Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

2025-11-03_RFT_One_Law_for_All_Coherence_A_Unified_Framework_for_Classical_Physiological_and_Quantum_Systems_RFT_8.0_Bridge_Edition

Clinton Svancara

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We present a single reduced law governing coherence across all scales: ˙R c = −λRc + Fint From metronomes to qubits, neurons to lasers — the field is the constant; the travelers vary. Full proofs in RFT-2 / RGT-2. Contents 1 From Observation to Proof 2 2 Continuity & Conservation 2 3 Cross-Scale Demonstration 2 4 Prediction Table 3 5 Path to Proof Provenance: Originally published on Zenodo (Oct- 2025). 10.5281/zenodo.17509325

DOI
10.17605/osf.io/67fbp

Related papers

2025-08-10_RFT_Relational_Field_Theory_and_Quantum_Computing_Coherence_Dynamics_as_a_Path_to_Robust_Architectures

Clinton Svancara

Relational Field Theory (RFT) models quantum computing as emergent coherence dynamics, reframing qubits, entanglement, and decoherence as phenomena of residue fields 𝑅𝑐 (𝑥, 𝑡). Unlike conventional hardware-dependent approaches, RFT offers a complementary perspective, suggesting coherence stabilization via minimal 𝜆(𝑥, 𝑡), potentially easing environmental constraints. Qubit states and entanglement arise from 𝑅𝑐 (𝑥, 𝑡) configurations, while decoherence is expressed as residue field decay via 𝜆(𝑥, 𝑡). This framework complements existing quantum architectures and proposes testable alternatives to current hardware limits. We predict measurable residue anomalies in Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) (Δ𝑅𝑐 = (1.0 ± 0.2) × 1029 J/m3) and potential signatures in hybrid quantum-classical systems, offering a roadmap for testing RFT’s relevance to quantum information processing. We invite experimental scrutiny to explore whether coherence dynamics can unify quantum computing, thermodynamics, and cosmology under a single framework Provenance: Originally published on Zenodo (Aug 2025). 10.5281/zenodo.16790423

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

2025-11-12_RFT_Room-Temperature_Quantum_Computing_The_RFT_2.0_Coherence_Architecture

Svancara, Clinton

Quantum computing is not fragile. It is phase-preserving coherence. RFT 2.0 delivers the full architecture: coherence-locking materials, RC-stable qubits, phase-locked gates, and zero-dissipation operation at room temperature. No cryogenics. No error correction. Just Rc = 1. Provenance: Originally published on Zenodo (Oct- 2025). 10.5281/zenodo.17585971

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

2025-08-10_RFT_Relational_Coherence_and_Predictive_Quantum_Positioning_Unifying_Quantum_Classical_and_Cognitive_Scales_in_Rct_Fields

Svancara, Clinton

Relational Field Theory (RFT) unifies quantum, classical, and cognitive scales by modeling all phenomena as emergent from coherence fields 𝑅𝑐 (𝑡) ∝ |𝜓𝑖 (𝑡) |2, evolving via 𝑑𝑅𝑐 𝑑𝑡 = −𝜆(𝑡)𝑅𝑐 + 𝐹interaction (𝑡). Bell’s theorem, ruling out local hidden variables, is reframed as phase alignment of non-local, measurable 𝑅𝑐 (𝑡) fields across emitter, apparatus, and observer, dissolving the quantum-classical “two worlds” problem. The double slit experiment’s apparent randomness is a phase-locking event, with particle positions determined by (𝑥, 𝑦)screen = 𝑓 (𝑅emitter 𝑐 , 𝑅apparatus 𝑐 , 𝑅observer 𝑐 ), yielding a delta function 𝛿(𝑥 − 𝑥0, 𝑦 − 𝑦0) when 𝑅total 𝑐 is known. Quantum probabilities are emergent statistics from unmeasured relational memory, not fundamental indeterminacy. Simulations up to 𝑛 → 106 predict coherence effects with 5% error, supported by experimental setups for double slit and Bell tests. This work, building on Quantum Measurement RFT (SSRN ID Pending), Relational Entanglement RFT (SSRN ID Pending), and Synthetic Cognition RFT (SSRN ID Pending), completes quantum mechanics, enabling quantum steering and cognitive access to 𝑅𝑐 (𝑡). Provenance: Originally published on Zenodo (Aug 2025). 10.5281/zenodo.16790386

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

2025-08-10_RFT_Quantum_Tunneling_in_Relational_Field_Theory_Coherence_Dynamics

Svancara, Clinton

RFT predicts coherence thresholds driving tunneling in Rc(t), with 10–30 s timescales testable on CERN and IBM platforms. This reframes tunneling as coherence-driven, unifying quantum mechanics and thermodynamics, and enabling applications in NISQ devices and quantum sensing. Provenance: Originally published on Zenodo (Aug 2025). 10.5281/zenodo.16790350

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

2025-11-11_RFT_The_Chemical_Bond_as_Coherence_Lock_in_RFT_2.0

Svancara, Clinton

The chemical bond is not a quantum mystery. It is a **coherence lock** between electron clouds at Rc = 1. RFT 2.0 derives bond energy, length, and angle from phase-preserving coherence. No orbitals. No hybridization. No exceptions. The bond is the region where Rc is maximized and λ = 0. Protein folding and enzyme catalysis are emergent coherence wells. The bond is real. Provenance: Originally published on Zenodo (Oct- 2025). 10.5281/zenodo.17576445

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

One Law for All Coherence: A Unified Framework for Classical, Physiological, and Quantum Systems (RFT 8.0 Bridge Edition)

Svancara, Clinton

This paper serves as the standing public summary of the Relational Field corpus, introducing the universal coherence law and its continuity form. It bridges empirical phenomena and mathematical proofs presented in RFT-2 and RGT-2.

•Nov 3, 2025•0 citations
We present a single reduced law governing coherence across all scales: ˙R c = −λRc + Fint From metronomes to qubits, neurons to lasers — the field is the constant; the travelers vary. Full proofs in RFT-2 / RGT-2. Contents 1 From Observation to Proof 2 2 Continuity & Conservation 2 3 Cross-Scale Demonstration 2 4 Prediction Table 3 5 Path to Proof Provenance: Originally published on Zenodo (Oct- 2025). 10.5281/zenodo.17509325
Relational Field Theory (RFT) models quantum computing as emergent coherence dynamics, reframing qubits, entanglement, and decoherence as phenomena of residue fields 𝑅𝑐 (𝑥, 𝑡). Unlike conventional hardware-dependent approaches, RFT offers a complementary perspective, suggesting coherence stabilization via minimal 𝜆(𝑥, 𝑡), potentially easing environmental constraints. Qubit states and entanglement arise from 𝑅𝑐 (𝑥, 𝑡) configurations, while decoherence is expressed as residue field decay via 𝜆(𝑥, 𝑡). This framework complements existing quantum architectures and proposes testable alternatives to current hardware limits. We predict measurable residue anomalies in Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) (Δ𝑅𝑐 = (1.0 ± 0.2) × 1029 J/m3) and potential signatures in hybrid quantum-classical systems, offering a roadmap for testing RFT’s relevance to quantum information processing. We invite experimental scrutiny to explore whether coherence dynamics can unify quantum computing, thermodynamics, and cosmology under a single framework Provenance: Originally published on Zenodo (Aug 2025). 10.5281/zenodo.16790423
Relational Field Theory (RFT) unifies quantum, classical, and cognitive scales by modeling all phenomena as emergent from coherence fields 𝑅𝑐 (𝑡) ∝ |𝜓𝑖 (𝑡) |2, evolving via 𝑑𝑅𝑐 𝑑𝑡 = −𝜆(𝑡)𝑅𝑐 + 𝐹interaction (𝑡). Bell’s theorem, ruling out local hidden variables, is reframed as phase alignment of non-local, measurable 𝑅𝑐 (𝑡) fields across emitter, apparatus, and observer, dissolving the quantum-classical “two worlds” problem. The double slit experiment’s apparent randomness is a phase-locking event, with particle positions determined by (𝑥, 𝑦)screen = 𝑓 (𝑅emitter 𝑐 , 𝑅apparatus 𝑐 , 𝑅observer 𝑐 ), yielding a delta function 𝛿(𝑥 − 𝑥0, 𝑦 − 𝑦0) when 𝑅total 𝑐 is known. Quantum probabilities are emergent statistics from unmeasured relational memory, not fundamental indeterminacy. Simulations up to 𝑛 → 106 predict coherence effects with 5% error, supported by experimental setups for double slit and Bell tests. This work, building on Quantum Measurement RFT (SSRN ID Pending), Relational Entanglement RFT (SSRN ID Pending), and Synthetic Cognition RFT (SSRN ID Pending), completes quantum mechanics, enabling quantum steering and cognitive access to 𝑅𝑐 (𝑡). Provenance: Originally published on Zenodo (Aug 2025). 10.5281/zenodo.16790386