One of the main purposes of this chapter is to explain, albeit in an abstract manner, how quantum physics–like models of the economics-finance contexts would differ from quantum math-like (or simply, quantum-like) models. For this, the chapter begins by considering, what may be called, the “physical” foundations of quantum theory. These include the foundations pertaining to the theoretical, experimental, and interpretational aspects of quantum theory. With reference to the physical foundations, the chapter elaborates on certain expectations from agent-centric economics-finance models to qualify as “quantum physics–analogous”. Then, by briefly reviewing some of the prominent theories of analogical arguments and reasoning from the philosophy of science (for instance, Aristotle’s theory, Hesse’s theory, Gentner’s structure-mapping theory and Bartha’s articulation model), the chapter ends by proposing a strategy for the systematic construction of quantum physics–analogous models of economics and finance.
One of the main purposes of this chapter is to explain, albeit in an abstract manner, how quantum physics–like models of the economics-finance contexts would differ from quantum math-like (or simply, quantum-like) models. For this, the chapter begins by considering, what may be called, the “physical” foundations of quantum theory. These include the foundations pertaining to the theoretical, experimental, and interpretational aspects of quantum theory. With reference to the physical foundations, the chapter elaborates on certain expectations from agent-centric economics-finance models to qualify as “quantum physics–analogous”. Then, by briefly reviewing some of the prominent theories of analogical arguments and reasoning from the philosophy of science (for instance, Aristotle’s theory, Hesse’s theory, Gentner’s structure-mapping theory and Bartha’s articulation model), the chapter ends by proposing a strategy for the systematic construction of quantum physics–analogous models of economics and finance.
This book had as its main objective to discuss how (quantum) physics concepts could be used in a relevant way in the modeling of a variety of economics/finance and psychology-based processes. For those readers who have come to read this conclusion, without skipping its “backbone,” we would like to say “thank you” for keeping with us until the end. The possible claim, which says that social science driven dynamics would need analyzing with techniques from the natural sciences, may well have been tempered with this book. Although quantum physics as a theory of prediction is one of the most successful theories humankind ever devised, it is not unreasonable to suggest that the number of foundational interpretations of quantum physics is sizable. Consider now the following natural question: “How can a theory with such a wide diversity of foundational interpretations serve to inform and elucidate a non-cognate area of research (like economics or psychology)?” Indeed, we should want to stand upright and write, without hesitation, the words “non-cognate.” No theory in social science can come close to the predictive power of quantum physics. However, very few social science theories are “plagued” by foundational issues of such depth as quantum physics. As an example, consider the issue of why quantum physical wave functions do have to be complex valued. Do physicists have a satisfactory answer to this very basic question? A theory of such predictive power has a partial differential equation, the Schrödinger equation, which cannot be rigorously derived. However, in economics and finance we strive to build theoretical edifices with the utmost respect for rigor.
Mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics: brief introduction In this chapter, we present basic notions of quantum mechanics, and we emphasize “quantum mathematics.” To posit that the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics can be used outside of quantum physics (as in sociology, economics, or finance) may be of interest. If one can steer away from merely positing and veer instead into convincing the reader that such a position is tenable, then some achievement has been booked. But the price to pay is that the formalism of quantum mechanics needs to be uncovered: how else can one judge whether what we posit is senseful? Thus, a reader can either (i) formally accept our viewpoint about the quantum-like paradigm (see Khrennikov [1]), or (ii) ask for a detailed analysis of the quantum foundations which would justify this paradigm. In the first case, it may well be sufficient to skip this chapter (but we should suggest to attempt to include Chapter 3). In the second case, we invite especially those readers who are concerned about the fact that the formal usage of the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics may transfer major problems of quantum foundations to social science, economics, and finance, to read the present chapter carefully.
This concise and self-contained book opens completely novel areas of research by directly implementing concepts from quantum physics into areas of social science. It constructs compelling arguments originating from fundamental concepts in physics and the philosophy of science, including key developments in economics and finance, then surveys the important work which has been performed to date through applying the formalism of quantum mechanics to decision making and finance. The book is accessible to graduate students and researchers in social science and physics, as well as avid interdisciplinary readers. This title is part of the Flip it Open Programme and may also be available Open Access. Check our website Cambridge Core for details.
Since the beginning of the 21st century, a new interdisciplinary research movement has started, which aims at developing quantum math-like (or simply quantum-like) models to provide an explanation for a variety of socio-economic processes and human behaviour. By making use of mainly the probabilistic aspects of quantum theory, this research movement has led to many important results in the areas of decision-making and finance. In this article, we introduce a novel and more exhaustive approach, to analyze the socio-economic processes and activities, than the pure quantum math-like modelling approach, by taking into account the physical foundations of quantum theory. We also provide a plausibility argument for its exhaustiveness in terms of what we can expect from such an approach, when it is applied to, for example, a generic socio-economic decision process.
Written by world experts in the foundations of quantum mechanics and its applications to social science, this book shows how elementary quantum mechanical principles can be applied to decision-making paradoxes in psychology and used in modelling information in finance and economics. The book starts with a thorough overview of some of the salient differences between classical, statistical and quantum mechanics. It presents arguments on why quantum mechanics can be applied outside of physics and defines quantum social science. The issue of the existence of quantum probabilistic effects in psychology, economics and finance is addressed and basic questions and answers are provided. Aimed at researchers in economics and psychology, as well as physics, basic mathematical preliminaries and elementary concepts from quantum mechanics are defined in a self-contained way.
Abstract Since Adam Smith, economics has erected a grand edifice upon the foundations of rational agents, equilibrium analysis, and linear causality; however, the 2008 global financial crisis, the European sovereign debt crisis, and the COVID-19 pandemic have successively revealed its fundamental limitations when confronted with complex economic phenomena: bubbles that ought not to have existed, crises unforeseen by equilibrium models, non-linear ruptures brought about by technological revolutions, and self-fulfilling expectations—all of which call for a richer theoretical language. This book serves as the foundational introduction to the "Quantum Economics Textbook Series," as well as the first gateway into this entire series. It introduces the methodological framework, mathematical apparatus, and philosophical insights of quantum mechanics to economic analysis, grounding its approach in the core proposition of a practical ontology—that human economic practice itself possesses quantum attributes such as superposition, entanglement, constructibility, uncertainty, and emergence—thereby reconstructing the economic world as a quantum process of superposition and evolution. Six core concepts—superposition, entanglement, measurement collapse, the uncertainty principle, quantum transitions, and emergence—run throughout the work. Quantum economics does not represent a simple negation of classical theory; rather, it constitutes a dialectical sublation: under the classical limit—where decoherence is complete, the measurement basis is fixed, and entanglement vanishes—quantum theory precisely reduces to classical theory. This book comprises five parts and thirty chapters: Part I establishes the paradigm shift and theoretical framework, covering critiques of Newton's worldview, the quantum worldview, a foundational conceptual framework, mathematical foundations, and research methodologies; Part II reconstructs quantum microeconomic theory, encompassing consumers, producers, pricing, markets, the wave-particle duality of markets, quantum games, and welfare economics; Part III builds quantum macroeconomic theory, addressing national income accounting, money, inflation, economic cycles, policy, and open economies; Part IV explores quantum finance and market dynamics, including asset pricing, portfolio management, market sentiment, risk management, and trading theory; Part V extends the scope to organizations, innovation, institutions, development, economic ethics, and the digital economy, while offering insights into the future of this discipline. This volume is intended for undergraduate and graduate students, as well as researchers in economics and related fields, and serves as the essential first volume in the quantum economics series.