Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The General Theory of Irreversible Distinguishability I: Formal Foundations

Sworup

Published Jan 11, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper establishes a minimal formal foundation for structure under irreversibledistinguishability. Starting from a single primitive—distinction—we derive equivalence,refinement, irreversible loss, persistence, probability, Hilbert space structure, unitaryadmissible transformations, counting, and intrinsic temporal ordering. No physical,probabilistic, or dynamical axioms are assumed. Probability, time, and reversible evolution arise necessarily as constrained structures induced by unresolved refinement andirreversible elimination. The formal core is shown to be minimal, irreducible, andcomplete with respect to admissible structure under loss. This paper constitutes thefoundational core of a multi-paper series deriving physics, chemistry, biology, cognition,and society as successive constrained extensions of irreversible distinguishability.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.18214727

Related papers

Time, Records, and Irreversibility: Operational Foundations Without Temporal Primitives

Robert Kornfeld

We establish two foundational results concerning time and irreversibility within an operational framework where physical measurements correspond to distinguishable, persistent record states. First, we prove that no physical clock can ground time as a fundamental parameter: any clock-induced ordering necessarily reduces to a preorder defined by reachability among record states via admissible transformations. Second, we prove that bounded recording capacity forces accessible irreversibility: any system capable of recording more distinct events than its accessible register capacity must exhibit non-invertible operations at the accessible level. These results are derived without assuming time, entropy, or thermodynamic principles as primitives. Together, they establish that temporal structure and irreversibility are not independent physical laws but emerge from operational constraints on physical memory and distinguishability. The framework is compatible with globally unitary microscopic dynamics while explaining effective irreversibility for bounded observers. We conclude that time is a representational index for record structure rather than an ontological primitive , establishing the necessary foundation for the failure of deterministic prediction addressed in companion work [3]

•Jan 11, 2026•0 citations

Physics of Difference I: Minimal Structure of Physical Description

Yasuaki Tamura

Abstract We investigate the minimal structural conditions under which representational accessibility and irreversibility-like asymmetry arise in physical description. Starting solely from the existence of distinguishable states and a class of admissible transformations, we analyze how accessibility of distinctions changes under non-injective representational updates without introducing prior notions of space, time, probability, measurement, or thermodynamic structure.Admissible non-injective transformations naturally induce equivalence relations on the state space, leading to a distinction between manifest difference, corresponding to representationally accessible distinctions, and latent difference, corresponding to distinctions that remain structurally present but inaccessible within a given representation. We show that accessibility and recoverability of distinctions are determined intrinsically by the admissible transformation structure itself rather than by externally imposed observational limitations or representational scales.A central result of the framework is that irreversibility-like asymmetry arises when latent distinctions become non-recoverable within the admissible transformation class. In this perspective, irreversibility-like behavior is interpreted not as a consequence of probabilistic uncertainty or thermodynamic entropy increase, but as a structural restriction on recoverability of representational accessibility.The present work does not introduce new mathematical constructions. Rather, it provides a conceptual reinterpretation of equivalence structures, representational accessibility, and recoverability within a minimal framework of physical description. This framework identifies structural preconditions for accessibility restriction and recoverability failure prior to the introduction of statistical, thermodynamic, or observer-dependent assumptions.

•Apr 28, 2026•0 citations

Stable Distinguishability as a Minimal Criterion for Physical Entity: A Constraint-Primacy Formal Framework

Israel Don

Abstract This paper proposes a minimal formal criterion for physical entity. It does not attempt to derive quantum mechanics, general relativity, quantum gravity, or any empirical prediction. Its aim is narrower: to ask what formal conditions must be satisfied before a structure may be treated as a physical entity at all. The starting point is the principle of stable distinguishability: a physical theory is possible only where distinctions can be made and re-identified under admissible change. From this requirement, the paper develops a constraint-primacy framework in which no particle, field, spacetime point, state, measurement, or observable is assumed as primitive. The formal layer consists of tokens, admissibility, and a closure operator defined on the full power set of tokens. Identity is reconstructed as closure-equivalence. Boundary is defined non-spatially as first-entry dependency, and core is defined non-circularly as a closed non-boundary substructure. A physical entity is then defined as a boundary-stable closure-core equivalence class: a closed admissible structure whose core closure-identity is preserved under relevant boundary-mediated extensions. The paper uses familiar mathematical tools, including closure, equivalence, isomorphism, and invariance; its proposed contribution is not those tools themselves, but the ontological criterion they support.

•Jul 7, 2026•0 citations

Distinguishability Structures and the Exclusion of Collapse

Swarup

We introduce a minimal formal framework for encoding distinction without presupposing time, dynamics, refinement, interpretation, or representation. The framework consists of a carrier equipped with a primitive relation,interpreted minimally as distinguishability. Collapse is defined as the absenceof all distinction. We isolate non-collapse as a boundary condition and showthat, by itself, it entails almost no structure. We then introduce a singleadditional notion—admissible weakening—and prove that non-collapse ispreserved under admissible weakening if and only if at least one distinctionis irreducible. This establishes the minimal structural content forced byexclusion of collapse, without introducing dynamics, laws, or domain-specificassumptions.

•Feb 4, 2026•0 citations

The Informational Foundations of Physical Reality

Kevin Ellis-Anderson

This preprint presents a foundations-level analysis of physical description based on structural dependency rather than dynamical construction. Quantum mechanics, classical mechanics, and relativistic spacetime are treated as effective regimes arising under different structural conditions, rather than as competing ontologies. The analysis identifies persistence under interaction, irreversible constraint accumulation, stable relational structure, and interaction as minimal requirements for physical behaviour. Collapse is characterised as irreversible loss of compatibility between alternative continuations, without appeal to observers, stochastic dynamics, or additional postulates. Time is treated as structural ordering induced by exclusion, rather than as a primitive background parameter. No new dynamics are proposed and no empirically successful theories are modified. The aim is to clarify explanatory dependencies that underlie familiar physical regimes and to dissolve persistent foundational problems that arise when regime-level descriptions are misidentified as foundations.

•Jan 9, 2026•0 citations

Admissible Non-Injective Transitions as the Primitive of Physical Description

Jérôme Beau

Quantum mechanics is the effective theory of physically real unresolved admissible structures and their resolution. This paper establishes the minimal axiomatic foundation from which this claim follows: physical structure is derived from a single primitive, the local structure of admissible transitions between observable states. Four axioms govern this structure: local projective admissibility (A1), structural non-injectivity (A2), admissibility as non-premature selection (A3), and projection locking (A4). Along the transitions A2 asserts to be generically non-injective, A1 and A2 give immediate-image information loss and structural fluctuations; neither permanent non-recovery nor the arrow of time follows, since non-invertible steps admit cycles. From A3, we derive the proto-state as a physically real unresolved configuration shared between two successive states, and show that admissibility forces the retention of phase coherence. Under an explicit representation-theoretic reading of the admissible fibre, A3 forbids invariant factorisation and hence imposes irreducibility. For a carrier of dimension greater than one generated by a conjugate pair, irreducibility implies non-commutation. It does not, however, make the commutator central or select a finite Heisenberg group: an explicit $\mathfrak{S}_3$ countermodel satisfies the extracted carrier contract and violates that conclusion. The Heisenberg carrier used by the spectral programme therefore remains a supplied realisation, and must be distinguished from its associated Weil representation. From A4, we derive the discrete character of quantum transitions as a consequence of the interaction between continuous Born–Infeld saturation and the discrete shell structure of the observable space. The foundation is stated with the point at which it stops short of carrier selection.

•Apr 16, 2026•0 citations
This paper establishes a minimal formal foundation for structure under irreversibledistinguishability. Starting from a single primitive—distinction—we derive equivalence,refinement, irreversible loss, persistence, probability, Hilbert space structure, unitaryadmissible transformations, counting, and intrinsic temporal ordering. No physical,probabilistic, or dynamical axioms are assumed. Probability, time, and reversible evolution arise necessarily as constrained structures induced by unresolved refinement andirreversible elimination. The formal core is shown to be minimal, irreducible, andcomplete with respect to admissible structure under loss. This paper constitutes thefoundational core of a multi-paper series deriving physics, chemistry, biology, cognition,and society as successive constrained extensions of irreversible distinguishability.
We establish two foundational results concerning time and irreversibility within an operational framework where physical measurements correspond to distinguishable, persistent record states. First, we prove that no physical clock can ground time as a fundamental parameter: any clock-induced ordering necessarily reduces to a preorder defined by reachability among record states via admissible transformations. Second, we prove that bounded recording capacity forces accessible irreversibility: any system capable of recording more distinct events than its accessible register capacity must exhibit non-invertible operations at the accessible level. These results are derived without assuming time, entropy, or thermodynamic principles as primitives. Together, they establish that temporal structure and irreversibility are not independent physical laws but emerge from operational constraints on physical memory and distinguishability. The framework is compatible with globally unitary microscopic dynamics while explaining effective irreversibility for bounded observers. We conclude that time is a representational index for record structure rather than an ontological primitive , establishing the necessary foundation for the failure of deterministic prediction addressed in companion work [3]
Abstract We investigate the minimal structural conditions under which representational accessibility and irreversibility-like asymmetry arise in physical description. Starting solely from the existence of distinguishable states and a class of admissible transformations, we analyze how accessibility of distinctions changes under non-injective representational updates without introducing prior notions of space, time, probability, measurement, or thermodynamic structure.Admissible non-injective transformations naturally induce equivalence relations on the state space, leading to a distinction between manifest difference, corresponding to representationally accessible distinctions, and latent difference, corresponding to distinctions that remain structurally present but inaccessible within a given representation. We show that accessibility and recoverability of distinctions are determined intrinsically by the admissible transformation structure itself rather than by externally imposed observational limitations or representational scales.A central result of the framework is that irreversibility-like asymmetry arises when latent distinctions become non-recoverable within the admissible transformation class. In this perspective, irreversibility-like behavior is interpreted not as a consequence of probabilistic uncertainty or thermodynamic entropy increase, but as a structural restriction on recoverability of representational accessibility.The present work does not introduce new mathematical constructions. Rather, it provides a conceptual reinterpretation of equivalence structures, representational accessibility, and recoverability within a minimal framework of physical description. This framework identifies structural preconditions for accessibility restriction and recoverability failure prior to the introduction of statistical, thermodynamic, or observer-dependent assumptions.
Abstract This paper proposes a minimal formal criterion for physical entity. It does not attempt to derive quantum mechanics, general relativity, quantum gravity, or any empirical prediction. Its aim is narrower: to ask what formal conditions must be satisfied before a structure may be treated as a physical entity at all. The starting point is the principle of stable distinguishability: a physical theory is possible only where distinctions can be made and re-identified under admissible change. From this requirement, the paper develops a constraint-primacy framework in which no particle, field, spacetime point, state, measurement, or observable is assumed as primitive. The formal layer consists of tokens, admissibility, and a closure operator defined on the full power set of tokens. Identity is reconstructed as closure-equivalence. Boundary is defined non-spatially as first-entry dependency, and core is defined non-circularly as a closed non-boundary substructure. A physical entity is then defined as a boundary-stable closure-core equivalence class: a closed admissible structure whose core closure-identity is preserved under relevant boundary-mediated extensions. The paper uses familiar mathematical tools, including closure, equivalence, isomorphism, and invariance; its proposed contribution is not those tools themselves, but the ontological criterion they support.
We introduce a minimal formal framework for encoding distinction without presupposing time, dynamics, refinement, interpretation, or representation. The framework consists of a carrier equipped with a primitive relation,interpreted minimally as distinguishability. Collapse is defined as the absenceof all distinction. We isolate non-collapse as a boundary condition and showthat, by itself, it entails almost no structure. We then introduce a singleadditional notion—admissible weakening—and prove that non-collapse ispreserved under admissible weakening if and only if at least one distinctionis irreducible. This establishes the minimal structural content forced byexclusion of collapse, without introducing dynamics, laws, or domain-specificassumptions.
This preprint presents a foundations-level analysis of physical description based on structural dependency rather than dynamical construction. Quantum mechanics, classical mechanics, and relativistic spacetime are treated as effective regimes arising under different structural conditions, rather than as competing ontologies. The analysis identifies persistence under interaction, irreversible constraint accumulation, stable relational structure, and interaction as minimal requirements for physical behaviour. Collapse is characterised as irreversible loss of compatibility between alternative continuations, without appeal to observers, stochastic dynamics, or additional postulates. Time is treated as structural ordering induced by exclusion, rather than as a primitive background parameter. No new dynamics are proposed and no empirically successful theories are modified. The aim is to clarify explanatory dependencies that underlie familiar physical regimes and to dissolve persistent foundational problems that arise when regime-level descriptions are misidentified as foundations.
Quantum mechanics is the effective theory of physically real unresolved admissible structures and their resolution. This paper establishes the minimal axiomatic foundation from which this claim follows: physical structure is derived from a single primitive, the local structure of admissible transitions between observable states. Four axioms govern this structure: local projective admissibility (A1), structural non-injectivity (A2), admissibility as non-premature selection (A3), and projection locking (A4). Along the transitions A2 asserts to be generically non-injective, A1 and A2 give immediate-image information loss and structural fluctuations; neither permanent non-recovery nor the arrow of time follows, since non-invertible steps admit cycles. From A3, we derive the proto-state as a physically real unresolved configuration shared between two successive states, and show that admissibility forces the retention of phase coherence. Under an explicit representation-theoretic reading of the admissible fibre, A3 forbids invariant factorisation and hence imposes irreducibility. For a carrier of dimension greater than one generated by a conjugate pair, irreducibility implies non-commutation. It does not, however, make the commutator central or select a finite Heisenberg group: an explicit S3\mathfrak{S}_3S3​ countermodel satisfies the extracted carrier contract and violates that conclusion. The Heisenberg carrier used by the spectral programme therefore remains a supplied realisation, and must be distinguished from its associated Weil representation. From A4, we derive the discrete character of quantum transitions as a consequence of the interaction between continuous Born–Infeld saturation and the discrete shell structure of the observable space. The foundation is stated with the point at which it stops short of carrier selection.