Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Phase and Discrete Space A Channel-Based Interpretation of Time, Action, and Transport

Hamdi Bilgin Ergun

Published Jan 29, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum Phase and Discrete Space A Channel-Based Interpretation of Time, Action, and Transport H. Bilgin Ergun, MSc.January 2026 — Bolu / TürkiyeORCID: 0009-0009-4733-4730 Abstract This book presents a unified conceptual framework for interpreting quantum and classical phenomena through discrete space, phase evolution, and channel formation. Rather than introducing new physical laws, it offers a geometrical and phase-based interpretation explaining why established principles such as least action, tunneling, interference, and lossless transport arise so robustly.Space is treated as a discrete phase-supporting structure in which physically meaningful events require completion of coherent phase cycles. Time is not assumed as a continuously flowing parameter, but emerges only after phase closure. Within this framework, transport phenomena are understood as phase-mediated channels rather than energetic violation or predefined trajectories.The approach provides a coherent interpretation of path integrals, tunneling, superconductivity, symmetry relaxation, and observer-induced decoherence, unifying them within a single phase-organized picture compatible with standard quantum formalism. Preface This book does not seek to replace established physical laws. Its purpose is to provide a geometrical and phase-based intuition explaining why those laws operate with such robustness across quantum and classical domains.The ideas presented here have been developed gradually through peer-reviewed articles and DOI-registered preprints. They are brought together in this volume to form a unified narrative accessible to physicists, engineers, and conceptually inclined readers interested in the foundations of physical theory.Author’s prior related work includes: A Phase-Coherence Interpretation of the Jahn–Teller Effect in Discrete Triadic Lattices, Zenodo (H. Bilgin Ergun), Record No: 18289641, Version 1, January 2026. Section 1 — Conceptual Interlude: Time Without Observation In phase-based descriptions, temporal ordering does not precede physical evolution; it emerges only after phase completion. Within a closed system evolving through discrete phase steps, intermediate configurations do not correspond to distinct moments in time but represent pre-temporal phase progressions.If an observer were present at every internal phase step, only the realized outcome would ever be accessible. Section 2 — Phase Selection and the Emergence of Least Action In the path–integral formulation introduced by Feynman, a system formally explores all conceivable trajectories between two configurations. Each path contributes with a phase factor determined by its action. Section 3 — Channel vs Channel-Free Propagation Energy may exist without direction, but direction does not arise without phase coherence. Section 4 — Phase-Guided Tunneling Quantum tunneling represents transport in which energetic transmission is suppressed while phase continuity persists. Section 5 — Collective Phase Locking and Lossless Transport Superconductivity represents the collective limit of phase-guided transport. Closure Note — Observation and Channel Disruption Observation disrupts phase continuity, collapsing channel multiplicity into a single route.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18420113

Related papers

Quantum Phase, Discrete Space, and the Limits of Continuity A Conceptual Framework Toward a Phase-Based Interpretation of Physical Reality

Hamdi Bilgin Ergun

Abstract Modern physics has achieved extraordinary predictive success through continuous mathematical formulations. However, the underlying nature of space, time, and physical processes remains conceptually open. This work presents a conceptual framework in which physical reality is interpreted as a discrete phase-supported structure. Space is considered as a lattice of elementary units separated at approximately the Planck scale, while time emerges through successive phase-closure events. Within this picture, energy transport, quantum coherence, and observable events are not continuous processes but arise from structured phase propagation. A triadic propagation mechanism naturally generates hexagonal connectivity, while phase closure defines the emergence of physical events. Rather than proposing new physical laws, this work suggests a broader interpretational perspective, encouraging reconsideration of continuity-based assumptions and inviting exploration of phase-based descriptions of physical reality. Author’s Perspective : I would like to submit the attached manuscript entitled: “Quantum Phase, Discrete Space, and the Limits of Continuity: A Conceptual Framework Toward a Phase-Based Interpretation of Physical Reality” for consideration as a conceptual or perspective article in your journal. The work presents a unified interpretational framework in which physical processes are described in terms of discrete phase propagation and phase closure. Rather than introducing new physical laws, the manuscript offers a geometrical and phase-based perspective that aims

•May 16, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Phase Coherence, Least Action, and Entropy in Discrete Space A Triadic Framework from Microscopic Order to Macroscopic Irreversibility

Hamdi Bilgin Ergun

Abstract This work proposes a conceptual connection between phase coherence, the principle of least action, and entropy within a discrete spatial framework. Space is interpreted as a lattice of elementary phase-supporting units, where physical processes occur through phase propagation and closure. Coherent phase evolution corresponds to minimal action and stable transport, while the loss of phase coherence leads to an increase in accessible microscopic configurations and thus entropy. The framework suggests that macroscopic irreversibility may emerge from the progressive breakdown of microscopic phase alignment. Triadic phase propagation, characterized by three equivalent directions separated by 120°, naturally generates hexagonal spatial connectivity and enables phase-cycle closure. This provides a unified geometrical perspective linking quantum coherence, transport processes, and thermodynamic behavior.

•Mar 22, 2026•0 citations

A Geometric Reconstruction of Schr¨odinger Dynamics via Axial–Phase Transport

Stephan Hueffer

This preprint presents a geometric reconstruction of Schrödinger dynamics based on coherent transport in an axial–phase configuration space. Within this framework, physical evolution is represented as a spiral process combining irreversible axial progression with transverse phase rotation. The approach seeks to provide a minimal geometric interpretation of quantum dynamics while preserving the established empirical structure of quantum mechanics. By imposing phase closure, preservation of superposition structure, and invariance of overlap relations, the admissible evolution law is constrained to a linear first-order transport equation generated by a Hermitian operator. When intrinsic evolution is projected onto an observational frame in which laboratory time is effectively defined, the resulting transport law reduces to the conventional Schrödinger equation. The framework suggests that laboratory time need not coincide with the fundamental evolution parameter but may emerge as an effective coordinate through projection. This perspective is consistent with ongoing discussions in both quantum theory and cosmology regarding the possibility that conventional notions of time are incomplete while leaving the successful predictive structure of quantum mechanics unchanged. Potential deviations from the standard description are expected only in regimes where intrinsic axial support becomes experimentally accessible or where the effective time-local approximation breaks down. The work therefore provides a geometric interpretation of Schrödinger dynamics that reproduces standard quantum mechanics within its established domain of validity while identifying possible directions for future theoretical and experimental investigation. This manuscript was originally prepared for submission to a peer-reviewed journal and is archived here as a preprint. Keywords: quantum mechanics, Schrödinger equation, geometric interpretation, time, phase space, Hermitian operators, quantum foundations, wave mechanics, coherent transport, emergent time.

•Jun 2, 2026•0 citations

What i Really Represents: From Spacetime Action to Quantum Phase

P J F Davies

What i Really RepresentsFrom Spacetime Action to Quantum Phase: The Imaginary Unit as aMarker of Action-Phase GeometryPeter Davies, v1.0230th April, 2026AbstractQuantum mechanics differs from classical probability theory by assigning complex amplitudes rather than real probabilities to physical alternatives. The appearance of the imaginary unit i in the Schr¨odinger equation, unitary time evolution, path integrals, gauge transformations, and geometric formulations of quantum mechanics suggests that i is not merely a calculational artifact.This paper argues that i is best understood as the algebraic marker of action-phase geometry: the phase-rotation structure through which action, measured in units of ℏ, becomes a probability-preserving quantum amplitude. In this interpretation, spacetime geometry determines the action accumulated along possible histories, while quantum mechanics maps this action into phase through eiS/ℏ. The constants ℏ and h acquire complementary interpretations: ℏ is action per radian of phase, while h = 2πℏ is action per full phase cycle. Observable probabilities arise only after interference among phase-weighted histories, with the final quadratic product converting the surviving amplitude structure into measurable probability. The paper develops this interpretation through phase gradients, action periodicity, proper-time phase, gauge connections, gravitational phase modulation, light–matter phase matching, and multi-photon interference. The proposed contribution is not a replacement of quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, or general relativity, but a conceptual synthesis: the repeated appearance of i, ℏ, h, action, proper time, and interference may be understood as different aspects of a single action-phase structure linking spacetime and quantum mechanics. The proposal is interpretive rather than a Bell-local hidden-variable completion of quantum mechanics. It does not assign pre-existing local outcome values to measurement events, and it is intended to remaincompatible with the nonclassical correlation structure required by Bell-type results. - Preprint version v1.02. This manuscript presents a conceptual framework and has not yet undergone peer review. Later versions may incorporate corrections, expanded references, and feedback on framing.

•Jun 17, 2026•1 citation

Quantum Phase Closure in Discrete Space A Triadic Channel Framework for the Emergence of Time, Transport, and Quantum Events

Hamdi Bilgin Ergun

•Mar 9, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Phase

Israel Martinez

Physical theories describe change through continuous time parameters, yet all operationally resolved processes involve finite phase accumulation. This work formalizes the idea that physically admissible evolution proceeds through a minimum resolvable phase step, independent of representation. When combined with a bounded phase generator, this discreteness implies a nonzero lower bound on time intervals associated with elementary events.

•Dec 20, 2025•0 citations
Quantum Phase and Discrete Space A Channel-Based Interpretation of Time, Action, and Transport H. Bilgin Ergun, MSc.January 2026 — Bolu / TürkiyeORCID: 0009-0009-4733-4730 Abstract This book presents a unified conceptual framework for interpreting quantum and classical phenomena through discrete space, phase evolution, and channel formation. Rather than introducing new physical laws, it offers a geometrical and phase-based interpretation explaining why established principles such as least action, tunneling, interference, and lossless transport arise so robustly.Space is treated as a discrete phase-supporting structure in which physically meaningful events require completion of coherent phase cycles. Time is not assumed as a continuously flowing parameter, but emerges only after phase closure. Within this framework, transport phenomena are understood as phase-mediated channels rather than energetic violation or predefined trajectories.The approach provides a coherent interpretation of path integrals, tunneling, superconductivity, symmetry relaxation, and observer-induced decoherence, unifying them within a single phase-organized picture compatible with standard quantum formalism. Preface This book does not seek to replace established physical laws. Its purpose is to provide a geometrical and phase-based intuition explaining why those laws operate with such robustness across quantum and classical domains.The ideas presented here have been developed gradually through peer-reviewed articles and DOI-registered preprints. They are brought together in this volume to form a unified narrative accessible to physicists, engineers, and conceptually inclined readers interested in the foundations of physical theory.Author’s prior related work includes: A Phase-Coherence Interpretation of the Jahn–Teller Effect in Discrete Triadic Lattices, Zenodo (H. Bilgin Ergun), Record No: 18289641, Version 1, January 2026. Section 1 — Conceptual Interlude: Time Without Observation In phase-based descriptions, temporal ordering does not precede physical evolution; it emerges only after phase completion. Within a closed system evolving through discrete phase steps, intermediate configurations do not correspond to distinct moments in time but represent pre-temporal phase progressions.If an observer were present at every internal phase step, only the realized outcome would ever be accessible. Section 2 — Phase Selection and the Emergence of Least Action In the path–integral formulation introduced by Feynman, a system formally explores all conceivable trajectories between two configurations. Each path contributes with a phase factor determined by its action. Section 3 — Channel vs Channel-Free Propagation Energy may exist without direction, but direction does not arise without phase coherence. Section 4 — Phase-Guided Tunneling Quantum tunneling represents transport in which energetic transmission is suppressed while phase continuity persists. Section 5 — Collective Phase Locking and Lossless Transport Superconductivity represents the collective limit of phase-guided transport. Closure Note — Observation and Channel Disruption Observation disrupts phase continuity, collapsing channel multiplicity into a single route.
Abstract Modern physics has achieved extraordinary predictive success through continuous mathematical formulations. However, the underlying nature of space, time, and physical processes remains conceptually open. This work presents a conceptual framework in which physical reality is interpreted as a discrete phase-supported structure. Space is considered as a lattice of elementary units separated at approximately the Planck scale, while time emerges through successive phase-closure events. Within this picture, energy transport, quantum coherence, and observable events are not continuous processes but arise from structured phase propagation. A triadic propagation mechanism naturally generates hexagonal connectivity, while phase closure defines the emergence of physical events. Rather than proposing new physical laws, this work suggests a broader interpretational perspective, encouraging reconsideration of continuity-based assumptions and inviting exploration of phase-based descriptions of physical reality. Author’s Perspective : I would like to submit the attached manuscript entitled: “Quantum Phase, Discrete Space, and the Limits of Continuity: A Conceptual Framework Toward a Phase-Based Interpretation of Physical Reality” for consideration as a conceptual or perspective article in your journal. The work presents a unified interpretational framework in which physical processes are described in terms of discrete phase propagation and phase closure. Rather than introducing new physical laws, the manuscript offers a geometrical and phase-based perspective that aims
Abstract This work proposes a conceptual connection between phase coherence, the principle of least action, and entropy within a discrete spatial framework. Space is interpreted as a lattice of elementary phase-supporting units, where physical processes occur through phase propagation and closure. Coherent phase evolution corresponds to minimal action and stable transport, while the loss of phase coherence leads to an increase in accessible microscopic configurations and thus entropy. The framework suggests that macroscopic irreversibility may emerge from the progressive breakdown of microscopic phase alignment. Triadic phase propagation, characterized by three equivalent directions separated by 120°, naturally generates hexagonal spatial connectivity and enables phase-cycle closure. This provides a unified geometrical perspective linking quantum coherence, transport processes, and thermodynamic behavior.
This preprint presents a geometric reconstruction of Schrödinger dynamics based on coherent transport in an axial–phase configuration space. Within this framework, physical evolution is represented as a spiral process combining irreversible axial progression with transverse phase rotation. The approach seeks to provide a minimal geometric interpretation of quantum dynamics while preserving the established empirical structure of quantum mechanics. By imposing phase closure, preservation of superposition structure, and invariance of overlap relations, the admissible evolution law is constrained to a linear first-order transport equation generated by a Hermitian operator. When intrinsic evolution is projected onto an observational frame in which laboratory time is effectively defined, the resulting transport law reduces to the conventional Schrödinger equation. The framework suggests that laboratory time need not coincide with the fundamental evolution parameter but may emerge as an effective coordinate through projection. This perspective is consistent with ongoing discussions in both quantum theory and cosmology regarding the possibility that conventional notions of time are incomplete while leaving the successful predictive structure of quantum mechanics unchanged. Potential deviations from the standard description are expected only in regimes where intrinsic axial support becomes experimentally accessible or where the effective time-local approximation breaks down. The work therefore provides a geometric interpretation of Schrödinger dynamics that reproduces standard quantum mechanics within its established domain of validity while identifying possible directions for future theoretical and experimental investigation. This manuscript was originally prepared for submission to a peer-reviewed journal and is archived here as a preprint. Keywords: quantum mechanics, Schrödinger equation, geometric interpretation, time, phase space, Hermitian operators, quantum foundations, wave mechanics, coherent transport, emergent time.
What i Really RepresentsFrom Spacetime Action to Quantum Phase: The Imaginary Unit as aMarker of Action-Phase GeometryPeter Davies, v1.0230th April, 2026AbstractQuantum mechanics differs from classical probability theory by assigning complex amplitudes rather than real probabilities to physical alternatives. The appearance of the imaginary unit i in the Schr¨odinger equation, unitary time evolution, path integrals, gauge transformations, and geometric formulations of quantum mechanics suggests that i is not merely a calculational artifact.This paper argues that i is best understood as the algebraic marker of action-phase geometry: the phase-rotation structure through which action, measured in units of ℏ, becomes a probability-preserving quantum amplitude. In this interpretation, spacetime geometry determines the action accumulated along possible histories, while quantum mechanics maps this action into phase through eiS/ℏ. The constants ℏ and h acquire complementary interpretations: ℏ is action per radian of phase, while h = 2πℏ is action per full phase cycle. Observable probabilities arise only after interference among phase-weighted histories, with the final quadratic product converting the surviving amplitude structure into measurable probability. The paper develops this interpretation through phase gradients, action periodicity, proper-time phase, gauge connections, gravitational phase modulation, light–matter phase matching, and multi-photon interference. The proposed contribution is not a replacement of quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, or general relativity, but a conceptual synthesis: the repeated appearance of i, ℏ, h, action, proper time, and interference may be understood as different aspects of a single action-phase structure linking spacetime and quantum mechanics. The proposal is interpretive rather than a Bell-local hidden-variable completion of quantum mechanics. It does not assign pre-existing local outcome values to measurement events, and it is intended to remaincompatible with the nonclassical correlation structure required by Bell-type results. - Preprint version v1.02. This manuscript presents a conceptual framework and has not yet undergone peer review. Later versions may incorporate corrections, expanded references, and feedback on framing.