Phase-only pattern synthesis is a long-standing and hard to solve problem in antenna engineering. Due to its non-linear nature, this kind of optimization problem is classically approached with iterative algorithms, where the convergence time depends on the problem topology. Often these heuristic solution routines get stuck in local optima and yield sub-optimal results. This paper addresses phase-only pattern synthesis by using a variational quantum algorithm, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). In this context, a mathematical approach is presented, which discretizes the optimization variables and allows representing the original non-linear functional as a higher-order polynomial. In contrast to other series expansion techniques it turns out that this polynomial has finite length without introducing any approximations. This makes phase-only patterns synthesis problems suitable to be solved on quantum computers with standard gate sets. The mathematical treatment of this optimization problem is complemented by a complexity analysis and a performance analysis. Finally, the challenges regarding future deployment of quantum approximate optimization for phase-only pattern synthesis are discussed.
Phase-only pattern synthesis is a long-standing and hard to solve problem in antenna engineering. Due to its non-linear nature, this kind of optimization problem is classically approached with iterative algorithms, where the convergence time depends on the problem topology. Often these heuristic solution routines get stuck in local optima and yield sub-optimal results. This paper addresses phase-only pattern synthesis by using a variational quantum algorithm, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). In this context, a mathematical approach is presented, which discretizes the optimization variables and allows representing the original non-linear functional as a higher-order polynomial. In contrast to other series expansion techniques it turns out that this polynomial has finite length without introducing any approximations. This makes phase-only patterns synthesis problems suitable to be solved on quantum computers with standard gate sets. The mathematical treatment of this optimization problem is complemented by a complexity analysis and a performance analysis. Finally, the challenges regarding future deployment of quantum approximate optimization for phase-only pattern synthesis are discussed.
We introduce a quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) for continuous optimization. The algorithm is based on the dynamics of a quantum system moving in an energy potential which encodes the objective function. By approximating the dynamics at finite time steps, the algorithm can be expressed as alternating evolution under two non-commuting Hamiltonians. We show that each step of the algorithm updates the wavefunction in the direction of its local gradient, with an additional momentum-dependent displacement. For initial states in a superposition over many points, this method can therefore be interpreted as a coherent version of gradient descent, i.e., 'gradient descent in superposition.' This approach can be used for both constrained and unconstrained optimization. In terms of computational complexity, we show how variants of the algorithm can recover continuous-variable Grover search, and how a single iteration can replicate continuous-variable instantaneous quantum polynomial circuits. We also discuss how the algorithm can be adapted to solve discrete optimization problems. Finally, we test the algorithm through numerical simulation in optimizing the Styblinski-Tang function.
The Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) is a widely studied quantum-classical iterative heuristic for combinatorial optimisation. While QAOA targets problems in complexity class NP, the classical optimisation procedure required in every iteration is itself known to be NP-hard. Still, advantage over classical approaches is suspected for certain scenarios, but nature and origin of its computational power are not yet satisfactorily understood. By introducing means of efficiently and accurately approximating the QAOA optimisation landscape from solution space structures, we derive a new algorithmic variant of unit-depth QAOA for two-level Hamiltonians (including all problems in NP): Instead of performing an iterative quantum-classical computation for each input instance, our non-iterative method is based on a quantum circuit that is instance-independent, but problem-specific. It matches or outperforms unit-depth QAOA for key combinatorial problems, despite reduced computational effort. Our approach is based on proving a long-standing conjecture regarding instance-independent structures in QAOA. By ensuring generality, we link existing empirical observations on QAOA parameter clustering to established approaches in theoretical computer science, and provide a sound foundation for understanding the link between structural properties of solution spaces and quantum optimisation.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a promising variational quantum algorithm introduced to tackle classically intractable combinatorial optimization problems. This tutorial offers a comprehensive, first-principles introduction to QAOA and its properties, focusing on its application to Quadratic and Polynomial Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO and PUBO) problems. The tutorial begins by outlining variational quantum circuits and QUBO problems, focusing on their key properties and the encoding of problem constraints through quadratic penalty terms. Next, it explores the QAOA in detail, covering its Hamiltonian formulation, gate decomposition, and example applications, along with their implementation and performance results. This is followed by an analysis of the algorithm's energy landscape, where proofs are provided for its symmetry and periodicity, and where a resulting parameter space reduction is proposed. Finally, the tutorial extends these concepts to PUBO problems by generalizing the results to higher-order Hamiltonians and discussing the associated symmetries and circuit construction.
Quantum computing is an emerging field on the multidisciplinary interface between physics, engineering, and computer science with the potential to make a large impact on computational intelligence (CI). The aim of this paper is to introduce quantum approximate optimization methods to the CI community because of direct relevance to solving combinatorial problems. We introduce quantum computing and variational quantum algorithms (VQAs). VQAs are an effective method for the near-term implementation of quantum solutions on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices with less reliable qubits and early-stage error correction. Then, we explain Farhi et al.'s quantum approximate optimization algorithm (Farhi's QAOA, to prevent confusion). This VQA is generalized by Hadfield et al. to the quantum alternating operator ansatz (QAOA), which is a nature-inspired (particularly, adiabatic) quantum metaheuristic for approximately solving combinatorial optimization problems on gate-based quantum computers. We discuss connections of QAOA to relevant domains, such as computational learning theory and genetic algorithms, discussing current techniques and known results regarding hybrid quantum-classical intelligence systems. We present a schematic of how QAOA is constructed, and also discuss how CI techniques can be used to improve QAOA. We conclude with QAOA implementations for the well-known maximum cut, maximum bisection, and traveling salesperson problems, which can serve as templates for CI practitioners interested in using QAOA.
Combinatorial Optimization problems play an important role in various domains such as logis- tics, life science or the financial sector. As their complexity in general grows exponentially with their problem size, finding the optimal solution classically becomes infeasible very fast. This raises the central question of whether quantum computers are in principle suitable for solving combinatorial optimization problems better and faster than classical computers. In order to find answers to that question, one needs to study quantum algorithms designed for those problems under ideal conditions (i.e., simulations, which are however limited due to exponential scaling) to investigate their potential, but one also needs real quantum hardware to test its viability and evaluate whether practical advantages are reasonable. In this regard, we consider variational quantum algorithms, especially the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) consisting of a problem and a mixer Hamiltonian with freely selectable parameters, originally proposed as variational hybrid ansatz with classical optimization. This algorithm structure of- fers flexible and relatively shallow circuits, which makes it suitable for current NISQ hardware. However, optimizing the variational circuit parameters can be an NP-hard problem at worst. In this thesis, we study different versions of QAOA, especially with a focus on limitations, perfor- mance and potential advantages opposite classical methods. The first part of the thesis concerns the investigation of various aspects regarding the imple- mentation of the variational QAOA protocol such as: the incorporation of a problem constraint either by adding a suitable penalty term of by choosing a suitable mixer (that restricts the search space), the scaling of the problem Hamiltonian in comparison to the mixer Hamiltonian, the choice of the initial values for the classical optimization of the circuit parameters, and finally the choice of the function to be minimized (i.e., CVaR vs. expectation value). We apply this proto- col to both the portfolio optimization and the feature selection and evaluate the performance. In order to improve QAOA, we consider the warm-start QAOA for different problem instances and analyze its improved performance with regard to involved quantum effects. For this purpose, we propose a classical pre-processing method and demonstrate that the warm-start results can be reproduced or even exceeded by this method. The second part addresses the issue that the standard variational form requires a high number of circuit parameters that have to be optimized at a sufficiently large depth, which is a major limitationforachievingpotentialscalingadvantagescomparedtoclassicalmethods. Toovercome this limitation, we investigate and further develop fixed schedules for QAOA, which only rely on two free parameters. We start with introducing the continuous adiabatic theorem as it motivates the form of QAOA and show its limitations, which we address by applying a discrete version of the theorem. With our findings, a new version of QAOA based on linear-ramps (LR-QAOA) is introduced and further developed. In order to derive suitable parameter values for this schedule, we propose a method based on extrapolation from smaller towards larger problem sizes. With our results obtained on a noiseless emulator, we evaluate the quantum runtime scaling and discuss whether a scaling advantage can be achieved compared to classical methods.
A new methodology is proposed to solve classical Boolean problems as Hamiltonians, using the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). Our methodology successfully finds all optimized approximated solutions for Boolean problems, after converting them from Boolean oracles (in different structures) into Phase oracles, and then into the Hamiltonians of QAOA. From such a conversion, we noticed that the total utilized numbers of qubits and quantum gates are dramatically minimized for the final quantum circuits of Hamiltonians. In this paper, arbitrary classical Boolean problems are examined by successfully solving them with our proposed methodology, using structures based on various logic synthesis methods, an IBM quantum computer, and a classical optimization minimizer. Accordingly, this methodology will provide broad opportunities to solve many classical Boolean problems as Hamiltonians, for the practical engineering applications of several algorithms, robotics, machine learning, just to name a few, in the hybrid classical-quantum domain.