Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Phenomenology from Operator Bookkeeping under Coherence Regime Constraints (IM-F003, v0.3)

Anders Nils Gunnar Widgren

Published Jan 23, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework, a coherence- and admissibility-based approach to physical description. The document is published as part of the first public wave of IM papers, providing a regime-based phenomenological bridge to established quantum-mechanical observations. This work presents a quantum-regime model in which quantum phenomenology arises when geometric bookkeeping becomes inadmissible under low coherence, requiring operator-defined relations as the primary physical content. No hidden variables or modified quantum dynamics are introduced.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18348691

Related papers

Particle Phenomenology from Coherence Selection and Admissible Structure (IM-F004, v0.3)

Anders Nils Gunnar Widgren

This paper is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework, a coherence- and admissibility-based approach to physical description. The document is published as part of the first public wave of IM papers, providing a regime-based phenomenological bridge to particle-like structure. This work presents a particle-regime interpretation in which stable particle-like structures emerge as coherence-selected discrete invariant carriers under nonzero noise. No new particle species, numerical constants, or modified dynamics are proposed.

•Jan 23, 2026•0 citations

Coherence-Bounded Calculus (IM-B001, v0.3)

Anders Nils Gunnar Widgren

This paper is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework, a coherence- and admissibility-based approach to physical description. The document is published as part of the first public wave of IM papers, establishing the mathematical and axiomatic basis on which downstream regime models and interpretations are built. This work defines the admissible mathematical domain used throughout Informational Mechanics, including bounded local variation and admissible limits. It introduces no physical axioms, interpretations, particles, or modified dynamics.

•Jan 22, 2026•0 citations

Operator Status of the Wavefunction: Admissibility, Observables, and Regime-Defined Physical Content (IM-E003, v0.3)

Anders Nils Gunnar Widgren

This document is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework and is published in the IM-E (Measurement & Operators) series within the IM v0.3 corpus. The paper analyzes the physical status of the quantum-mechanical wavefunction under admissibility constraints. Rather than adopting an ontological position (ψ-realism or ψ-epistemicism), the analysis evaluates when the wavefunction carries operator-defined physical content within a declared quantum-mechanical regime. Within Informational Mechanics, physical content is defined only where operator-implementable observables, stable invariants, and regime-bounded comparability are available. The wavefunction is therefore treated as a regime-defined representational object whose physical meaning depends on the continued admissibility of the operators required to define and compare its associated observables. The paper introduces no new axioms, collapse models, hidden variables, or empirical fits. Its contribution is structural and operational: to clarify when statements about the wavefunction are scientifically meaningful and when they extend beyond operator-defined structure.

•Feb 15, 2026•0 citations

Operator Stability and Classical Emergence: A Regime-Based Criterion for Observable Invariance (IM-E002, v0.3)

Anders Nils Gunnar Widgren

This document is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework and is published in the IM-E (Measurement & Operators) series within the IM v0.3 corpus. The paper formalizes an Operator Stability Condition (OSC) that specifies when quantum-mechanical observables exhibit regime-stable invariance under admissible disturbance. Rather than introducing new dynamics or modifying quantum theory, the analysis provides a structural criterion for when operator-defined quantities become persistently comparable and support classical description. Classical emergence is treated as a consequence of operator stability: when observables retain invariant content under admissible measurement and environmental interaction, effective classical structure arises without invoking collapse models, hidden variables, or additional ontological assumptions. The paper introduces no new axioms, dynamical mechanisms, or empirical fits. Its purpose is operational and disciplinary: to clarify the admissibility conditions under which classical description remains scientifically meaningful and to connect foundational admissibility constraints (IM-C series) with downstream structural consequences (IM-D series).

•Feb 15, 2026•0 citations

Foundations of Informational Mechanics (IM-C001, v0.3)

Anders Nils Gunnar Widgren

This paper is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework, a coherence- and admissibility-based approach to physical description. The document is published as part of the first public wave of IM papers, establishing the canonical axioms, scope discipline, and foundational claim boundaries of the framework. This work states the axioms and foundational commitments of Informational Mechanics, formulated within the admissible mathematical domain defined in IM-B001. It introduces no regime models, experiments, or applications.

•Jan 22, 2026•0 citations

On the Regime-Limited Validity of Quantum Mechanics (IM-I002, v0.3)

Anders Nils Gunnar Widgren

This document is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework and is published in the IM-I (Reviews & Syntheses) series within the IM v0.3 corpus. The paper synthesizes recent IM work on universality and regime-limited validity to clarify the status of quantum mechanics under admissibility constraints. Rather than proposing modifications to quantum theory, it analyzes the conditions under which claims of global validity remain scientifically meaningful. Drawing on IM-C003 (regime-limited universality), IM-E001 (operator criteria for universality), and IM-D005 (structural non-derivability across regime transitions), the document shows how quantum-mechanical unitarity and state evolution must be understood as regime-bound statements whose validity depends on operator-defined implementability and cross-regime comparability. The paper introduces no new axioms, models, or empirical results. Its purpose is clarificatory and integrative: to provide a coherent account of how quantum mechanics retains full validity within admissible regimes while avoiding unwarranted global extrapolation beyond operator-defined structure.

•Feb 15, 2026•0 citations
This paper is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework, a coherence- and admissibility-based approach to physical description. The document is published as part of the first public wave of IM papers, providing a regime-based phenomenological bridge to established quantum-mechanical observations. This work presents a quantum-regime model in which quantum phenomenology arises when geometric bookkeeping becomes inadmissible under low coherence, requiring operator-defined relations as the primary physical content. No hidden variables or modified quantum dynamics are introduced.
This paper is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework, a coherence- and admissibility-based approach to physical description. The document is published as part of the first public wave of IM papers, providing a regime-based phenomenological bridge to particle-like structure. This work presents a particle-regime interpretation in which stable particle-like structures emerge as coherence-selected discrete invariant carriers under nonzero noise. No new particle species, numerical constants, or modified dynamics are proposed.
This paper is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework, a coherence- and admissibility-based approach to physical description. The document is published as part of the first public wave of IM papers, establishing the mathematical and axiomatic basis on which downstream regime models and interpretations are built. This work defines the admissible mathematical domain used throughout Informational Mechanics, including bounded local variation and admissible limits. It introduces no physical axioms, interpretations, particles, or modified dynamics.
This document is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework and is published in the IM-E (Measurement & Operators) series within the IM v0.3 corpus. The paper analyzes the physical status of the quantum-mechanical wavefunction under admissibility constraints. Rather than adopting an ontological position (ψ-realism or ψ-epistemicism), the analysis evaluates when the wavefunction carries operator-defined physical content within a declared quantum-mechanical regime. Within Informational Mechanics, physical content is defined only where operator-implementable observables, stable invariants, and regime-bounded comparability are available. The wavefunction is therefore treated as a regime-defined representational object whose physical meaning depends on the continued admissibility of the operators required to define and compare its associated observables. The paper introduces no new axioms, collapse models, hidden variables, or empirical fits. Its contribution is structural and operational: to clarify when statements about the wavefunction are scientifically meaningful and when they extend beyond operator-defined structure.
This document is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework and is published in the IM-E (Measurement & Operators) series within the IM v0.3 corpus. The paper formalizes an Operator Stability Condition (OSC) that specifies when quantum-mechanical observables exhibit regime-stable invariance under admissible disturbance. Rather than introducing new dynamics or modifying quantum theory, the analysis provides a structural criterion for when operator-defined quantities become persistently comparable and support classical description. Classical emergence is treated as a consequence of operator stability: when observables retain invariant content under admissible measurement and environmental interaction, effective classical structure arises without invoking collapse models, hidden variables, or additional ontological assumptions. The paper introduces no new axioms, dynamical mechanisms, or empirical fits. Its purpose is operational and disciplinary: to clarify the admissibility conditions under which classical description remains scientifically meaningful and to connect foundational admissibility constraints (IM-C series) with downstream structural consequences (IM-D series).
This paper is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework, a coherence- and admissibility-based approach to physical description. The document is published as part of the first public wave of IM papers, establishing the canonical axioms, scope discipline, and foundational claim boundaries of the framework. This work states the axioms and foundational commitments of Informational Mechanics, formulated within the admissible mathematical domain defined in IM-B001. It introduces no regime models, experiments, or applications.
This document is part of the Informational Mechanics (IM) framework and is published in the IM-I (Reviews & Syntheses) series within the IM v0.3 corpus. The paper synthesizes recent IM work on universality and regime-limited validity to clarify the status of quantum mechanics under admissibility constraints. Rather than proposing modifications to quantum theory, it analyzes the conditions under which claims of global validity remain scientifically meaningful. Drawing on IM-C003 (regime-limited universality), IM-E001 (operator criteria for universality), and IM-D005 (structural non-derivability across regime transitions), the document shows how quantum-mechanical unitarity and state evolution must be understood as regime-bound statements whose validity depends on operator-defined implementability and cross-regime comparability. The paper introduces no new axioms, models, or empirical results. Its purpose is clarificatory and integrative: to provide a coherent account of how quantum mechanics retains full validity within admissible regimes while avoiding unwarranted global extrapolation beyond operator-defined structure.