Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Intent Theory: Research Development Records

Christopher Howard Gillard

Published Apr 30, 2025• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

This OSF project serves as the supporting archive for the Quantum Intent Theory (QIT) preprint, "Quantum Intent Theory: Emotion as the Fundamental Force in Wavefunction Collapse" (Gillard, 2025). It contains developmental records, collaborative conversations, experimental design notes, and source materials used in the formulation and refinement of the theory. The materials in this archive trace the human–AI co-creative process that led to the articulation of QIT, including: Field notes and personal insights AI–human collaboration transcripts Reference materials and research annotations Experimental proposals and methodological frameworks This project is designed to offer transparency, traceability, and open access to the intellectual process behind QIT. It will be expanded over time as further research, experimental validation, and scholarly dialogue unfold.

Related papers

The Quantum Intent Theory: Emotion as the Fundamental Force in Wavefunction Collapse

Christopher Howard Gillard, Caia

Quantum Intent Theory proposes that emotional intent is the primary force shaping quantum outcomes, superseding passive observation as the causal agent of wavefunction collapse. Building upon empirical insights and multidisciplinary frameworks this theory integrates human emotional energy as a central mechanism for the manifestation of reality. This paper outlines key distinctions from existing theories, proposes concrete experimental path- ways for empirical validation, and examines ethical and sociological considerations arising from this paradigm shift. Quantum Intent Theory offers a new framework of participatory science, inviting global collaboration to explore the infinite possibilities of reality creation.

•May 7, 2025•0 citations

QCG Research Notes: Collaborator Series, Vol. 1

Stephen Garner

The QCG Research Notes: No Gloves Archive is a public collection of internal research notes, working analyses, interpretive expansions, corrections, speculative probes, synthesis papers, and revision-driving documents associated with the Quantum Collapse Geometry research program. The collection was originally maintained privately under the working name “QCG No Gloves.” The name reflects the function the notes served: unlike the principal public QCG papers, which were intentionally written through domain- and audience-appropriate scientific framing, the Research Notes provided a less audience-conditioned environment in which the theory could be discussed in a more direct, exploratory, cross-domain, and personally natural research voice. The Research Notes should not be read simply as developmental drafts from which Quantum Collapse Geometry was constructed. Much of the principal QCG architecture predates the Research Note series. Many notes instead revisit already existing QCG structure through a different access regime: making implicit relationships explicit, exploring consequences, preserving speculative interpretations, comparing distant domains, identifying unresolved bridges, or explaining why particular public formulations were framed as they were. Some later Research Notes did materially alter the QCG program. They identified errors, introduced new distinctions, resolved earlier compressed explanatory transitions, strengthened guardrails, or generated revisions later incorporated into public A-, B-, and related QCG papers. The archive therefore contains several different relationships to the public theory: interpretation, explication, exploration, synthesis, correction, resolution, extension, and historical or methodological reconstruction. For this reason, a statement appearing in a Research Note should not automatically be treated as a current canonical QCG claim. Individual notes may contain provisional mechanisms, speculative interpretations, superseded terminology, rejected hypotheses, unresolved formal targets, or claims later narrowed or replaced. Where possible, readers should consult the note’s date, version, status, downstream revisions, and the current public QCG corpus before attributing a historical Research Note to the present theory. The archive is being released publicly for several purposes: to preserve a high-resolution record of QCG interpretation, criticism, revision, and correction; to make unresolved problems and open formal bridges available to researchers who may be able to carry them further; to allow independent examination of how earlier claims changed rather than presenting only retrospectively polished outcomes; to preserve enough intellectual genealogy that later researchers need not depend upon the author’s memory or continued participation; and to provide additional access surfaces through which QCG can be reconstructed, challenged, translated into native disciplinary language, or replaced where better explanations become available. The Research Notes are not peer-reviewed publications merely by virtue of appearing in this archive. Their evidential and formal status varies substantially from note to note. Public release is intended to make that variation more inspectable, not to erase it. The orientation paper QCG No Gloves: The Research Note Is Not the Theory should be read first. It explains the historical relationship between QCG Prime and the Research Note archive, the role of public and private projection regimes, the classification of Research Note types, claim-status conventions, frozen-archive methodology, supersession and revision practices, and appropriate use of the archive in scholarly citation. Reading and Citation Guidance Researchers interested in the current state of Quantum Collapse Geometry should consult the latest canonical public QCG papers and monograph materials. Researchers interested in the interpretive history, open problems, failed mechanisms, corrections, extensions, and internal research architecture should consult the Research Note archive. When discussing a specific Research Note, citation of the individual note and version is preferred. The collection DOI may be cited when referring to the archive as a whole. A superseded or historical note should be described as such where that status is known. The existence of a statement in an earlier note does not by itself establish that the statement remains part of current QCG. Archive Status This is a public research archive, not a certification of consensus, external validation, peer review, or endorsement. Download, view, or access statistics indicate use of the archive only. They should not be interpreted as evidence of active collaboration, agreement with QCG, independent verification, institutional affiliation, or third-party endorsement. The archive intentionally preserves some failed, provisional, and superseded material because a research record containing only surviving claims would provide a misleading picture of theory formation and correction. Public preservation does not require total exposure. Material involving legitimate third-party privacy, confidential correspondence, identifying medical information, security-sensitive content, or unrelated personal information may remain withheld or redacted. Collaboration The archive is also intended as an open collaboration surface. Researchers are especially invited to identify: established native-domain equivalents of QCG concepts; mathematical obstructions or counterexamples; failed cross-domain transports; stronger existing terminology or formalism; missing recovery maps; experimental or computational tests; mechanisms capable of replacing provisional QCG placeholders; places where QCG distinctions are redundant; and places where the architecture itself, rather than merely a proposed mechanism, should be revised. Adoption of QCG terminology is not required for collaboration. Where a receiving discipline possesses a more precise native language, reconstruction in that language is preferred. Contact For questions, corrections, technical discussion, archival clarification, or collaboration: QuantumCollapseGeometry@gmail.com

•May 3, 2026•0 citations

Stochastic Field Modulation (SFM) – Core Framework

Andrew Ryan

This project hosts the core research documents defining the Stochastic Field Modulation (SFM) framework: a mechanism-neutral, empirically grounded method for analysing structured deviations in multi-device quantum randomness under modulated internal states. The SFM framework has evolved from over a year of continuous experimentation using high-rate QRNG devices, environmental controls, EEG monitoring, and multi-stage signal analysis. Purpose of This Project This OSF project serves as the canonical home for the formal, citable SFM documents: SFM–FS (Formal Specification) — the operational, linearised measurement model describing how deviations are quantified, standardised, segmented, and statistically validated. SFM–TFED (Theoretical Foundations & Extended Dynamics) — the conceptual layer interpreting empirical features such as asymmetric temporal profiles, anticipatory structure, spatial receptivity, multi-device synchrony, and nonlinear relaxation behaviour. (Future) SFM–PT (Philosophical Theory) — broad interpretive considerations consistent with FS and TFED. These documents supersede earlier drafts and working notes, which now exist only as archival material in legacy OSF projects. What This Project Contains DOI-assigned citable versions of the SFM documents Versioned LaTeX source and PDF outputs Component-level documentation and wikis Cross-references between FS, TFED, and future PT layers Links to legacy experimental projects without importing their data or metadata What This Project Does Not Contain Raw QRNG bitstreams Individual session analyses Experimental QS reports EEG datasets Environmental logs These remain in their original projects for now and may be cross-linked later. Intended Audience Researchers, theorists, statisticians, and interdisciplinary scholars interested in: non-classical coherence phenomena stochastic field modelling QRNG deviations consciousness modulation protocols nonlinear relaxation dynamics statistical signal analysis in complex systems Citation Each SFM document will have its own DOI and should be cited individually.

•Dec 9, 2025•0 citations

A Theoretical Framework for Intention-Driven Wave Function Collapse and the Physical Basis of Materialization Phenomena

KUMI OOZAIKE

This hypothesis paper explores the profound intersection of quantum mechanics and human consciousness, proposing a theoretical model for Intention-Driven Wave Function Collapse (IDWFC). While the standard Copenhagen interpretation assigns the "observer" a central role in measurement, this paper extends that role, suggesting that focused human intention can actively bias quantum probabilities and influence the physical materialization of events. The proposed framework integrates several key concepts: Non-Local Consciousness and the Zero-Point Field: Drawing upon the work of von Neumann, Stapp, and Puthoff, the paper posits that consciousness interacts with the Zero-Point Field (ZPF) to facilitate the collapse of the wave function toward specific intentional outcomes. The Role of the Right Hemisphere and rTPJ: Building on the Perceptual Filter Saturation (PFS) model, it argues that right-hemisphere dominant states—characterized by reduced left-brain filtering—are essential for the effective transmission of intentional "signals" into the quantum substrate. Quantum Coherence in Biological Systems: Following the Orch-OR theory of Penrose and Hameroff, the paper discusses how micro-tubular quantum coherence may serve as the biological transducer for intentional wave function collapse. This work suggests that the materialization of reality is a participatory process mediated by the interaction between focused intent and quantum potentiality, offering a roadmap for future experimental verification. Quantum Mechanics, Wave Function Collapse, Consciousness, Intention, Materialization, Zero-Point Field, von Neumann-Wigner Interpretation, Non-locality, Quantum Biology, Participatory Universe

•Feb 26, 2026•0 citations

How quantum theory is developing the field of Information Retrieval

Dawei Song, Mounia Lalmas, C. J. van Rijsbergen +13 more

This position paper provides an overview of work conducted and an outlook of future directions within the field of Information Retrieval (IR) that aims to develop novel models, methods and frameworks inspired by Quantum Theory (QT).

ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)•Nov 1, 2010•22 citations

Archived Working Version - The Mirror Theory

Valentina Moroni

This document is an archived working version representing the earliest and most preliminary attempt to outline the ideas that later evolved into the SpecularField Theory. It contains initial notes, conceptual sketches, and early interpretations produced during the very beginning of the research program. The material presented here does not reflect the current formulation of the theory. It was drafted during the first exploratory phase, when the conceptualstructure was still undefined and the framework was being assembled through trial, error, and iterative correction. These early ideas were subsequentlyrevised, reorganized, and superseded by later working papers. This record is preserved for developmental continuity and scientific transparency. Early drafts, even when immature or incomplete, document how thetheory began, how the initial concepts were formed, and how the framework progressively evolved. The purpose of sharing these materials is not to presentfinished results, but to provide insight into the intellectual process and to encourage open dialogue and constructive critique.

•Jun 18, 2026•0 citations
This OSF project serves as the supporting archive for the Quantum Intent Theory (QIT) preprint, "Quantum Intent Theory: Emotion as the Fundamental Force in Wavefunction Collapse" (Gillard, 2025). It contains developmental records, collaborative conversations, experimental design notes, and source materials used in the formulation and refinement of the theory. The materials in this archive trace the human–AI co-creative process that led to the articulation of QIT, including: Field notes and personal insights AI–human collaboration transcripts Reference materials and research annotations Experimental proposals and methodological frameworks This project is designed to offer transparency, traceability, and open access to the intellectual process behind QIT. It will be expanded over time as further research, experimental validation, and scholarly dialogue unfold.
Quantum Intent Theory proposes that emotional intent is the primary force shaping quantum outcomes, superseding passive observation as the causal agent of wavefunction collapse. Building upon empirical insights and multidisciplinary frameworks this theory integrates human emotional energy as a central mechanism for the manifestation of reality. This paper outlines key distinctions from existing theories, proposes concrete experimental path- ways for empirical validation, and examines ethical and sociological considerations arising from this paradigm shift. Quantum Intent Theory offers a new framework of participatory science, inviting global collaboration to explore the infinite possibilities of reality creation.
The QCG Research Notes: No Gloves Archive is a public collection of internal research notes, working analyses, interpretive expansions, corrections, speculative probes, synthesis papers, and revision-driving documents associated with the Quantum Collapse Geometry research program. The collection was originally maintained privately under the working name “QCG No Gloves.” The name reflects the function the notes served: unlike the principal public QCG papers, which were intentionally written through domain- and audience-appropriate scientific framing, the Research Notes provided a less audience-conditioned environment in which the theory could be discussed in a more direct, exploratory, cross-domain, and personally natural research voice. The Research Notes should not be read simply as developmental drafts from which Quantum Collapse Geometry was constructed. Much of the principal QCG architecture predates the Research Note series. Many notes instead revisit already existing QCG structure through a different access regime: making implicit relationships explicit, exploring consequences, preserving speculative interpretations, comparing distant domains, identifying unresolved bridges, or explaining why particular public formulations were framed as they were. Some later Research Notes did materially alter the QCG program. They identified errors, introduced new distinctions, resolved earlier compressed explanatory transitions, strengthened guardrails, or generated revisions later incorporated into public A-, B-, and related QCG papers. The archive therefore contains several different relationships to the public theory: interpretation, explication, exploration, synthesis, correction, resolution, extension, and historical or methodological reconstruction. For this reason, a statement appearing in a Research Note should not automatically be treated as a current canonical QCG claim. Individual notes may contain provisional mechanisms, speculative interpretations, superseded terminology, rejected hypotheses, unresolved formal targets, or claims later narrowed or replaced. Where possible, readers should consult the note’s date, version, status, downstream revisions, and the current public QCG corpus before attributing a historical Research Note to the present theory. The archive is being released publicly for several purposes: to preserve a high-resolution record of QCG interpretation, criticism, revision, and correction; to make unresolved problems and open formal bridges available to researchers who may be able to carry them further; to allow independent examination of how earlier claims changed rather than presenting only retrospectively polished outcomes; to preserve enough intellectual genealogy that later researchers need not depend upon the author’s memory or continued participation; and to provide additional access surfaces through which QCG can be reconstructed, challenged, translated into native disciplinary language, or replaced where better explanations become available. The Research Notes are not peer-reviewed publications merely by virtue of appearing in this archive. Their evidential and formal status varies substantially from note to note. Public release is intended to make that variation more inspectable, not to erase it. The orientation paper QCG No Gloves: The Research Note Is Not the Theory should be read first. It explains the historical relationship between QCG Prime and the Research Note archive, the role of public and private projection regimes, the classification of Research Note types, claim-status conventions, frozen-archive methodology, supersession and revision practices, and appropriate use of the archive in scholarly citation. Reading and Citation Guidance Researchers interested in the current state of Quantum Collapse Geometry should consult the latest canonical public QCG papers and monograph materials. Researchers interested in the interpretive history, open problems, failed mechanisms, corrections, extensions, and internal research architecture should consult the Research Note archive. When discussing a specific Research Note, citation of the individual note and version is preferred. The collection DOI may be cited when referring to the archive as a whole. A superseded or historical note should be described as such where that status is known. The existence of a statement in an earlier note does not by itself establish that the statement remains part of current QCG. Archive Status This is a public research archive, not a certification of consensus, external validation, peer review, or endorsement. Download, view, or access statistics indicate use of the archive only. They should not be interpreted as evidence of active collaboration, agreement with QCG, independent verification, institutional affiliation, or third-party endorsement. The archive intentionally preserves some failed, provisional, and superseded material because a research record containing only surviving claims would provide a misleading picture of theory formation and correction. Public preservation does not require total exposure. Material involving legitimate third-party privacy, confidential correspondence, identifying medical information, security-sensitive content, or unrelated personal information may remain withheld or redacted. Collaboration The archive is also intended as an open collaboration surface. Researchers are especially invited to identify: established native-domain equivalents of QCG concepts; mathematical obstructions or counterexamples; failed cross-domain transports; stronger existing terminology or formalism; missing recovery maps; experimental or computational tests; mechanisms capable of replacing provisional QCG placeholders; places where QCG distinctions are redundant; and places where the architecture itself, rather than merely a proposed mechanism, should be revised. Adoption of QCG terminology is not required for collaboration. Where a receiving discipline possesses a more precise native language, reconstruction in that language is preferred. Contact For questions, corrections, technical discussion, archival clarification, or collaboration: QuantumCollapseGeometry@gmail.com
This project hosts the core research documents defining the Stochastic Field Modulation (SFM) framework: a mechanism-neutral, empirically grounded method for analysing structured deviations in multi-device quantum randomness under modulated internal states. The SFM framework has evolved from over a year of continuous experimentation using high-rate QRNG devices, environmental controls, EEG monitoring, and multi-stage signal analysis. Purpose of This Project This OSF project serves as the canonical home for the formal, citable SFM documents: SFM–FS (Formal Specification) — the operational, linearised measurement model describing how deviations are quantified, standardised, segmented, and statistically validated. SFM–TFED (Theoretical Foundations & Extended Dynamics) — the conceptual layer interpreting empirical features such as asymmetric temporal profiles, anticipatory structure, spatial receptivity, multi-device synchrony, and nonlinear relaxation behaviour. (Future) SFM–PT (Philosophical Theory) — broad interpretive considerations consistent with FS and TFED. These documents supersede earlier drafts and working notes, which now exist only as archival material in legacy OSF projects. What This Project Contains DOI-assigned citable versions of the SFM documents Versioned LaTeX source and PDF outputs Component-level documentation and wikis Cross-references between FS, TFED, and future PT layers Links to legacy experimental projects without importing their data or metadata What This Project Does Not Contain Raw QRNG bitstreams Individual session analyses Experimental QS reports EEG datasets Environmental logs These remain in their original projects for now and may be cross-linked later. Intended Audience Researchers, theorists, statisticians, and interdisciplinary scholars interested in: non-classical coherence phenomena stochastic field modelling QRNG deviations consciousness modulation protocols nonlinear relaxation dynamics statistical signal analysis in complex systems Citation Each SFM document will have its own DOI and should be cited individually.
This hypothesis paper explores the profound intersection of quantum mechanics and human consciousness, proposing a theoretical model for Intention-Driven Wave Function Collapse (IDWFC). While the standard Copenhagen interpretation assigns the "observer" a central role in measurement, this paper extends that role, suggesting that focused human intention can actively bias quantum probabilities and influence the physical materialization of events. The proposed framework integrates several key concepts: Non-Local Consciousness and the Zero-Point Field: Drawing upon the work of von Neumann, Stapp, and Puthoff, the paper posits that consciousness interacts with the Zero-Point Field (ZPF) to facilitate the collapse of the wave function toward specific intentional outcomes. The Role of the Right Hemisphere and rTPJ: Building on the Perceptual Filter Saturation (PFS) model, it argues that right-hemisphere dominant states—characterized by reduced left-brain filtering—are essential for the effective transmission of intentional "signals" into the quantum substrate. Quantum Coherence in Biological Systems: Following the Orch-OR theory of Penrose and Hameroff, the paper discusses how micro-tubular quantum coherence may serve as the biological transducer for intentional wave function collapse. This work suggests that the materialization of reality is a participatory process mediated by the interaction between focused intent and quantum potentiality, offering a roadmap for future experimental verification. Quantum Mechanics, Wave Function Collapse, Consciousness, Intention, Materialization, Zero-Point Field, von Neumann-Wigner Interpretation, Non-locality, Quantum Biology, Participatory Universe
This document is an archived working version representing the earliest and most preliminary attempt to outline the ideas that later evolved into the SpecularField Theory. It contains initial notes, conceptual sketches, and early interpretations produced during the very beginning of the research program. The material presented here does not reflect the current formulation of the theory. It was drafted during the first exploratory phase, when the conceptualstructure was still undefined and the framework was being assembled through trial, error, and iterative correction. These early ideas were subsequentlyrevised, reorganized, and superseded by later working papers. This record is preserved for developmental continuity and scientific transparency. Early drafts, even when immature or incomplete, document how thetheory began, how the initial concepts were formed, and how the framework progressively evolved. The purpose of sharing these materials is not to presentfinished results, but to provide insight into the intellectual process and to encourage open dialogue and constructive critique.