Probing the quantum nature of gravity is one of the most profound open challenges in physics. A promising direction is the Gravitationally Induced Entanglement (GIE) protocol, where two initially unentangled probes become entangled solely through local interactions with a mediator of interaction, the gravitational field. Such entanglement would imply that gravity must carry quantum features, namely, it must possess at least a couple of incompatible observables. This thesis further expands the GIE protocol and its Theory-Independent argument by introducing a general, dynamics-independent inequality: the quantum correlation gain between the probes is upper-bounded by the non-commutativity of the mediator’s observables and its Hilbert space dimension. This bound holds for arbitrary interactions and any finite-dimensional systems. A decoherence analysis shows the bound vanishes when the mediator becomes classical. These results provide a quantitative, operational tool for observing the non-classicality of mediators, thereby expanding the conceptual and experimental reach of GIE-based tests of gravity.
Probing the quantum nature of gravity is one of the most profound open challenges in physics. A promising direction is the Gravitationally Induced Entanglement (GIE) protocol, where two initially unentangled probes become entangled solely through local interactions with a mediator of interaction, the gravitational field. Such entanglement would imply that gravity must carry quantum features, namely, it must possess at least a couple of incompatible observables. This thesis further expands the GIE protocol and its Theory-Independent argument by introducing a general, dynamics-independent inequality: the quantum correlation gain between the probes is upper-bounded by the non-commutativity of the mediator’s observables and its Hilbert space dimension. This bound holds for arbitrary interactions and any finite-dimensional systems. A decoherence analysis shows the bound vanishes when the mediator becomes classical. These results provide a quantitative, operational tool for observing the non-classicality of mediators, thereby expanding the conceptual and experimental reach of GIE-based tests of gravity.
Once again, dispute has arisen over the interpretation of proposed quantum information theory experiments to probe the quantum nature of gravity by testing for gravitationally induced entanglement (GIE) between two spatially separated massive particles ([2] vs. [16, 17]; further contributions in [11, 13]). The confusion appears to reside in interpreting applications of a Hamiltonian formalism. But classical gravity cannot mediate entanglement on independent grounds. A Newton-Cartan analysis shows that if gravity is classical, a mediator, and entanglement is observed as an outcome of performing a GIE experiment, something other than gravity must have supplied the (virtual) force needed during the experiment to produce the effect.
Gravity-induced entanglement (GIE) experiments have been proposed as a theory-independent test of the quantum nature of gravity, on the strength of several no-go theorems concluding that GIE detection implies the gravitational interaction is either nonlocal or nonclassical. This is in apparent tension with a growing number of papers claiming that theories with a classical gravitational field do predict GIE. This article resolves the tension by reviewing the assumptions of the no-go theorems and highlighting the information-theoretic, rather than spatiotemporal, nature of the locality assumption. This makes violating locality not particularly problematic. Indeed, quantum electrodynamics and perturbative quantum gravity are nonlocal in the sense of the theorems. Thus, simple detection GIE is not sufficient to rule out a classical gravitational field and we will need quantitative comparison of theoretical predictions in the low-energy quantum gravity regime to test whether the gravitational field is quantum or classical.
Abstract There has been a wave of recent interest in detecting the quantum nature of gravity with tabletop experiments that witness gravitationally mediated entanglement. Central to these proposals is the assumption that any mediator capable of generating entanglement must itself be nonclassical. However, previous arguments for this have modeled classical mediators as finite, discrete systems such as bits, which excludes physically relevant continuous and infinite-dimensional systems such as those of classical mechanics and field theory. In this work, we close this gap by modeling classical systems as commutative unital C ∗ -algebras, arguably encompassing all potentially physically relevant classical systems. We show that these systems cannot mediate entanglement between two quantum systems A and B , even if A and B are themselves infinite-dimensional or described by arbitrary unital C ∗ -algebras (as in quantum field theory), composed with an arbitrary C ∗ -tensor product. This result reinforces the conclusion that the observation of gravity-induced entanglement would require the gravitational field to possess inherently non-classical features.
Gravity-induced entanglement (GIE) is widely regarded as key evidence of nonclassical gravity. Recent work, however, argues that a classical gravitational background can generate entanglement through virtual matter propagation between separated masses. Here we show that this mechanism is negligible once realistic matter dynamics is taken into account. For bound or condensed matter, the binding potential converts the claimed long-range matter-mediated interaction into an exponentially short-ranged one, with an attenuation length of only a few picometers for representative binding energies-well below atomic dimensions and therefore negligible under experimentally relevant distances. For unbound matter, the channel remains negligible before significant wave-packet overlap, while after overlap the packets no longer represent two spatially separated subsystems. Thus the proposed classical matter-mediated mechanism does not challenge the usual interpretation of GIE as evidence for nonclassical gravity once physical localization and finite-time matter dynamics are treated consistently.
Quantum theory is one of the most successful theories in modern physics. It has been extensively tested in the microscopic domain, always with remarkable success. Yet, these tests do not currently extend in a conclusive way to all physical systems and across all scales. This leaves open the question of whether quantum theory provides a truly universal description of reality, especially in regimes where direct experimental access is limited, such as the gravitational field or complex macroscopic biological systems. This Thesis addresses this question through the study of hybrid systems, where a well-controlled quantum sector interacts with an unknown sector whose underlying description may or may not be quantum. It contributes to the emerging framework of information-theoretical witnesses of non-classicality, where the quantum sector is used as a probe to test the nature of the unknown system under minimal assumptions. We first examine spatial entanglement-based witnesses, in which the ability of an unknown system to mediate entanglement between two quantum probes by local means provides a sufficient condition for its non-classicality. We extend this framework by quantitatively showing that locally mediated quantum correlations lower bound the non-commutativity of the observables of the mediator, within quantum theory. We then introduce a novel class of single-probe temporal witnesses, where non-classicality is inferred from the temporal evolution of a probe under a global conservation law. We prove that quantum coherent evolution under such a constraint can only be mediated by a non-classical system, and propose an application to light-harvesting processes in photosynthetic complexes. Finally, we develop a temporal entanglement-based witness. Here, the sufficient condition for the non-classicality of the unknown system is the ability to mediate temporal entanglement relative to the probe's local conserved quantity and a non-commuting observable. This result provides a temporal extension of the spatial entanglement-based witness, representing a promising route for the development of the next generation of tests to probe the universality of quantum theory in previously inaccessible fields such as gravity and biology.
Recent proposals suggest that detecting entanglement between two spatially superposed masses would establish the quantum nature of gravity. However, these gravitationally induced entanglement (GIE) experiments rely on assumptions about subsystem independence. We sharpen the theoretical underpinnings of such proposals by examining them through the lens of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT), distinguishing distinct operational and algebraic notions of independence. We argue that state and measurement independence of subsystems, essential to the experimental logic, is nontrivial in the presence of gauge constraints and gravitational dressing. Using gravitationally dressed fields, we recall that commutation relations between spacelike separated observables are nontrivial, undermining strict Hilbert space factorization. We further explore the implications for entanglement witnesses, investigating the Tsirelson bound when subsystem algebras fail to commute, and showing that the Tsirelson bound persists for a suitably symmetrized CHSH observable even though the operational status of such "joint" observables becomes delicate when commensurability fails. Our analysis highlights how even within linearized covariant quantum gravity, violations of microcausality may affect both the interpretation, modelling, and design of proposed laboratory tests of quantum gravity, despite remaining negligible for current experimental regimes. Although we consider GIE-style protocols as a concrete case study, the subsystem-independence issues we highlight are generic to low-energy (perturbative) quantum gravity. Finally, we derive estimates for dressing-induced microcausality violations, which suggest a complementary avenue to current proposals: in principle, bounding dressing-induced microcausality violations themselves as a probe of the quantum nature of gravity.