Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Longevity Horizon

Why Ze is not Many-Worlds

Jaba Tkemaladze

Published Jan 14, 2026• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper presents a definitive refutation of the recurring conjecture that the Ze framework constitutes a variant of the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics. Through a systematic, point-by-point analysis, we demonstrate that the two are radically orthogonal paradigms, separated by irreconcilable differences in their foundational principles. While both reject the notion of a fundamental wavefunction collapse, MWI responds by positing an ever-branching multiverse where all quantum possibilities are ontologically real. In stark contrast, the Ze framework, grounded in the principles of active inference and free energy minimization, preserves a single-world ontology. It reinterprets quantum superpositions as manifestations of unresolved epistemic model conflict within an adaptive system, and "measurement" as the physical process of forced localization, where a definite history crystallizes. The analysis conclusively distinguishes Ze from MWI across critical dimensions: the nature of alternatives (ontological worlds vs. epistemic models), the process of definiteness (subjective branching vs. objective optimization), the role of the observer (covert privilege vs. its elimination), and the capacity for empirical prediction. We conclude that Ze is not an interpretation of quantum formalism but a broader theory of how adaptive systems, from particles to brains, resolve uncertainty, thereby offering a monistic, parsimonious, and empirically grounded alternative to the inflationary ontology of the multiverse.

DOI
10.65649/fyd9x473

Related papers

Ze and Relational QM

Jaba Tkemaladze

The measurement problem in quantum mechanics challenges our understanding of reality, demanding explanations beyond both Copenhagen's "collapse" and the Many-Worlds' ontological multiplicity. This paper introduces and formalizes the Ze framework as a novel synthesis of Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) and the Active Inference paradigm from theoretical neuroscience. Ze posits that quantum states are relational, defined by the posterior beliefs of interacting generative models engaged in variational free energy minimization. Within this framework, quantum superposition is formalized as high compatibility (ℐ ≈ 1) between competing models, characterized by low free-energy conflict (ΔF < θ). Conversely, the transition to a localized state—the physical correlate of "collapse"—is reconceived not as a metaphysical event but as an optimization-driven phase transition. This occurs when model conflict exceeds a critical threshold (ΔF > θ), a process objectively driven by interactions like which-path marking. We demonstrate that matter-wave interferometry with complex molecules provides a direct experimental testbed for these principles, where which-path information and quantum erasure actively manipulate ΔF. Extending the isomorphism, we propose that transitions in human cognition—from focused wakefulness to dreaming and psychedelic states—are governed by analogous shifts in the brain's inferential threshold (θ). Thus, Ze offers a unified, testable architecture bridging quantum foundations, statistical physics, and the neuroscience of consciousness.

Longevity Horizon•Jan 15, 2026•7 citations

Ze, Decoherence, and the Quantum Eraser

Jaba Tkemaladze

The quantum eraser experiment, while confirming the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics, has persistently challenged intuitive understanding, often invoking concepts of retrocausality or the necessity of a conscious observer. This paper develops and articulates the Ze interpretation as a comprehensive framework that resolves these conceptual challenges without such metaphysical additions. We propose that quantum dynamics is fundamentally governed by the competition between two active generative models: a direct causal model (Model A, "particle-like") and a counterfactual wave model (Model B, "wave-like"). Decoherence is reinterpreted not as information loss, but as the environmental amplification of a structural incompatibility between these models, leading to a forced stabilization of the system into a state compatible with a single, definite narrative—a process we identify as physical collapse. The quantum eraser is shown to be an active intervention that dismantles this incompatibility by removing the environmental basis for discriminating between models, thereby restoring the conditions for a low-conflict consensus state that manifests as interference. This framework seamlessly unifies unitary evolution, decoherence, collapse, and erasure as facets of a single process of model competition and stabilization. It eliminates the need for an observer-centric explanation, replaces the "collapse" postulate with a dynamical physical mechanism, and yields novel, testable predictions regarding interference in complex systems and the dynamic nature of the quantum-classical threshold.

Longevity Horizon•Jan 10, 2026•8 citations

Information-Theoretic and Spacetime Constraints on Ontological Branching in Quantum Mechanics: A Physical Refutation of MWI.

Ayoub Taoussi

Description: This research provides a rigorous physical deconstruction of the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics by shifting the focus from mathematical formalism to the fundamental constraints of physical reality. While MWI is often celebrated for its avoidance of the collapse postulate, this paper demonstrates that its core mechanism—exponential ontological branching—imposes requirements that violate established physical laws. Key Arguments Presented: * The Energetic Barrier (Landauer’s Principle): The work proves that if branching is a physical process, the creation of each distinct branch entails a thermodynamic cost ($\Delta Q \geq k_B T \ln 2$). The exponential proliferation of worlds would require energy exceeding the total mass-energy of the observable universe. The Information Ceiling (Bekenstein Bound): By applying the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy limits, the paper demonstrates that a finite universe cannot accommodate the infinite information storage required for distinct branch records. The Infinite Gap Theorem ($\infgap$): A formal proof showing the fundamental discrepancy between the infinite precision of mathematical Hilbert spaces and the finite representational capacity of physical systems. The Paradox of Macroscopic Superposition Cost: An empirical analysis showing that the extreme energy and operational difficulty required to maintain quantum coherence in laboratories contradicts the "cost-free" world-splitting assumed by MWI. Conclusion: The study concludes that MWI is a mathematical ghost-theory; the "Many Worlds" it predicts are informationally and energetically unrealizable within a finite physical manifold. Keywords: Quantum Foundations, Many-Worlds Interpretation, Information Theory, Landauer's Principle, Bekenstein Bound, Decoherence, Quantum Thermodynamics.

•Jan 4, 2026•0 citations

Branching Without Multiplicity: Structural Resolution of the Many-Worlds Assumption

Lisa Doumbouya

The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics preserves unitary evolution by rejecting wavefunction collapse and treating all outcome branches as equally real. While mathematically consistent, this move elevates admissible descriptions of a system to ontological status without an accompanying principle of physical selection. In this paper, we argue that quantum branching need not imply ontological multiplicity once structural admissibility, temporal constraint, and recoverability are made explicit. Unitary evolution defines the space of allowable continuations, but only a subset of these persist forward in time due to structural resolution. Within this framework, the appearance of branching reflects under-resolved admissible paths rather than the realization of multiple worlds. Many-Worlds is thus reinterpreted as a transitional bookkeeping scaffold rather than a necessary ontological commitment.

•Dec 20, 2025•0 citations

Predictive Inference and the Origin of Quantum Phenomena

Jaba Tkemaladze

This preprint presents a foundational theory that reinterprets quantum mechanics not as a description of fundamental physical reality, but as the emergent statistical signature of a universal information-processing architecture. We introduce and formally define the Ze (Zero-point entropy) system—an active predictive engine that operates through a mandatory cycle of forward prediction and retrograde inference. The system's core axiom is that the retrograde encoding process, essential for reconciling past models with present evidence, necessitates a complete cessation of the forward information flow. From this single architectural constraint, we mathematically derive phenomena isomorphic to quantum superposition, interference, and wavefunction collapse. Superposition corresponds to a dynamical equilibrium of multiple predictive hypotheses; collapse is a structured, non-fundamental process triggered when hypothesis divergence exceeds a system-specific stability threshold; and interference arises from the coherent blending of compatible hypotheses. The framework positions quantum behavior as an epistemic property of any system performing active inference under this architectural constraint, bridging domains from particle physics to cognitive neuroscience. We present novel, falsifiable predictions and propose that quantum theory describes the dynamics of a universal class of predictive engines, not a microscopic realm of reality.

•Jan 16, 2026•6 citations

Physical Interpretation of Ze

Jaba Tkemaladze

This paper presents a unified physical interpretation of the Ze framework, positioning it not as a computational algorithm but as a foundational ontological theory. We argue that Ze is built upon a single primitive: a fundamental state whose norm is conserved. This state admits a dual representation—continuous for analysis and discrete for dynamics—where integer-valued counters constitute the physical substrate. From this basis, all conventional physical concepts are derived. Quantization emerges from the discreteness of counter updates, replacing wave-particle duality with a minimal unit of registration. Causality and the arrow of time arise from the principle of directional stabilization, where the causal order is the sequence that maximizes global state predictability. Space and time are not independent continua but emerge as antiparallel modes of processing the state: time as sequential accumulation and space as parallel comparison. Their competition yields the kinematic structure of Special Relativity, while gradients in the state's stable orientation manifest as effective curvature, reproducing General Relativity. Consequently, matter is interpreted as a stabilized pattern, motion as its reorientation, and forces as stabilization gradients. The interpretation leads to a monistic ontology where the universe is a single, conserved state undergoing structured redistribution, offering a parsimonious path to unifying quantum and relativistic phenomena without dualistic postulates.

Longevity Horizon•Jan 1, 2025•6 citations
This paper presents a definitive refutation of the recurring conjecture that the Ze framework constitutes a variant of the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics. Through a systematic, point-by-point analysis, we demonstrate that the two are radically orthogonal paradigms, separated by irreconcilable differences in their foundational principles. While both reject the notion of a fundamental wavefunction collapse, MWI responds by positing an ever-branching multiverse where all quantum possibilities are ontologically real. In stark contrast, the Ze framework, grounded in the principles of active inference and free energy minimization, preserves a single-world ontology. It reinterprets quantum superpositions as manifestations of unresolved epistemic model conflict within an adaptive system, and "measurement" as the physical process of forced localization, where a definite history crystallizes. The analysis conclusively distinguishes Ze from MWI across critical dimensions: the nature of alternatives (ontological worlds vs. epistemic models), the process of definiteness (subjective branching vs. objective optimization), the role of the observer (covert privilege vs. its elimination), and the capacity for empirical prediction. We conclude that Ze is not an interpretation of quantum formalism but a broader theory of how adaptive systems, from particles to brains, resolve uncertainty, thereby offering a monistic, parsimonious, and empirically grounded alternative to the inflationary ontology of the multiverse.
The measurement problem in quantum mechanics challenges our understanding of reality, demanding explanations beyond both Copenhagen's "collapse" and the Many-Worlds' ontological multiplicity. This paper introduces and formalizes the Ze framework as a novel synthesis of Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM) and the Active Inference paradigm from theoretical neuroscience. Ze posits that quantum states are relational, defined by the posterior beliefs of interacting generative models engaged in variational free energy minimization. Within this framework, quantum superposition is formalized as high compatibility (ℐ ≈ 1) between competing models, characterized by low free-energy conflict (ΔF < θ). Conversely, the transition to a localized state—the physical correlate of "collapse"—is reconceived not as a metaphysical event but as an optimization-driven phase transition. This occurs when model conflict exceeds a critical threshold (ΔF > θ), a process objectively driven by interactions like which-path marking. We demonstrate that matter-wave interferometry with complex molecules provides a direct experimental testbed for these principles, where which-path information and quantum erasure actively manipulate ΔF. Extending the isomorphism, we propose that transitions in human cognition—from focused wakefulness to dreaming and psychedelic states—are governed by analogous shifts in the brain's inferential threshold (θ). Thus, Ze offers a unified, testable architecture bridging quantum foundations, statistical physics, and the neuroscience of consciousness.
The quantum eraser experiment, while confirming the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics, has persistently challenged intuitive understanding, often invoking concepts of retrocausality or the necessity of a conscious observer. This paper develops and articulates the Ze interpretation as a comprehensive framework that resolves these conceptual challenges without such metaphysical additions. We propose that quantum dynamics is fundamentally governed by the competition between two active generative models: a direct causal model (Model A, "particle-like") and a counterfactual wave model (Model B, "wave-like"). Decoherence is reinterpreted not as information loss, but as the environmental amplification of a structural incompatibility between these models, leading to a forced stabilization of the system into a state compatible with a single, definite narrative—a process we identify as physical collapse. The quantum eraser is shown to be an active intervention that dismantles this incompatibility by removing the environmental basis for discriminating between models, thereby restoring the conditions for a low-conflict consensus state that manifests as interference. This framework seamlessly unifies unitary evolution, decoherence, collapse, and erasure as facets of a single process of model competition and stabilization. It eliminates the need for an observer-centric explanation, replaces the "collapse" postulate with a dynamical physical mechanism, and yields novel, testable predictions regarding interference in complex systems and the dynamic nature of the quantum-classical threshold.
Description: This research provides a rigorous physical deconstruction of the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics by shifting the focus from mathematical formalism to the fundamental constraints of physical reality. While MWI is often celebrated for its avoidance of the collapse postulate, this paper demonstrates that its core mechanism—exponential ontological branching—imposes requirements that violate established physical laws. Key Arguments Presented: * The Energetic Barrier (Landauer’s Principle): The work proves that if branching is a physical process, the creation of each distinct branch entails a thermodynamic cost (ΔQ≥kBTln⁡2\Delta Q \geq k_B T \ln 2ΔQ≥kB​Tln2). The exponential proliferation of worlds would require energy exceeding the total mass-energy of the observable universe. The Information Ceiling (Bekenstein Bound): By applying the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy limits, the paper demonstrates that a finite universe cannot accommodate the infinite information storage required for distinct branch records. The Infinite Gap Theorem ($\infgap$): A formal proof showing the fundamental discrepancy between the infinite precision of mathematical Hilbert spaces and the finite representational capacity of physical systems. The Paradox of Macroscopic Superposition Cost: An empirical analysis showing that the extreme energy and operational difficulty required to maintain quantum coherence in laboratories contradicts the "cost-free" world-splitting assumed by MWI. Conclusion: The study concludes that MWI is a mathematical ghost-theory; the "Many Worlds" it predicts are informationally and energetically unrealizable within a finite physical manifold. Keywords: Quantum Foundations, Many-Worlds Interpretation, Information Theory, Landauer's Principle, Bekenstein Bound, Decoherence, Quantum Thermodynamics.
The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics preserves unitary evolution by rejecting wavefunction collapse and treating all outcome branches as equally real. While mathematically consistent, this move elevates admissible descriptions of a system to ontological status without an accompanying principle of physical selection. In this paper, we argue that quantum branching need not imply ontological multiplicity once structural admissibility, temporal constraint, and recoverability are made explicit. Unitary evolution defines the space of allowable continuations, but only a subset of these persist forward in time due to structural resolution. Within this framework, the appearance of branching reflects under-resolved admissible paths rather than the realization of multiple worlds. Many-Worlds is thus reinterpreted as a transitional bookkeeping scaffold rather than a necessary ontological commitment.
This preprint presents a foundational theory that reinterprets quantum mechanics not as a description of fundamental physical reality, but as the emergent statistical signature of a universal information-processing architecture. We introduce and formally define the Ze (Zero-point entropy) system—an active predictive engine that operates through a mandatory cycle of forward prediction and retrograde inference. The system's core axiom is that the retrograde encoding process, essential for reconciling past models with present evidence, necessitates a complete cessation of the forward information flow. From this single architectural constraint, we mathematically derive phenomena isomorphic to quantum superposition, interference, and wavefunction collapse. Superposition corresponds to a dynamical equilibrium of multiple predictive hypotheses; collapse is a structured, non-fundamental process triggered when hypothesis divergence exceeds a system-specific stability threshold; and interference arises from the coherent blending of compatible hypotheses. The framework positions quantum behavior as an epistemic property of any system performing active inference under this architectural constraint, bridging domains from particle physics to cognitive neuroscience. We present novel, falsifiable predictions and propose that quantum theory describes the dynamics of a universal class of predictive engines, not a microscopic realm of reality.
This paper presents a unified physical interpretation of the Ze framework, positioning it not as a computational algorithm but as a foundational ontological theory. We argue that Ze is built upon a single primitive: a fundamental state whose norm is conserved. This state admits a dual representation—continuous for analysis and discrete for dynamics—where integer-valued counters constitute the physical substrate. From this basis, all conventional physical concepts are derived. Quantization emerges from the discreteness of counter updates, replacing wave-particle duality with a minimal unit of registration. Causality and the arrow of time arise from the principle of directional stabilization, where the causal order is the sequence that maximizes global state predictability. Space and time are not independent continua but emerge as antiparallel modes of processing the state: time as sequential accumulation and space as parallel comparison. Their competition yields the kinematic structure of Special Relativity, while gradients in the state's stable orientation manifest as effective curvature, reproducing General Relativity. Consequently, matter is interpreted as a stabilized pattern, motion as its reorientation, and forces as stabilization gradients. The interpretation leads to a monistic ontology where the universe is a single, conserved state undergoing structured redistribution, offering a parsimonious path to unifying quantum and relativistic phenomena without dualistic postulates.