Quantum non-locality and quantum contextuality result from the impossibility of explain- ing the probabilities of measurement outcomes in quantum systems using theoretical mod- els that assume that observables have well-defined values prior to the measurement, and that these values do not depend on which other compatible measurements are performed simultaneously to the measurement. These two features are not only of foundational im- portance for quantum theory, but are also recognized as resources for quantum computing and other applications. The experimental verification of contextuality has garnered significant attention, and its recognition as an operational resource for quantum information is expected to further fuel this interest. Developing a robust theoretical framework for contextuality that is both operationally grounded and experimentally applicable is crucial. Particularly, real-world experiments often violate the non-disturbance assumption, requiring alternative frame- works that remain effective under such conditions. This dissertation builds upon a recent work by Renou et.al, which explores how dif- ferent variants of a Bell inequality, despite being equivalent under the condition of no- signaling, are not equally robust in real experiments. In order to do so, they propose a method which employs the group of symmetries of a Bell scenario to analyze and op- timize the robustness of Bell inequalities. The primary goal of this dissertation is to generalize this method to contextuality scenarios, exploring the role of group representa- tion theory in optimizing inequalities, and enhancing both theoretical understanding and experimental applicability.
Quantum non-locality and quantum contextuality result from the impossibility of explain- ing the probabilities of measurement outcomes in quantum systems using theoretical mod- els that assume that observables have well-defined values prior to the measurement, and that these values do not depend on which other compatible measurements are performed simultaneously to the measurement. These two features are not only of foundational im- portance for quantum theory, but are also recognized as resources for quantum computing and other applications. The experimental verification of contextuality has garnered significant attention, and its recognition as an operational resource for quantum information is expected to further fuel this interest. Developing a robust theoretical framework for contextuality that is both operationally grounded and experimentally applicable is crucial. Particularly, real-world experiments often violate the non-disturbance assumption, requiring alternative frame- works that remain effective under such conditions. This dissertation builds upon a recent work by Renou et.al, which explores how dif- ferent variants of a Bell inequality, despite being equivalent under the condition of no- signaling, are not equally robust in real experiments. In order to do so, they propose a method which employs the group of symmetries of a Bell scenario to analyze and op- timize the robustness of Bell inequalities. The primary goal of this dissertation is to generalize this method to contextuality scenarios, exploring the role of group representa- tion theory in optimizing inequalities, and enhancing both theoretical understanding and experimental applicability.
Contextuality is a feature of quantum correlations. It is crucial from a foundational perspective as a non-classical phenomenon, and from an applied perspective as a resource for quantum advantage. It is commonly defined in terms of hidden variables, for which it forces a contradiction with the assumptions of parameter-independence and determinism. The former can be justified by the empirical property of non-signalling or non-disturbance, and the latter by the empirical property of measurement sharpness. However, in realistic experiments neither empirical property holds exactly, which leads to possible objections to contextuality as a form of non-classicality, and potential vulnerabilities for supposed quantum advantages. We introduce measures to quantify both properties, and introduce quantified relaxations of the corresponding assumptions. We prove the continuity of a known measure of contextuality, the contextual fraction, which ensures its robustness to noise. We then bound the extent to which these relaxations can account for contextuality, via corrections terms to the contextual fraction (or to any non-contextuality inequality), culminating in a notion of genuine contextuality, which is robust to experimental imperfections. We then show that our result is general enough to apply or relate to a variety of established results and experimental set-ups. This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum contextuality, causality and freedom of choice'.
Contextuality provides a unifying paradigm for nonclassical aspects of quantum probabilities and resources of quantum information. Unfortunately, most forms of quantum contextuality remain experimentally unexplored due to the difficulty of performing sequences of projective measurements on individual quantum systems. Here we show that two-point correlations between binary compatible observables are sufficient to reveal any form of contextuality. This allows us to design simple experiments that are more robust against imperfections and easier to analyze, thus opening the door for observing interesting forms of contextuality, including those requiring quantum systems of high dimensions. In addition, it allows us to connect contextuality to communication complexity scenarios and reformulate a recent result relating contextuality and quantum computation.
Nonlocality and contextuality are at the root of conceptual puzzles in quantum mechanics, and are key resources for quantum advantage in information-processing tasks. Bell nonlocality is best understood as the incompatibility between quantum correlations and the classical theory of causality, applied to relativistic causal structure. Contextuality, on the other hand, is on a more controversial foundation. In this work, I provide a common conceptual ground between nonlocality and contextuality as violations of classical causality. First, I show that Bell inequalities can be derived solely from the assumptions of no-signalling and no-fine-tuning of the causal model. This removes two extra assumptions from a recent result from Wood and Spekkens, and remarkably, does not require any assumption related to independence of measurement settings -- unlike all other derivations of Bell inequalities. I then introduce a formalism to represent contextuality scenarios within causal models and show that all classical causal models for violations of a Kochen-Specker inequality require fine-tuning. Thus the quantum violation of classical causality goes beyond the case of space-like separated systems, and manifests already in scenarios involving single systems.
The descriptions of the quantum realm and the macroscopic classical world di�er signi
�cantly not only in their mathematical formulations, but also in their foundational concepts
and philosophical consequences. The assumptions of local realism, non-contextuality
and macroscopic realism (macro-realism) along with the quantum mechanical violations
of these assumptions are discussed.
A complete generalization is provided of Wigner's argument inferring quantum nonlocality,
originally restricted for the EPR-Bohm entangled state, based on assuming joint
probability distributions for all the relevant dichotomic observables. Such Generalized
Wigner Inequality (GWI) turns out to be the N-partite local realist inequality which is
violated by quantum mechanics for all pure entangled states for any N.
We then exploit the non-trivial manifestation of quantum non-locality via local contextuality
on three qubit system. Here, we propose an experimental scheme to realize this
feature by deriving a new local realist inequality. The way quantum entanglement can
be used for global contextual value assigning is discussed in a quantum pseudo-telepathy
game.
In the second part of this report, we formulate Leggett-Garg inequality (LGI) in terms
of joint probability and demonstrate its quantum mechanical violation for two state oscillation,
which is initial state dependent, unlike the case of standard LGI. It has been
shown that, the newly formulated LGI reveals robustness against unsharp measurement
for testing compatibility between macro-realism and quantum mechanics. Finally we
show that, the recently proposed No-signaling in time condition, contradicts with quantum
mechanical predictions for any degree of unsharpness in measurement.
Among the various "no-go theorems" in the foundations of quantum mechanics, Bell inequalities are among the few, which do not implicitly rely on the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. Instead, Bell inequalities are commonly understood to rest on Kolmogorov's theory of probability and a "locality" assumption. Physical evidence supporting their violation is hence taken as evidence against at least one of these two assumptions.
This work provides a comprehensive analysis of the physical debate on Bell inequalities from the point of view of Kolmogorov's theory of probability, focusing on the Bell-Clauser-Horn-Shimony-Holt inequality (BCHSH inequality). The central contribution is the motivation and mathematical study of the notion of contextuality in Bell experiments: in so-called contextual Bell models the detectors themselves behave randomly and the distribution of the random detector parameters depends on the chosen detector settings. It is shown how even "classical" Bell experiments motivate such a description. The need to account for contextuality was pointed out before by de la Peña, Cetto, Brody, Lochak, Bohm, Hiley and others. A broad class of contextual models is proven to satisfy the BCHSH inequality, thereby generalizing a previous result by Gill and Lambare. Nonetheless, even under strong locality requirements, contextual Bell models may violate the BCHSH inequality: based on work by Popescu and Rohrlich, we consider a "proof of concept" example exhibiting the maximum possible violation.
Contrary to the much debated "loopholes" in empirical tests of Bell inequalities, contextuality thus reveals a conceptual misunderstanding in the physical conclusions commonly drawn from Bell inequality violations.
Non-locality and contextuality are key features of quantum mechanics that distinguish it from classical physics. We aim to develop a deeper, more structural understanding of these phenomena, underpinned by robust and elegant mathematical theory with a view to providing clarity and new perspectives on conceptual and foundational issues. A general framework for logical non-locality is introduced and used to prove that 'Hardy's paradox' is complete for logical non-locality in all (2,2,l) and (2,k,2) Bell scenarios, a consequence of which is that Bell states are the only entangled two-qubit states that are not logically non-local, and that Hardy non-locality can be witnessed with certainty in a tripartite quantum system. A number of developments of the unified sheaf-theoretic approach to non-locality and contextuality are considered, including the first application of cohomology as a tool for studying the phenomena: we find cohomological witnesses corresponding to many of the classic no-go results, and completely characterise contextuality for large families of Kochen-Specker-like models. A connection with the problem of the existence of perfect matchings in k-uniform hypergraphs is explored, leading to new results on the complexity of deciding contextuality. A refinement of the sheaf-theoretic approach is found that captures partial approximations to locality/non-contextuality and can allow Bell models to be constructed from models of more general kinds which are equivalent in terms of non-locality/contextuality. Progress is made on bringing recent results on the nature of the wavefunction within the scope of the logical and sheaf-theoretic methods. Computational tools are developed for quantifying contextuality and finding generalised Bell inequalities for any measurement scenario which complement the research programme. This also leads to a proof that local ontological models with `negative probabilities' generate the no-signalling polytopes for all Bell scenarios.