Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Single-Particle Systems versus Agents – I

Vikram Athalye, Emmanuel Haven

Published Dec 19, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This chapter (together with the next one) introduces probably the highlight of the book, i.e. it attempts to answer the important question: what can we now do with the quantum-physics like stance? An immediate, almost obvious, discussion centres around the analogies with the famed double-slit experiment. We set ourselves the task of answering how we can begin to enumerate, quite precisely, analogies between electrons and agents. As the reader will find out, we will need to move over several (important) hurdles, one of them being the perennially difficult analogy we need to make with the Planck constant. We then proceed in shaping the idea of two-preference interference, a concept of paramount importance in our quest to properly define the quantum physics–like research direction.

DOI
10.1017/9781108953177.012

Related papers

Single-Particle Systems versus Agents – II

Vikram Athalye, Emmanuel Haven

This chapter provides, we believe, for the apogee of what we think will form the base for success of the quantum physics–like applications. Readers are invited in this chapter to carefully study the two-slit interference experiment with agents (and the agent two-preference interference) for a variety of real potential functions.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 19, 2025•0 citations

Future Directions

Vikram Athalye, Emmanuel Haven

In this last chapter of the book, we keep coming back to the potential function and we attempt to connect it to more precise ideas in finance, including that of the agent heterogeneities. We also initiate a discussion on agent behaviour and causality and nonlocality. Our last words in this book will be centred on what comes next. One of the key queries we have is whether we can consider more complicated real potentials in the two-slit interference experiment with agents (and the agent two-preference interference). The other one is centred around the investigation on the nonexistence of “spooky” free will of the individual agents.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 19, 2025•0 citations

Conclusions

George Jaroszkiewicz

In the Preface to this book, we started with Alice and Bob having very different views of their observations. Alice used an optical telescope and reported nothing unusual about a distant galaxy that she could see. Bob, on the other hand, detected intense radio activity in that galaxy. Our question was: who has the true view of that galaxy? We advised the reader that the answer is not Alice . Neither is it Bob . The answer is not both of them , nor is it neither of them . It is not a trick question either. So what is the answer that this book would supply? Our answer will come presently. While this book has set forth a definite mathematical perspective on empirical physics, it has contained quite a lot of commentary that might be disparaged as metaphysics or philosophy. Such commentary is generally frowned on in science, because it has no empirical content. It is vacuous. In our defense, we point out the obvious: science is not a robotic activity; it is carried out by humans and these are driven by their metaphysical, philosophical, and emotional imperatives. For instance, the hard-core scientific view that quantum theory needs no interpretation but only application is itself a philosophy. It is no more than a conditioned response, based on opinion and subscription to current scientific norms. It is, indeed, a philosophy of how to do quantum mechanics. So we all do it, in one way or another. Our concern in this book is that the way that we do it should be based soundly on scientific principles. The quantized detector approach that we describe and use in this book is our attempt to do just that. There is an excellent paper on all of this that has the provocative title “Quantum Theory Needs No Interpretation,” by Fuchs and Peres (2000). It seems on the face of it to dismiss any sort of “interpretation” of quantum mechanics. In fact, close reading of it confirms (to us at least) the agenda that we have set out in this book. Yes, quantum mechanics needs no interpretation, when it is being applied to processes that take place in the information void .

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 28, 2017•0 citations

One- and two-body physics

Manuel Valiente, Nikolaj Thomas Zinner

In this chapter, we take a deeper look at a number of interesting and important models that contain one or two particles. We focus on examples, from a variety of settings and fields, with the goal of not only finding relevant physical phenomena occurring in these systems, but also giving the reader a place where they can actually practise much of what has been said previously throughout the book. In some cases, straight application of the methods explained earlier suffices, while in some others slightly different (yet related) methods are needed. Most of the models studied in this chapter are justified in chapters 4 and 5, sometimes in full. Other times, the justification from chapters 4 and 5 may be only partial, and the interested reader is encouraged to consult more specialized literature in the subject.

Institute of Physics eBooks•Sep 1, 2023•0 citations

Which way are the photons pointing?

Alastair I. M. Rae

The previous chapter surveyed part of the rich variety of physical phenomena that can be understood using the ideas of quantum physics. Now that we are beginning the task of looking more deeply into the subject we shall find it useful to concentrate on examples that are comparatively simple to understand but which still illustrate the fundamental principles and highlight the basic conceptual problems. Some years ago most writers discussing such topics would probably have turned to the example of a ‘particle’ passing through a two-slit apparatus (as in Figure 1.2), whose wave properties are revealed in the interference pattern. Much of the discussion would have been in terms of wave–particle duality and the problems involved in position and momentum measurements, as in the discussion of the uncertainty principle in the last chapter. However, there are essentially an infinite number of places where the particle can be and an infinite number of possible values of its momentum, and this complicates the discussion considerably. We can illustrate all the points of principle we want to discuss by considering situations where a measurement has only a small number of possible outcomes. One such quantity relating to the physics of light beams and photons is known as polarisation . In the next section we discuss it in the context of the classical wave theory of light, and the rest of the chapter extends the concept to situations where the photon nature of light is important.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Oct 7, 2004•0 citations

Which way are the photons pointing?

Alastair I. M. Rae

The previous chapter surveyed part of the rich variety of physical phenomena that can be understood using the ideas of quantum physics. Now that we are beginning the task of looking more deeply into the subject we shall find it useful to concentrate on examples that are comparatively simple to understand but which still illustrate the fundamental principles and highlight the basic conceptual problems. Some years ago most writers discussing such topics would probably have turned to the example of a ‘particle’ passing through a two-slit apparatus (as in Figure 1.2), whose wave properties are revealed in the interference pattern. Much of the discussion would have been in terms of wave–particle duality and the problems involved in position and momentum measurements, as in the discussion of the uncertainty principle in the last chapter. However, there are essentially an infinite number of places where the particle can be and an infinite number of possible values of its momentum, and this complicates the discussion considerably. We can illustrate all the points of principle we want to discuss by considering situations where a measurement has only a small number of possible outcomes. One such quantity relating to the physics of light beams and photons is known as polarisation . In the next section we discuss it in the context of the classical wave theory of light, and the rest of the chapter extends the concept to situations where the photon nature of light is important.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 26, 2012•0 citations
This chapter (together with the next one) introduces probably the highlight of the book, i.e. it attempts to answer the important question: what can we now do with the quantum-physics like stance? An immediate, almost obvious, discussion centres around the analogies with the famed double-slit experiment. We set ourselves the task of answering how we can begin to enumerate, quite precisely, analogies between electrons and agents. As the reader will find out, we will need to move over several (important) hurdles, one of them being the perennially difficult analogy we need to make with the Planck constant. We then proceed in shaping the idea of two-preference interference, a concept of paramount importance in our quest to properly define the quantum physics–like research direction.
In this last chapter of the book, we keep coming back to the potential function and we attempt to connect it to more precise ideas in finance, including that of the agent heterogeneities. We also initiate a discussion on agent behaviour and causality and nonlocality. Our last words in this book will be centred on what comes next. One of the key queries we have is whether we can consider more complicated real potentials in the two-slit interference experiment with agents (and the agent two-preference interference). The other one is centred around the investigation on the nonexistence of “spooky” free will of the individual agents.
In the Preface to this book, we started with Alice and Bob having very different views of their observations. Alice used an optical telescope and reported nothing unusual about a distant galaxy that she could see. Bob, on the other hand, detected intense radio activity in that galaxy. Our question was: who has the true view of that galaxy? We advised the reader that the answer is not Alice . Neither is it Bob . The answer is not both of them , nor is it neither of them . It is not a trick question either. So what is the answer that this book would supply? Our answer will come presently. While this book has set forth a definite mathematical perspective on empirical physics, it has contained quite a lot of commentary that might be disparaged as metaphysics or philosophy. Such commentary is generally frowned on in science, because it has no empirical content. It is vacuous. In our defense, we point out the obvious: science is not a robotic activity; it is carried out by humans and these are driven by their metaphysical, philosophical, and emotional imperatives. For instance, the hard-core scientific view that quantum theory needs no interpretation but only application is itself a philosophy. It is no more than a conditioned response, based on opinion and subscription to current scientific norms. It is, indeed, a philosophy of how to do quantum mechanics. So we all do it, in one way or another. Our concern in this book is that the way that we do it should be based soundly on scientific principles. The quantized detector approach that we describe and use in this book is our attempt to do just that. There is an excellent paper on all of this that has the provocative title “Quantum Theory Needs No Interpretation,” by Fuchs and Peres (2000). It seems on the face of it to dismiss any sort of “interpretation” of quantum mechanics. In fact, close reading of it confirms (to us at least) the agenda that we have set out in this book. Yes, quantum mechanics needs no interpretation, when it is being applied to processes that take place in the information void .
In this chapter, we take a deeper look at a number of interesting and important models that contain one or two particles. We focus on examples, from a variety of settings and fields, with the goal of not only finding relevant physical phenomena occurring in these systems, but also giving the reader a place where they can actually practise much of what has been said previously throughout the book. In some cases, straight application of the methods explained earlier suffices, while in some others slightly different (yet related) methods are needed. Most of the models studied in this chapter are justified in chapters 4 and 5, sometimes in full. Other times, the justification from chapters 4 and 5 may be only partial, and the interested reader is encouraged to consult more specialized literature in the subject.
The previous chapter surveyed part of the rich variety of physical phenomena that can be understood using the ideas of quantum physics. Now that we are beginning the task of looking more deeply into the subject we shall find it useful to concentrate on examples that are comparatively simple to understand but which still illustrate the fundamental principles and highlight the basic conceptual problems. Some years ago most writers discussing such topics would probably have turned to the example of a ‘particle’ passing through a two-slit apparatus (as in Figure 1.2), whose wave properties are revealed in the interference pattern. Much of the discussion would have been in terms of wave–particle duality and the problems involved in position and momentum measurements, as in the discussion of the uncertainty principle in the last chapter. However, there are essentially an infinite number of places where the particle can be and an infinite number of possible values of its momentum, and this complicates the discussion considerably. We can illustrate all the points of principle we want to discuss by considering situations where a measurement has only a small number of possible outcomes. One such quantity relating to the physics of light beams and photons is known as polarisation . In the next section we discuss it in the context of the classical wave theory of light, and the rest of the chapter extends the concept to situations where the photon nature of light is important.
The previous chapter surveyed part of the rich variety of physical phenomena that can be understood using the ideas of quantum physics. Now that we are beginning the task of looking more deeply into the subject we shall find it useful to concentrate on examples that are comparatively simple to understand but which still illustrate the fundamental principles and highlight the basic conceptual problems. Some years ago most writers discussing such topics would probably have turned to the example of a ‘particle’ passing through a two-slit apparatus (as in Figure 1.2), whose wave properties are revealed in the interference pattern. Much of the discussion would have been in terms of wave–particle duality and the problems involved in position and momentum measurements, as in the discussion of the uncertainty principle in the last chapter. However, there are essentially an infinite number of places where the particle can be and an infinite number of possible values of its momentum, and this complicates the discussion considerably. We can illustrate all the points of principle we want to discuss by considering situations where a measurement has only a small number of possible outcomes. One such quantity relating to the physics of light beams and photons is known as polarisation . In the next section we discuss it in the context of the classical wave theory of light, and the rest of the chapter extends the concept to situations where the photon nature of light is important.