Quantum programming languages permit a hardware independent, high-level description of quantum algo rithms. In particular, the quantum lambda-calculus is a higher-order programming language with quantum primitives, mixing quantum data and classical control. Giving satisfactory denotational semantics to the quantum lambda-calculus is a challenging problem that has attracted significant interest in the past few years. Several models have been proposed but for those that address the whole quantum λ-calculus, they either do not represent the dynamics of computation, or they lack the compositionality one often expects from denotational models. In this paper, we give the first compositional and interactive model of the full quantum lambda-calculus, based on game semantics. To achieve this we introduce a model of quantum games and strategies, combining quantum data with a representation of the dynamics of computation inspired from causal models of concurrent systems. In this model we first give a computationally adequate interpretation of the affine fragment. Then, we extend the model with a notion of symmetry, allowing us to deal with replication. In this refined setting, we interpret and prove adequacy for the full quantum lambda-calculus. We do this both from a sequential and a parallel interpretation, the latter representing faithfully the causal independence between sub-computations.
We present a language extension for parallel quantum programming to (1) remove ambiguities concerning parallelism in current quantum programming languages and (2) facilitate space-time tradeoff investigations in quantum computing. While the focus of similar libraries in the domain of classical computing (OpenMP, OpenACC, etc.) is to divide a computation into multiple threads, the main goal of QParallel is to keep the compiler and the runtime system from introducing parallelism-inhibiting dependencies, e.g., through reuse of qubits in automatic qubit management. We describe the syntax and semantics of the proposed language extension, implement a prototype based on Q#, and present several examples and use cases to illustrate its performance benefits. Moreover, we introduce a tool that guides programmers in the placement of parallel regions by identifying the subroutines that profit most from parallelization, which is especially useful if the programmer's knowledge of the source code is limited. Support for QParallel can be added to any multithreading library and language extension, including OpenMP and OpenACC.
This paper applies established techniques for concurrent programming in Haskell to the case of Concurrent Quantum Programming. The foundation of the approach is an extension to Concurrent Quantum Programming of the technique of “virtual values ” proposed by Amr Sabry for quantum programming in Haskell. The basic idea is to encapsulate quantum values within MVars, the monadic variables that support thread synchronization and mutually exclusive accesses to shared references. In this way, quantum processes can be concurring to have access to quantum values and we will be applying the now established quantum programming paradigm of “control is classic, data is quantum ” to the concurrent and distributed quantum programming domain: the case in focus is that the control of concurrency is classical control, while shared data between quantum processes are quantum data. We illustrate the use of the proposed approach by programming sample algorithms for quantum teleportation and quantum cryptographic key distribution. 1.
This paper describes the semantics of Quantum, a language that was specifically designed to control resource consumption of distributed computations, such as mobile agent style applications. In Quantum, computations can be driven by mastering their resource consumption. Resources can be understood as processors cycles, geographical expansion, bandwidth or duration of communications, etc. We adopt a generic view by saying that computations need energy to be performed. Quantum relies on three new primitives that deal with energy. The first primitive creates a tank of energy associated with a computation. Asynchronous notifications inform the user of energy exhaustion and computation termination. The other two primitives allow us to implement suspension and resumption of computations by emptying a tank and by supplying more energy to a tank. The semantics takes the form of an abstract machine with explicit parallelism and energy-related primitives. 1 Introduction Millions of computers ...
In contrast to a classical bit, which can only take the value
0 or
1, its quantum counterpart -- a qubit -- can exist in a superposition of
0 and
1. This is a superposition of data values, naturally raising the question of whether one can superpose not only data but also programs. For example, a particular superposition of programs, known as the quantum SWITCH, has attracted much attention, and its implementations and computational advantages have been studied extensively within the physics community.
A naive way to control a program by a qubit is by means of a controlled operation. Given an operation
F, this amounts to considering an operation that behaves as
F when the control qubit is
∣1⟩, and as the identity operation when the control qubit is
∣0⟩. This idea works well when
F is a unitary operation, but it is not well-defined for a general quantum channel. By contrast, the quantum SWITCH is free from the well-definedness issue. This contrast leads to the key insight of this paper: controlled operations and the quantum SWITCH should be regarded as different kinds of quantum control mechanisms.
Building on this insight, we develop a novel quantum programming language with quantum control and measurement that can express the quantum SWITCH over quantum channels. Using a semantic analysis based on program transformations, we identify the source of the ill-behavedness of controlled operations as the \emph{correspondence problem}: a lack of coordination between the measurements performed in the then- and else-branches of quantum conditional branching. We address this problem with a linear type system that enforces alignment of the quantum operations used in the two branches, yielding a well-behaved language capable of expressing the quantum SWITCH.