Quantum machine learning (QML) has gained significant interest by combining quantum computing and artificial intelligence, two topics that are expected to revolutionize the way of data processing. While gate-based quantum computing uses precisely defined unitary operations on qubits, currently available noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices are not ready for implementations of high-depth circuits. However, machine learning is one of the promising applications to be used on NISQ hardware via parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs). An alternative QML paradigm comes from a different direction: Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) relies on using physical systems as quantum artificial neural networks. Instead of using controlled gate operations, here the system dynamics are controlled by the underlying Hamiltonian, and the machine learning layer is performed at the output weights. Despite their distinct origin, both ML approaches are connected and can formally be mapped onto each other. We discuss this analogy by realizing a transverse-field Ising model on a gate-based quantum computing architecture establishing a fundamental connection on an abstract level between these two very different QML paradigms. This enables us to connect the known expressivity measure of PQC-QML with the quantification of expressiveness of physical dynamical systems.
Quantum machine learning (QML) has gained significant interest by combining quantum computing and artificial intelligence, two topics that are expected to revolutionize the way of data processing. While gate-based quantum computing uses precisely defined unitary operations on qubits, currently available noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices are not ready for implementations of high-depth circuits. However, machine learning is one of the promising applications to be used on NISQ hardware via parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs). An alternative QML paradigm comes from a different direction: Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) relies on using physical systems as quantum artificial neural networks. Instead of using controlled gate operations, here the system dynamics are controlled by the underlying Hamiltonian, and the machine learning layer is performed at the output weights. Despite their distinct origin, both ML approaches are connected and can formally be mapped onto each other. We discuss this analogy by realizing a transverse-field Ising model on a gate-based quantum computing architecture establishing a fundamental connection on an abstract level between these two very different QML paradigms. This enables us to connect the known expressivity measure of PQC-QML with the quantification of expressiveness of physical dynamical systems.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is the convergence of two cutting-edge technologies—quantum computing and artificial intelligence—dedicated to rewriting computational horizons of pattern recognition, optimization, and prediction based on data. The present chapter is an introductory tutorial and cutting-edge coverage of theory foundations, algorithmic developments, and pedagogical models needed to bring QML into secondary and undergraduate classrooms. We then dispel magic from fundamental quantum-computing concepts such as qubits, superposition, entanglement, and quantum gates and demonstrate how they enable quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Fourier Transform, amplitude amplification, variational circuits, and quantum support-vector machines. From these building blocks, the chapter follows classical machine-learning pipelines—data encoding, feature extraction, model training, inference, and evaluation—and demonstrates how they map to their quantum equivalents, with emphasis on hybrid quantum-classical paradigms that are implementable on near-term noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices.
Machine Learning (ML) has been widely applied across numerous domains due to its ability to automatically identify informative patterns from data for various tasks. The availability of large-scale data and advanced computational power enables the development of sophisticated models and training strategies, leading to state-of-the-art performance, but it also introduces substantial challenges. Quantum Computing (QC), which exploits quantum mechanisms for computation, has attracted growing attention and significant global investment as it may address these challenges. Consequently, Quantum Machine Learning (QML), the integration of these two fields, has received increasing interest, with a notable rise in related studies in recent years. We are motivated to review these existing contributions regarding quantum circuit-based learning models for classical data analysis and highlight the identified potentials and challenges of this technique. Specifically, we focus not only on QML models, both kernel-based and neural network-based, but also on recent explorations of their integration with classical machine learning layers within hybrid frameworks. Moreover, we examine both theoretical analysis and empirical findings to better understand their capabilities, and we also discuss the efforts on noise-resilient and hardware-efficient QML that could enhance its practicality under current hardware limitations. In addition, we cover several emerging paradigms for advanced quantum circuit design and highlight the adaptability of QML across representative application domains. This study aims to provide an overview of the contributions made to bridge quantum computing and machine learning, offering insights and guidance to support its future development and pave the way for broader adoption in the coming years.
Quantum machine learning (QML) is a rapidly growing field that combines quantum computing principles with traditional machine learning. It seeks to revolutionize machine learning by harnessing the unique capabilities of quantum mechanics and employs machine learning techniques to advance quantum computing research. This paper presents an overview of quantum computing for the machine learning paradigm, where variational quantum circuits (VQC) are used to develop QML architectures on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. We discuss machine learning for the quantum computing paradigm, showcasing our recent theoretical and empirical findings. In particular, we delve into future directions for studying QML, exploring the potential industrial impacts of QML research.
Quantum computation is a form of computation utilizing quantum mechanical phenomena.A formal formulation of quantum computer was proposed in 1985, leading to novel quantum algorithms whose computation time scales better, with respect to the problem size, than the classical counterparts.However, running these quantum algorithms requires fault-tolerant implementations, and hence, such engineering in quantum systems can be an overhead in utilizing quantum systems for information processing.This suggests, in addition to seeking faster quantum algorithms, the necessity of exploring how to harness quantum systems more naturally without extensive engineering, leading to another form of quantum information processing.Quantum machine learning (QML) is expected to be a promising approach for harnessing quantum systems for information processing.This is motivated by the fact that the success of neural networks has led to the possibility of solving ML tasks more efficiently with non-digital computer designs.Several QML algorithms that resemble neural networks utilize quantum systems in a manner distinct from digital quantum algorithms.However, training quantum systems is fundamentally challenging, suggesting that it still remains necessary to explore an alternative way of harnessing quantum systems for ML.Along with this direction, the quantum reservoir model harnesses quantum systems in a unique way: nontrivial outputs from an untrained quantum system are leveraged by a linear classical machine learning model to solve various tasks.Hence, the quantum part does not need to be programmable and can be analog quantum dynamics.Without extensive engineering in the quantum part, a quantum reservoir model was shown to be capable of performing nontrivial ML tasks using physical dynamics, which had already been realized experimentally.Therefore, the quantum reservoir model should be one of the promising directions for pursuing another form of quantum information processing.In this thesis, I will investigate the computational capability of natural quantum dynamics in the quantum reservoir model.I will tackle the following critical open questions in this context: (i) how well natural dynamics perform nontrivial ML tasks compared to engineered systems, and (ii) what kind of engineering in quantum dynamics is essential and appropriate for a given task.To tackle the first question (i), I will benchmark the learning performance of various natural quantum dynamics against random circuits that require complicated engineering, thereby revealing the computational power of natural dynamics.For the second question (ii), I will present a characterization method of quantum dynamics that has the potential to bridge quantum properties and their machine learning roles, providing concrete insights into essential and appropriate engineering to design quantum systems for ML.v
The rapid advancement of quantum computing hardware and software has ushered in a new era for computational science, promising to tackle problems that are intractable for classical computers. Parallelly, machine learning (ML) has revolutionized data analysis and artificial intelligence. The confluence of these two fields, known as Quantum Machine Learning (QML), aims to harness the principles of quantum mechanics-such as superposition, entanglement, and interference-to enhance and redefine classical machine learning algorithms. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the burgeoning field of QML. We begin by elucidating the fundamental quantum concepts that underpin QML approaches. We then present a detailed taxonomy and analysis of prominent QML algorithms, categorizing them into quantum-enhanced classical models and fully quantum models. Key families of algorithms discussed include Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM), Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs), and Quantum Generative Adversarial Networks (QGANs). For each, we explain the theoretical quantum advantage, the circuit implementation, and the current limitations. Furthermore, we delve into the critical challenges facing the practical realization of QML, including the pervasive issue of noise in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, the problem of barren plateaus in training quantum circuits, and the complexities of efficient data encoding (quantum feature maps). We also present a small-scale experimental simulation of a variational quantum classifier on a standardized dataset, demonstrating its principle and comparing its performance with a classical counterpart. Finally, the paper discusses the future trajectory of QML, highlighting the importance of error mitigation, hybrid quantum-classical architectures, and the development of quantum-specific learning inductive biases. We conclude that while fault-tolerant quantum computers remain on the horizon, QML represents a paradigm shift with the potential to deliver profound computational advantages in the coming decades.
In the current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ)era, quantum machine learning is emerging as a dominant paradigm to program gate-based quantum computers. In quantum machine learning, the gates of a quantum circuit are parameterized, and the parameters are tuned via classical optimization based on data and on measurements of the outputs of the circuit. Parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) can efficiently address combinatorial optimization problems, implement probabilistic generative models, and carry out inference (classification and regression). This monograph provides a self-contained introduction to quantum machine learning for an audience of engineers with a back groundin probability and linear algebra. It first describes the necessary background, concepts, and tools necessary to describe quantum operations and measurements. Then,it covers parameterized quantum circuits, the variation alquantum eigensolver, as well as unsupervised and supervised quantum machine learning formulations.