Abstract The rapid evolution of quantum devices fuels concerted efforts to experimentally establish quantum advantage over classical computing. Many demonstrations of quantum advantage, however, rely on computational assumptions and face verification challenges. Furthermore, steady advances in classical algorithms and machine learning make the issue of provable, practically demonstrable quantum advantage a moving target. In this work, we unconditionally demonstrate that parallel quantum computation can exhibit greater computational power than previously recognized. We prove that polynomial-size biased threshold circuits of constant depth—which model neural networks with tunable expressivity—fail to solve certain problems solvable by small constant-depth quantum circuits with local gates, for values of the bias that allow quantifiably large computational power. Additionally, we identify a family of problems that are solvable in constant depth by a universal quantum computer over prime-dimensional qudits with bounded connectivity, but remain hard for polynomial-size biased threshold circuits. We thereby bridge the foundational theory of non-local games in higher dimensions with computational advantage on emerging devices operating on a wide range of physical platforms. Finally, we show that these quantum advantages are robust to noise across all prime qudit dimensions with all-to-all connectivity, enhancing their practical appeal.
Abstract The rapid evolution of quantum devices fuels concerted efforts to experimentally establish quantum advantage over classical computing. Many demonstrations of quantum advantage, however, rely on computational assumptions and face verification challenges. Furthermore, steady advances in classical algorithms and machine learning make the issue of provable, practically demonstrable quantum advantage a moving target. In this work, we unconditionally demonstrate that parallel quantum computation can exhibit greater computational power than previously recognized. We prove that polynomial-size biased threshold circuits of constant depth—which model neural networks with tunable expressivity—fail to solve certain problems solvable by small constant-depth quantum circuits with local gates, for values of the bias that allow quantifiably large computational power. Additionally, we identify a family of problems that are solvable in constant depth by a universal quantum computer over prime-dimensional qudits with bounded connectivity, but remain hard for polynomial-size biased threshold circuits. We thereby bridge the foundational theory of non-local games in higher dimensions with computational advantage on emerging devices operating on a wide range of physical platforms. Finally, we show that these quantum advantages are robust to noise across all prime qudit dimensions with all-to-all connectivity, enhancing their practical appeal.
The rapid evolution of quantum devices fuels concerted efforts to experimentally establish quantum advantage over classical computing. Many demonstrations of quantum advantage, however, rely on computational assumptions and face verification challenges. Furthermore, steady advances in classical algorithms and machine learning make the issue of provable, practically demonstrable quantum advantage a moving target. In this work, we unconditionally demonstrate that parallel quantum computation can exhibit greater computational power than previously recognized. We prove that polynomial-size biased threshold circuits of constant depth-which model neural networks with tunable expressivity-fail to solve certain problems solvable by small constant-depth quantum circuits with local gates, for values of the bias that allow quantifiably large computational power. Additionally, we identify a family of problems that are solvable in constant depth by a universal quantum computer over prime-dimensional qudits with bounded connectivity, but remain hard for polynomial-size biased threshold circuits. We thereby bridge the foundational theory of non-local games in higher dimensions with computational advantage on emerging devices operating on a wide range of physical platforms. Finally, we show that these quantum advantages are robust to noise across all prime qudit dimensions with all-to-all connectivity, enhancing their practical appeal.
We consider quantum devices restricted to local operations in 2D and subject to local stochastic noise below a constant threshold. We show that such circuits are computationally more powerful than AC0-circuits, i.e., noise-free, geometrically-unconstrained constant-depth classical circuits with unbounded fan-in AND, OR and NOT gates. To this end, we exhibit a computational problem with the following properties: (i) Any instance of the problem is correctly solved with high probability by a certain geometrically 2D-local quantum circuit even if the latter is imperfectly implemented, but (ii) any polynomial-size AC0-circuit fails to solve certain instances of the problem with constant probability. To our knowledge, this isthe first complexity-theoretic separation which applies to planar quantum devices, incorporates noise-resilience and is unconditional, i.e., does not rely on complexity-theoretic assumptions. This brings the experimental demonstration of an unconditional quantum advantage closer to experimental realities.
Quantum computers were initially proposed to surpass the limitations of classical computers in simulating physical systems. Soon after, the field of quantum computing advanced through landmark discoveries of quantum algorithms, with some conjectured to provide exponential advantages over classical counterparts. These include Shor’s factoring algorithm, which has profound implications in cryptography. Additionally, moderate yet significant polynomial separations have further increased interest in the field. However, despite this progress, unconditional proofs confirming quantum superiority on the theoretical side remain elusive. At the same time, large, noise-resilient quantum computations on the experimental side, which could challenge the extended Church-Turing thesis by potentially breaking classical computational barriers, have yet to be achieved. Meanwhile, our understanding of the differences between classical and quantum mechanics has deepened. We now possess rigorous theoretical tools, such as Bell inequalities and nonlocal games, to describe behaviors unique to these theories. Moreover, the main loopholes for observing non-classical correlations have been closed experimentally, showing that correlations in the physical world exceed those predicted by classical mechanics. This thesis investigates computational complexity differences between quantum and classical models by studying shallow-depth circuits. The primary focus lies in identifying, elucidating, and proving computational quantum advantages. Additionally, the analysis delves into the bijection between these circuits and foundational non-local game constructions, exploring how quantum-classical deviations in multi-party correlation settings translate to computational advantages. A key question addressed is how to synthesize constant-depth quantum circuits for various problems to leverage quantum advantages. To this end, circuit synthesis techniques tailored to measurement-based quantum computation are developed, enabling simultaneously optimal quantum strategies for certain nonlocal games based on a particular bijection between this model and XOR non-local games. Building on this work, we confront a pivotal challenge: If a candidate quantum circuit potentially provides a computational advantage, how can we prove that no classical circuit surpasses it? This work presents new unconditional quantum-classical separations within shallow-depth settings, distinguishing for the first time constant-depth quantum circuits with one- and two-qubit gates from biased polynomial threshold circuits, which incorporate neural-network-type functionalities. These separations extend to prime-dimensional quantum systems, and we conjecture to have identified Razborov-Smolensky-type problems uniquely solvable by specific prime dimensions. The thesis also differentiates constant-depth quantum circuits with multi-qubit Toffoli gates from their classical counterparts, emphasizing the power of parallel quantum computation. Finally, verifying shallow-depth quantum computations is challenging due to conjectured exponential separations from classical computations, limiting correctness verification through simulation. While specific quantum algorithms within BQP have been addressed, we explore whether a quantum computer can reliably execute any instance from a fixed class of quantum circuits. Moving beyond heuristic-based solutions, we propose a benchmarking protocol that certifies, with exponentially high confidence, the execution of arbitrary circuits of specified dimensions, widths, and depths.
We consider quantum circuits consisting of d layers of nearest-neighbor two-qubit gates acting on n qubits arranged on a line, where every qubit is independently depolarized with a constant probability before each layer. We describe a randomized parallel algorithm which samples from the output distribution of any such circuit to within total variation error δ, with parallel runtime 2O(d)loglog(n/δ) and n2O(d) elementary real-arithmetic operations. Without noise, the same approach gives an exact sampler with parallel runtime O(logn). For constant depth, we further show that the input/output behavior of the noisy quantum circuit is reproduced up to a constant error by a randomized AC0-circuit, that is, a Boolean circuit of polynomial size and constant depth with unbounded fan-in AND and OR gates and NOT gates. Consequently, every relation problem solved by a noisy constant-depth quantum circuit in one dimension is also solved, with essentially the same success probability, by a randomized AC0-circuit. This rules out, for noisy circuits in one dimension, the unconditional quantum advantage established for noisy shallow circuits in two and three dimensions, where polynomial-size classical circuits over the same gate set require depth Ω(logn/loglogn). Our algorithm exploits the fact that depolarizing noise cuts a one-dimensional circuit into independent pieces of logarithmic width, each of which can be sampled exactly in parallel.
Abstract Although quantum computers are believed to be more powerful than classical ones, a convincing experimental demonstration of this fact remains elusive. Proposed schemes either rely on unproven complexity-theoretic hardness assumptions, and/or require universal, fault-tolerant scalable quantum computers to implement. This has motivated the study of restricted models of computation. Constant-depth quantum circuits are known to be more powerful than unbounded fan-in classical ( AC0 AC 0 -)circuits. Here we ask if this advantage persists in the presence of noise and under locality constraints. We present a computational problem for which every instance can be solved with near-certainty, despite noise, by a constant-depth quantum circuit with local operations in 3D. In contrast, every AC0 AC 0 -circuit of size smaller than a certain (sub)exponential fails with near-certainty on a uniformly random instance. This constitutes a proposal with built-in fault-tolerance to experimentally observe the strongest known complexity-theoretic separation between classical and quantum computation.
Circuit depth is a central resource in complexity theory. While bounded-depth classical circuits admit well-understood hierarchy theorems, the internal structure of constant-depth quantum computation remains comparatively unexplored.
We prove an explicit depth hierarchy theorem for QNC0. For each d≥12, we construct a family of two-round interactive problems on which no depth-(d−1) quantum circuit can achieve near-perfect success, regardless of gate set, circuit size, or ancillary qubits. In contrast, we prove that our construction admits realizations by simple bounded fan-in quantum circuits of depth larger than d by a small constant factor. Moreover, all bounded fan-in classical circuits of sublogarithmic depth (in the input size) fail to achieve perfect success on these tasks for every d, yielding a hierarchy of problems that show unconditional quantum advantage of QNC0 over NC0.
A key obstacle is the scarcity of lower bound techniques for quantum circuits. To address this, we develop methods to analyze how depth affects a circuit's ability to realize nonlocal correlations amongst its output qubits in a fine-grained manner. Our approach exploits the correspondence between constraint systems and nonlocal games, translating group-theoretic constructions into rigid operator-valued constraint systems and then into non-local games. In particular, we construct constraint systems whose unique faithful operator-valued solutions require every perfect strategy, and every near-perfect strategy to a fixed precision, to implement multi-controlled phase operations. This reduces to a nonlocal unitary-synthesis problem, yielding depth lower bounds for both shallow quantum and classical circuits.
These results show that increasing depth strictly increases computational power within QNC0, establishing a genuinely quantum hierarchy.