This preprint is the third paper in a series on thermodynamic persistence and macroscopic identity. A recently proposed thermodynamic persistence constraint and its empirical test in biological and classical systems suggest that macroscopic identities operating under irreversible dynamics remain admissible only so long as cumulative irreversible dissipation remains finite. The condition does not introduce new dynamical laws or predict lifetimes; it excludes only those histories in which maintaining a coarse-grained identity would require unbounded irreversible entropy production. In this work I examine whether state-of-the-art superconducting qubit platforms are empirically compatible with such a persistence accounting. Using only published device parameters and order-of-magnitude estimates for control and dissipation, I construct an operational diagnostic quantity from independently measurable observables: coherence time, irreversible power dissipation, and device scale. I evaluate this diagnostic in two representative contexts: (i) idle coherence limited by energy relaxation and dephasing, and (ii) driven operation under repeated gate application as characterized by randomized benchmarking and error-per-gate metrics, including logical-level operation in surface-code experiments. Across these regimes, the empirical behavior mirrors that observed in classical and biological systems: coherence time and logical error rates vary primarily through changes in effective dissipation and noise, while the normalized cumulative irreversible burden associated with loss of a qubit’s operational identity remains finite and modest under realistic operating conditions. No violations of the proposed thermodynamic admissibility condition are found within the parameter ranges examined. These results do not establish a thermodynamic bound on quantum coherence or gate fidelities. They do, however, support the empirical viability of treating qubit-level persistence as constrained by cumulative irreversible effects within standard thermodynamic bookkeeping, in continuity with classical and biological systems.
This preprint is the third paper in a series on thermodynamic persistence and macroscopic identity. A recently proposed thermodynamic persistence constraint and its empirical test in biological and classical systems suggest that macroscopic identities operating under irreversible dynamics remain admissible only so long as cumulative irreversible dissipation remains finite. The condition does not introduce new dynamical laws or predict lifetimes; it excludes only those histories in which maintaining a coarse-grained identity would require unbounded irreversible entropy production. In this work I examine whether state-of-the-art superconducting qubit platforms are empirically compatible with such a persistence accounting. Using only published device parameters and order-of-magnitude estimates for control and dissipation, I construct an operational diagnostic quantity from independently measurable observables: coherence time, irreversible power dissipation, and device scale. I evaluate this diagnostic in two representative contexts: (i) idle coherence limited by energy relaxation and dephasing, and (ii) driven operation under repeated gate application as characterized by randomized benchmarking and error-per-gate metrics, including logical-level operation in surface-code experiments. Across these regimes, the empirical behavior mirrors that observed in classical and biological systems: coherence time and logical error rates vary primarily through changes in effective dissipation and noise, while the normalized cumulative irreversible burden associated with loss of a qubit’s operational identity remains finite and modest under realistic operating conditions. No violations of the proposed thermodynamic admissibility condition are found within the parameter ranges examined. These results do not establish a thermodynamic bound on quantum coherence or gate fidelities. They do, however, support the empirical viability of treating qubit-level persistence as constrained by cumulative irreversible effects within standard thermodynamic bookkeeping, in continuity with classical and biological systems.
This preprint develops a thermodynamic admissibility condition on the persistence of quantum identity in open systems. Standard quantum mechanics allows extremely large spaces of possible system histories, but only a small subset remains experimentally realisable once irreversible entropy production is taken into account. This work formalizes this as an admissibility constraint: any quantum system that preserves a stable, trackable identity over time must satisfy a finite budget on cumulative irreversible dissipation. No new forces, variables, or dynamics are added; the constraint is purely structural and compatible with existing open-systems formalisms. The paper connects this requirement with decoherence, spectrum broadcasting, quantum Darwinism, and the emergence of classical objectivity. It frames identity persistence as a pre-dynamical condition—necessary before predictions about evolution or measurement outcomes are meaningful. This structural account clarifies why only certain histories are physically realisable, how objectivity arises under irreversibility, and how thermodynamic bookkeeping parameters (such as an “identity budget”) implicitly constrain experimental practice. The result provides a unifying, thermodynamically grounded framework linking dissipative quantum processes, system architecture, and long-term identifiability.
Fault-tolerant quantum computation relies on continuous error-correcting processes to preserve logical identity over time. While fault-tolerance threshold theorems bound logical error rates per operation, the thermodynamic cost of sustaining quantum identity under ongoing maintenance has not been explicitly isolated. In this work, we show that any fault-tolerant quantum system that preserves logical identity through active error correction must dissipate heat at a rate bounded below by the irreversible information processed during syndrome extraction and reset. As a consequence, at fixed temperature and cooling power, there exists an upper bound on the sustained throughput of fault-tolerant quantum identity, independent of code family, decoding strategy, or physical noise model. The result establishes a fundamental persistence–dissipation constraint arising from irreversible maintenance rather than from quantum dynamics themselves. This work is intentionally descriptive and non-operational, identifying a structural thermodynamic bound without proposing mechanisms, architectures, or control strategies.
Fault-tolerant quantum computation is often analyzed in the limit of vanishing physical noise, where logical error rates per operation can be made arbitrarily small. This limit is sometimes interpreted as implying that the physical cost of maintaining quantum information may likewise vanish. In this work, we show that this inference is incorrect for systems that preserve logical identity through sustained error correction. Even as physical noise approaches zero, the irreversible classical maintenance required to extract, process, and reset syndrome information imposes a non-vanishing thermodynamic cost. As a result, persistence limits on sustained quantum identity do not disappear in the ideal-noise limit. The constraint arises from irreversible identity maintenance rather than from noise suppression or imperfect hardware. This work is intentionally descriptive and non-operational, identifying a structural persistence bound without proposing mechanisms, architectures, or control strategies.
Quantum information reset is an intrinsically irreversible process constrained by the second law of thermodynamics. In contemporary superconducting processors, dissipation during qubit reset is frequently dominated not only by quantum limits but by a classical energy floor on the order of 10^{-21} J. In contrast, the entropic bound T \Delta S at dilution refrigerator temperatures (\sim 15 mK) corresponds to a lower energy scale of approximately 10^{-23} J, establishing entropy production as the organizing physical principle that limits both the efficiency and the speed of reset operations. We introduce an entropy-limited efficiency estimator, \eta_S = 1 - (T \Delta S / W_{\rm diss}), which quantifies the thermodynamic distance from the entropic (Landauer) limit. By construction, \eta_S = 0 corresponds to the saturation of the entropy production limit, while \eta_S \to 1 indicates dissipation dominated by non-entropic (classical) contributions. Maximizing \eta_S is equivalent to a constrained variational problem in which dissipated work is minimized subject to the second law of thermodynamics. For typical superconducting qubits (\omega_q/2\pi \sim 5 GHz, T_1 \sim 50–100 \mus, T \sim 15 mK), the entropic bound T \Delta S \sim 10^{-23} J lies two orders of magnitude below the experimentally observed classical dissipation floor W_{\rm floor} \sim 10^{-21} J. Figures 1 and 2 were generated using the provided scripts_generate_figures.py script, using parameters: \omega_q/2\pi = 5 GHz, T_1 = 80 \mus, and T = 15 mK.
Two-level systems (TLS) are widely recognized as a dominant source of energy relaxation in superconducting qubits, limiting coherence times and device performance. While TLS-induced dissipation is often modeled as independent channels, interacting TLS can form finite many-body environments whose dynamical role in qubit relaxation remains insufficiently understood. Building on the information-erasure-based framework for irreversible thermalization developed in our previous work, we present a microscopic model and numerical simulations of a superconducting qubit coupled to a finite interacting many-body TLS environment as a concrete physical realization of this mechanism. We show that effective irreversible energy relaxation can emerge from intrinsic many-body dynamics without invoking external baths or phenomenological dissipation. The introduction of information erasure drives a transition from coherent oscillatory energy exchange to nonoscillatory exponential relaxation of the qubit. The relaxation times exhibit the scaling T1,T2∝Jq,τ−2 with respect to the qubit-TLS coupling strength, consistent with Fermi's golden rule and Lindblad-type descriptions. Importantly, both exponential decay and its scaling behavior arise directly from microscopic many-body dynamics. These results provide quantitative insight into TLS-induced decoherence mechanisms and establish a microscopic link between information erasure, many-body thermalization, and irreversible relaxation in superconducting quantum systems.
Over the past seven weeks, I’ve shared a sequence of connected reports addressing practical quantum operation under realistic hardware conditions. The first report, Empirically Integrated Qubit Stability (P01–P23 + QE2 Framework), presented a large-scale empirical analysis of real qubit behaviour, including drift dynamics, shadow zones, and correlated error structures observed across multiple devices. The second report, introducing PULS as a preventive stabilization approach, showed how noise exposure and drift accumulation during active operation can be reduced by restructuring when and how qubits are driven. The third report completes this sequence as a Public Safe Continuity Report, addressing the residual effects that remain even after effective preventive stabilization. Taken together, these three reports describe a layered operational stability architecture: • Empirical stability characterization — identifying and quantifying real-world instability, drift cycles, and error correlation• Active stabilization (PULS) — reducing exposure to noise and slowing drift accumulation during operation• Operational continuity — limiting disruption and preserving meaningful execution when instability events still occur When evaluated as an integrated system, these layers produce measurable system-level effects: • ~80% reduction in accumulated operational downtime• ~60% reduction in downstream error impact• ~30% reduction in long error bursts and temporal clustering These improvements are achieved without introducing new logical assumptions or modifying quantum-mechanical constraints. The framework does not replace quantum error correction, but operates strictly in the pre-logical operational regime, and remains stable under stressed operating conditions. Rather than treating instability as a single phenomenon, this work shows it to consist of three distinct operational problems — empirical stability behaviour, active stabilization, and continuity under failure — each requiring its own dedicated layer. This report is published as a Public Safe Report. It presents architectural structure and system-level behaviour while intentionally excluding implementation parameters, control logic, and integration details. Those elements remain protected and are available only under appropriate confidentiality.