied to medical imaging (quantum support vector machines, quantum neural networks, variational quantum circuits, and quantum convolutional neural networks) and quantum image representations such as the flexible representation of quantum images (FRQI) and the novel enhanced quantum representation (NEQR). Reported applications include brain tumor classification and segmentation on MRI, pneumonia detection on chest radiographs, skin and breast lesion classification, CT and PET reconstruction, and ultrasound denoising. Nearly all published systems are hybrid quantum-classical pipelines evaluated on small, downsampled benchmark datasets or simulators, and clinical deployment is not yet feasible. We conclude with current limitations and translational priorities for radiology.