Universal computing can be dated to 1903 when Alan Turing’s theoretical model of the Turing machine led a large-scale innovative revolution towards digital computing machines.¹ The next milestone is to process and control information at its fundamental level — quantum states of particles. Richard Feynman first pointed out that as certain types of computational problems get more complex, classical bits fail to give efficient answers.² For example, when simulating quantum mechanics, the amount of memory needed to describe a quantum system increases exponentially with the number of its components. A new device — a quantum computer — is therefore highly sought after by physicists.³
Universal computing can be dated to 1903 when Alan Turing’s theoretical model of the Turing machine led a large-scale innovative revolution towards digital computing machines.¹ The next milestone is to process and control information at its fundamental level — quantum states of particles. Richard Feynman first pointed out that as certain types of computational problems get more complex, classical bits fail to give efficient answers.² For example, when simulating quantum mechanics, the amount of memory needed to describe a quantum system increases exponentially with the number of its components. A new device — a quantum computer — is therefore highly sought after by physicists.³
Computation is a process of performing a large number of simple operations. The main building blocks of classical computers are bits. Each of them can take either the value 0 or 1. A series of gates can change these values by acting on them selectively. This process is structured to fulfil a purpose. For example, if we are interested in adding two numbers, the numbers are encoded into bits and gates are performed such that the final state of the bits reveals the desired answer: a number which is the sum of the initial ones. While it is possible to build algorithms that can perform almost any computation, it is also desirable to find the answer within a reasonable length of time or with a reasonable amount of resources. There is an ever-growing demand in computational power for both scientific and commercial purposes. Indeed, it is surprisingly easy to find an application that can jam even the fastest computer. This fuels a vast effort in the research of information science to increase the speed and processing power of computers. Modern computational models are based on the universal Turing machine (Turing, 1937). This is a theoretical information processing model that employs the elementary gate processes described above. It can efficiently simulate any other device capable of performing an algorithmic process. Since the introduction of the Turing machine, physics has influenced computation in many ways.
In the preceding chapter we established that a suitable set of quantum gates, complemented by quantum error correction, allows us to produce a desired multiqubit unitary transformation. This transformation is one of the three steps in a quantum computation; the others, of course, are the preparation of the qubits in their initial state and the measurement of them after the transformation has been implemented. A quantum computation is designed to solve a problem or class of problems. The power of quantum computers is that they can do this, at least for some problems, very much more efficiently and quickly than any conventional computer based on classical logic operations. If we can build a quantum computer then a number of important problems which are currently intractable will become solvable. The potential for greatly enhanced computational power is, in itself, reason enough to study quantum computers, but there is another. Moore’s law is the observation that the number of transistors on a chip doubles roughly every eighteen months. A simple corollary is that computer performance also doubles on the same timescale. Associated with this exponential improvement is a dramatic reduction in the size of individual components. If the pace is to be kept up then it is inevitable that quantum effects will become increasingly important and ultimately will limit the operation of the computer. In these circumstances it is sensible to consider the possibility of harnessing quantum effects to realize quantum information processors and computers. We start with a brief introduction to the theory of computer science, the principles of which underlie the operation of what we shall refer to as classical computers. These include all existing machines and any based on the manipulation of classical bits. The development of computer science owes much to Turing, who devised a simple but powerful model of a computing device: the Turing machine. It its most elementary form, this consists of four elements. (i) A tape for data storage, which acts as a memory. This tape has a sequence of spaces, each of which has on it one of a finite set of symbols. (ii) A processor, which controls the operations of the machine.
It was Richard Feynman who first proposed, in 1982, the far-reaching concept of \na ”quantum computer”—a device more powerful than classical computers. The idea \nof a quantum computer is to employ the fascinating and often counterintuitive \nlaws of quantum mechanics to process information. It is far from obvious that \nthe proposed concept of a quantum computer is more powerful than its classical \ncounterpart, it was only in 1994 when Peter Shor theoretically demonstrated the \nexistence of a quantum algorithm for factorizing integers into prime factors \nthat runs in polynomial time unlike its classical counterpart which works in \nsub-exponential time. The factorization of integers into prime factors is the \nbasis of asymmetric cryptography. These early theoretical results lunched an \nimmense interest of the scientific community. Already during ’90s, the first \nproposals for the physical implementation of quantum computation emerged. Ever \nsince, many experimental groups around the world pursued different physical \nimplementations of quantum bits (qubits). The first decade of the new century \nsaw a steady improvement in the control and decoherence time (the time over \nwhich the information carried by the qubit is lost) for various qubits by many \norders of magnitude. The natural next step in this context is to answer the \nquestion of how to scale the system up to include many qubits and thus build a \nquantum computer? One of the main parts of this thesis addresses exactly this \nquestion, namely the question of architecture and scalability of future quantum \ncomputer. \n \nAmong various different physical realizations of qubits, the idea of using \nelectron spins trapped in electrostatic semiconductor quantum dots as the \nbuilding blocks of a quantum computer (the so-called spin qubits), put forward \nby Daniel Loss and David DiVincenzo in 1997, triggered tremendous interest in \nscientific community. Nevertheless, the implementation of the original \nLoss-DiVincenzo proposal posed a considerable technical challenge. It used \nquantum tunneling between qubits to enable their communication with each other, \nand thus required that the qubits to be placed very close to each other. This \nrequirement not only leaves little \nspace for the placement of the vast amount of gates and wirings needed to define \nthe electrostatic quantum dots, but also makes it challenging to control the \nlocal magnetic field needed for single-qubit operations. For these reasons, no \nsystem with more than a couple of spin qubits has been \nsuccessfully implemented thus far. In the first part of this thesis, we leap \nover this long-standing problem with an entirely different strategy of using \nmetallic floating gates or ferromagnets to couple together qubits that are \nseparated over a long distance. Our scheme works for any type of \nspin qubits, including the qubits based on nitrogen-vacancy center (NV-center) \nin diamond and technologically very important silicon qubits. \n \nThe main topic of this thesis is related to quantum computer. Still, quite \nunexpectedly, some of the ideas we employed in order to tackle the problem of \nquantum computer scalability can be utilized in a completely different field of \nresearch, namely, in the field of magnetic field sensing. Qubit are not only a \nnecessary ingredient of quantum computer but they also provide a way to measure \nvery accurately magnetic fields. The magnetometer build upon the qubit based on \nNV-center, so-called NV-magnetometer, emerged in recent years as most sensitive \nmagnetic moment sensor. These magnetometers are able to detect about hundred \nnuclear spins within a minute of acquisition time. In the second part of this \nthesis, we propose an entirely novel experimental realization of \nNV-magnetometers which increases present NV-center sensitivities by four orders \nof magnitude at room temperature. This unprecedented amplification of \nsensitivity will render magnetometers capable of detecting individual nuclear \nspins. This amplification is achieved by introducing a ferromagnetic particle \nbetween the nuclear spin that needs to be detected and the NV-magnetometer. Our \nsetup, in contrast to existing schemes, is particularly advantageous because, \ndue to the large amplification of sensitivity, the nuclear spin need not lie \nwithin a few nanometers of the surface but rather can be detectable at a \ndistance of 30 nm. With these novelties, our scheme provides chemically \nsensitive spin detection under ambient conditions allowing nanoscale resolution \nof nuclear magnetic moments in biological systems—the holy grail of nuclear \nmagneticresonance. \n \nIn the last part of the thesis we focus our attention to a new direction in \nquantum computer implementation that deals with topological quantum computer \nintroduced by Alexei Kitaev in 1997; in this approach the idea is to use \nquasiparticles with ”fractional” statistics and to perform the single- and \ntwo-qubit gates by merely exchanging these quasiparticles. Additionally, \ninformation in this system is stored non-locally thus it mitigates the problem \nof decoherence caused by local noise from the environment. Majorana fermions are \none of the most well known examples of such excitations. We analyze transport \nsignatures of different topological states in one-dimensional systems, like \nMajorana fermions and fractionally charged states. We envision an Aharonov-Bohm \nsetup wherein conductance measurement provides a clear signature of presence of \nfractionally charged fermionic states, since oscillations with double period \nemerge in this case. Additionally, we propose a very simple setup that enables \nexistence of degenerate mid-gap states, so-called Tamm-Shockley states that are \ncharacterized by fractional charge and discuss possible ways of detecting these \nstates experimentally. \n
There are signs that we are approaching a technical revolution that might take humankind’s computational capabilities to a new level. Quantum Computing leverages the principles of quantum mechanics, enabling the computational power to solve specific problems currently intractable for classical computers (e.g., cracking cryptographic keys). Since we are getting to a point where we can no longer build smaller, more powerful, more efficient devices with conventional methodologies, we need to think of new ways for technological progress. The manufacturing of microchips is reaching its limits in the use of traditional architectures. Hence, new and more advanced technologies need to address the challenges of increasing energy consumption and data processing. Connectivity, scalable architectures and concepts like Cloud Computing and Software-as-a-Service have already helped to scale computational-intense applications in the last years and have attracted the interest of IS researchers (e.g., Benlian et al. 2009 ; Benlian et al. 2018 ; Messerschmidt and Hinz 2013 ). Looking ahead to the next generation, computing will comprise technologies that enable high-performance applications far beyond today’s possibilities. One prominent example with a disruptive potential is Quantum Computing. While there are abundant open questions and directions for further developments, researchers in this area have made substantial progress in the last decade, indicating that, after medical imaging, lasers, and superconductors, another quantum-technological innovation might be approaching. We, therefore, intend to provide an overview of the current state of Quantum Computing research and outline how this new technology might stimulate research in Information Systems.
In the twenty-fi rst century, many signifi cant developments in science and engineering have been achieved through interdisciplinary research. Quantum computing (QC) is about computing with quantum systems, called quantum computers. A quantum computer is a computational device that makes use of the quantum mechanics (QM) phenomena such as entanglement, superposition and interference to perform operations on data. Quantum computers are different from classical binary digital computers since they work with quantum bits. The theoretical model is the quantum turing machine (QTM) which is a normal turing machine (TM) with quantum parallelism. Richard Feynman introduced this fi eld for the fi rst time in the 80’s (Feynman 1982) since he observed that certain quantum-mechanical effects cannot be simulated in an effi cient way using a classical computer. Such observation let to speculate that using quantum effects may become more effi cient computing. The interest grew up in 1994 when Peter Shor published the paper entitled “Algorithms for Quantum Computation : Discrete Logarithms and Factoring” (Shor 1994) where he described polynomial time quantum algorithms for fi nding discrete logarithms and factoring integers.
Why quantum computing? As we all know very well, conventional (electronic) computers have enormous power which, moreover, is constantly increasing. With their help gigantic quantities of data can be handled and evaluated. This is of crucial importance, for instance, in modern high energy physics experiments. On the other hand, computers can be used to model very complex systems with the aim of predicting, for example, future developments in our environment, notably climatic changes. Thanks to their incredible speed computers are, of course, destined to treat mathematical problems for which specific algorithms exist very efficiently. To mention a simple example, the digits of π are readily evaluated up to a very high order. Last, but not least, their potential to solve differential equations numerically, even when they are nonlinear, makes computers indispensable in modern research. So, one might ask, is there any reason to look for fundamentally new ways of computing as they are seemingly offered by quantum processes? What advantages can be expected when the laws of quantum mechanics, rather than those of classical physics, are exploited for computation? Two answers were given: first, the simulation of complex quantum systems on classical computers meets serious difficulties that might be overcome with the help of quantum computers. This idea was suggested in 1982 by R. Feynman, and in the 1990s it was indeed shown by several groups of researchers that quantum mechanical systems for which no efficient simulation on a classical computer is known can be efficiently simulated on a quantum computer.