Stratified Electron Fields and Cross-Layer Propagation

Robert Bobo Ostojić

Published Dec 29, 2025• 0 citations

Abstract

Description / Summary This work proposes a structural reinterpretation of electron behavior in which quantum phenomena arise from stratified field organization rather than point-particle dynamics evolving in linear time. By treating the electron as a coherent field pattern distributed across discrete structural layers, quantum effects such as probabilistic outcomes, apparent non-locality, and limits of quantum computation are understood as consequences of cross-layer interaction and accessibility. The approach preserves established physical formalisms while offering a unifying conceptual framework that clarifies measurement, vacuum effects, and computational constraints without introducing new particles, forces, or speculative mechanisms.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18087610

Related papers

Stratified Electron Fields and Cross-Layer Propagation

Robert Bobo Ostojić

Jan 1, 20250 citations

QUANTUM TUNNELING RE-INTERPRETATION

Robert Bobo Ostojić

This work presents a structural reinterpretation of quantum tunneling based on stratified electron-field continuity. Potential barriers are described as suppression zones that selectively attenuate electron-field strata rather than blocking particles. Tunneling emerges as coherent field propagation across stratified layers, offering a deterministic and physically intuitive alternative to probabilistic transmission models.

Dec 30, 20250 citations

QUANTUM TUNNELING RE-INTERPRETATION

Robert Bobo Ostojić

Jan 1, 20250 citations

A Structural Interpretation of the Electron in Terms of Coherence and Resonance

Henrik Nilsson

This work presents a structural interpretation of the electron in which its fundamental properties—charge, spin, and interaction—are derived from coherence structure rather than introduced as intrinsic postulates. The electron is described as a stable resonance configuration within a coherence-based field framework, allowing a unified physical interpretation of electromagnetic interaction, electron correlation, and atomic structure. A key aspect of the model is that the electron is not fully confined to three-dimensional space, but extends along an internal coherence dimension. Observable behavior is interpreted as a projection of this deeper structure, providing a structural basis for delocalization, tunneling, and orbital formation. Within this framework, charge arises from asymmetry in lateral coherence, while spin is understood as an internal phase-topological property. Electron–electron interaction is described in terms of coherence interference, offering a structural explanation for repulsion, pairing, and exclusion behavior. Electromagnetic phenomena are interpreted as coherence dynamics: fields correspond to continuous structure, while photons are treated as localized propagating excitations. This provides a unified but differentiated description of electromagnetic interaction. The framework is consistent with established theoretical descriptions while providing a physically interpretable basis for electron structure and its role in electromagnetism and atomic systems. It aims to clarify conceptual foundations rather than replace existing predictive models, and establishes a basis for further work in atomic structure and chemical behavior.

Apr 12, 20260 citations

Global Realization Without Propagation: A Structural Model of Interference Beyond Local Dynamics

Luka Gluvić

This work addresses the long-standing claim that interference phenomena—most notably in double-slit–type experiments—cannot be physically modeled without invoking wave propagation or particles following multiple trajectories. We show that this claim rests on an implicit restriction to local, dynamical descriptions acting between emission and detection. We introduce a minimal framework in which detection events are treated as discrete realizations occurring at an absorbing boundary, while the observed interference pattern arises from global structural admissibility constraints of the full experimental configuration. The model does not attempt to generate or predict individual detection events. Instead, it characterizes the statistical distribution of outcomes as a property of realization closure rather than of local evolution in transit. Within this approach, interference patterns are understood as emergent statistical signatures of global realization structure, not as evidence of propagating waves, hidden variables, or oscillatory dynamics in space. The framework preserves all empirical features of standard interference experiments while avoiding assumptions about intermediate physical processes that are neither observed nor required by theory. This work is consistent with relativistic and quantum no-go results concerning photon trajectories, localization, and in-flight observables. It complements earlier structural interpretations of light and realization by providing a concrete, physically explicit model demonstrating how stable interference statistics arise without propagation. The contribution clarifies the precise sense in which interference is modelable, and the sense in which it is not: individual events remain intrinsically unpredictable, while their global organization is physically intelligible at the level of realization structure. The model introduces no new forces, fields, or modifications of established equations, and is intended as a refinement of conceptual foundations rather than a replacement of existing formalisms.

Feb 21, 20260 citations

Light as Structural Reorganization of the Electromagnetic Field

Luka Gluvić

This work develops a structural framework in which light is understood not as a propagating particle or wave, but as a process of electromagnetic field reorganization constrained by geometry and material conditions.Emission is treated as a local disruption of field coherence rather than the creation of a traveling entity. Between emission and absorption, the field enters an open, pre-realizational phase in which no localized physical event occurs. Geometry, material boundaries, and environmental structure act as physical selectors that restrict admissible field configurations. A photon is realized only at absorption, as the localized closure of this open field organization.The framework integrates established empirical phenomena — including spontaneous emission, interference with single quanta, cavity quantum electrodynamics, detector discreteness, and mirror behavior — into a single causal architecture, without introducing new field equations or modifying the formalism of Maxwellian electrodynamics or quantum electrodynamics.The speed of light is interpreted as a structural limit governing the maximal rate at which coherent field organization can be maintained across spatial separation, rather than as the velocity of a transported object. The work further identifies a continuity between quantum and gravitational regimes, in which both emerge from a common phase structure but correspond to different domains of realizability.The proposal is structural rather than dynamical in scope. It does not introduce new laws or entities, but specifies where and when physical events are taken to occur within existing electromagnetic theory, thereby providing a unified physical account of emission, interference, reflection, and photon detection.

Jan 22, 20260 citations