Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Journal of Supercomputing

HQWGAN: a hybrid quantum–classical Wasserstein generative adversarial network for image generation

Qi Han, Yihan Xu, Hao Wang, Abdullah Gani, Lip Yee Por

Published Dec 25, 2025• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11227-025-08172-z

Related papers

Hybrid quantum–classical generative adversarial networks for image generation via learning discrete distribution

Nanrun Zhou, Tianfeng Zhang, Xin-Wen Xie +1 more

Signal Processing Image Communication•Nov 1, 2022•162 citations

iHQGAN: A lightweight invertible hybrid quantum-classical generative adversarial networks for unsupervised image-to-image translation

Yang Xue, Ri‐Gui Zhou, Shizheng Jia +6 more

Expert Systems with Applications•Jul 2, 2025•3 citations

A hybrid quantum-classical generative adversarial networks algorithm based on inherited layerwise learning with circle-connectivity circuit

Wenjie Liu, Jiaojiao Zhao, Qingshan Wu

Quantum Information Processing•Nov 9, 2022•6 citations

A Hybrid Quantum–Classical Generative Adversarial Network for Synthetic Medical Data Generation and Disease Diagnosis

P.Mano Paul, Ruchitha K, Monish R +3 more

•Sep 1, 2026•0 citations

Hybrid quantum-classical schemes for generative adversarial learning: HQGANs

Jonathan Romero, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 5, 2019•1 citation

Anomaly detection with variational quantum generative adversarial networks

Daniel Herr, Benjamin Obert, Matthias Rosenkranz

Abstract Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are a machine learning framework comprising a generative model for sampling from a target distribution and a discriminative model for evaluating the proximity of a sample to the target distribution. GANs exhibit strong performance in imaging or anomaly detection. However, they suffer from training instabilities, and sampling efficiency may be limited by the classical sampling procedure. We introduce variational quantum–classical Wasserstein GANs (WGANs) to address these issues and embed this model in a classical machine learning framework for anomaly detection. Classical WGANs improve training stability by using a cost function better suited for gradient descent. Our model replaces the generator of WGANs with a hybrid quantum–classical neural net and leaves the classical discriminative model unchanged. This way, high-dimensional classical data only enters the classical model and need not be prepared in a quantum circuit. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method on a credit card fraud dataset. For this dataset our method shows performance on par with classical methods in terms of the F 1 score. We analyze the influence of the circuit ansatz, layer width and depth, neural net architecture parameter initialization strategy, and sampling noise on convergence and performance.

arXiv:2010.10492•Quantum Science and Technology•Jun 21, 2021•71 citations
Abstract Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are a machine learning framework comprising a generative model for sampling from a target distribution and a discriminative model for evaluating the proximity of a sample to the target distribution. GANs exhibit strong performance in imaging or anomaly detection. However, they suffer from training instabilities, and sampling efficiency may be limited by the classical sampling procedure. We introduce variational quantum–classical Wasserstein GANs (WGANs) to address these issues and embed this model in a classical machine learning framework for anomaly detection. Classical WGANs improve training stability by using a cost function better suited for gradient descent. Our model replaces the generator of WGANs with a hybrid quantum–classical neural net and leaves the classical discriminative model unchanged. This way, high-dimensional classical data only enters the classical model and need not be prepared in a quantum circuit. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method on a credit card fraud dataset. For this dataset our method shows performance on par with classical methods in terms of the F 1 score. We analyze the influence of the circuit ansatz, layer width and depth, neural net architecture parameter initialization strategy, and sampling noise on convergence and performance.