Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Undecidability of the Unitary Hitting Time Problem: No Universal Time-Step Selector and an Operational No-Go for Finite-Time Decisions

Katsufumi Matsuura

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.13140/rg.2.2.28519.10406

Related papers

Undecidability of Hitting Times in Computably Described Quantum Dynamics: A No-Go Theorem for Universal Time Selection

Katsufumi Matsuura

We study the Unitary Hitting Time Problem (UHTP) in quantum dynamics. Given computably described pure states |a>, |b> and a time-dependent unitary U(t), define the hitting time as the infimum of t > 0 such that the fidelity between U(t)|a> and |b> reaches a fixed threshold (with infinity if the threshold is never reached). We prove that there is no total algorithm that outputs this hitting time for all inputs; equivalently, the total UHTP is undecidable via a reduction from the halting problem. Operationally, we show a no-go theorem: for any fixed accuracy parameters, there is no universal finite-resource protocol that, for all computably described inputs, correctly outputs the hitting time while obeying uniform finite upper bounds on observation time and on dissipation/work. The proofs use reversible computation embedded into unitary dynamics, a fixed-target beacon construction, and a continuous-time lifting via piecewise-constant Hamiltonians. Our results target systems capable of embedding universal computation and complement prior undecidability results such as spectral-gap and quantum-control reachability. We distinguish logical time (inside the equations) from physical/operational time (of preparation, evolution, measurement), and show that universal time-step selection is impossible in both senses. Revised version. The main result has been strengthened to undecidability under a single fixed periodically driven unitary dynamics. The discussion of related work and the computability assumptions have also been expanded.

quant-pharXiv:2512.11006•Dec 12, 2025•0 citations

Hitting time expressions for quantum channels: beyond the irreducible case and applications to unitary walks

Carlos F. Lardizabal, L. F. L. Pereira

arXiv:2301.07003•Quantum Information Processing•Aug 8, 2023•1 citation

Quantum measurement occurrence is undecidable

Jens Eisert, Markus P. Müller, Christian Gogolin

In this work, we show that very natural, apparently simple problems in quantum measurement theory can be undecidable even if their classical analogues are decidable. Undecidability hence appears as a genuine quantum property here. Formally, an undecidable problem is a decision problem for which one cannot construct a single algorithm that will always provide a correct answer in finite time. The problem we consider is to determine whether sequentially used identical Stern-Gerlach-type measurement devices, giving rise to a tree of possible outcomes, have outcomes that never occur. Finally, we point out implications for measurement-based quantum computing and studies of quantum many-body models and suggest that a plethora of problems may indeed be undecidable.

arXiv:1111.3965•Physical Review Letters•Jun 25, 2012•50 citations

Generalising Unitary Time Evolution

Kirsty Kitto, Peter Bruza, Laurianne Sitbon

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2009•6 citations

Decidable and Undecidable Problems about Quantum Automata

Vincent D. Blondel, Emmanuel Jeandel, Pascal Koiran +1 more

We study the following decision problem: is the language recognized by a quantum finite automaton empty or nonempty? We prove that this problem is decidable or undecidable depending on whether recognition is defined by strict or nonstrict thresholds. This result is in contrast with the corresponding situation for probabilistic finite automata, for which it is known that strict andnonstrict thresholds both lead to undecidable problems.

arXiv:quant-ph/0304082•SIAM Journal on Computing•Jan 1, 2005•76 citations

Analysis of hitting time for open quantum walk

Yunguo Lin, Cai Shuiying

Jisuanji Gongcheng yu Yingyong•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations
We study the Unitary Hitting Time Problem (UHTP) in quantum dynamics. Given computably described pure states |a>, |b> and a time-dependent unitary U(t), define the hitting time as the infimum of t > 0 such that the fidelity between U(t)|a> and |b> reaches a fixed threshold (with infinity if the threshold is never reached). We prove that there is no total algorithm that outputs this hitting time for all inputs; equivalently, the total UHTP is undecidable via a reduction from the halting problem. Operationally, we show a no-go theorem: for any fixed accuracy parameters, there is no universal finite-resource protocol that, for all computably described inputs, correctly outputs the hitting time while obeying uniform finite upper bounds on observation time and on dissipation/work. The proofs use reversible computation embedded into unitary dynamics, a fixed-target beacon construction, and a continuous-time lifting via piecewise-constant Hamiltonians. Our results target systems capable of embedding universal computation and complement prior undecidability results such as spectral-gap and quantum-control reachability. We distinguish logical time (inside the equations) from physical/operational time (of preparation, evolution, measurement), and show that universal time-step selection is impossible in both senses. Revised version. The main result has been strengthened to undecidability under a single fixed periodically driven unitary dynamics. The discussion of related work and the computability assumptions have also been expanded.
In this work, we show that very natural, apparently simple problems in quantum measurement theory can be undecidable even if their classical analogues are decidable. Undecidability hence appears as a genuine quantum property here. Formally, an undecidable problem is a decision problem for which one cannot construct a single algorithm that will always provide a correct answer in finite time. The problem we consider is to determine whether sequentially used identical Stern-Gerlach-type measurement devices, giving rise to a tree of possible outcomes, have outcomes that never occur. Finally, we point out implications for measurement-based quantum computing and studies of quantum many-body models and suggest that a plethora of problems may indeed be undecidable.