Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

EntanglementAlgebraic Spacetime: Notes on Scope, Terminology, and Use

Labhard, Michael

Published Dec 12, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This document accompanies a collection of papers developing the Entanglement-Algebraic Spacetime (EAS) framework. It does not present new results or summarize individual papers. Its purpose is limited to clarifying scope, terminology, and the manner in which the papers relate to one another as an evolving research program.
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.17918310

Related papers

Archived Working Version - The Mirror Theory

Valentina Moroni

This document is an archived working version representing the earliest and most preliminary attempt to outline the ideas that later evolved into the SpecularField Theory. It contains initial notes, conceptual sketches, and early interpretations produced during the very beginning of the research program. The material presented here does not reflect the current formulation of the theory. It was drafted during the first exploratory phase, when the conceptualstructure was still undefined and the framework was being assembled through trial, error, and iterative correction. These early ideas were subsequentlyrevised, reorganized, and superseded by later working papers. This record is preserved for developmental continuity and scientific transparency. Early drafts, even when immature or incomplete, document how thetheory began, how the initial concepts were formed, and how the framework progressively evolved. The purpose of sharing these materials is not to presentfinished results, but to provide insight into the intellectual process and to encourage open dialogue and constructive critique.

•Jun 18, 2026•0 citations

Introductory Chapter: Quantum Entanglement at High Energies – Experiment, Theory, and Interdisciplinarity

Oliver Keith Baker

IntechOpen eBooks•Apr 24, 2024•0 citations

A Framework and Taxonomy for Quantum Computing

Artor Nuhiu, Sam Goundar, K. Shruthi +2 more

The rapid advancement of quantum computing has, without question, outpaced the rate of the subsequent setting up of an appropriate framework to categorize its various technologies. This has resulted in essentially fragmented terminologies with research efforts being considered in isolation, limiting collaboration or adaptation by industry. This chapter intends to fill the gap by introducing a multidimensional taxonomic approach to help develop a coherent and standardized framework for terminology in quantum computing. The proposed framework separates itself from existing frameworks by unifying four significant dimensions: computational models, hardware implementations, algorithmic strategies, and application domains. Its modular nature promotes relative ease of adaptation to emerging technologies, such as diamond-based qubits and cloud-based quantum platforms. The theoretical framework upon which this model has been developed is based on systematic literature review, domain analysis, and expert consultation. Using comparative benchmarking and real-world scenarios, the framework documents its flexibility in coordinating technical capabilities with market demands. For academia, it offers a structured curriculum tool and research roadmap, whereas, for industry, it clarifies investment priorities and benchmarks technological advancements. The identified challenges such as complexity and maintenance demands, are acknowledged with solutions proposed through dynamic updating mechanisms and collaborative governance. Providing a common terminology and adaptable structure not only organizes present knowledge but also makes possible a faster transfer of theoretical breakthroughs to social impact. It allows stakeholders to conduct complex tasks on quantum computing technology and ensure equitable and sustainable utilization of its future transformative potential.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 28, 2025•0 citations

The Mathematical Language of Quantum Theory: From Uncertainty to Entanglement

Teiko Heinosaari, Mário Ziman

A clear and detailed exposition of the fundamental concepts of quantum theory for graduate students and researchers.

•Feb 13, 2012•143 citations

QCG Research Notes: Collaborator Series, Vol. 1

Stephen Garner

The QCG Research Notes: No Gloves Archive is a public collection of internal research notes, working analyses, interpretive expansions, corrections, speculative probes, synthesis papers, and revision-driving documents associated with the Quantum Collapse Geometry research program. The collection was originally maintained privately under the working name “QCG No Gloves.” The name reflects the function the notes served: unlike the principal public QCG papers, which were intentionally written through domain- and audience-appropriate scientific framing, the Research Notes provided a less audience-conditioned environment in which the theory could be discussed in a more direct, exploratory, cross-domain, and personally natural research voice. The Research Notes should not be read simply as developmental drafts from which Quantum Collapse Geometry was constructed. Much of the principal QCG architecture predates the Research Note series. Many notes instead revisit already existing QCG structure through a different access regime: making implicit relationships explicit, exploring consequences, preserving speculative interpretations, comparing distant domains, identifying unresolved bridges, or explaining why particular public formulations were framed as they were. Some later Research Notes did materially alter the QCG program. They identified errors, introduced new distinctions, resolved earlier compressed explanatory transitions, strengthened guardrails, or generated revisions later incorporated into public A-, B-, and related QCG papers. The archive therefore contains several different relationships to the public theory: interpretation, explication, exploration, synthesis, correction, resolution, extension, and historical or methodological reconstruction. For this reason, a statement appearing in a Research Note should not automatically be treated as a current canonical QCG claim. Individual notes may contain provisional mechanisms, speculative interpretations, superseded terminology, rejected hypotheses, unresolved formal targets, or claims later narrowed or replaced. Where possible, readers should consult the note’s date, version, status, downstream revisions, and the current public QCG corpus before attributing a historical Research Note to the present theory. The archive is being released publicly for several purposes: to preserve a high-resolution record of QCG interpretation, criticism, revision, and correction; to make unresolved problems and open formal bridges available to researchers who may be able to carry them further; to allow independent examination of how earlier claims changed rather than presenting only retrospectively polished outcomes; to preserve enough intellectual genealogy that later researchers need not depend upon the author’s memory or continued participation; and to provide additional access surfaces through which QCG can be reconstructed, challenged, translated into native disciplinary language, or replaced where better explanations become available. The Research Notes are not peer-reviewed publications merely by virtue of appearing in this archive. Their evidential and formal status varies substantially from note to note. Public release is intended to make that variation more inspectable, not to erase it. The orientation paper QCG No Gloves: The Research Note Is Not the Theory should be read first. It explains the historical relationship between QCG Prime and the Research Note archive, the role of public and private projection regimes, the classification of Research Note types, claim-status conventions, frozen-archive methodology, supersession and revision practices, and appropriate use of the archive in scholarly citation. Reading and Citation Guidance Researchers interested in the current state of Quantum Collapse Geometry should consult the latest canonical public QCG papers and monograph materials. Researchers interested in the interpretive history, open problems, failed mechanisms, corrections, extensions, and internal research architecture should consult the Research Note archive. When discussing a specific Research Note, citation of the individual note and version is preferred. The collection DOI may be cited when referring to the archive as a whole. A superseded or historical note should be described as such where that status is known. The existence of a statement in an earlier note does not by itself establish that the statement remains part of current QCG. Archive Status This is a public research archive, not a certification of consensus, external validation, peer review, or endorsement. Download, view, or access statistics indicate use of the archive only. They should not be interpreted as evidence of active collaboration, agreement with QCG, independent verification, institutional affiliation, or third-party endorsement. The archive intentionally preserves some failed, provisional, and superseded material because a research record containing only surviving claims would provide a misleading picture of theory formation and correction. Public preservation does not require total exposure. Material involving legitimate third-party privacy, confidential correspondence, identifying medical information, security-sensitive content, or unrelated personal information may remain withheld or redacted. Collaboration The archive is also intended as an open collaboration surface. Researchers are especially invited to identify: established native-domain equivalents of QCG concepts; mathematical obstructions or counterexamples; failed cross-domain transports; stronger existing terminology or formalism; missing recovery maps; experimental or computational tests; mechanisms capable of replacing provisional QCG placeholders; places where QCG distinctions are redundant; and places where the architecture itself, rather than merely a proposed mechanism, should be revised. Adoption of QCG terminology is not required for collaboration. Where a receiving discipline possesses a more precise native language, reconstruction in that language is preferred. Contact For questions, corrections, technical discussion, archival clarification, or collaboration: QuantumCollapseGeometry@gmail.com

•May 3, 2026•0 citations

Study of the role of dimensionality in the entanglement of detector-quantum field systems

Irene Melgarejo-Lermas

To study the role of space-time dimensionality in the phenomena of entanglement harvesting. entanglement harvesting

•May 19, 2018•0 citations
This document is an archived working version representing the earliest and most preliminary attempt to outline the ideas that later evolved into the SpecularField Theory. It contains initial notes, conceptual sketches, and early interpretations produced during the very beginning of the research program. The material presented here does not reflect the current formulation of the theory. It was drafted during the first exploratory phase, when the conceptualstructure was still undefined and the framework was being assembled through trial, error, and iterative correction. These early ideas were subsequentlyrevised, reorganized, and superseded by later working papers. This record is preserved for developmental continuity and scientific transparency. Early drafts, even when immature or incomplete, document how thetheory began, how the initial concepts were formed, and how the framework progressively evolved. The purpose of sharing these materials is not to presentfinished results, but to provide insight into the intellectual process and to encourage open dialogue and constructive critique.
The rapid advancement of quantum computing has, without question, outpaced the rate of the subsequent setting up of an appropriate framework to categorize its various technologies. This has resulted in essentially fragmented terminologies with research efforts being considered in isolation, limiting collaboration or adaptation by industry. This chapter intends to fill the gap by introducing a multidimensional taxonomic approach to help develop a coherent and standardized framework for terminology in quantum computing. The proposed framework separates itself from existing frameworks by unifying four significant dimensions: computational models, hardware implementations, algorithmic strategies, and application domains. Its modular nature promotes relative ease of adaptation to emerging technologies, such as diamond-based qubits and cloud-based quantum platforms. The theoretical framework upon which this model has been developed is based on systematic literature review, domain analysis, and expert consultation. Using comparative benchmarking and real-world scenarios, the framework documents its flexibility in coordinating technical capabilities with market demands. For academia, it offers a structured curriculum tool and research roadmap, whereas, for industry, it clarifies investment priorities and benchmarks technological advancements. The identified challenges such as complexity and maintenance demands, are acknowledged with solutions proposed through dynamic updating mechanisms and collaborative governance. Providing a common terminology and adaptable structure not only organizes present knowledge but also makes possible a faster transfer of theoretical breakthroughs to social impact. It allows stakeholders to conduct complex tasks on quantum computing technology and ensure equitable and sustainable utilization of its future transformative potential.
The QCG Research Notes: No Gloves Archive is a public collection of internal research notes, working analyses, interpretive expansions, corrections, speculative probes, synthesis papers, and revision-driving documents associated with the Quantum Collapse Geometry research program. The collection was originally maintained privately under the working name “QCG No Gloves.” The name reflects the function the notes served: unlike the principal public QCG papers, which were intentionally written through domain- and audience-appropriate scientific framing, the Research Notes provided a less audience-conditioned environment in which the theory could be discussed in a more direct, exploratory, cross-domain, and personally natural research voice. The Research Notes should not be read simply as developmental drafts from which Quantum Collapse Geometry was constructed. Much of the principal QCG architecture predates the Research Note series. Many notes instead revisit already existing QCG structure through a different access regime: making implicit relationships explicit, exploring consequences, preserving speculative interpretations, comparing distant domains, identifying unresolved bridges, or explaining why particular public formulations were framed as they were. Some later Research Notes did materially alter the QCG program. They identified errors, introduced new distinctions, resolved earlier compressed explanatory transitions, strengthened guardrails, or generated revisions later incorporated into public A-, B-, and related QCG papers. The archive therefore contains several different relationships to the public theory: interpretation, explication, exploration, synthesis, correction, resolution, extension, and historical or methodological reconstruction. For this reason, a statement appearing in a Research Note should not automatically be treated as a current canonical QCG claim. Individual notes may contain provisional mechanisms, speculative interpretations, superseded terminology, rejected hypotheses, unresolved formal targets, or claims later narrowed or replaced. Where possible, readers should consult the note’s date, version, status, downstream revisions, and the current public QCG corpus before attributing a historical Research Note to the present theory. The archive is being released publicly for several purposes: to preserve a high-resolution record of QCG interpretation, criticism, revision, and correction; to make unresolved problems and open formal bridges available to researchers who may be able to carry them further; to allow independent examination of how earlier claims changed rather than presenting only retrospectively polished outcomes; to preserve enough intellectual genealogy that later researchers need not depend upon the author’s memory or continued participation; and to provide additional access surfaces through which QCG can be reconstructed, challenged, translated into native disciplinary language, or replaced where better explanations become available. The Research Notes are not peer-reviewed publications merely by virtue of appearing in this archive. Their evidential and formal status varies substantially from note to note. Public release is intended to make that variation more inspectable, not to erase it. The orientation paper QCG No Gloves: The Research Note Is Not the Theory should be read first. It explains the historical relationship between QCG Prime and the Research Note archive, the role of public and private projection regimes, the classification of Research Note types, claim-status conventions, frozen-archive methodology, supersession and revision practices, and appropriate use of the archive in scholarly citation. Reading and Citation Guidance Researchers interested in the current state of Quantum Collapse Geometry should consult the latest canonical public QCG papers and monograph materials. Researchers interested in the interpretive history, open problems, failed mechanisms, corrections, extensions, and internal research architecture should consult the Research Note archive. When discussing a specific Research Note, citation of the individual note and version is preferred. The collection DOI may be cited when referring to the archive as a whole. A superseded or historical note should be described as such where that status is known. The existence of a statement in an earlier note does not by itself establish that the statement remains part of current QCG. Archive Status This is a public research archive, not a certification of consensus, external validation, peer review, or endorsement. Download, view, or access statistics indicate use of the archive only. They should not be interpreted as evidence of active collaboration, agreement with QCG, independent verification, institutional affiliation, or third-party endorsement. The archive intentionally preserves some failed, provisional, and superseded material because a research record containing only surviving claims would provide a misleading picture of theory formation and correction. Public preservation does not require total exposure. Material involving legitimate third-party privacy, confidential correspondence, identifying medical information, security-sensitive content, or unrelated personal information may remain withheld or redacted. Collaboration The archive is also intended as an open collaboration surface. Researchers are especially invited to identify: established native-domain equivalents of QCG concepts; mathematical obstructions or counterexamples; failed cross-domain transports; stronger existing terminology or formalism; missing recovery maps; experimental or computational tests; mechanisms capable of replacing provisional QCG placeholders; places where QCG distinctions are redundant; and places where the architecture itself, rather than merely a proposed mechanism, should be revised. Adoption of QCG terminology is not required for collaboration. Where a receiving discipline possesses a more precise native language, reconstruction in that language is preferred. Contact For questions, corrections, technical discussion, archival clarification, or collaboration: QuantumCollapseGeometry@gmail.com