Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Supplement Number 1

Yuchen Han, Hongliang Wu, Hao Wu, Mark Oxborrow, W. Li, Yeliang Wang, Dezhi Zheng, Dmitry Budker, Bo Zhang, Jun Zhang

Published Jan 5, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The document contains 8 sections and 2 figures. S1: Responsivity and sensitivity calculations; S2: Relationship between gain and frequency; S3: S−parameter measurements; S4: SQL of our system; S5: Qualitative analysis to enhance sensitivity; S6: Parameters and initial conditions determination in the dynamics simulation; S7: Modelling of the spin dynamics in heterodyne detection; S8: Evaluation of noise temperature.

DOI
10.60893/figshare.apr.30936335

Related papers

Probing entanglement in a many-body-localized system

Lukin, Alexander, Matthew Rispoli, Robert Schittko +6 more

This repository contains the data presented in the manuscript.\n\nMain text figures: \n\n\n\tFig.2D.xlsx\n\tFig.2E.xlsx\n\tFig.3A.xlsx\n\tFig.3B.xlsx\n\tFig.3C.xlsx\n\tFig.4B.xlsx\n\tFig.4C.xlsx\n\tFig.5A.xlsx\n\tFig.5B.xlsx\n\n\nSupplementary materials:\n\n\n\tFig.S2.xlsx\n\tFig.S4.xlsx\n\tFig.S5.xlsx\n\tFig.S6.xlsx\n\tFig.S7.xlsx\n\tFig.S8.xlsx\n\tFig.S10.xlsx\n\tFig.S11.xlsx\n\tFig.S12.xlsx\n

•Feb 20, 2019•0 citations

Quantum effects and optimization of heterodyne detection

Michael Austin Johnson, Charles Hard Townes

Optics Communications•May 1, 2000•7 citations

Quantum Spectrodynamics (QSD)

Marek Hubka

Quantum Spectrodynamics (QSD) is a framework for deriving physical dynamics from eigenvalue spectra of quantum error correction codes. Its starting point is an observation: The universe is suspiciously stable. An isolated qubit in the best laboratory on Earth decoheres in microseconds. A warm, dense, radiation-bathed universe has maintained coherent, lawful, persistent structure for 13.8 billion years — the same particles, the same couplings, the same interference phenomena, everywhere we look. Quantum states are fragile; the quantum universe is not. Physics knows exactly one class of systems that preserve quantum information against continuous noise: error-corrected ones. QSD takes that observation as its single structural axiom: (L0) The universe is a quantum error-correcting code $[[n,k,d]]_q$ — with all four parameters initially unknown. Everything else is derivation. The code parameters are selected, not chosen: a seven-step exclusion chain plus Landauer's thermodynamic principle single out the perfect five-qubit code $[[5,1,3]]_2$ as the unique minimal, thermodynamically ground-state solution. The selected code's geometry then fixes three constants, and those constants fix the dynamics. QSD is a framework for deriving physical dynamics — not, specifically, a model of the Standard Model. The Standard Model sector (gauge couplings, masses) is its first worked application (v1.0, this repository's original release); the same machinery derives the code-selection theorem itself and gravitational dynamics (Phase 2, releasing incrementally as v2.x). - Holographic bit density $Hb_4 = 1/(4 \ln 2)$ — from $K_4$ (the $n−k = 4$ stabiliser/face count; the Bekenstein–Hawking factor 4 is a consequence) - Spectral bond $ϖ = π φ²$ — from $C_5$ (spectral class ratio $φ²$) - Geometric strain $ς = 3/(80 φ²)$ — from $K_4 ∪ C_5$ (the frustration of the two geometries; the framework's small parameter) Symbol Observable QSD Prediction Experimental Value Agreement $\alpha^{-1}$ Fine structure constant $137.033$ $137.036$ $-21.7$ ppm $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ Strong coupling at $M_Z$ $3π/80 = 0.11781$ $0.1180 \pm 0.0009$ $0.16\%$ $\sin^2\theta_W$ Weak mixing angle $0.23122$ $0.23122 \pm 0.00003$ $< 0.01\%$ $m_H$ Higgs boson mass $126.7$ GeV $125.25$ GeV $1.3\%$ $E_{\mathrm{syn}}$ Snap energy $28.24$ GeV $\sim 28$ GeV* $0.2\%$ * falsifiable 28.24 GeV snap energy coinciding with the CMS dimuon excess at ~28.3 GeV (CMS-PAS-HIG-20-009) A modular record This record grows by parts. Each version adds a self-contained paper with its supplements as a new section; published sources are never rewritten. Part 0 — Phase 1: the Standard Model sector (v1.0, March 2026) Main preprint (quantum_spectrodynamics) + supplements S1–S7 + technical note TN-1, with the computational validation suite and interactive visualizations. S1 formal proofs · S2 energy scale · S3 Lagrangian · S4 topological renormalization (α⁻¹) · S5 the 28 GeV prediction & proton stability · S6 string correspondence · S7 cosmological constant · TN-1 Hb notation. Part 1 — Phase 2, Paper 1: code selection (v2.0, July 2026) P1 — The QECC Selection Theorem (qsd2_p1_code_selection): why $[[5,1,3]]_2$ and nothing else — the seven-step exclusion chain from L0 plus Landauer's principle as the thermodynamic selector. With supplements: S8 — Crossing errors and Deutsch CTCs (qsd2_s8_crossing_ctc): the crossing-error channel is a Deutsch closed timelike curve; fixed-point consistency and its forensic record. S9 — The observer (qsd2_s9_observer): the observer as a code-internal structure; measurement as syndrome extraction. Supplement numbering is programme-wide (S1–S7 phase 1, S8+ phase 2). *(Future parts: P2 node & triad $→$ v2.1 · P3 lattice $→$ v2.2 · P4 transition $→$ v2.3 · P5 Einstein equations $→$ v2.4, each with its supplements. The derivation-walkthrough series and the QSD wiki knowledge base are slated for v3.)* Files on this record - quantum_spectrodynamics.pdf — main preprint (start here) - qsd2_p1_code_selection.pdf — Phase 2 Paper 1 (v2.0 entry document) - qsd2_s8_crossing_ctc.pdf — S8 crossing errors and Deutsch CTCs - qsd2_s9_observer.pdf — S9 the observer within QSD - qsd_pdfs.zip — v1 +v2 + the v1 errata, as PDFs - qsd_v2.0_full.zip — complete repository snapshot (sources, code, visualization) Epistemic transparency Phase 2 documents tag every major claim: [R] rigorous (derived from L0 + established mathematics) [C+] well-supported conjecture (named external premise) [T] thermodynamic principle (empirical) [EXP] exploratory/speculative [O] open problem Phase 1 used the coarser Derived/Constructed/Open scheme; the mapping is one-to-one. Known corrections to published sources are collected in the v1 errata (ships with v2.0); published files themselves stay frozen. Version history Version Date Adds v1.0.0 2026-03 Phase 1: main preprint, S1–S7, TN-1, code, visualizations v2.0.0 2026-09 Phase 2 Part 1: P1 code selection, S8, S9; unified preamble & bibliography; v1 errata; repository restructure (manuscripts/supplements/derivations)

•Mar 3, 2026•0 citations

Homodyne and Heterodyne Detection

Ray LaPierre

Undergraduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Hopf Fibrations as Topological Framework for Qubit Entanglement — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: The Hopf fibration (S³→S²) is the topological backbone of single-qubit Bloch sphere geometry, and its generalization to multi-qubit entangled states via higher-dimensional Hopf fibrations reveals a nested sphere structure where entanglement corresponds to specific fiber/base decompositions. | MATH: Single qubit: S³ ≅ SU(2) ≅ Hopf fiber bundle S¹ ↪ S³ → S² (base = Bloch sphere, fiber = U(1) phase). For 2 qubits: S⁷ → S⁴ (Hopf fibration with S³ fibers) — the arXiv paper (quant-ph/0108137v1) explicitly constructs entangled-state geometry via S⁷ → S⁴, where the S³ fiber encodes relative phase and the S⁴ base encodes the joint probability amplitudes. Key invariants: Hopf invariant H = 1 for the S³→S² map (linking number of any two fibers = 1); for S⁷→S⁴, the Hopf invariant is also 1 (the only higher-dimensional Hopf maps with fiber S³, S⁷, S¹⁵ exist in dimensions 2, 4, 8 — tied to normed division algebras ℝ, ℂ, ℍ, 𝕆). | CONNECTION: The Hopf fibration's base S² is the Riemann sphere Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Oct 4, 2026•0 citations

Statistics of balanced homodyne detection

W. Vogel, Jens Grabow

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•May 10, 1992•0 citations
The document contains 8 sections and 2 figures. S1: Responsivity and sensitivity calculations; S2: Relationship between gain and frequency; S3: S−parameter measurements; S4: SQL of our system; S5: Qualitative analysis to enhance sensitivity; S6: Parameters and initial conditions determination in the dynamics simulation; S7: Modelling of the spin dynamics in heterodyne detection; S8: Evaluation of noise temperature.
Quantum Spectrodynamics (QSD) is a framework for deriving physical dynamics from eigenvalue spectra of quantum error correction codes. Its starting point is an observation: The universe is suspiciously stable. An isolated qubit in the best laboratory on Earth decoheres in microseconds. A warm, dense, radiation-bathed universe has maintained coherent, lawful, persistent structure for 13.8 billion years — the same particles, the same couplings, the same interference phenomena, everywhere we look. Quantum states are fragile; the quantum universe is not. Physics knows exactly one class of systems that preserve quantum information against continuous noise: error-corrected ones. QSD takes that observation as its single structural axiom: (L0) The universe is a quantum error-correcting code [[n,k,d]]q[[n,k,d]]_q[[n,k,d]]q​ — with all four parameters initially unknown. Everything else is derivation. The code parameters are selected, not chosen: a seven-step exclusion chain plus Landauer's thermodynamic principle single out the perfect five-qubit code [[5,1,3]]2[[5,1,3]]_2[[5,1,3]]2​ as the unique minimal, thermodynamically ground-state solution. The selected code's geometry then fixes three constants, and those constants fix the dynamics. QSD is a framework for deriving physical dynamics — not, specifically, a model of the Standard Model. The Standard Model sector (gauge couplings, masses) is its first worked application (v1.0, this repository's original release); the same machinery derives the code-selection theorem itself and gravitational dynamics (Phase 2, releasing incrementally as v2.x). - Holographic bit density Hb4=1/(4ln⁡2)Hb_4 = 1/(4 \ln 2)Hb4​=1/(4ln2) — from K4K_4K4​ (the n−k=4n−k = 4n−k=4 stabiliser/face count; the Bekenstein–Hawking factor 4 is a consequence) - Spectral bond ϖ=πφ2ϖ = π φ²ϖ=πφ2 — from C5C_5C5​ (spectral class ratio φ2φ²φ2) - Geometric strain ς=3/(80φ2)ς = 3/(80 φ²)ς=3/(80φ2) — from K4∪C5K_4 ∪ C_5K4​∪C5​ (the frustration of the two geometries; the framework's small parameter) Symbol Observable QSD Prediction Experimental Value Agreement α−1\alpha^{-1}α−1 Fine structure constant 137.033137.033137.033 137.036137.036137.036 −21.7-21.7−21.7 ppm αs(MZ)\alpha_s(M_Z)αs​(MZ​) Strong coupling at MZM_ZMZ​ 3π/80=0.117813π/80 = 0.117813π/80=0.11781 0.1180±0.00090.1180 \pm 0.00090.1180±0.0009 0.16%0.16\%0.16% sin⁡2θW\sin^2\theta_Wsin2θW​ Weak mixing angle 0.231220.231220.23122 0.23122±0.000030.23122 \pm 0.000030.23122±0.00003 <0.01%< 0.01\%<0.01% mHm_HmH​ Higgs boson mass 126.7126.7126.7 GeV 125.25125.25125.25 GeV 1.3%1.3\%1.3% EsynE_{\mathrm{syn}}Esyn​ Snap energy 28.2428.2428.24 GeV ∼28\sim 28∼28 GeV* 0.2%0.2\%0.2% * falsifiable 28.24 GeV snap energy coinciding with the CMS dimuon excess at ~28.3 GeV (CMS-PAS-HIG-20-009) A modular record This record grows by parts. Each version adds a self-contained paper with its supplements as a new section; published sources are never rewritten. Part 0 — Phase 1: the Standard Model sector (v1.0, March 2026) Main preprint (quantum_spectrodynamics) + supplements S1–S7 + technical note TN-1, with the computational validation suite and interactive visualizations. S1 formal proofs · S2 energy scale · S3 Lagrangian · S4 topological renormalization (α⁻¹) · S5 the 28 GeV prediction & proton stability · S6 string correspondence · S7 cosmological constant · TN-1 Hb notation. Part 1 — Phase 2, Paper 1: code selection (v2.0, July 2026) P1 — The QECC Selection Theorem (qsd2_p1_code_selection): why [[5,1,3]]2[[5,1,3]]_2[[5,1,3]]2​ and nothing else — the seven-step exclusion chain from L0 plus Landauer's principle as the thermodynamic selector. With supplements: S8 — Crossing errors and Deutsch CTCs (qsd2_s8_crossing_ctc): the crossing-error channel is a Deutsch closed timelike curve; fixed-point consistency and its forensic record. S9 — The observer (qsd2_s9_observer): the observer as a code-internal structure; measurement as syndrome extraction. Supplement numbering is programme-wide (S1–S7 phase 1, S8+ phase 2). *(Future parts: P2 node & triad →→→ v2.1 · P3 lattice →→→ v2.2 · P4 transition →→→ v2.3 · P5 Einstein equations →→→ v2.4, each with its supplements. The derivation-walkthrough series and the QSD wiki knowledge base are slated for v3.)* Files on this record - quantum_spectrodynamics.pdf — main preprint (start here) - qsd2_p1_code_selection.pdf — Phase 2 Paper 1 (v2.0 entry document) - qsd2_s8_crossing_ctc.pdf — S8 crossing errors and Deutsch CTCs - qsd2_s9_observer.pdf — S9 the observer within QSD - qsd_pdfs.zip — v1 +v2 + the v1 errata, as PDFs - qsd_v2.0_full.zip — complete repository snapshot (sources, code, visualization) Epistemic transparency Phase 2 documents tag every major claim: [R] rigorous (derived from L0 + established mathematics) [C+] well-supported conjecture (named external premise) [T] thermodynamic principle (empirical) [EXP] exploratory/speculative [O] open problem Phase 1 used the coarser Derived/Constructed/Open scheme; the mapping is one-to-one. Known corrections to published sources are collected in the v1 errata (ships with v2.0); published files themselves stay frozen. Version history Version Date Adds v1.0.0 2026-03 Phase 1: main preprint, S1–S7, TN-1, code, visualizations v2.0.0 2026-09 Phase 2 Part 1: P1 code selection, S8, S9; unified preamble & bibliography; v1 errata; repository restructure (manuscripts/supplements/derivations)
FINDING: The Hopf fibration (S³→S²) is the topological backbone of single-qubit Bloch sphere geometry, and its generalization to multi-qubit entangled states via higher-dimensional Hopf fibrations reveals a nested sphere structure where entanglement corresponds to specific fiber/base decompositions. | MATH: Single qubit: S³ ≅ SU(2) ≅ Hopf fiber bundle S¹ ↪ S³ → S² (base = Bloch sphere, fiber = U(1) phase). For 2 qubits: S⁷ → S⁴ (Hopf fibration with S³ fibers) — the arXiv paper (quant-ph/0108137v1) explicitly constructs entangled-state geometry via S⁷ → S⁴, where the S³ fiber encodes relative phase and the S⁴ base encodes the joint probability amplitudes. Key invariants: Hopf invariant H = 1 for the S³→S² map (linking number of any two fibers = 1); for S⁷→S⁴, the Hopf invariant is also 1 (the only higher-dimensional Hopf maps with fiber S³, S⁷, S¹⁵ exist in dimensions 2, 4, 8 — tied to normed division algebras ℝ, ℂ, ℍ, 𝕆). | CONNECTION: The Hopf fibration's base S² is the Riemann sphere Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com